CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06976710PC2Updated Sep 15, 2026

PRIORITY-CONNECT 2 Trial

An interventional study of Preoperative Exercise and Postoperative Exercise in Colorectal Cancer and Colorectal Neoplasms, sponsored by Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe). Recruiting at 31 sites in Australia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-15.

Sponsored by Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2025; still recruiting 11 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
564
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Objectives:

The primary aim of this project is to establish the effectiveness of an individualised stepped, multidisciplinary intervention, including education and peer support group, delivered via a virtual multimodal (p)rehabilitation hub, in reducing postoperative complications within 30-days following colorectal cancer surgery, compared to usual care alone.

The secondary aims will be to obtain data on the likely difference in key outcomes including:

(i) Quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29) (ii) Number of days at home within 30, 90 and 365 days after surgery (DAH-30, 90, 365) (iii) Quality of recovery (QoR-15) (iv) Cost-effectiveness (v) Implementation metrics (RE-AIM)

Our hypothesis is that the PRIORITY-CONNECT 2 intervention will be more effective in reducing postoperative complications and more cost-effective than usual care.

Study design:

Pragmatic Randomised Type I Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Trial.

Planned sample size:

To achieve the primary aim, 564 participants will provide 90% power to detect a 15% difference in 30-day postoperative complication rates between the intervention and control groups. The sample size calculation accounts for up to 10% loss to follow-up, 5% non-compliance and a two-side alpha of 0.05.

Selection criteria:

A sample of 564 participants undergoing colorectal cancer surgery including open, laparoscopic or robotic-assisted surgery (mostly, anterior resection, sigmoid colectomy, hemicolectomy, total proctocolectomy, subtotal colectomy, total colectomy) at sites throughout Australia will be included. These are common colorectal cancer surgeries performed at the participating centres. All the surgeons involved in this study have clinical appointments in their respective hospitals.

Inclusion: Adults aged ≥18 years undergoing elective major surgery for colon or rectal cancer with curative intent; and consulting a colorectal surgeon at least 1 week prior to scheduled surgery.

Exclusion: Patients undergoing Pelvic Exenteration (PE), Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) with or without HIPEC, or concurrent surgery for metastatic disease; or cognitive impairment such that they are unable to provide informed consent.

Study Procedure:

Participant's treating team will screen and provide an information sheet about the trial to consecutive patients. Interested patients will be contacted by a study researcher to discuss the trial further, answer any questions, confirm eligibility against the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and consent patients. Consenting patients will undergo baseline assessment and be randomised to a virtual multimodal hub (Intervention group) or usual care alone (Control group). The intervention will include the delivery of usual care and evidence-based exercise, nutritional, psychological and nursing interventions, and / or group-delivered peer support. All interventions will be conducted before and after surgery.

Duration of the Study:

Approximately 60 months.

Funding:

Medical Research Future Fund (MRFF) 2023 Early and Mid-Career Researchers (Application ID: 2031563).

Sponsor:

The University of Sydney.

Read the detailed description

Further details on the study procedures:

Patients will be identified by their treating team (including but not limited to colorectal surgeon, allied health, research and nursing staff). The treating team will screen and provide the information sheet about the trial to consecutive patients. Interested patients will be contacted by a study researcher to discuss the trial further, answer any questions, confirm eligibility against the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and consent patients. Consenting patients will undergo baseline assessment and be randomised to a virtual multimodal hub (Intervention group) or usual care alone (Control group). Patients will undergo an immediate second randomisation to determine their virtual hub assignment (Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Hub or The Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Hub).

The participants randomised into the intervention group will then be contacted by a range of allied health workers, depending on their individual needs. These may include a physiotherapist, dietitian, psychologist, nurse and/ or a social worker. The intervention will provide the participants support as they navigate the health system. These health workers will communicate with them via the virtual hub for sessions to provide support before surgery and help with their recovery. Participant's individual needs will determine the frequency, intensity, time, type, volume, and progression of these sessions. This intervention may last for up to 12 months after their surgery, but they will be discharged from the intervention once they have reached their treatment goals. If participants do not have access to a smart device and/or internet, the investigators can provide them with a tablet with internet connectivity to engage in virtual delivery of sessions.

Data and safety monitoring:

An independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB), will be monitored by a multidisciplinary panel (including statistician(s)). This panel will assess for adverse events and adherence to the protocol at regular intervals to ensure the safety of participants. The frequency of DSMB meetings and the stopping rules for the study will be defined a priori in a charter, in consultation with the DSMB members and study investigators. This will include after commencing participant recruitment and once one fourth of participants have been recruited.

ProCoMida:

The PRO CoMiDa form is a data management tool, designed to provide standardised documentation of the completion, or reasons for non-completion, of patient reported outcomes assessments by patients in a clinical trial. Such documentation is crucial for quality assurance since missing data is the greatest threat to the integrity and interpretability of patient reported outcomes data. The PRO CoMiDa form must be completed at each scheduled patient reported outcomes assessment.

GCP Certificates:

The trial will conform to all relevant ICH GCP guidelines and regulations. Annual audits will be conducted by research officers to ensure that all study staff maintain current GCP certification.

02

Conditions studied

  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Colorectal Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Prehabilitation
  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Surgery
  • Surgical Outcomes
  • Randomised Controlled Trial
  • Virtual Rehabilitation
  • Virtual Prehabilitation
  • Multidisciplinary
  • Virtual Care
  • Rehabilitation
03

In context

Colorectal Neoplasms

5,599 studies on the registry are indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms; 1,459 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 564 is above the median of 77 across 4,123 interventional studies indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms.

Browse Colorectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe) is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged ≥18 years undergoing elective major surgery for colon or rectal cancer with curative intent
  • Consulting with a colorectal cancer surgeon at least 1 week prior to scheduled surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing Pelvic Exenteration (PE), Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) with or without HIPEC, or concurrent surgery for metastatic disease
  • Cognitive impairment such that they are unable to provide informed consent
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
564 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Virtual Multimodal Hub and usual care (Intervention Group)

    The intervention is a multicomponent virtual hub which encompasses medical, social, psychological and functional assessment(s) and intervention(s). Following a comprehensive holistic assessment, clinicians will tailor the intervention subject to individual's presentation and needs. This may include evidence-based exercise, nutritional, psychological and nursing interventions, and /or group-delivered peer support, in addition to usual care. Adjustments and progression will be made in each session according to an individual's response. All interventions will be conducted before and after surgery. Standardised assessment tools will guide the frequency, intensity, duration, type, volume, and progression of the multimodal interventions, with the potential for the intervention(s) to be stepped-up or stepped-down based on individual patient needs

    Behavioral: Preoperative Exercise · Behavioral: Postoperative Exercise · Dietary Supplement: Preoperative Nutrition · Dietary Supplement: Postoperative Nutrition · Behavioral: Preoperative Psychology · Behavioral: Postoperative Psychology · Other: Preoperative Nursing · Other: Postoperative Nursing · Behavioral: Preoperative Peer Support Group · Behavioral: Postoperative Peer Support Group · Other: Usual Care

  • Active comparator
    Usual care alone (Control Group)

    Participants allocated to the control group will only receive usual care according to their health care team, which may consist of advice on smoking cessation, reduction of alcohol intake, nutritional counselling, and medical optimisation in the preoperative anaesthetic clinic visits. Participants will be asked to maintain their normal daily activities. No attempt will be made to alter the routine care pathway. The use of any additional service will be recorded to inform the comprehensive cost analysis (linked to PBS and MBS data).

    Other: Usual Care

Interventions

  • BehavioralPreoperative Exercise

    Aerobic, Endurance, Respiratory, Muscle Strength, Education

  • BehavioralPostoperative Exercise

    Aerobic, Endurance, Respiratory, Muscle Strength, Education

  • Dietary supplementPreoperative Nutrition

    Malnutrition screening, Weight monitoring, Symptom management, Dietetic counselling, Nutrition support

  • Dietary supplementPostoperative Nutrition

    Malnutrition screening, Weight monitoring, Symptom management, Dietetic counselling, Nutrition support

  • BehavioralPreoperative Psychology

    CBT skills, Skills training, Emotional validation, Behavioural activation, Psycho-education

  • BehavioralPostoperative Psychology

    CBT skills, Skills training, Emotional validation, Behavioural activation, Psycho-education

  • OtherPreoperative Nursing

    Risk management, Managing pain, Wound care, Bowel function, Surgical education

  • OtherPostoperative Nursing

    Risk management, Managing pain, Wound care, Bowel function/Stoma management, Education

  • BehavioralPreoperative Peer Support Group

    Fortnightly sessions moderated by a social worker including patients and carers: Safe space, Share experiences/ideas, Support, Education

  • BehavioralPostoperative Peer Support Group

    Fortnightly sessions moderated by a social worker including patients and carers: Safe space, Share experiences/ideas, Support, Education

  • OtherUsual Care

    All participants will receive usual care according to their health care team, which may consist of advice on smoking cessation, reduction of alcohol intake, nutritional counselling, and medical optimisation in the preoperative anaesthetic clinic visits.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of participants developing postoperative complications within 30 days after surgery.

    The primary outcome will be the proportion of participants developing postoperative complications within 30 days after surgery, defined as any deviation from the normal postoperative course and classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. The risk of developing complications following colorectal cancer surgery is highest in the first 30-days after surgery; this is a critical determinant of recovery, long-term outcomes, and colorectal cancer treatment costs.

    Time frame: First 30-days after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quality of Life Outcome (EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29)

    The European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaires (QLQ) are validated, cancer-specific tools commonly used to assess quality of life in colorectal cancer patients. The QLQ-C30 includes 30 items assessing five functional domains, nine symptom scales, financial impact and overall quality of life. The QLQ-CR29 is a 29-item tool to evaluate symptoms (gastrointestinal, urinary, pain and others) and functional areas (sexual, body image and others) that are associated with colorectal cancer and its treatments. Both tools use scales ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores on functional and global health scales reflect better functioning or quality of life, whereas higher scores on symptom scales indicate greater symptom burden or problems.

    Time frame: Measured at baseline, 1-2 day(s) before surgery, perioperative (within 1 day of hospital discharge), 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post index surgery.

  2. Quality of Recovery (QoR-15)

    The QoR-15 is a validated tool designed to assess the quality of recovery after surgery. It consists of 15 items rated on an 11-point numerical rating scale ranging from 0 to 10. The overall QoR-15 score is calculated by summing all individual item scores, resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 150, where higher scores indicate a better quality of recovery. Recovery will be defined as return to baseline values or better in each of the questions or assessments.

    Time frame: Measured at baseline, 1-2 day(s) before surgery, perioperative (within 1 day of hospital discharge), 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post index surgery.

  3. Number of days at home within 30, 90 and 365 days of surgery (DAH-30, 90, 365)

    Validated (Australian-population) patient-centred outcome metrics that integrates length of hospital stay, discharge destination (other than home), hospital readmission and early death. The number of days at home is reduced by, for example, complications elongating acute hospital bed stay, discharge to a care facility, re-admission, and death. This is quantified as the days alive and at home during the 30 days after surgery. Days at home is calculated using mortality and hospitalisation data from the date of the index surgery (= Day 0).

    Time frame: Days at home within 30, 90 and 365 days of index surgery

  4. Resource use (costs)

    Patient and health system resource use, including the cost of the virtual multimodal hub interventions, hospitalisations, will be collected (surveys) from randomisation (1-6 weeks prior to surgery) to 12 months post index surgery.

    Time frame: Measured at baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post index surgery.

  5. Implementation metrics: (RE-AIM)

    The framework is used to plan, evaluate and assess the impact of a variety of health care and prevention programs. Elements assessed: Reach: Proportion of eligible patients recruited into the study, alongside the baseline characteristics (referral pathways, age, postcode, marital, work status, and cultural and linguistic diversity) of all potential participants. Effectiveness: Clinical outcomes, healthcare utilisation, and participant satisfaction (measured both quantitatively and qualitatively). Adoption: Referral rates, enablers and barriers (collected post intervention from patients, carers, surgeons, clinical and administrative staff). Implementation: Centre level - implementation process (patients, carers, and clinical staff interviews and direct observation), concordance with intervention protocol. Maintenance: referral rates and stakeholder interviews to identify refinements and infrastructure needed to maintain and scale intervention beyond the project period.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 12 months

Other outcomes

  1. Pain (NPRS)

    The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is a widely used tool for assessing pain intensity in individuals. It is a segmented numeric scale where respondents select a whole number (0-10) that best reflects their pain intensity. The scale ranges from 0, indicating "no pain," to 10, representing "the worst pain imaginable." This method allows for a straightforward and quantifiable measure of pain, facilitating communication between patients and healthcare providers.

    Time frame: Measured at baseline, 1-2 day(s) before surgery, perioperative (within 1 day of hospital discharge), 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post index surgery.

  2. Exercise capacity (30sSTS)

    30 seconds Sit-to-Stand Test (30sSTS) is a reliable and valid tool in evaluating functional exercise capacity in patients.The 30sSTS the performance of as many sit-to-stand actions as possible in 30 seconds without upper limb involvement.

    Time frame: Measured at baseline, 1-2 day(s) before surgery, perioperative (within 1 day of hospital discharge), 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post index surgery.

  3. Self-reported physical activity (IPAQ-SF)

    International Physical Activity Questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF) measures the types of intensity of physical activity and sitting time that people do as part of their daily lives. The questionnaire asks participants to report any physical activity (performed for at least 10 minutes) during the last seven days reported as hours per day, minutes per day, and days per week. This aims to be an estimate of total physical activity. IPAQ-SF has demonstrated high reliability and validity.

    Time frame: Measured at baseline, 1-2 day(s) before surgery, perioperative (within 1 day of hospital discharge), 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post index surgery.

  4. Nutritional Status (PG-SGA SF)

    Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment Short Form (PG-SGA SF) includes four patient-generated historical components (Weight History, Food Intake, Symptoms and Activities and Function).

    Time frame: Measured at baseline, 1-2 day(s) before surgery, perioperative (within 1 day of hospital discharge), 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post index surgery.

  5. Anxiety (GAD-7)

    General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) is a self-administered patient questionnaire used as a screening tool and severity measure for generalised anxiety disorder (GAD). Scores of 5, 10, and 15 are taken as the cut-off points for mild, moderate and severe anxiety, respectively.

    Time frame: Measured at baseline, 1-2 day(s) before surgery, perioperative (within 1 day of hospital discharge), 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post index surgery.

  6. Depression (PHQ-9)

    Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a self-administered version of the PRIME-MD diagnostic instrument for common mental disorders.The PHQ-9 is the depression module, which scores each of the nine DSM-IV criteria as "0" (not at all) to "3" (nearly every day). PHQ-9 is used to monitor the severity of depression and response to treatment.

    Time frame: Measured at baseline, 1-2 day(s) before surgery, perioperative (within 1 day of hospital discharge), 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post index surgery.

  7. Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR-1r)

    Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR-1r) is a single-item screening measure for fear of cancer recurrence.The FCR-1r is a valid tool for FCR screening in colorectal cancer survivors with excellent ability to discriminate between clinical and non-clinical fear of cancer recurrence.

    Time frame: Measured at baseline, 1-2 day(s) before surgery, perioperative (within 1 day of hospital discharge), 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post index surgery.

  8. Adverse events (NHMRC Safety Monitoring and Reporting of Clinical Trials)

    The NHMRC publication Safety monitoring and reporting in clinical trials involving therapeutic goods sets out the requirements for the monitoring, collection and reporting of adverse events and adverse reactions that occur in clinical trials.

    Time frame: From date of opening recruitment to date of trial close-out

  9. Self-efficacy (GSE)

    General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE) is a self-reported measure of self-efficacy.The General Self-Efficacy Scale is correlated to emotion, optimism, work satisfaction.The total score is calculated by finding the sum of the all items. For the GSE, the total score ranges between 10 and 40, with a higher score indicating more self-efficacy.

    Time frame: Measured at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post index surgery.

  10. Treatment & Health Services

    Data on treatments and health service utilisation including instance of treatment received, number of diagnostic imaging, number of GP/specialists visits, number of emergency department visits, number of hospital readmissions, number of support services received, hours of paid and unpaid work performed.

    Time frame: Measured at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post index surgery.

  11. Satisfaction & Experience

    Self-reported questionnaire asking participants to answer questions regarding their level of satisfaction with various components of the intervention reported on a 5-point Likert scale from extremely dissatisfied to extremely staisfied. Moreover, satisfaction feedback regarding the program, barriers and facilitators for future implementation will be obtained through interviews with clinicians, patients and caregivers at the end of the study period.

    Time frame: Measured at 12 months post index surgery.

  12. Return to work

    Information about the impact of the intervention and surgery on return to work, and leisure activities will be obtained from questionnaires.

    Time frame: Measured between 1 and 12 months post index surgery.

  13. Acceptability of the intervention

    Patients, clinicians and carers acceptability to the virtual multimodal hub (Intervention) will be assessed with a semi-structured questionnaire administered at 12-months (last survey). The semi-structured questionnaire contains 11 questions and participants (Patients, clinicians and carers) will be instructed to use a 5-point Likert Scale (ranked from strongly disagree to strongly agree) to express how much they agree or disagree with each statement. In addition, patients will be asked how satisfied they were with the virtual multimodal program and how confident they were in their ability to follow the advice given. The investigators will also take the opportunity to seek further feedback about the virtual multimodal hub (open ended question).

    Time frame: Measured at 12 months post index surgery.

07

Study locations

13 of 31 sites recruiting
  • Coffs Harbour Health Campus
    Coffs Harbour, New South Wales 2450, Australia
    • Andrew Sutherland · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Calvary Mater Hospital
    Newcastle, New South Wales 2298, Australia
    • Stephen Smith · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • John Hunter Hospital
    Newcastle, New South Wales 2305, Australia
    • Stephen Smith · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • Chris O'Brien Lifehouse
    Sydney, New South Wales 2050, Australia
    • Michael Solomon · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
    Sydney, New South Wales 2050, Australia
    Recruiting
  • Concord Repatriation General Hospital
    Sydney, New South Wales 2139, Australia
    • Michael Suen · Contact
    • Yanlan Lin · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • Westmead Hospital
    Sydney, New South Wales 2145, Australia
    • Amy Cao · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • Blacktown Hospital
    Sydney, New South Wales 2148, Australia
    • Rajni Lal · Contact
    • Danette Wright · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • Wagga Wagga Base Hospital
    Wagga Wagga, New South Wales 2650, Australia
    • Stephen Jancewicz · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • Wollongong Hospital
    Wollongong, New South Wales 2500, Australia
    • Robert Winn · Contact
    • Andrew Still · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital
    Brisbane, Queensland 4029, Australia
    • David Clark · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Princess Alexandra Hospital
    Brisbane, Queensland 4102, Australia
    • Chris Gillespie · Contact
    • Natalie Mazzeo · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • The Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital
    Brisbane, Queensland 4108, Australia
    • Chris Gillespie · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • Royal Adelaide Hospital
    Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia
    • Tarik Sammour · Contact
    • Tracy Fitzsimmons · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Flinders Medical Centre
    Adelaide, South Australia 5042, Australia
    • Dayan De Fontgalland · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • Modbury Hospital
    Adelaide, South Australia 5092, Australia
    • Elizabeth Murphy · Contact
    • Hoang Van · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Lyell McEwin Hospital
    Adelaide, South Australia 5112, Australia
    • Elizabeth Murphy · Contact
    • Hoang Van · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Grampians Health Ballarat Hospital
    Ballarat, Victoria 3350, Australia
    • Fernando Arduini · Contact
    • Natasha Brice · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Bendigo Health
    Bendigo, Victoria 3550, Australia
    • Angus Lee · Contact
    • Kate Booth · Contact
    Recruiting
  • University Hospital Geelong (Barwon Health)
    Geelong, Victoria 3220, Australia
    • Douglas Stupart · Contact
    • Anne Vandewater · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
    Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
    • Bernard Riedel · Contact
    • Joanne Shafer · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Alfred Hospital
    Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia
    • Joseph Kong · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • Footscray Hospital
    Melbourne, Victoria 3011, Australia
    • Justin Yeung · Contact
    • Howard Tang · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Werribee Mercy Hospital
    Melbourne, Victoria 3030, Australia
    • Toan Pham · Contact
    • Tess Asgill · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • Royal Melbourne Hospital
    Melbourne, Victoria 3050, Australia
    • Jacob McCormick · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • St Vincent's Melbourne Hospital
    Melbourne, Victoria 3065, Australia
    • Corina Behrenbruch · Contact
    • James Keck · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • Northern Hospital Epping
    Melbourne, Victoria 3076, Australia
    • Basil D'Souza · Contact
    • Andrea Ditoro · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Austin Hospital
    Melbourne, Victoria 3084, Australia
    • Helen Mohan · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • Eastern (Box Hill) Hospital
    Melbourne, Victoria 3128, Australia
    • Vinna An · Contact
    • Wei Ming · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • Cabrini Hospital
    Melbourne, Victoria 3144, Australia
    • Joseph Kong · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • Royal Perth Hospital
    Perth, Western Australia 6000, Australia
    • Vicki Patton · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Following explicit informed consent from individual participants, any de-identified data will be shared for studies approved by both the Principal Investigator (A/Prof Daniel Steffens) and a NHRMC approved Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC).

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06976710
Lead sponsor
Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe)
Collaborators
University of Sydney, Medical Research Future Fund
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 16, 2025
Start date
Oct 15, 2025
Primary completion
Jul 30, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 30, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 15, 2026

Study contacts

Daniel Steffens, PhD
Contact
Daniel.Steffens@health.nsw.gov.au
+61 02 9515 3203

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion