CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06971705Updated Dec 18, 2025

fMRI Study on Cerebral Localization and Network Mechanisms of rTMS in Chronic Ankle Instability Treatment

An interventional study of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, rTMS and ankle stability training in Chronic Ankle Instability, CAI and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI), sponsored by Wuhan University. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-18.

Sponsored by Wuhan University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by May 2026, 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as active, not recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Chronic ankle instability (CAI) is a common sports injury that often leads to recurrent injuries and functional deficits. While conventional rehabilitation can restore ankle stability, the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms remain poorly understood, and the long-term efficacy of current treatments is limited. This study aims to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in combination with conventional ankle stability training for CAI and to evaluate its impact on ankle-stabilizing muscle activation and cerebral cortex excitability.

The study design is a single-center, randomized, single-blind, parallel-controlled trial. Participants with CAI will be randomly assigned to either an ankle stability training plus real rTMS group or an ankle stability training plus sham rTMS group. The primary outcome measure is the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) score, which assesses the severity of ankle instability. Secondary outcomes include the Karlsson-Peterson Ankle Function Score (KPAFS), American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Score (AOFAS), surface electromyography (sEMG) data, and task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. These secondary outcomes will provide a comprehensive evaluation of ankle function, muscle activation patterns, and neural activity changes.

The intervention will consist of a 4-week program, with participants receiving rTMS sessions three times per week. Each rTMS session will target key brain regions. The ankle stability training will include exercises designed to improve strength, balance, and proprioception. The sham rTMS group will receive identical ankle stability training but with a placebo rTMS protocol to ensure blinding.

Data will be collected at baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks. The primary outcome, CAIT score, will be used to assess the overall improvement in ankle stability. The KPAFS and AOFAS scores will provide additional measures of ankle function and pain. sEMG data will be collected during specific functional tasks to evaluate the activation patterns of the tibialis anterior, peroneus longus, and other relevant muscles. Task-based fMRI will be used to assess changes in brain activity in motor and sensory areas before and after the intervention.

Statistical analyses will be performed using SPSS 22.0. Data will be presented as mean ± standard deviation. Between-group differences will be compared using independent samples t-tests, and overall differences across time points will be assessed via two-way repeated-measures ANOVA or mixed-effects models. Post-hoc analyses will be conducted to identify specific time points and conditions where significant differences occur.

The study timeline spans from March 2025 to December 2026, including participant recruitment, intervention implementation, data collection, and analysis, as well as manuscript drafting. This research aims to provide new insights into the neurophysiological mechanisms of CAI and to offer a novel, evidence-based approach to the rehabilitation of CAI, potentially improving long-term outcomes and reducing the risk of recurrent injuries.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Ankle Instability, CAI
  • Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)

Keywords

  • Chronic ankle instability
  • functional magnetic resonance imaging
  • repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
  • ankle stability training
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Wuhan University is the lead sponsor of 45 studies on the registry; 14 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age 18-60 years.
  2. History of at least one significant ankle sprain within the past 12 months, accompanied by inflammatory response (including pain resulting in at least one day of restricted physical activity).
  3. The most recent ankle sprain must have occurred more than 3 months prior to enrollment.
  4. Self-reported symptoms of ankle instability, defined by one or more of the following: At least two episodes of "giving way" in the affected ankle within the past 6 months; Recurrent sprains (≥2 documented sprains in the same ankle); Subjective perception of instability confirmed by any one of the following validated instruments: Ankle Instability Instrument (AII): ≥5 affirmative responses; Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT): Score \<24; Identification of Functional Ankle Instability (IdFAI): Score >11.
  5. Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM): Activities of Daily Living (ADL) subscale \<90%; FAAM Sports subscale \<80%; Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS): Scores \<75% in ≥3 subcategories.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Chronic ankle instability caused by bilateral ankle sprains;
  2. History of lower extremity musculoskeletal or neurological surgery;
  3. History of lower extremity fractures;
  4. Acute musculoskeletal injuries in other lower extremity joints within 3 months that compromised joint integrity and function, resulting in ≥1 day of interrupted daily or sports activities;
  5. Concomitant severe systemic diseases (cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, renal, etc.);
  6. Severe psychiatric disorders or cognitive impairments;
  7. Presence of metal implants or inability to tolerate MRI examinations.
  8. Patient refusal to participate.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Sham rTMS plus ankle stability training

    Behavioral: ankle stability training · Device: Sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, SrTMS

  • Experimental
    rTMS plus ankle stability training

    Device: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, rTMS · Behavioral: ankle stability training

Interventions

  • Devicerepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, rTMS

    Participants underwent rTMS intervention prior to daily ankle stability training. The interventional targets were the key cortical brain regions identified in preliminary studies, with stimulation applied to the contralateral cortical areas corresponding to the affected ankle joint. Parameters included a figure-of-8 coil, 10 Hz frequency, 2-second stimulation duration, 8-second inter-train intervals, 60 repetitions, totaling 1,200 pulses per session, with each session lasting 10 minutes. Ankle stability training commenced within 10 minutes post-rTMS, following the same duration and intensity as the Ankle Stability Training Group + Sham rTMS Group. The treatment was conducted three times per week for a total of 4 weeks.

  • Behavioralankle stability training

    The ankle stability training protocol comprised three modalities: neuromuscular training, balance training, and proprioceptive training. Specific exercises included single-leg stance, balance pad training, heel raises, resistive ankle inversion/eversion exercises, MOBO board balance exercises, alphabet tracing (toe-writing), lateral walking, heel walking, toe walking, and jump and landing control drills. The training progressed from stable to unstable surfaces, starting at low intensity and gradually increasing in difficulty and intensity. The training was conducted three times per week for a total of 4 weeks.

  • DeviceSham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, SrTMS

    Before each session of ankle stability training, participants received sham rTMS intervention. The sham stimulation mimicked the sensory experience of real rTMS but did not produce any physiological effects.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool score, CAIT

    A self-reported questionnaire designed to assess functional ankle instability. It consists of 9 items with a total score ranging from 0 to 30, where higher scores indicate better ankle stability.

    Time frame: Before treatment, 2 week after treatment and 4 weeks after treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Karlsson-Peterson Ankle Function Score, KPAFS

    The KPAFS is a scoring system used to evaluate ankle dysfunction. It includes 10 items: pain, daily activities, walking ability, need for support, squatting ability, ankle range of motion, limb positioning, limb length, limb circumference, and limb appearance. Each item is scored based on the patient's condition, with a total possible score of 100. Higher scores indicate better ankle function.

    Time frame: Before treatment, 2 week after treatment and 4 weeks after treatment

  2. American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society score, AOFAS

    The AOFAS is a widely used assessment tool for evaluating functional outcomes in foot and ankle disorders. It includes domains such as pain, function, gait, range of motion, stability, and foot alignment. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting better foot and ankle function.

    Time frame: Before treatment, 2 week after treatment and 4 weeks after treatment

  3. Surface electromyography

    The surface electromyography of the tibialis anterior, gastrocnemius, and peroneus longus muscles was tested while the subjects were standing on one leg and undergoing the star excursion balance test (SEBT). The following indicators were collected: 1. Time-domain analysis indicators: Root Mean Square (RMS), Integrated Electromyography (iEMG), and Averaged Electromyography (AEM). 2. Frequency-domain analysis indicators: Mean Power Frequency (MPF) and Median Frequency (MF).

    Time frame: Before treatment and 4 weeks after treatment

  4. fMRI

    Task - related fMRI data were collected by using the affected lower limb isometric contraction combined with "single - leg standing" motor imagery.

    Time frame: Before treatment and 4 weeks after treatment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Zhongnan hospital of Wuhan University
    Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China
08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jan 26, 2025

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 18, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06971705
Lead sponsor
Wuhan University
Responsible party
Qing Shu (associate chief physician, Wuhan University) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 14, 2025
Start date
Mar 20, 2025
Primary completion
May 20, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 18, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion