ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06532994Updated Apr 21, 2026

Predictive Algorithms for Critical Rehabilitation Outcomes

An observational study in Intensive Care, Mechanical Ventilation and Rehabilitation, sponsored by Wuhan University. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-21.

Sponsored by Wuhan University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2024; still recruiting 2 years 3 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
250
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

An increasing amount of evidence from evidence-based medicine indicates that early rehabilitation intervention for patients receiving mechanical ventilation is safe and feasible, and can promote functional recovery and reduce hospital stay. However, the conscious state, respiratory function, and daily living activities of these patients after being discharged from the ICU vary greatly, and some patients do not show obvious benefits. How to identify which patients may have benefit from early rehabilitation is a key issue that needs to be addressed in critical care rehabilitation. This study aims to investigate the clinical data related to the disease of the ICU survivors who received mechanical ventilation as the research object, by collecting their clinical data when receiving early rehabilitation intervention, and constructing a clinical prediction model for the efficacy of early rehabilitation intervention in the ICU through the selection of optimal regression equation or machine learning algorithm. The application of this model can effectively determine whether ICU inpatients need early rehabilitation intervention, thereby reducing complication rates and improving their quality of life.

Read the detailed description

An increasing amount of evidence from evidence-based medicine suggests that early rehabilitation intervention (including early active and passive exercises, position management, pulmonary rehabilitation, etc.) for mechanical ventilation patients is safe and feasible, and can promote certain degree of functional recovery and reduce the length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, the differences in consciousness state, muscle strength, respiratory function, and activity of daily living (ADL) among patients who are discharged from the ICU after condition stabilization are very large, even some patients did not obtain obvious benefits. Therefore, how to identify which patients may have better benefit from early rehabilitation intervention is a key issue that needs to be focused on in ICU.

This study used "Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD)" as the guideline. Survivors undergoing mechanical ventilation in the ICU were recruited as the participants, whether patients gained progress in ADL function at different time points after receiving early rehabilitation intervention in the ICU was used as the outcome which is a time-to-event indicator. Demographic data, clinical diagnostic data and disease intervention data of the subjects were collected as alternative predictors. Variable transformation and variable screening were used to find predictors that could predict the outcome. The process of constructing clinical predictive models is completed by fitting models through regression equations and machine learning algorithms, internal validation, external validation, and clinical value assessment. The model with the best prediction efficiency is selected based on the differentiation and calibration of different models after validation. This model will be presented with a nomogram or a web app. The application of this clinical predictive model will identify whether and when this patient can received better recovery on ADL after receiving early rehabilitation intervention, so as to further optimize the timing of early intervention in rehabilitation and improve his survival quality.

02

Conditions studied

  • Intensive Care
  • Mechanical Ventilation
  • Rehabilitation
  • Algorithms
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Wuhan University is the lead sponsor of 46 studies on the registry; 14 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

ICU patients received mechanical ventilation and early rehabilitation interventions, regardless of the primary diagnosis.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age older than 18 years;
  2. Received mechanical ventilation, including endotracheal intubation and tracheostomy, during ICU admission;
  3. Met the rehabilitation intervention indications outlined in the "Chinese Expert Consensus on Neurocritical Rehabilitation" during ICU admission and underwent corresponding early rehabilitation interventions, including but not limited to arousal therapy for consciousness disorders, early active/passive mobilization, comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation, etc.;
  4. No mortality events occurred during ICU admission;
  5. form signed by family members or the patient.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pediatric patients under 18 years of age;
  2. Hospitalized patients in the ICU who did not receive mechanical ventilation;
  3. Patients in the ICU who did not undergo early rehabilitation interventions;
  4. mortality events occurred during ICU admission;
  5. Patients transferred out of the ICU due to treatment abandonment by family members;
  6. Family refusal to sign the form or patient refusal to sign the informed consent form when conscious and competent.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
250 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Survivors of ICU with Mechanical Ventilation

    Survivors of ICU with Mechanical Ventilation are individuals who have been treated in an intensive care unit (ICU) and require the use of a mechanical ventilator to assist their breathing with no mortality events occurring.

    Other: Early rehabilitation intervention

Interventions

  • OtherEarly rehabilitation intervention

    Based on the indications for early rehabilitation intervention outlined in the "Chinese Expert Consensus on Neurological Critical Care Rehabilitation," early rehabilitation interventions are categorized into three stages according to the patient's consciousness level (GCS score), degree of cooperation (S5Q score), and sedation status (RASS score)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scale

    The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scale is a widely used tool designed to assess an individual's level of disability and functional independence in activities of daily living (ADLs). The FIM scale consists of 18 items divided into two main categories: \*\*self-care\*\* and \*\*mobility\*\*, each evaluating specific tasks such as eating, bathing, dressing, and transferring. Each item is scored on a scale from 1 to 7, where: * 1 indicates total dependence (the individual requires assistance), * 7 indicates complete independence (the individual performs the task safely and independently). The total FIM score can range from 18 to 126, with higher scores representing greater functional independence levels.

    Time frame: From date of enrollment until the date of ADL improvement (FIM increase ≥ 5) or date of participants are transferred out of the ICU. FIM score was assessed every other day after treatment starts and up to 6 weeks.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Adhikari NK, Fowler RA, Bhagwanjee S, Rubenfeld GD. Critical care and the global burden of critical illness in adults. Lancet. 2010 Oct 16;376(9749):1339-46. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60446-1. Epub 2010 Oct 11. PubMed 20934212 ↗
  • Liu L, Gao Z, Yang Y, Li M, Mu X, Ma X, Li G, Sun W, Wang X, Gu Q, Zheng R, Zhao H, Xie J, Qiu H. Economic variations in patterns of care and outcomes of patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation in China: a national cross-sectional survey. J Thorac Dis. 2019 Jul;11(7):2878-2889. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.07.51. PubMed 31463117 ↗
  • Stiller K. Physiotherapy in intensive care: towards an evidence-based practice. Chest. 2000 Dec;118(6):1801-13. doi: 10.1378/chest.118.6.1801. No abstract available. PubMed 11115476 ↗
  • Schweickert WD, Pohlman MC, Pohlman AS, Nigos C, Pawlik AJ, Esbrook CL, Spears L, Miller M, Franczyk M, Deprizio D, Schmidt GA, Bowman A, Barr R, McCallister KE, Hall JB, Kress JP. Early physical and occupational therapy in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009 May 30;373(9678):1874-82. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60658-9. Epub 2009 May 14. PubMed 19446324 ↗
  • Schaller SJ, Anstey M, Blobner M, Edrich T, Grabitz SD, Gradwohl-Matis I, Heim M, Houle T, Kurth T, Latronico N, Lee J, Meyer MJ, Peponis T, Talmor D, Velmahos GC, Waak K, Walz JM, Zafonte R, Eikermann M; International Early SOMS-guided Mobilization Research Initiative. Early, goal-directed mobilisation in the surgical intensive care unit: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016 Oct 1;388(10052):1377-1388. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31637-3. PubMed 27707496 ↗
  • Balas MC, Burke WJ, Gannon D, Cohen MZ, Colburn L, Bevil C, Franz D, Olsen KM, Ely EW, Vasilevskis EE. Implementing the awakening and breathing coordination, delirium monitoring/management, and early exercise/mobility bundle into everyday care: opportunities, challenges, and lessons learned for implementing the ICU Pain, Agitation, and Delirium Guidelines. Crit Care Med. 2013 Sep;41(9 Suppl 1):S116-27. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a17064. PubMed 23989089 ↗
  • Hodgson CL, Stiller K, Needham DM, Tipping CJ, Harrold M, Baldwin CE, Bradley S, Berney S, Caruana LR, Elliott D, Green M, Haines K, Higgins AM, Kaukonen KM, Leditschke IA, Nickels MR, Paratz J, Patman S, Skinner EH, Young PJ, Zanni JM, Denehy L, Webb SA. Expert consensus and recommendations on safety criteria for active mobilization of mechanically ventilated critically ill adults. Crit Care. 2014 Dec 4;18(6):658. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0658-y. PubMed 25475522 ↗
  • Bakhru RN, Wiebe DJ, McWilliams DJ, Spuhler VJ, Schweickert WD. An Environmental Scan for Early Mobilization Practices in U.S. ICUs. Crit Care Med. 2015 Nov;43(11):2360-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001262. PubMed 26308435 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Aug 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2026, 26 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 15, 2024
First posted
Aug 1, 2024
StartActual
Aug 1, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Oct 30, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 30, 2026
Last update
Apr 21, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06532994
Lead sponsor
Wuhan University
Collaborators
General Hospital of the Yangtze River Shipping/Wuhan Brain Hospital, Wuhan Wuchang Hospital
Responsible party
Qing Shu (associate chief physician, Wuhan University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 1, 2024
Start date
Aug 1, 2024
Primary completion
Oct 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 21, 2026

Study contacts

Qing' Shu, Ph.D
Contact
shuqingj@whu.edu.cn
+86 13971081682

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion