An interventional study of Minimalism Transcatheter LAAC Group and Standard Transcatheter LAAC Group in Atrial Fibrillation, Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion and General Anesthesia, sponsored by Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-13.
Sponsored by Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an effective strategy for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Standard procedure requires general anesthesia, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) guidance. With the experience accumulation, LAAC can be successfully completed in many centers under local anesthesia, the guidance of X-ray and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), also known as minimalist procedure. Our center was one of the earliest to carry out minimalist procedure worldwide. At present, expert consensus suggests that minimalist procedure is feasible in experienced centers, but the relevant evidence is insufficient. Some single-arm studies have shown that minimalist procedure is safe and effective. However, there is currently a lack of direct evidence to compare the strengths and weaknesses of these two LAAC procedures. The goal of the study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of minimalist procedure and standard procedure for LAAC in patients with NVAF.
This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, multi-center clinical study designed to compare the safety and efficacy of minimalism transcatheter LAAC versus standard transcatheter LAAC in NVAF patients. The study aims to enroll approximately 200 NVAF patients requiring transcatheter LAAC at 20 to 30 research centers in China. All eligible patients who sign the informed consent form will be randomly assigned to either the minimalism transcatheter LAAC group or the standard transcatheter LAAC group in a 1:1 ratio. The study will record preoperative baseline information and follow-up data at 7 days post-Procedure or discharge, and at 2, 6, and 12 months post-Procedure, to explore the incidence of procedure-related complications and peridevice leak ≤5mm between the two groups.
3,957 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Fibrillation; 933 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 145 across 2,437 interventional studies indexed under Atrial Fibrillation.
Browse Atrial Fibrillation studies →Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital is the lead sponsor of 648 studies on the registry; 289 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients underwent LAAC under simplified guidance of TTE and fluoroscopy.
Procedure: Minimalism Transcatheter LAAC Group
Patients underwent LAAC under standard guidance of TEE and fluoroscopy.
Procedure: Standard Transcatheter LAAC Group
Patients will undergo transcatheter LAAC under local anesthesia, guided by DSA and TTE, using the WATCHMAN FLX system. The release criteria (PASS: Position, Anchor, Size, Seal) will be confirmed through DSA and TTE.
Patients will undergo LAAC under general anesthesia, guided by TEE, using the WATCHMAN FLX system, following the steps outlined in the product manual.
primary safety
Occurrence of a composite endpoint about serious perioperative complications including all-cause death, ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, systemic embolism, and procedure related complications requiring thoracotomy or endovascular intervention treatment.
Time frame: 7 days after LAAC procedure
primary efficacy
Occurrence of successful device implantation under predetermined guidance as well as effective LAA closure with residual leak ≤ 5mm
Time frame: From LAAC procedure to the end of treatment at 12 months
Stroke/transient ischemic attack and systemic embolism
Occurrence of stroke/transient ischemic attack and systemic embolism
Time frame: at 2, 6, and 12 months post-procedure
Bleeding events;
Occurrence of bleeding events
Time frame: at 2, 6, and 12 months post-procedure
All-cause death;
Occurrence of all-cause death
Time frame: at 2, 6, and 12 months post-procedure
Cardiac death;
Occurrence of cardiac death
Time frame: at 2, 6, and 12 months post-procedure
Device-related thrombosis events;
Occurrence of device-related thrombosis events
Time frame: at 2, 6, and 12 months post-procedure
Immediate procedure success rate
The occurrence rate of successful device implantation under predetermined guidance
Time frame: Perioperation
The duration of the procedure
The duration of the LAAC procedure (minutes)
Time frame: Perioperation
the amount of contrast medium
the amount of intraoperative contrast medium (ml)
Time frame: Perioperation
the amount of radiation
the amount of intraoperative radiation (Gy)
Time frame: Perioperation
hospitalization time
hospitalization time (days)
Time frame: Perioperation
The number of replacements of the device.
The number of replacements of the device.
Time frame: Perioperation
All procedure-related complications
Occurrence of all procedure-related complications
Time frame: at 2, 6, and 12 months post-procedure
Effective LAA closure
The occurrence rate of effective LAA closure (residual leak ≤5mm)
Time frame: at 2, 6, and 12 months post-procedure
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Start is estimated for Jun 2025; primary completion for Jun 2027, 24 months later.
Of 789 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Atrial Fibrillation, half reached primary completion within 39 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 21 and three quarters within 59. This study's planned 24 months is below that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 1,031 studies reached it within 34 months; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 54.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.