An observational study in Myositis, sponsored by University of Giessen. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Hours and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-13.
Sponsored by University of Giessen · Observational
Myositis syndromes are a relatively rare group of diseases in which acquired inflammation of the muscles occurs. According to clinical, histological and immunopathological criteria, autoimmune (dermatomyositis, polymyositis, immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, anti-synthetase syndrome, inclusion body myositis), pathogen-related and so-called special forms (e.g. checkpoint-inhibitor-related) of myositis can be distinguished.
A typical symptom of the disease is progressive muscle weakness. In addition, especially a possible extramuscular organ manifestation can lead to increased morbidity.
The initiation of appropriate drug therapy and regular follow-ups to measure the success of the therapy are of crucial importance. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and sonography are imaging methods that have proven effective for this purpose to date.
The former can be used to detect changes such as fatty remodeling, edema or inflammatory changes using T1- and T2-weighted images and Short-Tau-Inversion-Recovery (STIR). However, the duration of the examination, the lack of space and the high costs are certainly a limitation of the examination. Furthermore, patients with corresponding contraindications, such as a pacemaker.
Sonography of the musculature is therefore also important. In particular, changes in the muscle parenchyma in the sense of increasing echogenicity can be detected in this context. Moreover, regional atrophy can also be detected in this modality. However, myosonography is more of a screening procedure for neuromuscular diseases than it is suitable for monitoring progression and therapy.
Another option is the method of multispectral optoacoustic imaging (MSOT), in which ultrasound is combined with optical imaging using laser beams.
Depending on the wavelength, different chromophores such as hemoglobin or melanin (wavelength in the visible range of light) or lipids and proteins (wavelength in the near-infrared range, long-wave light) can be imaged.
Optoacoustic imaging thus provides information about morphological as well as molecular and functional conditions.
The advantages of this imaging have already been established in the context of various neuromuscular diseases:
For example, a significant increase in collagen concentration was shown in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy compared to a healthy control group as a possible marker of fibrosis. A significant correlate was also found in the clinical neurological examination. Particularly striking here was an indirect correlation between the 6-minute walk test and the collagen concentration.
The aforementioned imaging can also offer advantages for patients with neuromuscular diseases, particularly with regard to therapy monitoring.
Objective and quantitative measurement of disease progression is essential here. Optoacoustic imaging allows functional and molecular parameters in particular to be differentiated. This enables early and objective quantitative measurement of possible tissue loss, which can ultimately influence further therapy.
The aim of the present study is to carry out functional and molecular imaging using optoacoustic imaging to evaluate possible functional and molecular parameters, which may prove to be suitable markers for monitoring progression.
The aim of the study is to investigate whether the examination technique could be suitable for monitoring the progression of myositis.
All patients with a neuromuscular disease of the NMZ will be included in this trial.
246 studies on the registry are indexed under Myositis; 104 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 51 is below the median of 226 across 74 observational studies indexed under Myositis.
Browse Myositis studies →University of Giessen is the lead sponsor of 95 studies on the registry; 22 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
The study population consits of patients with myositis and an age and gender matched control group.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients with myositis should be included as well as healthy age and sex matched individuals als control group.
Other: MSOT of musculature
All measurements using multispectral optoacustic tomography (MSOT) are performed on the paraspinal muscles as well as the trapezius, rectus abdominus and the proximal and distal limb muscles in a right vs. left comparison (leg proximal: quadriceps and ischiocrural muscle, leg distal triceps surae muscle, tibialis anterior muscle; arm proximal: M. biceps, distal: forearm flexors).
Parchenchmymal changes in the muscles in the context of myositis
The primary endpoint of the study is the concentration of hemoglobin as correlate for an ongoing inflammation in the muscle compared to a healthy control group. The following hypothesis applies: The concentration of hemoglobin is increased in patients with myositis compared to a healthy control group.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of examinations six months
Concentration of collagen and lipids in the musculature compared to a healthy control group
Myositis is known to lead to remodelling processes in the muscles, in the sense of connective tissue or fatty remodelling. Therefore, the secondary outcome parameter is the concentration of collagen in the musculature of patients with myositis compared to a healthy control group. A further secondary outcome measure is the concentration of lipids in the muscles of patients with myositis as a correlate for fatty remodelling. It is hypothesised that the concentration of lipids and collagen is increased in patients with myositis compared to a healthy control group.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of examinations six months
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Ran from Mar 2025 to primary completion in May 2025, 2 months.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Giessen