CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06955624OMID-NEUROUpdated May 2, 2025

Use of Omics Methods to Classify Variations of Uncertain Significance and Improve Diagnosis of Neurogenetic Diseases

An interventional study of RNA and/or DNA methylation and/or protein analysis in Neurogenetic Diseases, sponsored by University Hospital, Rouen. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-02.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Rouen · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2025, registered Apr 2025).
  • Started Jan 2025; still recruiting 1 year 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
95
Allocation
Not applicable
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Many neurological disorders show a strong genetic basis, from hereditary diseases caused by a single mutation in a given gene, to diseases caused by combinations of strong genetic risk factors. However, even after the sequencing of the appropriate genes, a large proportion of patients remains undiagnosed, either because there is no candidate mutation observed, or in case of identification of a candidate mutation with insufficient knowledge to consider it as pathogenic or not.

The aim of this project is to identify the cause of neurogenetic diseases in patients in situations of diagnostic wandering or dead ends by proposing the analysis of RNA and/or proteins from different tissues.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neurogenetic Diseases

Keywords

  • Neurogenetic diseases
  • Central nervous system disease
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Rouen is the lead sponsor of 410 studies on the registry; 104 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

For this project, the inclusion of 3 participant profiles is required:

  • 1a. Patient, major or minor, with a neurological disease affecting the central nervous system, who has already benefited from a genomic analysis (panel, exome or genome sequencing) as part of routine care, with inconclusive analysis because the result was either a variation of uncertain significance or the absence of a variant of interest (patients with inconclusive genomic results).
  • 1b. Patient with neurological disease affecting the central nervous system, of confirmed monogenic or probable oligogenic cause (positive controls).
  • A relative of a type 1a. or 1b. patient with no symptoms of the disease, after the expected age of onset of symptoms in the patient's own family (healthy relatives).

For all 3 groups:

  • Affiliation with a social security scheme
  • Agreement to take part in the study with signature of a specific informed consent form for the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

For patients with inconclusive results: Patient with a neurological disease not suspected of a monogenic or oligogenic cause

For healthy relatives: existence of a neurological disease (other than uncomplicated migraine) or psychiatric disease (other than simple anxiety stable under treatment).

-

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
95 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    Controls

    * Patients with neurological disease affecting the central nervous system, of confirmed monogenic or probable oligogenic cause (positive controls * Unaffected relatives, showing no symptoms of the disease after the expected age of onset of symptoms in the family

    Genetic: RNA and/or DNA methylation and/or protein analysis

Interventions

  • GeneticRNA and/or DNA methylation and/or protein analysis

    RNA and/or DNA methylation and/or protein analysis from a blood sample or another tissue including dedifferenciation into induced pluripotent stem cells

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. number and proportion of patients

    number and proportion of patients in the "Patients with inconclusive results" group for whom a final diagnosis can be made at the end of this research.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 5 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Inclusion

    Inclusion of at least 50 participants with successful implementation of at least two procedures (see below, list of procedures)

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 5 years

  2. Identification of at least one candidate biomarker linked to one or more abnormalities of a gene or group of genes.

    Identification of at least one candidate biomarker linked to one or more abnormalities of a gene or group of genes.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 5 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 2, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06955624
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Rouen
Collaborators
University Hospital, Lille, Groupe Hospitalier Pitie-Salpetriere
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 2, 2025
Start date
Jan 15, 2025
Primary completion
Jan 15, 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 15, 2031 (estimated)
Last update
May 2, 2025

Study contacts

Gaël Nicolas, MD, PhD
Contact
gael.nicolas@chu-rouen.fr
0033232888747

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion