CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06954363Updated Jan 8, 2026

Effectiveness of Muscle Energy Techniques and Mulligan Mobilization Along With Conventional Physical Therapy in Knee Joint Osteoarthritis Patients

An interventional study of Mulligan Mobilization and Muscle Energy Technique (MET) in Knee Osteoarthritis, sponsored by Khyber Medical University Peshawar. Completed at 3 sites in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 40 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-08.

Sponsored by Khyber Medical University Peshawar · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of integrating Muscle Energy Technique (MET) and Mulligan Mobilization with conventional physical therapy in the management of knee osteoarthritis (OA), with a specific focus on improving hamstring flexibility and reducing functional limitations. The findings will help inform clinical decision-making and enhance patient outcomes in OA rehabilitation.

Read the detailed description

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a progressive degenerative joint disease characterized by the destruction of articular cartilage and the formation of bone spurs, leading to pain, joint stiffness, and decreased functional mobility. While its exact cause remains unknown, factors such as age, sex, obesity, sedentary lifestyle, genetics, bone density, smoking, and joint location contribute significantly to its development. As patients experience pain and reduced joint mobility, they often limit movement, particularly of the knee, resulting in muscular tightness-most notably in the hamstring, a two-joint muscle.

Globally, OA is a major public health concern, with knee OA affecting approximately 250 million people in 2010, including 18% of women and 9.6% of men over 60. It has substantial economic impacts, such as costing the United States 1-2.5% of its GDP and Spain €4.7 billion in 2007. Regional data from South Asia show higher prevalence in rural populations, emphasizing the disease's widespread burden.

Physical therapy has been shown to be highly effective in managing knee OA symptoms. Several randomized controlled trials support the use of techniques like Muscle Energy Technique (MET) and Mulligan Mobilization. MET has demonstrated superior efficacy compared to static stretching and whole-body vibration in improving hamstring flexibility and reducing stiffness. Similarly, Mulligan Mobilization, particularly when combined with supervised exercises, has shown better outcomes than Maitland mobilization in improving flexibility and function in OA patients.

However, current literature presents conflicting evidence regarding the individual efficacy of MET and Mulligan Mobilization. This study seeks to address these inconsistencies by investigating the effectiveness of integrating both MET and Mulligan Mobilization with conventional physical therapy in treating knee OA. The goal is to provide evidence-based insights that can guide clinicians in optimizing therapeutic strategies for better functional outcomes and enhanced quality of life for patients with knee osteoarthritis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Knee Osteoarthritis

Keywords

  • Knee Osteoarthritis
  • Muscle Stretching Exercises
  • Range of Motion, Articular
03

In context

Osteoarthritis, Knee

3,302 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis, Knee; 608 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 24 is below the median of 70 across 2,731 interventional studies indexed under Osteoarthritis, Knee.

Browse Osteoarthritis, Knee studies →

Lead sponsor

Khyber Medical University Peshawar is the lead sponsor of 53 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosed cases of osteoarthritis (Grade 1 to 3)
  • X-ray showing Grades I to III on Kellgren Lawrence scale of Osteoarthritis.
  • Residents of Peshawar verified via NADRA CNIC
  • Both genders will be included with unilateral or bilateral knee involvement.
  • Age group 40 and above.
  • Duration of Knee pain for more than 3 months.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of any previously known neurological conditions i.e. stroke, peripheral neuropathy
  • Fractures in treatment limb.
  • Suspicious of malignancy around the knee joint.
  • Recent under gone surgery
  • Recent Intra-articular injection.
  • Significant comorbid diseases and disabilities are excluded from the study
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
24 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention Group

    Participants in this group will receive Mulligan Mobilization combined with Conventional Physical Therapy. Mulligan Mobilization includes medial and lateral tibial glides using a Mulligan belt. Each session will consist of 3 sets of 10 repetitions, administered 5 days a week for 3 weeks. In addition, patients will undergo standard conventional physical therapy exercises such as quadriceps strengthening, straight leg raising, and stretching exercises. Each treatment session will last 30 minutes.

    Procedure: Mulligan Mobilization

  • Active comparator
    Control Group

    Participants in this group will receive Muscle Energy Technique (MET) targeting the hamstring muscles, in combination with Conventional Physical Therapy. The MET will follow a post-isometric relaxation approach, using both direct and indirect methods depending on patient condition. Each isometric contraction will be held for 10 seconds, followed by a 20-second stretch, repeated for 3 sets. Therapy will be conducted 5 days a week over a 3-week period. Each session will last 30 minutes. The same conventional physical therapy regimen as the intervention group will be applied.

    Procedure: Muscle Energy Technique (MET)

Interventions

  • ProcedureMulligan Mobilization

    Mulligan Mobilization involves manual tibial glides (medial and lateral) using a mobilization belt. The patient lies supine with the knee flexed between 30°-45°. The therapist applies a sustained glide while the patient actively moves the knee into flexion and extension. The treatment is delivered in 3 sets of 10 repetitions per session, 5 days per week for 3 weeks, along with a conventional physical therapy protocol.

  • ProcedureMuscle Energy Technique (MET)

    Muscle Energy Technique involves the application of post-isometric relaxation targeting hamstring muscles. The therapist applies a 10-second isometric contraction at the resistance barrier, followed by a 20-second passive stretch, progressing into a new range of motion. This technique is applied 3 times per session, 5 days per week for 3 weeks, in combination with a conventional physical therapy protocol.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hamstring Flexibility Measured by Goniometer

    Hamstring range of motion (ROM) will be assessed using a goniometer before and after the intervention. The change in ROM will be used to evaluate effectiveness. Outcome improvement categories: Mild Increase: 5-10 degrees Moderate Increase: 10-15 degrees Marked Increase: \>15 degrees

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Post-treatment (End of Week 3)

  2. Change in Pain Score Using Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-12 questionnaire Questionnaire

    The function in daily activities subscale of Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-12 questionnaire will assess participants' ability to perform routine activities before and after the intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Post-treatment (End of Week 3)

  3. Change in Knee-Related Quality of Life Using Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-12 questionnaire

    The quality of life (QOL) subscale of KOOS-12 will evaluate the impact of osteoarthritis on participants' knee-related wellbeing pre- and post-treatment.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Post-treatment (End of Week 3)

  4. Change in Activity of Daily Living Function Using KOOS-12

    The function in daily activities subscale of KOOS-12 will assess participants' ability to perform routine activities before and after the intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Post-treatment (End of Week 3)

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar
    Peshawar, KPK 25000, Pakistan
  • Alkhidmat Hospital Peshawar
    Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan
  • Bibi Zahida Memorial Hospital, NCS University System
    Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Farazdaghi M, Kordi Yoosefinejad A, Abdollahian N, Rahimi M, Motealleh A. Dry needling trigger points around knee and hip joints improves function in patients with mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2021 Jul;27:597-604. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.04.011. Epub 2021 Apr 30. PubMed 34391293 ↗
  • Ceballos-Laita L, Jimenez-Del-Barrio S, Marin-Zurdo J, Moreno-Calvo A, Marin-Bone J, Albarova-Corral MI, Estebanez-de-Miguel E. Effects of dry needling on pain, pressure pain threshold and psychological distress in patients with mild to moderate hip osteoarthritis: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Complement Ther Med. 2020 Jun;51:102443. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102443. Epub 2020 May 18. PubMed 32507443 ↗
  • Ashraf F, Anwar K, Arshad H. Effects of muscle energy technique along conventional physical therapy after mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in knee osteoarthritis patients. Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Dec;40(11):2558-2564. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.11.9605. PubMed 39634887 ↗
  • Goksen A, Can F, Yilmaz S, Korkusuz F. Comparison of different neuromuscular facilitation techniques and conventional physiotherapy in knee osteoarthritis. Turk J Med Sci. 2021 Dec 13;51(6):3089-3097. doi: 10.3906/sag-2101-298. PubMed 34565133 ↗
  • Sanchez-Romero EA, Pecos-Martin D, Calvo-Lobo C, Ochoa-Saez V, Burgos-Caballero V, Fernandez-Carnero J. Effects of dry needling in an exercise program for older adults with knee osteoarthritis: A pilot clinical trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jun;97(26):e11255. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011255. PubMed 29952993 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The study will make individual participant data (IPD) available to other researchers after the conclusion of the study. The IPD shared will include anonymized data related to the primary and secondary outcome measures, including depression scores, biochemical markers (e.g., TNF-α, IL-6, BDNF), EEG data, and other relevant clinical and demographic data collected during the trial. The data will be de-identified to ensure participant confidentiality. The data will be shared through an approved data repository or by direct request to the study's primary investigators.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 8, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06954363
Lead sponsor
Khyber Medical University Peshawar
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 1, 2025
Start date
Apr 1, 2025
Primary completion
Oct 30, 2025
Completion
Nov 28, 2025
Last update
Jan 8, 2026

Study contacts

Babar Israr, MSPT
principal investigator · Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Khyber Medical University Peshawar
Shakir Ullah, PhD
study director · Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Khyber Medical University Peshawar
Samra Farid, MSPT
principal investigator · Alkhidmat Hospital Peshawar

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion