ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06952777Updated May 1, 2025

Validation of Sensors for Long-term Non-Invasive Fetal Monitoring

An interventional study of Non-adhesive capacitively-coupled sensors in Fetal Distress With Antenatal Problem and Fetal Growth Retardation, sponsored by University of Manchester. Recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to female participants aged 16 Years to 50 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-01.

Sponsored by University of Manchester · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Registered 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2024, registered Apr 2025).
  • Started Jun 2024; still recruiting 2 years 5 months later.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
69
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
16 Years to 50 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

A multidisciplinary team of a doctor and engineers have developed a new sensor that will be able to detect mothers' and babies' heartbeat and babies movements in late pregnancy. This sensor can be placed in contact with the mothers' skin over the pregnant uterus without having to be stuck down. We anticipate that this sensor would allow us to monitor babies for longer periods of time which might help us to better identify babies who are being deprived of oxygen during pregnancy. We need to test these sensors on women in late pregnancy for two reasons. Firstly, we need to ensure they reliably measure mother and babies heart rates without interference from movement or other electrical equipment. Secondly we need to ensure that the information they provide is accurate (compared to current measurement techniques).

We will carry out two related studies. The first will include up to 24 women to develop the sensors to ensure that they can obtain consistent signals from mothers' and babies' heartbeats without interference from movement and other electronic devices. We will adjust the electronics in the sensors to ensure they give the best signal. The second will include up to 45 women to see whether the information detected by the sensors is comparable to existing technologies. This information will help us to see whether these sensors can be organised into a new device for fetal monitoring which can then be tested.

Read the detailed description

In the first part of the study we will ask up to 24 pregnant women to wear the non adhesive sensors and determine whether they consistently detect the electronic signals and to reduce recording of background electrical noise e.g. from electrical wires / devices / sockets etc. which are likely to emit electrical activity in the same microvolt range as the fetal heart rate trace.

Participants will be from three separate time periods in late pregnancy (8 women in each time frame) 28+0-31+6 weeks, 32+0-35+6 weeks and finally from 36+0 until 40+0 weeks. Women will be recruited from the Tommy's research clinics and the antenatal clinics at St Mary's Hospital, Manchester. All participants will have an ultrasound scan prior to participation to measure baby's size, the liquor volume and umbilical artery Doppler (all indicators of baby's wellbeing).

This will ensure that baby is well before the sensors are used. If needed we will make adaptations to the electronics to optimise the detection of the mother's and baby's heart rate.

Participants will be asked to lie on an examination couch for up to 60 minutes at 45 degrees while the electronic sensor(s) are gently held in contact with the maternal abdomen by an elastic belt. If participants are uncomfortable they will be able to sit or stand to relieve their discomfort. Basic information including body mass index, stage of pregnancy and estimated fetal weight will be recorded on a proforma.

If consistent signals can be obtained we will assess whether the sensors can accurately display maternal heart rate and fetal heart rate at different stages of late pregnancy. To assess whether the recording is accurate we will compare the output from the sensors with current methods to assess maternal heart rate (ECG), fetal heart rate (MONICA24).

We will use ultrasound scan to assess whether fetal movements are associated with expected changes in fetal heart activity.

To assess sensor reliability we will recruit up to 15 women from each gestational age group from 28+0-31+6 weeks, 32+0-35+6 weeks and finally from 36+0 until 40+0 weeks. Women will be approached if they have healthy singleton pregnancies and have a pre-pregnancy BMI from 20-35. As previously, women will be recruited from the Tommy's research clinics and the antenatal clinics at St Mary's Hospital, Manchester. The correlation between the maternal and fetal heart rates obtained using established techniques and the new sensors will be calculated.

Participants will be asked to complete a short baseline questionnaire before commencing the monitoring process. Participants will be asked to lie on an examination couch for up to 60 minutes at 45 degrees while the electronic sensor(s) are gently held in contact with the maternal abdomen by an elastic belt. In addition to the new sensors the fetal and maternal heart rate will be recorded using the MONICA AN24 device and fetal movements will be recorded with ultrasound (for 20 minutes of the 60). If participants are uncomfortable they will be able to sit or stand to relieve their discomfort. Basic information including body mass index, stage of pregnancy and estimated fetal weight will be recorded on a proforma. In addition, participants will be asked to complete a questionnaire about anxiety and wearing the device after the monitoring process.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fetal Distress With Antenatal Problem
  • Fetal Growth Retardation

Keywords

  • Fetal monitoring
  • Fetal heart rate monitoring
03

In context

Fetal Growth Retardation

262 studies on the registry are indexed under Fetal Growth Retardation; 69 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 69 is below the median of 150 across 110 interventional studies indexed under Fetal Growth Retardation.

Browse Fetal Growth Retardation studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Manchester is the lead sponsor of 201 studies on the registry; 44 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants will be included if they have a non-anomalous singleton pregnancy after 28 weeks' gestation with an estimated fetal weight >10th centile \< 90th centile. Participants will be 16 years or over in order that they can give independent consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants will be excluded if there are fetal anomalies (as defined by the NHS Fetal Anomaly Screening Programme - https://www.gov.uk/guidance/fetal-anomaly-screening-programme-overview), it is a multiple pregnancy, there is evidence of Fetal Growth Restriction (Estimated Fetal Weight \<10th centile) or if participants cannot speak or do not understand fluent English. Participants will not be able to participate if they are unable to give . Participants \<16 years of age will be excluded from this study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
69 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Women using sensors

    Participants will be asked to complete a short baseline questionnaire before commencing the monitoring process. Participants will be asked to lie on an examination couch for up to 60 minutes at 45 degrees while the electronic sensor(s) are gently held in contact with the maternal abdomen by an elastic belt. In addition to the new sensors the fetal and maternal heart rate will be recorded using the MONICA AN24 device and fetal movements will be recorded with ultrasound (for 20 minutes of the 60). If participants are uncomfortable they will be able to sit or stand to relieve their discomfort. Basic information including body mass index, stage of pregnancy and estimated fetal weight will be recorded on a proforma. In addition, participants will be asked to complete a questionnaire about anxiety and wearing the device after the monitoring process.

    Other: Non-adhesive capacitively-coupled sensors

Interventions

  • OtherNon-adhesive capacitively-coupled sensors

    Non-adhesive capacitively-coupled sensors which can detect signals of the magnitude of the fetal heart rate and information about fetal movements.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recording quality of non-adherent sensors

    Proportion of recording time that non-adherent sensors record fetal heart rate

    Time frame: 0-60 minutes recording during

Secondary outcomes

  1. Maternal comfort

    Self-reported comfort of wearing the non-adherent sensors using Likert Scale

    Time frame: Immediately after the recording period

  2. Maternal anxiety

    Completion of state trait anxiety index

    Time frame: Immediately prior to or after the recording period

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — There is no plan to share individual participant data after this initial preclinical study.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2025, 18 months after the start.

Of 39 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Fetal Growth Retardation, half reached primary completion within 35 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 52. This study's planned 18 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 40 studies reached it within 35 months; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 52.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 23, 2025
First posted
May 1, 2025
StartActual
Jun 1, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2025
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2025
Last update
May 1, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 1, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06952777
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 1, 2025
Start date
Jun 1, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
May 1, 2025

Study contacts

Alexander Heazell, PhD
Contact
alexander.heazell@manchester.ac.uk
+441612766484
Emma Tomlinson, RM
Contact
emma.tomlinson@mft.nhs.uk
+441617016965
Alexander Heazell, PhD
principal investigator · University of Manchester

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion