ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06952738Updated Dec 22, 2025

Investigating Periprosthetic Fracture Cultures in Arthroplasty

An observational study in Periprosthetic Fracture Around Prosthetic Joint Implant, sponsored by University of Chicago. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-22.

Sponsored by University of Chicago · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2025; still recruiting 1 year 1 month later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to improve how doctors diagnose infections in patients with broken bones around joint replacements. Currently, there are no clear guidelines to help determine when an infection is present, making treatment decisions difficult. By studying how often infections are found through lab tests and identifying factors that predict infection, the investigators hope to create better ways to diagnose and care for these patients.

Read the detailed description

All steps in the protocol will be completed under the standard of care for our hospital's orthopedic joints and trauma surgeons. All patients identified under the inclusion criteria will undergo preoperative imaging. In accordance with current standards of care, patients with periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) around the hip will receive three views of X-rays of the hip and femur as well as the anterior-posterior view of the pelvis. Likewise, patients with PPFs around the knee will undergo X-rays that include the knee and femur. No advanced imaging (Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, etc.) will be obtained for the purpose of this study.

Preoperative laboratory analysis will include C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) as inflammatory markers. Intraoperative synovial fluid analysis will be performed using synovial white blood cell (WBC) count and polymorphonuclear (PMN) percentage. Three cultures will be obtained from the involved joint fluid and tissue, and incubated for 14 days for analysis of aerobic, anaerobic bacterial cultures, fungal and acid-fast bacilli (AFB) analysis. The cultures will be collected from synovial fluid, peri-implant femoral synovium/periosteum, peri-implant tibial or acetabular synovium/periosteum. These laboratory tests and cultures are part of the standard protocol our surgeons have determined for their patient care.

Based on the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria for positive histology intraoperative histology will be performed utilizing frozen section analysis. These slides will be isolated from synovium, peri-implant femoral synovium/periosteum, and peri-implant tibial or acetabular synovium/periosteum. Additional cultures may be sent at discretion of surgeon but would not be included in analysis.

Per institutional protocol, preoperative cefazolin and vancomycin will be administered intravenously and continued for 24 hours perioperatively. Patients who are allergic to vancomycin will receive daptomycin, and those who are allergic to beta-lactam drugs including cephalosporins will be given gentamicin. No intra-articular antibiotics will be routinely administered.

All cultures will be followed until final. If cultures become positive, our institutional infectious disease (ID) department will be consulted for further recommendations and consideration for treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Periprosthetic Fracture Around Prosthetic Joint Implant

Keywords

  • Periprosthetic fractures
  • synovial fluid
  • prosthetic joint infections
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Chicago is the lead sponsor of 924 studies on the registry; 185 are open to participants now.

Of its 103 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 72 (70%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

This population would include all consenting patients older than 18 years who present to the University of Chicago Medical Center with periprosthetic hip or knee fractures and will require operative management of the fracture or infection.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients (>18 years old) with periprosthetic fractures around primary or revision hip or knee arthroplasty
  • Patients requiring operative management for these fractures (fixation or revision arthroplasty)
  • Patients presenting to the University of Chicago Medical Center during two (2) year period (October 2025 to October 2027)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing non-operative management for periprosthetic fractures
  • Any documented or reported history of past prosthetic joint infection of the involved joint
  • Sinus tract at the time of presentation at the involved joint
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Periprosthetic Fractures

    This group will be all patients enrolled in the study: they will all have periprosthetic hip or knee fractures.

    Other: Not applicable- observational study

Interventions

  • OtherNot applicable- observational study

    The investigators are only looking to see the rate of positivity of the cultures as well as what the organisms that are found in the cultures are.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Culture Positivity Rates

    This outcome measure is the percentage of cultures that grow organisms among the population

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 14 days.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rate of Complications

    Number of participants with surgery-related complications within one year after their surgeries.

    Time frame: From date of surgery to one year after the specific participant's surgery.

  2. Culture Organisms

    The names, number, and frequency of organisms being found in the cultures.

    Time frame: From surgery date to 14 days after surgery.

  3. Treatments Used

    The list of antibiotics used for treating organisms found to be positive in the cultures.

    Time frame: From enrollment to one year after surgery.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Parvizi J, Tan TL, Goswami K, Higuera C, Della Valle C, Chen AF, Shohat N. The 2018 Definition of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection: An Evidence-Based and Validated Criteria. J Arthroplasty. 2018 May;33(5):1309-1314.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.078. Epub 2018 Feb 26. PubMed 29551303 ↗
  • McArthur BA, Abdel MP, Taunton MJ, Osmon DR, Hanssen AD. Seronegative infections in hip and knee arthroplasty: periprosthetic infections with normal erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein level. Bone Joint J. 2015 Jul;97-B(7):939-44. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B7.35500. PubMed 26130349 ↗
  • Schinsky MF, Della Valle CJ, Sporer SM, Paprosky WG. Perioperative testing for joint infection in patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Sep;90(9):1869-75. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01255. PubMed 18762646 ↗
  • Shah RP, Plummer DR, Moric M, Sporer SM, Levine BR, Della Valle CJ. Diagnosing Infection in the Setting of Periprosthetic Fractures. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Sep;31(9 Suppl):140-3. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.08.045. Epub 2016 Mar 17. PubMed 27067465 ↗
  • Preston S, Somerville L, Lanting B, Howard J. Are Nucleated Cell Counts Useful in the Diagnosis of Infection in Periprosthetic Fracture? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jul;473(7):2238-43. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4162-8. PubMed 25631172 ↗
  • Chevillotte CJ, Ali MH, Trousdale RT, Larson DR, Gullerud RE, Berry DJ. Inflammatory laboratory markers in periprosthetic hip fractures. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Aug;24(5):722-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.05.026. Epub 2008 Sep 11. PubMed 18789633 ↗
  • Austin MS, Ghanem E, Joshi A, Lindsay A, Parvizi J. A simple, cost-effective screening protocol to rule out periprosthetic infection. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Jan;23(1):65-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.09.005. PubMed 18165031 ↗
  • van den Kieboom J, Tirumala V, Xiong L, Klemt C, Kwon YM. Concomitant Hip and Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Periprosthetic Fracture: Diagnostic Utility of Serum and Synovial Fluid Markers. J Arthroplasty. 2021 Feb;36(2):722-727. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.08.029. Epub 2020 Aug 18. PubMed 32893059 ↗
  • Barberis L, Abdelrahman T, Driscoll DA, Dasci MF, Gehrke T, Citak M. Unexpected Positive Cultures in Hip and Knee Periprosthetic Fractures. J Arthroplasty. 2024 Jul;39(7):1834-1839. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.01.030. Epub 2024 Jan 18. PubMed 38244640 ↗
  • Shichman I, Roof M, Askew N, Nherera L, Rozell JC, Seyler TM, Schwarzkopf R. Projections and Epidemiology of Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Medicare Patients to 2040-2060. JB JS Open Access. 2023 Feb 28;8(1):e22.00112. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.22.00112. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar. PubMed 36864906 ↗
  • Sloan M, Premkumar A, Sheth NP. Projected Volume of Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty in the U.S., 2014 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Sep 5;100(17):1455-1460. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01617. PubMed 30180053 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Oct 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2027, 18 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 23, 2025
First posted
May 1, 2025
StartActual
Oct 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Apr 30, 2027
CompletionEst.
Oct 31, 2027
Last update
Dec 22, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 22, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06952738
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 1, 2025
Start date
Oct 1, 2025
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 22, 2025

Study contacts

Malik J Scott, BA
Contact
mjscott1@uchicago.edu
773-834-0822
Vincent Buckman, BS
Contact
vincent.buckman@uchicagomedicine.org
Sara Wallace, MD
principal investigator · The University of Chicago Department of Orthopaedic Surgery

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion