ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06949527OB-MUSCLEUpdated Apr 29, 2025

Effects of Open Bite Activator and Skeletal Anchorage-Supported Vertical Elastics on the Masseter Muscle

An interventional study of Open Bite Activator with Skeletal Anchorage-Supported Vertical Elastics in Hyperdivergent Facial Pattern, Skeletal Open Bite and Hyperdivergent Growth Pattern, sponsored by Murat Kaan Erdem. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 14 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-29.

Sponsored by Murat Kaan Erdem · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2024, registered Apr 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
12 Years to 14 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This clinical trial aims to evaluate the effects of a combined treatment involving an open bite activator and anterior skeletal anchorage-supported vertical elastics on the masseter muscle in children with skeletal open bite. A total of 24 growing individuals with increased vertical skeletal pattern were treated with a functional appliance and intermaxillary vertical elastics supported by miniscrews placed in the anterior region. Ultrasonographic and sonoelastographic assessments were performed at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months to measure changes in masseter muscle thickness and stiffness. Cephalometric radiographs were also used to evaluate dentofacial structural changes. This study aims to provide insight into the soft tissue changes associated with functional orthopedic treatment in hyperdivergent patients.

Read the detailed description

This prospective clinical study investigates the dentofacial and muscular effects of a combined orthopedic treatment method in patients with skeletal open bite. The intervention includes the use of an open bite activator appliance along with anterior skeletal anchorage-supported vertical elastics. The study was conducted at Ankara University Faculty of Dentistry, Orthodontics Department, and received ethical approval (Approval No: 36290600/78).

A total of 24 growing individuals (14 females, 10 males) with increased vertical facial pattern (GoGn/SN ≥ 36°) were treated over a 12-month period. Patients received custom-made open bite activators designed to eliminate occlusal contact in the anterior region and redirect functional forces posteriorly. Miniscrews were placed between the lateral and canine teeth in both the maxilla and mandible, and vertical elastics were applied between these skeletal anchorage points with a force of 150 grams on each side, worn for 20-22 hours daily.

Masseter muscle changes were assessed using ultrasonography and sonoelastography at three time points: baseline (T0), interim (6 months, T1), and end of treatment (12 months, T2). Muscle thickness and stiffness (elasticity) were measured bilaterally during rest and maximal clenching. Cephalometric radiographs were obtained at T0 and T2 to evaluate skeletal and dentoalveolar changes, including SNA, SNB, ANB angles, overbite, U1-PP, L1-MP, and other relevant vertical and angular measurements.

Statistical analysis revealed significant increases in masseter muscle thickness during the treatment period, especially between T0 and T1. Stiffness values peaked at T1 and slightly decreased at T2, but remained higher than baseline. Cephalometric findings showed improvements in overbite and reductions in vertical growth tendencies, including significant changes in GoGn/SN and PP-MP angles.

This study demonstrates that combined functional appliance and skeletal anchorage-based vertical control therapy can positively influence muscle structure and dentofacial morphology in hyperdivergent skeletal open bite cases. Ultrasonography and sonoelastography proved to be reliable, non-invasive methods for assessing soft tissue changes in orthodontic treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hyperdivergent Facial Pattern
  • Skeletal Open Bite
  • Hyperdivergent Growth Pattern
  • Anterior Open Bite

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Open Bite Treatment
  • Masseter Muscle
  • Ultrasound Imaging
  • Sonoelastography
  • Skeletal Anchorage
  • Vertical Elastics
  • Functional Orthodontic Appliance
  • Cephalometric Analysis
03

In context

Open Bite

34 studies on the registry are indexed under Open Bite; 8 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 24 is below the median of 30 across 28 interventional studies indexed under Open Bite.

Browse Open Bite studies →

Lead sponsor

Murat Kaan Erdem is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 14 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • GoGn/SN angle ≥ 36°
  • Decreased overbite (dental open bite)
  • In active growth phase (confirmed by hand-wrist radiograph)
  • Good oral hygiene
  • No prior orthodontic or orthognathic treatment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of systemic disease or craniofacial deformity
  • Poor oral hygiene
  • Non-compliance with appliance wear
  • Previous use of skeletal anchorage devices
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
24 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Functional Appliance with Skeletal Anchorage-Supported Vertical Elastics

    Patients were treated using a custom-made open bite activator combined with vertical elastics supported by anterior miniscrews placed between lateral and canine teeth in both jaws. The elastics applied 150g of force bilaterally and were worn for 20-22 hours per day over a 12-month period. The goal was to manage vertical skeletal development and evaluate changes in masseter muscle morphology via ultrasound and sonoelastography.

    Device: Open Bite Activator with Skeletal Anchorage-Supported Vertical Elastics

Interventions

  • DeviceOpen Bite Activator with Skeletal Anchorage-Supported Vertical Elastics

    A custom-made acrylic open bite activator was fabricated for each participant, with the bite registered 3-4 mm above freeway space. Miniscrews were placed between the lateral and canine teeth in both jaws. Vertical elastics (150g force) were applied bilaterally between miniscrews and the appliance. The intervention aimed to reduce vertical growth in posterior regions and stimulate anterior dentoalveolar development while improving masseter muscle morphology.

    Also known as: Functional Appliance, Vertical Elastics, Mini-Implants

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in masseter muscle thickness measured by ultrasonography

    Masseter muscle thickness (in millimeters) will be measured at rest and during maximal clenching using ultrasonography at three time points: baseline (T0), 6 months (T1), and 12 months (T2).

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in masseter muscle stiffness assessed by sonoelastography

    The ratio of stiff (red) areas to total cross-sectional area of the masseter muscle will be evaluated using shear wave sonoelastography at T0, T1, and T2.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ankara University Faculty of Dentistry
    Ankara, Çankaya 06500, Turkey
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — De-identified individual participant data (IPD) may be shared upon reasonable request. No personal or identifiable information will be included in the shared data.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2024 to primary completion in Jan 2025, 12 months.

Of 24 interventional studies with no phase under Open Bite, half reached primary completion within 17 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 36. This study's 12 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 22, 2025
First posted
Apr 29, 2025
StartActual
Jan 15, 2024
Primary completionActual
Jan 15, 2025
CompletionActual
Jan 15, 2025
Last update
Apr 29, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 29, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06949527
Lead sponsor
Murat Kaan Erdem
Responsible party
Murat Kaan Erdem (PhD, DDS, Ankara University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Apr 29, 2025
Start date
Jan 15, 2024
Primary completion
Jan 15, 2025
Completion
Jan 15, 2025
Last update
Apr 29, 2025

Study contacts

Murat K Erdem, PhD, DDS
principal investigator · Ankara University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion