An interventional study of virtual patient simulation and peer simulation conducted in a virtual environment in Pregnancy and Sexuality, sponsored by Ankara University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-30.
Sponsored by Ankara University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
The aim of this study is to compare, in a multidimensional manner, the effectiveness of different educational methods-virtual patient simulation and peer simulation-in improving sexual counseling skills during pregnancy among nursing faculty students.
The study will evaluate three different training methods: virtual patient simulation, peer simulation conducted in a virtual environment, and face-to-face peer simulation. To determine the effectiveness of peer simulation and virtual patient simulation in sexual health counseling, multimodal data collection and analysis methods will be used. These methods will contribute to the development of counseling skills by examining in detail the verbal and non-verbal communication elements exhibited by participants during their interactions with virtual patients and peers. Throughout the research process, students' demographic characteristics, sexual attitudes and beliefs, sexual counseling skills, learning satisfaction and self-confidence levels, opinions on system usability, eye-tracking data, and body movements will be analyzed.
130 studies on the registry are indexed under Sexuality; 26 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 51 is below the median of 75 across 79 interventional studies indexed under Sexuality.
Browse Sexuality studies →Ankara University is the lead sponsor of 320 studies on the registry; 64 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Other: virtual patient simulation
Other: peer simulation conducted in a virtual environment
Other: face-to-face peer simulation
Students in this group are expected to provide sexual counseling to a virtual patient model following theoretical training. In this context, a virtual patient model has been developed with whom the students will engage for the counseling process.
Students in this group are expected to provide sexual counseling to their peers in a virtual environment following theoretical training. In the virtual peer simulation, students will see the same background displayed in the virtual patient simulation; however, instead of interacting with a virtual patient, they will connect with a peer via an online platform to conduct the counseling session.
Students in this group are expected to provide sexual counseling to their peers following theoretical training. In the peer simulation, students will conduct their sessions in a communication skills laboratory designed to resemble a clinical consultation room.
Sexual Attitudes and Beliefs
Students' sexual attitudes and beliefs will be assessed using the the sexual attitudes and belief survey. This scale is a six-point Likert-type scale, with scores ranging from a minimum of 12 to a maximum of 72. Higher scores indicate more negative attitudes and beliefs toward sexual care.
Time frame: immediately before the training-immediately after the training
Learning Satisfaction and Self-Confidence
Learning satisfaction and self-confidence will be measured using the Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale. This scale is a five-point Likert-type scale, with responses ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Higher scores reflect greater student satisfaction and self-confidence in learning.
Time frame: immediately after the training
Sexual Counseling Skills
Students' sexual counseling skills will be assessed using the Sexual Counseling Skills Assessment Form. This form is developed based on the BETTER, PLISSIT, Ex-PLISSIT, and One-to-One models, and it covers the entire counseling process from initiation to conclusion. Each item is scored as 0 (not demonstrated) or 1 (demonstrated). The total score ranges from 0 to 34, with higher scores indicating a higher level of skill. The form will be completed while students simulate their counseling skills.
Time frame: During simulation
System Usability Opinions
Students' opinions regarding system usability will be assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS). The SUS is a 10-item instrument scored on a five-point Likert scale. Scores range from a minimum of 10 to a maximum of 100. Higher scores indicate higher perceived usability of the system.
Time frame: immediately after the training
Eye Tracking
Eye tracking parameters in the study will be assessed using a wearable eye-tracking system. This device will analyze the areas of focus during students' interactions with virtual patients and peers. The analysis of gaze points and eye movements will help evaluate the distribution of attention during communication.
Time frame: During simulation
Body Movements
Body movements will be evaluated using a motion tracking device. These motion detection systems will analyze body language to assess participants' capacity to establish effective connections with virtual patients and peers. This method aims to evaluate participants' ability to use gestures and body language effectively to build strong relationships with patients.
Time frame: During simulation
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Ran from Apr 2025 to primary completion in Jun 2025, 1 month.
Of 54 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Sexuality, half reached primary completion within 12 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 32. This study's 1 month is below that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 54 studies reached it within 12 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 32.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.