ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06938568LIFDIUpdated May 4, 2025

Personalized Physical Back Training Program to Improve Physical Functioning in People With Non-specific Low Back Pain

An interventional study of Personalized back exercises and Non-personalized back exercises in Exercise Therapy and Low Back Pain, sponsored by Claudio Perret. Recruiting at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-04.

Sponsored by Claudio Perret · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2025; still recruiting 1 year 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
180
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Personalized medicine and individualized therapeutic approaches are prominent in current research. But are these approaches also effective for treating non-specific low back pain (NSLBP)? NSLBP is one of the most common musculoskeletal issues, which can impair physical well-being, reduce the quality of life, and limit physical functioning. Additionally, it contributes to substantial direct and indirect healthcare costs, such as frequent doctor visits and work absences. Despite NSLBP being a significant burden for both individuals and society, effective alleviation methods remain unclear. The investigators' research project therefore aims to investigate whether personalized therapy, specifically a personalized physical back training program, can effectively address NSLBP. Within the context of NSLBP, the investigators' specific aim is to improve physical functioning as this outcome is considered relevant from all perspectives, including those of patients, clinical professionals, researchers, and guidelines.

02

Conditions studied

  • Exercise Therapy
  • Low Back Pain

Keywords

  • Physical Functioning
  • Exercise
03

In context

Low Back Pain

2,875 studies on the registry are indexed under Low Back Pain; 484 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 180 is above the median of 60 across 2,315 interventional studies indexed under Low Back Pain.

Browse Low Back Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Claudio Perret as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Access to the University Sports of the Lucerne Universities (i.e., students, employees, alumni, subscribers)
  • NSLBP for at least 6 weeks
  • Activity limiting NSLBP (at least one activity with a PSFS Score of ≤ 50/100 on a scale from 0 = unable to perform due to NSLBP to 100 = able to perform at the same level as before NSLBP)
  • Age between 18 and 65 years
  • Understand the German language
  • Willing to participate in the study
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Specific LBP
  • Red flags associated with any serious pathology or specific LBP,
  • Being on a waiting list for or less than 12 months post any surgery of the lower back
  • Pregnancy or given birth within the last 12 months
  • Diagnosed central neurological disease
  • Not allowed to exercise
  • Participant in the feasibility study
  • Expecting to be absent for more than 2 weeks during the intervention period
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
180 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Personalized back exercises

    The study intervention is a 12-week personalized physical back training program. It consists of six to eight exercises selected from a predefined set by a physical therapist or medical doctor. These exercises are selected through a clinical reasoning process, i.e., they are tailored and problem-oriented, based on the results of a clinical assessment.

    Other: Personalized back exercises

  • Active comparator
    Non-personalized back exercises

    The active control intervention is a 12-week non-personalized physical back training program. It consists of six to eight exercises selected from a predefined set by a physical therapist or medical doctor. These exercises are not selected through a clinical reasoning process, i.e., they are neither tailored nor problem-oriented nor based on the results of a clinical assessment.

    Other: Non-personalized back exercises

Interventions

  • OtherPersonalized back exercises

    The study intervention is a 12-week personalized physical back training program. It consists of six to eight exercises selected from a predefined set by a physical therapist or medical doctor. These exercises are selected through a clinical reasoning process, i.e., they are tailored and problem-oriented, based on the results of a clinical assessment. An initial one-on-one training session will take place to familiarize participants with the back training program, corresponding to the first week's session of the 12-week intervention period. During the 12-week intervention period, the training comprises one supervised group session per week, lasting 30 minutes, along with three individual unsupervised sessions, each lasting 10-15 minutes. Our procedures ensures that both participants and instructors are blinded to the group allocation, allowing both groups to train together (e.g., mixed training groups).

  • OtherNon-personalized back exercises

    The active control intervention is a 12-week non-personalized physical back training program. It consists of six to eight exercises selected from a predefined set by a physical therapist or medical doctor. These exercises are not selected through a clinical reasoning process, i.e., they are neither tailored nor problem-oriented nor based on the results of a clinical assessment. An initial one-on-one training session will take place to familiarize participants with the back training program, corresponding to the first week's session of the 12-week intervention period. During the 12-week intervention period, the training comprises one supervised group session per week, lasting 30 minutes, along with three individual unsupervised sessions, each lasting 10-15 minutes. Our procedures ensures that both participants and instructors are blinded to the group allocation, allowing both groups to train together (e.g., mixed training groups).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Self-rated physical functioning

    Change in Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS), most bothersome activity. Range from 0 (unable to perform due to NSLBP) to 100 (able to perform at the same level as before NSLBP)

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Self-rated physical functioning

    Change in Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS), most bothersome activity. Range from 0 (unable to perform due to NSLBP) to 100 (able to perform at the same level as before NSLBP)

    Time frame: Baseline to 4, 8, and 24 weeks

  2. Self-rated physical functioning (RMDQ)

    Change in Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). Range from 0 (no disability) to 24 (maximum disability).

    Time frame: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks

  3. Health-related quality of life (EQ-VAS)

    Change in EQ Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS). Range from 0 (lowest health-related quality of life) to 100 (highest health-related quality of life).

    Time frame: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks

  4. Health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L)

    Change in 5-Level EuroQoL5D version (EQ-5D-5L). Range from 0 (lowest health-related quality of life) to 1 (highest health-related quality of life).

    Time frame: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks

  5. Pain intensity (NRS)

    Change in pain intensity (11-point Numeric Rating Scale, NRS). Range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). Recall period: 7 days.

    Time frame: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks

  6. Safety outcome

    Number of serious adverse events (SAE) and adverse events (AE) that are deemed possibly, probably, or definitely related to the intervention (according to our protocol and ClinO, Art. 63, Switzerland).

    Time frame: During the 12 week intervention period

Other outcomes

  1. Pain frequency

    Change in number of episodes with NSLBP. Numerically, with 0 = minimum. Recall period: 7 days.

    Time frame: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks

  2. Pain duration

    Change in pain duration (e.g., average duration of an episode of NSLBP within the last 7 days). In minutes, hours, or days, with 0 = minimum. Recall period: 7 days.

    Time frame: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks

  3. Pain interference (PEG)

    Change in Pain, Enjoyment, and General Activity (PEG) 3-Item Scale. Range from 0 (no pain; does not interfere) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine; completely interferes). Recall period: 7 days.

    Time frame: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks

  4. NSLBP-related work productivity loss

    Change in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI). Percentages, with 0%=no work productivity loss.

    Time frame: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks

  5. Participant satisfaction

    Participant satisfaction (e.g., 1. I am satisfied with the training program I received. 2. I am satisfied with the result of the training program). 4-point Likert scale (strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree).

    Time frame: At 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University of Lucerne, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University Research Centre Health and Society
    Lucerne, Canton of Lucerne 6002, Switzerland
    • Claudio Perret, PhD · Contact · claudio.perret@unilu.ch · +41419396650
    • Andrea M Aegerter, PhD · Contact · andrea.aegerter@unilu.ch · +41412295739
    • Claudio Perret, PhD · Principal investigator
    • Andrea M Aegerter, PhD · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — It is anticipated that the investigators will make encrypted individual participant data (IPD) available via a data repository and, additionally, upon reasonable request to the Principal Investigator. In both cases, only data from participants who have provided informed consent for data sharing will be made available.

Time frame: It is anticipated that the data will be made available as soon as possible after the completion of the study and will remain accessible for at least 10 years.

Access criteria: Access to the data will be granted in accordance with the criteria of the repository and/or publisher.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 4, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06938568
Lead sponsor
Claudio Perret
Responsible party
Claudio Perret (Prof. Dr. Claudio Perret, Universität Luzern) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Apr 22, 2025
Start date
May 1, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Last update
May 4, 2025

Study contacts

Claudio Perret, PhD
Contact
claudio.perret@unilu.ch
+41419396650
Andrea M Aegerter, PhD
Contact
andrea.aegerter@unilu.ch
+41412295739
Claudio Perret, PhD
principal investigator · University of Lucerne, University Research Centre Health and Society

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion