CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06933966ATTENUATIONUpdated Apr 18, 2025

Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety De-escalation Versus Standard Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Low Risk Localized Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma

A Phase 2 interventional study of observation alone in Gastric Adenocarcinoma or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma or Esophageal Carcinoma and Non Metastatic Disease, sponsored by Centre Leon Berard. Not yet recruiting at 3 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-18.

Sponsored by Centre Leon Berard · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The ATTENUATION study targets patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (GA), esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) or gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) who have received 4 cycles of FLOT chemotherapy before the surgery. Standard post-operative management consists of chemotherapy with 4 cycles of FLOT.

However, the nature and duration of postoperative treatment are standardized and are not adapted to the specific tumor response of each patient. All patients are therefore referred to the same treatment regimen.

As a result, good responders (defined in particular by wide resection of the tumor and a good response to preoperative chemotherapy on the tumor removed during surgery) may be over-treated and exposed to unnecessary adverse events.

Only 50-60% of patients can start chemotherapy post-operatively, due to the potential residual adverse effects associated with surgery in particular. Thus, it would appear that preoperative chemotherapy is the most important factor in the overall efficacy of the treatment sequence. Moreover, numerous retrospective studies have reported a favorable outcome in patients with a major response to pre-operative treatment but who were unable to receive post-operative chemotherapy.

The hypothesis of this study is that surveillance after surgery in patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction tumors, with a good response to preoperative chemotherapy could provide significant clinical benefit and favorable disease progression.

Participants will:

  • be distributed in one of the two arms
  • will be followed up every 3 months for 2 years, then every 6 months (clinical examination, imaging, quality-of-life questionnaire) subsequent years until 3 years after the randomization of the last patient.
  • followed up until their death or their progression whether local, regional or metastatic.
02

Conditions studied

  • Gastric Adenocarcinoma or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma or Esophageal Carcinoma
  • Non Metastatic Disease

Keywords

  • De-escalation post-operative chemotherapy
  • Gastric Adenocarcinoma or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma or Esophageal Adenocarcinoma
03

In context

Adenocarcinoma

2,004 studies on the registry are indexed under Adenocarcinoma; 375 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 45 across 1,553 interventional studies indexed under Adenocarcinoma.

Browse Adenocarcinoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Leon Berard is the lead sponsor of 206 studies on the registry; 61 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • I1. Age ≥ 18 years, I2. Histologically proven non-metastatic (M0) gastric, oesophageal or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, I3. Subjects must have completed both pre-operative chemotherapy with a fluoropyrimidine-platinum containing regimen (FLOT 4 cycles) and microscopically complete (R0) resection prior to randomization.

Note for surgery: total or distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy according to ESMO guidelines should have been completed for gastric and junctional Siewert type III cancers. Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy with two field lymphadenectomy should have been performed for junctional Siewert type I cancers and lower oesophageal adenocarcinomas. For Siewert type II cancers either total gastrectomy with D2-lymphadenectomy or oesophagectomy with two field lymphadenectomy should have been completed. Open, minimal invasive or hybrid surgical approaches are acceptable as long as the requirements above are fulfilled. In frail patients with Siewert I or II, transhiatal oesophagectomy with lymphadenectomy in the lower mediastinum without transthoracic access is acceptable. Regardless of the type of surgery a minimum of 16 (gastric cancer) or 7 lymph nodes (in case of oesophageal carcinoma) should have been resected and examined (ref TNM 8 eme edition)

I4. Low risk of disease recurrence, defined by the following criteria:

  • Absence of lymph node involvement (ypN0), assessed on a min. of 16 or 7 lymph nodes according to the localization and,
  • Either ypT0-2 (all TRG grade) or ypT3 (with TRG 1a-b according to Becker classification or TRG1-2 according to Mandard's classification), I5. ECOG Performance Status 0-1, I6. Patients fit to receive post-operative chemotherapy, I7. Interval between the date of surgery and the date of randomization no longer than 10 weeks, I8. Adequate organs function defined as : Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1.5 x 109/L; Platelets ≥ 100 x 109/L; Haemoglobin ≥ 9 g/dL (without transfusion within 7 days); Serum creatinine AND Calculated creatinine clearance as per MDRD or CKD-EPI formula ≤ 1.5 upper limit of normal (ULN) AND ≥ 40 mL/min /1.73m²; Serum total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 ULN OR Direct bilirubin ≤ ULN for patients with total bilirubin levels > 1.5 ULN (except for patients with Gilbert disease for whom a total serum bilirubin ≤ 3ULN is acceptable); AST and ALT ≤ 3 ULN; International Normalized Ratio (INR) and activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT)≤ 1.5 ULN .

I9. No contraindication to study assessments, I10. Signed and dated informed consent for prior to any study-specific procedure, I11. Women of childbearing potential accepting to use highly effective contraceptive measures or abstain from heterosexual activity, for the course of the study and at least an- 9 months after the end of the treatment with oxaliplatin - 6 months after the end of the treatment with fluorouracil - 2 months after the end of the treatment with docetaxel and men must use contraception during treatment and at least - 6 months after the end of the treatment with oxaliplatin, - 3 months after the end of the treatment with fluorouracil - 4 months after the end of the treatment with docetaxel.

I12. Patient must be covered by a medical insurance or equivalent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • E1. Oesophageal squamous cell carcinomas, E2. Tumour with Deficient MisMatch Repair (MMR) and/or Microsatellite Instability status, E3. Dihydro Pyrimidine Dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency, NB: if not previously done, the following blood chemistry level must be perform at screening, : blood uracil level - uracilemia dosing result is mandatory prior the inclusion E4. Persistent toxicities related to prior treatment of grade>1, E5. QTcF longer than 450 msec for men and longer than 470 msec for women, E6. Hypokalemia OR Hypomagnesemia OR Hypocalcemia Grade>1

E7. Contraindication to postoperative treatment (FLOT):

  • Known history of hypersensitivity to fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, docetaxel or calcium folinate to any of their excipients, according to the SmPCs of these products OR
  • Peripheral sensory neuropathy with functional impairment prior to first treatment according the SmPC of oxaliplatin OR
  • Clinically significant active heart disease or myocardial infarction within 6 months OR
  • Recent or concomitant treatment with brivudine or recent treatment with live vaccines (minimal wash out period before randomisation: 4 weeks) E8. Any concurrent chemotherapy, Investigational product for cancer treatment. E9. Concurrent enrolment in another clinical study, unless it is an observational (non-interventional) clinical study E10. Suspicion of serious infection, E11. Pregnant or breastfeeding woman, E12. Patient under tutorship or curatorship of deprived of liberty.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental strategy: surveillance without FLOT post-operative chemotherapy

    Other: observation alone

  • No intervention
    Standard strategy : post-operative chemotherapy (4 cycles of FLOT)

    Patients will received 4 cycles of FLOT after surgery.

Interventions

  • Otherobservation alone

    Patient will not received post-operative chemotherapy. There will be only surveillance until progression.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 3 year Overall Survival rate

    The primary endpoint will the 3-year Overall Survival (OS) rate, described as the proportion of patients still alive 3 years after the date of randomization.

    Time frame: From the date of randomisation to 3 years post-randomisation follow-up visit.

  2. 3 year disease-free survival rate

    The co-primary endpoint is the 3-year Disease-Free Survival rate, considered as a binary variable with a success defined as being relapse-free at 3 years.

    Time frame: Time from the date of randomisation to 3 year post-randomisation follow-up visit

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall survival

    The overall survival (OS) will be defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause or to the date of last contact if patient is still alive (censored patients).

    Time frame: Time from the date of randomisation to the date of death due to any cause or to the date of last contact if patient is still alive (censored patients), assessed up to 60 months.

  2. Disease-Free Survival (DFS)

    The Disease-Free Survival (DFS) will be defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented relapse of the disease or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Patients alive and disease-free at the time of the analysis will be censored at the date of their last tumoral evaluation.

    Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of the first documented relapse of the disease or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 60 months.

  3. Type of Relapses

    The relapses will be described by their location (either locoregional or distant relapse).

    Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of the first documented relapse of the disease, assessed up to 60 months.

  4. The tolerability profile

    The tolerability profile will be assessed continuously using the NCI-CTC AE version 5.0. All Adverse Events (AE), whichever their relationship with study treatments, all Serious AE, all Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reactions and all toxic deaths, will be reported.

    Time frame: From date of randomization to 3 years follow-up visit or death due to any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 60 months

  5. The health-related quality of life by QLQ-C30

    The health-related quality of life will be assessed using the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30). Descriptive statistics and graphs will be reported to evaluate Quality of life in the 2 study arms. Mixed model for repeated measure and time to deterioration will be used to analyse longitudinal Quality of life.

    Time frame: At Baseline and every year after randomisation during 3 years.

  6. The nutritional status by food intake changes

    The nutritional status will be assessed at baseline and during the course of treatment by a descriptive analysis of food intake changes.

    Time frame: At baseline, every 3 months visits during the first 2 years then every 6 months until 3 years post-randomisation.

  7. ctDNA positivity

    The ctDNA positivity will be described in each arm in terms of proportion of positivity at each time point and delay between ctDNA positivity and recurrence documented on imaging.

    Time frame: At baseline, every 3 months visits during the first 2 years then every 6 months until 3 years post-randomisation.

  8. The feasibility of using a standardized pathological report

    The feasibility of using a standardized pathological report will be described in the whole study population by the adherence to the standardized report (proportion of patients with a report and quality of filling).

    Time frame: At baseline visit only

  9. The health-related quality of life by QLQ-OG25

    The health-related quality of life will be assessed using the Gastric Cancer module (EORTC QLQ-OG25). Descriptive statistics and graphs will be reported to evaluate Quality of life in the 2 study arms. Mixed model for repeated measure and time to deterioration will be used to analyse longitudinal Quality of life.

    Time frame: At Baseline and every year after randomisation during 3 years.

  10. The nutritional status by sarcopenia

    The nutritional status will be assessed at baseline and during the course of treatment by a descriptive analysis of sarcopenia. It will be analysed with muscle mass evaluation (computed tomography scans at lumbar level 3).

    Time frame: At baseline, every 3 months visits during the first 2 years then every 6 months until 3 years post-randomisation.

  11. The physical performance

    The physical performance will be assessed at baseline and during the course of treatment by a descriptive analysis of handgrip test.

    Time frame: At baseline, every 3 months visits during the first 2 years then every 6 months until 3 years post-randomisation.

  12. The nutritional status by systemic inflammation (CRP)

    The nutritional status will be assessed at baseline and during the course of treatment by a descriptive analysis of measurements of serum C-reactive protein (CRP).

    Time frame: At baseline, every 3 months visits during the first 2 years then every 6 months until 3 years post-randomisation.

  13. The nutritional status by measurements of albumin

    The nutritional status will be assessed at baseline and during the course of treatment by a descriptive analysis of measurements of albumin.

    Time frame: At baseline, every 3 months visits during the first 2 years then every 6 months until 3 years post-randomisation.

  14. The nutritional status by weight changes

    The nutritional status will be assessed at baseline and during the course of treatment by a descriptive analysis of weight changes.

    Time frame: At baseline, every 3 months visits during the first 2 years then every 6 months until 3 years post-randomisation.

  15. The nutritional status by body mass index evaluation

    The nutritional status will be assessed at baseline and during the course of treatment by a descriptive analysis of body mass index (BMI) evaluation.

    Time frame: At baseline, every 3 months visits during the first 2 years then every 6 months until 3 years post-randomisation.

07

Study locations

3 sites
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 18, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06933966
Lead sponsor
Centre Leon Berard
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 18, 2025
Start date
Sep 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 1, 2032 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 18, 2025

Study contacts

Séverine METZGER
Contact
severine.metzger@lyon.unicancer.fr
+ 33478782786
Christelle DE LA FOUCHARDIERE, MD
principal investigator · Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Department of Medical Oncology

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion