ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06931223Updated Apr 17, 2025

Efficacy of Gut-Brain Neuromodulators for Functional Dyspepsia

An interventional study of Flupentixol-Melitracen + Lansoprazole and Lansoprazole in Functioanl Dyspepsia, sponsored by RenJi Hospital. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-17.

Sponsored by RenJi Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Sep 2025, 1 year 2 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The use of Neuromodulators is now recognized by international consensus as effective in improving Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction (DGBIs). However, the digestive mind-body concept of therapeutic drugs is still in the experience-based treatment stage, and there is a lack of clinical studies in the field of DGBIs. Although numerous studies have been conducted to confirm the safety of Neuromodulators for the treatment of DGBIs, the current functional dyspepsia (FD) treatment is still awaiting further explorations and accumulations. In addition, neuromodulators, like Flupentixol-Melitracen (FM), are often used as a second-line treatment option for FD after the failure of acid-suppressive therapy with proton pump inhibitors, etc. However, the efficacy of conventional drugs for FD is mediocre, which often leads to recurrent and prolonged symptoms, seriously affecting patients' confidence in treatment and their quality of life, and the repeated visits to the clinic also create a huge economic burden for the society. Therefore, we conducted a clinical trial to verify whether FM can be used as the first-line therapy to improve the efficacy of FD patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Functioanl Dyspepsia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Dyspepsia

372 studies on the registry are indexed under Dyspepsia; 67 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 89 across 302 interventional studies indexed under Dyspepsia.

Browse Dyspepsia studies →

Lead sponsor

RenJi Hospital is the lead sponsor of 550 studies on the registry; 247 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. adult patients with primary FD who meet the diagnostic criteria for Roman IV;
  2. able to complete the questionnaire, trial evaluation and sign the written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. organic gastrointestinal diseases by gastroenteroscopy within 6 months;
  2. severe insufficiency of heart, liver, kidney, lung and other important organs and with congenital diseases;
  3. allergic to the drugs used in this study
  4. being pregnant, lactating or planning to become pregnant;
  5. are taking or have taken monoamine oxidase inhibitors within the past 5 weeks;
  6. have a known risk of narrow angle glaucoma.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Patients were treated with Flupentixol-Melitracen (FM) plus lansoprazole for 2 weeks

    Drug: Flupentixol-Melitracen + Lansoprazole

  • Experimental
    Patients were treated with placebo plus lansoprazole for 2 weeks

    Drug: Lansoprazole

Interventions

  • DrugFlupentixol-Melitracen + Lansoprazole

    Flupentixol-Melitracen and Lansoprazole for the treatment of functional dyspepsia.

  • DrugLansoprazole

    Placebo and Lansoprazole for functional dyspepsia.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Leuven Postprandial Distress Scale (LPDS) score

    The LPDS questionnaire contains 8 symptoms, namely early satiation, postprandial fullness, upper abdominal bloating, epigastric pain, epigastric burning, nausea, belching, and heartburn. Each symptom was rated on a severity scale of 0-4. The mean of the early satiation, postprandial fullness, and upper abdominal bloating scores was calculated as the postprandial distress syndrome score, and the mean of the epigastric pain, epigastric burning scores was calculated as the epigastric pain syndrome. Changes in LPDS score during the treatment period were assessed.

    Time frame: Until the end of the study, up to 14 weeks

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Apr 2025; primary completion for Sep 2025, 5 months later.

Of 71 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Dyspepsia, half reached primary completion within 18 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 28. This study's planned 5 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 79 studies reached it within 17 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 28.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 31, 2025
First posted
Apr 17, 2025
StartEst.
Apr 10, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Sep 10, 2025
CompletionEst.
Sep 10, 2025
Last update
Apr 17, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 17, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06931223
Lead sponsor
RenJi Hospital
Responsible party
Shengliang Chen (Professor, RenJi Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 17, 2025
Start date
Apr 10, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 10, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 10, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 17, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion