CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06930378S-DIEPUpdated Apr 16, 2025

Improvement in Breast Skin Sensibility After Breast Reconstruction: a Comparison of 3 Surgical Techniques

An interventional study of Nerve Suture in Breast Cancer Surgery, Reconstruction Breast Surgery and Sensitization, sponsored by Patricia Esther Engels. Recruiting at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-16.

Sponsored by Patricia Esther Engels · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
63
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if nerve sutures in free flap breast reconstruction can optimize sensibility in the reconstructed breast in patients opting for DIEP flap breast reconstruction due to breast cancer or genetic conditions. Affected women 18 to 80 years old can be included. The main question is:

If a nerve suture was carried out, can pressure be felt better on the reconstructed breast after 12 months? If a nerve suture was carried out, will better sensibility and quality of life be felt and perceived (questionnaire) at 12 and 24 months after the initial operation ? Researchers will compare two different nerve suture techniques and no nerve suture to one another to see if and which nerve suture optimizes sensibility.

Participants will have regular visits and follow-up controls, during which

  • their sensibility will be tested multimodally,
  • they will fill out questionnaires
  • skin biopsies will be taken.
Read the detailed description

Breast reconstruction with autologous tissue is one of the most important methods: The DIEP (deep inferior epigastric artery perforator) flap is today's workhorse in autologous reconstruction. Routinely, the arteries and veins of the donor- and recipient sites are connected, but not the nerves. The sensory recovery is an undervalued aspect despite the disadvantages of insensate flaps. Connection of the abdominal flap skin's nerves to the breast region's nerves allows sensitized reconstruction. The research project aims to make sensitized flap-based breast reconstruction the standard method by proving its superiority, using the sensory testing with Semmes-Weinstein-Monofilament (pressure threshold) as the primary outcome measured before surgery and 12 months post-surgery. Therefore, patients will be randomized in three groups:

  1. sensitization with direct nerve suture or
  2. autograft or
  3. no sensitization. Moreover, no previous studies have analyzed the potential changes in flap skin with proteomics, thus justifying our secondary objective.

The hypothesis is that flaps with nerve suture(s) have better sensibility. The main outcome will be the sensory testing (pressure threshold). As secondary outcomes the questionnaire will show the patients' quality of life, and the proteomic analysis, should, according to our hypothesis, show that quantity and expression of the proteins of flap skin with nerve suture are closer to normal skin than without nerve suture.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer Surgery
  • Reconstruction Breast Surgery
  • Sensitization
  • DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • free flap
  • breast reconstruction
  • autologous-based reconstruction
  • neurotization
  • sensory recovery
  • post-mastectomy sensation
  • autologous breast reconstruction
  • DIEP flap
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

12,544 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 2,892 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 63 is below the median of 72 across 9,303 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Patricia Esther Engels as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

A) Pilot study

Inclusion criteria:

  • 18-80 years old
  • having received DIEP flap breast reconstruction with a flap not completely buried
  • having given written informed consent for participating in the study

Exclusion criteria:

  • postoperative radiotherapy on the flap
  • neurological conditions as diabetic neuropathy, alcoholism or any other severe underlying peripheral neuropathy including chemotherapy-induced neuropathy or neuropathy induced by other medications
  • active smoking
  • language barrier
  • pregnancy or lactating women

B) Main study

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 to 80 years old
  • having given written informed consent for participating in the study
  • receiving immediate or delayed unilateral DIEP breast reconstruction with a DIEP flap which will not be completely buried

Exclusion Criteria:

  • autologous reconstruction where the flap is completely buried
  • patients in need of both-sided reconstruction (double DIEP)
  • postoperative radiotherapy on the flap
  • neurological conditions as diabetic neuropathy, alcoholism, or any other severe underlying peripheral neuropathy including chemotherapy-induced neuropathy or neuropathy induced by other medications
  • active smoking
  • language barrier
  • pregnancy at time of planned DIEP flap surgery and lactation
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
63 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    no nerve suture

    No nerve suture will be carried out.

  • Experimental
    direct nerve suture

    Epineural coaptation of one nerve of the flap to one nerve of the breast region

    Procedure: Nerve Suture

  • Experimental
    interposition of an autograft

    Epineural coaptation intercostal nerve flap to autograft (from another intercostal nerve of the flap) to intercostal nerve of the breast = interposition of an autograft

    Procedure: Nerve Suture

Interventions

  • ProcedureNerve Suture

    Sensory nerve coaptations will be performed 1. either by suturing the donor to the recipient nerve immediately (1 coaptation) 2. or by interposing an autograft originating from the zone of the flap to be discarded (2 coaptations). The anterior cutaneous branch (ACB) of the 3rd or 4th intercostal nerve (ICN) will be connected to the sensory branch of the 10th, 11th or 12th ICN of the flap.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Semmes-Weinstein-Monofilament-Test

    The results of one modality of the sensory testing, the Semmes-Weinstein-Monofilament-Test for pressure perception. The breast will be divided into 9 zones, which will all be measured with the Semmes Weinstein monofilament 20-piece full kit (unit: grams of force) at the given time (see time frame).

    Time frame: At 12-months-follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in breast sensation

    Semmes-Weinstein monoflament The breast will be divided into 9 zones, which will all be measured with the Semmes Weinstein monofilament 20-piece full kit at the given times (see time frame). The resulting monofilament values (unit: grams of force) are examined over the various specified periods and the delta is determined.

    Time frame: day-1/1week/3/6/12/24 months postop

  2. Sensory recovery to DIEP flap

    2-point-discrimination, i.e. threshold distance between two points that are perceived as separate in millimeters. Instrument: Aesthesiometer. 9 zones of the breast.

    Time frame: 12 months postop

  3. Change in breast sensation

    2-point-discrimination, i.e. threshold distance between two points that are perceived as separate in millimeters. Instrument: Aesthesiometer. 9 zones of the breast. Measurement at the specified times (see time frame), determination of the delta.

    Time frame: day-1/1week/3/6/12/24 months postop

  4. Sensory recovery to DIEP flap

    Vibration perception with tuning forks of 256 and 32 Hz. Binary: yes/no on 9 zones of the breast.

    Time frame: 12 months postop

  5. Change in breast sensation

    Vibration perception with tuning forks of 256 and 32 Hz. 9 zones of the breast. Binary: yes/no Evaluation of the difference in the number of zones of the breast with perception of vibration, delta over different time points.

    Time frame: day-1/1week/3/6/12/24 months postop

  6. Sensory recovery to DIEP flap

    Temperature perception. Metal rods of 6°C and 37°C. Patients have to indicate which rod feels colder that the other. Capacity of differentiation of temperature: yes/no on 9 zones of the breast.

    Time frame: 12 months postop

  7. Change in breast sensation

    Temperature perception. Metal rods of 6°C and 37°C. Patients have to indicate which rod feels colder that the other. Capacity of differentiation of temperature: yes/no on 9 zones of the breast. Testing at given time points (see time frame), Calculation of delta of number of zones with distinction.

    Time frame: day-1/1week/3/6/12/24 months postop

  8. Sensory recovery to DIEP flap

    Temperature surface. FLIR thermal camera, flap monitor versus whole breast and contralateral breast surface temperature, difference in temperature in degree Celsius.

    Time frame: 12 months postop

  9. Change in breast sensation

    Temperature surface. FLIR thermal camera, flap monitor versus whole breast and contralateral breast surface temperature, difference in temperature in degree Celsius. Calculation of delta over given time points (see time frame)

    Time frame: day-1/1week/3/6/12/24 months postop

  10. Sensory recovery to DIEP flap

    Sharp/dull: Instrument system used: 18G needle / cotton swab, on nine areas of the breast. * Each area will be tested 3 consecutive times with both objects (i.e., 6 measurements per area) * The distinction between prick and gentle pressure will be considered successful if the patient responds correctly 5 times out of 6 or 6 times out of 6 (distinction ability: yes/no)

    Time frame: 12 months postop

  11. Change in breast sensation

    Sharp/dull: Instrument system used: 18G needle / cotton swab, on nine areas of the breast. * Each area will be tested 3 consecutive times with both objects (i.e., 6 measurements per area) * The distinction between prick and gentle pressure will be considered successful if the patient responds correctly 5 times out of 6 or 6 times out of 6 (distinction ability: yes/no) Delta calculation over given time points (see time frame)

    Time frame: day-1/1week/3/6/12/24 months postop

  12. Breast-specific health-related QoL

    Breast-Q®

    Time frame: 12 months postop

  13. Breast-specific health-related QoL (change over time)

    Breast-Q®, delta of points over time (see time frame)

    Time frame: Day -1, 12 &24 months postop

  14. Operative time

    Minutes for nerve coaptation(s)

    Time frame: At time of 1st operation

  15. Changes to DIEP flap skin

    Proteomics, neuroprotein quantification

    Time frame: A) Pilot study Postoperatively at any time of follow-up-interventions. B) Main study At time of 1st operation and at 6-months-follow-up

  16. Sensory recovery to DIEP flap

    2-point-discrimination, i.e. threshold distance between two points that are perceived as separate in millimeters. Instrument: Aesthesiometer.

    Time frame: 12 months postop

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Geneva University Hospitals
    Geneva, 1205, Switzerland
    • Patricia E Engels, MD · Contact · patricia.engels@hug.ch · +41795537557
    • Axelle Serre, MD · Contact · axelle.serre@hug.de · +41795538642
    • Patricia E Engels, MD · Principal investigator
    • Axelle Serre, MD · Sub investigator
    • Stephanie N Schulz, MD · Sub investigator
    • Srinivas Madduri, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Daniel F Kalbermatten, PhD · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Puonti HK, Broth TA, Soinila SO, Hallikainen HK, Jaaskelainen SK. How to Assess Sensory Recovery After Breast Reconstruction Surgery? Clin Breast Cancer. 2017 Oct;17(6):471-485. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.04.011. Epub 2017 Apr 29. PubMed 28673764 ↗
  • Blondeel PN, Demuynck M, Mete D, Monstrey SJ, Van Landuyt K, Matton G, Vanderstraeten GG. Sensory nerve repair in perforator flaps for autologous breast reconstruction: sensational or senseless? Br J Plast Surg. 1999 Jan;52(1):37-44. doi: 10.1054/bjps.1998.3011. PubMed 10343589 ↗
  • Spiegel AJ, Salazar-Reyes H, Izaddoost S, Khan FN. A novel method for neurotization of deep inferior epigastric perforator and superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Jan;123(1):29e-30e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181905564. No abstract available. PubMed 19116520 ↗
  • Bijkerk E, Beugels J, van Kuijk SMJ, Lataster A, van der Hulst RRWJ, Tuinder SMH. Clinical Relevance of Sensory Nerve Coaptation in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction Evaluated Using the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Nov 1;150(5):959e-969e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009617. Epub 2022 Aug 22. PubMed 35993852 ↗
  • Shiah E, Laikhter E, Comer CD, Manstein SM, Bustos VP, Bain PA, Lee BT, Lin SJ. Neurotization in Innervated Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Techniques and Outcomes. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022 Sep;75(9):2890-2913. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.06.006. Epub 2022 Jun 17. PubMed 35872020 ↗
  • Ducic I, Yoon J, Momeni A, Ahcan U. Anatomical Considerations to Optimize Sensory Recovery in Breast Neurotization with Allograft. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Nov 7;6(11):e1985. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001985. eCollection 2018 Nov. PubMed 30881792 ↗
  • Spiegel AJ, Menn ZK, Eldor L, Kaufman Y, Dellon AL. Breast Reinnervation: DIEP Neurotization Using the Third Anterior Intercostal Nerve. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2013 Dec 6;1(8):e72. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000008. eCollection 2013 Nov. PubMed 25289267 ↗
  • Beugels J, Cornelissen AJM, van Kuijk SMJ, Lataster A, Heuts EM, Piatkowski A, Spiegel AJ, van der Hulst RRWJ, Tuinder SMH. Sensory Recovery of the Breast following Innervated and Noninnervated DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Aug;144(2):178e-188e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005802. PubMed 31348332 ↗
  • Hamilton KL, Kania KE, Spiegel AJ. Post-mastectomy sensory recovery and restoration. Gland Surg. 2021 Jan;10(1):494-497. doi: 10.21037/gs.2020.03.22. PubMed 33634007 ↗
  • Bijkerk E, van Kuijk SMJ, Lataster A, van der Hulst RRWJ, Tuinder SMH. Breast sensibility in bilateral autologous breast reconstruction with unilateral sensory nerve coaptation. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jun;181(3):599-610. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05645-y. Epub 2020 Apr 28. PubMed 32346819 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 16, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06930378
Lead sponsor
Patricia Esther Engels
Responsible party
Patricia Esther Engels (Principal Investigator, Consultant and Senior Clinical Researcher, University Hospital, Geneva) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Apr 16, 2025
Start date
Apr 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Feb 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 16, 2025

Study contacts

Patricia E Engels, MD
Contact
patricia.engels@hug.ch
+41795537557
Axelle Serre, MD
Contact
axelle.serre@usb.ch
+41795538642
Patricia E Engels, MD
principal investigator · University Hospital, Geneva

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion