ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06925139Updated Aug 17, 2026

Efficacy of Non-Ablative Radiofrequency on Vaginal and Sexual Health in Postmenopausal Women

An interventional study of Non-ablative monopolar radiofrequency treatment in Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause, Vaginal Health and Sexual Dysfunction, sponsored by University of Castilla-La Mancha. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to female participants aged 40 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-17.

Sponsored by University of Castilla-La Mancha · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
62
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 65 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study will test if non-ablative monopolar radiofrequency can help improve vaginal tissue and reduce symptoms of Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause (GSM) in postmenopausal women. The study is a randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial in which participants and outcome assessors were masked to treatment allocation. The study will examine the impact of the treatment on sexual function, vaginal health, and quality of life over an extended period. There will be two groups in the study: one will receive the non-ablative monopolar radiofrequency treatment, and the other will receive the placebo treatment. Participants will have six treatment sessions and will be checked at the start, end, and three months post-treatment.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of non-ablative monopolar radiofrequency (RF) treatment in improving vaginal tissue regeneration and alleviating symptoms of Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause (GSM) in postmenopausal women. This randomized clinical trial will include two groups: one receiving the active RF treatment and the other receiving a placebo treatment. The study will include six treatment sessions for each participant, with evaluations conducted at baseline, at the end of the treatment period, and three months post-treatment.

The sample size was calculated to detect a between-group difference of 4.5 points in the total FSFI score, with a two-sided α of 0.05, 80% power, and an assumed standard deviation of 6. Allowing for an anticipated 10% attrition rate, 31 participants per group were required (total N = 62).

Participants will be postmenopausal women who have experienced more than one year of amenorrhea and exhibit symptoms of GSM, such as vaginal dryness, irritation, and sexual dysfunction.

The primary outcome measures will include improvements in vaginal health assessed through clinical examination and patient-reported outcomes related to sexual function.

Secondary outcome measures will involve the analysis of vaginal pH, the maturation index of vaginal epithelial cells, and any adverse events reported during the study. The intervention involves the use of a non-ablative monopolar RF device applied intracavitarily. The placebo group will undergo the same procedure without the active RF component.

The study is conducted in accordance with ethical standards and has been reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee for Clinical Research with Medicines of the City of Toledo. Data will be collected and analyzed to determine the effectiveness of the treatment in comparison to the placebo, and results will contribute to the understanding of non-ablative RF treatments in menopausal health.

02

Conditions studied

  • Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause
  • Vaginal Health
  • Sexual Dysfunction

Keywords

  • Non-ablative radiofrequency
  • Vaginal Health
  • Sexual Health
  • Postmenopause
  • Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause
  • Sexual Dysfunction
  • Women's Health
03

In context

Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological

385 studies on the registry are indexed under Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological; 72 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 62 is below the median of 72 across 263 interventional studies indexed under Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological.

Browse Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Castilla-La Mancha is the lead sponsor of 107 studies on the registry; 26 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 40 and 65 years.
  • women (defined as no menstrual period for at least 12 months).
  • Experiencing symptoms of Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause (GSM), such as vaginal dryness, irritation, or discomfort.
  • Experiencing discomfort or complaints during vaginal penetration. Engaging in sexual activity (at least once a month).
  • Willing to participate in the study and sign the form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presenting with active vaginal infections.
  • Presence of neurological, neoplastic, or sexually transmitted diseases.
  • Presenting with vulvodynia or vaginismus.
  • Prolapse grade 2 or higher.
  • Presenting with altered sensitivity in the pelvic area.
  • Being a pacemaker carrier or having any device that contains batteries.
  • Hormonal treatment with estrogens in the last 3 months.
  • History of radiotherapy in the pelvic area.
  • Recent pelvic surgery (within the last 6 months).
  • Being on anticoagulant treatment.
  • Having undergone laser treatment in the pelvic area or ablative vaginal rejuvenation in the last 6 months.
  • Cognitive impairment that prevents answering the questionnaires.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
62 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Treatment Group

    6 treatment sessions of non-ablative radiofrequency, with a frequency of 1 session per week. The following protocol will be followed: Preparation (5 minutes): Resistive monopolar electrode applied to vulvar area with gradual heating (sensation 4-5/10). Main Phase (10 minutes): Intracavitary capacitive electrode used to reach and maintain 41-43°C throughout the 10-minute application. Final Phase (5 minutes): Repeat resistive electrode application with subthermal effect (sensation 3-4/10).

    Device: Non-ablative monopolar radiofrequency treatment

  • Sham comparator
    Placebo Group

    Participants in this group will receive the same treatment protocol, but without the application of heat.

    Device: Non-ablative monopolar radiofrequency treatment

Interventions

  • DeviceNon-ablative monopolar radiofrequency treatment

    Protocol for the experimental group: Tissue preparation phase: 5 minutes with the circular resistive monopolar electrode, applying slow circular or semicircular movements in the perineal area. The temperature will be gradually increased based on the patient's temperature perception, ensuring it remains comfortable (approximately 5 out of 10). Main phase: 10 minutes using the intracavitary capacitive electrode connected to the PLUMA handle, lightly resting it on the tissues and continuously moving the electrode. The intravaginal temperature was maintained at 41-43°C throughout the 10-minute intracavitary application. Final phase: 5 minutes with the circular resistive monopolar electrode, applying it similarly to the preparatory phase, with a subthermal effect, reaching a self-reported thermal sensation of 3 to 4 out of 10. Participants in this group will receive the same treatment protocol, but with radiofrequency energy disabled.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)

    Multidimensional questionnaire evaluates sexual function over the past 4 weeks. The total score ranges from 2.0 (severe dysfunction) to 36.0 (no dysfunction). Sexual dysfunction was defined as a score equal to or below 26.55

    Time frame: Baseline, end of treatment period (6 weeks), and three months post-treatment.

  2. Change in Vaginal Health Index (VHI)

    A tool that evaluates five parameters: vaginal elasticity, vaginal secretion (type and consistency), pH, mucosal epithelial integrity, and vaginal moisture. Each parameter was scored on a scale from 1 (most unfavorable condition) to 5 (optimal condition), with a maximum possible score of 25 points. In cases where the score was below 15, the vagina was considered atrophic.

    Time frame: Baseline, end of treatment period (6 weeks), and three months post-treatment.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in sexual desire

    Assessed by Female Sexual Function Index in individual domain of sexual desire. Score from 1,2 (worst) to 6 (best)

    Time frame: Baseline, end of treatment period (6 weeks), and three months post-treatment.

  2. Change in sexual arousal

    Assessed by Female Sexual Function Index in individual domain of sexual arousal. Score from 0 (worst) to 6 (best)

    Time frame: Baseline, end of treatment period (6 weeks), and three months post-treatment.

  3. Change in sexual lubrication

    Assessed by Female Sexual Function Index in individual domain of sexual lubrication. Score from 1,2 (worst) to 6 (best)

    Time frame: Baseline, end of treatment period (6 weeks), and three months post-treatment.

  4. Change in sexual orgasm

    Assessed by Female Sexual Function Index in individual domain of sexual orgasm. Score from 0 (worst) to 6 (best)

    Time frame: Baseline, end of treatment period (6 weeks), and three months post-treatment.

  5. Change in sexual satisfaction

    Assessed by Female Sexual Function Index in individual domain of sexual satisfaction. Score from 0.8 (worst) to 6 (best)

    Time frame: Baseline, end of treatment period (6 weeks), and three months post-treatment.

  6. Change in sexual pain

    Assessed by Female Sexual Function Index in individual domain of sexual pain. Score from 0 (the worst possible pain) to 6 (no pain).

    Time frame: Baseline, end of treatment period (6 weeks), and three months post-treatment.

  7. Change in vaginal Elasticity

    Assessed by Vaginal Health Index in individual domain of vaginal elasticity. Score from 1 (most unfavorable condition) to 5 (optimal condition)

    Time frame: Baseline, end of treatment period (6 weeks), and three months post-treatment.

  8. Change in Vaginal secretion

    Assessed by Vaginal Health Index in individual domain of vaginal secretion. Score from 1 (most unfavorable condition) to 5 (optimal condition)

    Time frame: Baseline, end of treatment period (6 weeks), and three months post-treatment.

  9. Change in vaginal pH

    Assessed by Vaginal Health Index in individual domain of vaginal pH. Score from 1 (most unfavorable condition) to 5 (optimal condition)

    Time frame: Baseline, end of treatment period (6 weeks), and three months post-treatment.

  10. Change in vaginal Ephitelial integrity

    Assessed by Vaginal Health Index in individual domain of vaginal ephitelial integrity. Score from 1 (most unfavorable condition) to 5 (optimal condition)

    Time frame: Baseline, end of treatment period (6 weeks), and three months post-treatment.

  11. Change in vaginal Moisture

    Assessed by Vaginal Health Index in individual domain of vaginal moisture. Score from 1 (most unfavorable condition) to 5 (optimal condition)

    Time frame: Baseline, end of treatment period (6 weeks), and three months post-treatment.

  12. Change in Vaginal Maturity Index

    The proportion of parabasal, intermediate, and superficial cells in each 100 cells counted on a smear of the upper two-thirds of the vagina.

    Time frame: Baseline, end of treatment period (6 weeks), and three months post-treatment.

  13. Change in Status Estrogen

    This index will be calculated using Meisels' formula: (% intermediate cells × 0.5 + % superficial cells).

    Time frame: Baseline, end of treatment period (6 weeks), and three months post-treatment.

  14. Change in Vaginal Laxity Questionnaire (VLQ)

    7-point Likert-type subjective scale, ranging from very loose to very tight. Scores below 4 (neither loose nor tight) indicate vaginal laxity.

    Time frame: Baseline, end of treatment period (6 weeks), and three months post-treatment.

  15. Change in Pain assessed by NRS

    Pain intensity perceived during the insertion of vaginal dilators of varying diameters (ranging from 20 to 30 mm) will be assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 represents the worst possible pain.

    Time frame: Baseline, end of treatment period (6 weeks), and three months post-treatment.

  16. Change in Urinary Symptoms by International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form

    It is a brief 4-item questionnaire designed to assess the frequency, severity, and impact of urinary incontinence on quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline, end of treatment period (5 weeks), and three months post-treatment.

  17. Change in Health- related quality of Life by SF-12

    It consists of 12 items that yield two summary scores: physical and mental components. The response options follow a Likert-type scale that measures either intensity or frequency. Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with 0 indicating the worst health status and 100 the best.

    Time frame: Baseline, end of treatment period (6 weeks), and three months post-treatment.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Castilla-La Mancha
    Toledo, Toledo 45000, Spain
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Naumova I, Castelo-Branco C. Current treatment options for postmenopausal vaginal atrophy. Int J Womens Health. 2018 Jul 31;10:387-395. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S158913. eCollection 2018. PubMed 30104904 ↗
  • Potter N, Panay N. Vaginal lubricants and moisturizers: a review into use, efficacy, and safety. Climacteric. 2021 Feb;24(1):19-24. doi: 10.1080/13697137.2020.1820478. Epub 2020 Sep 29. PubMed 32990054 ↗
  • Wiegerinck AIP, Thomsen A, Hisdal J, Kalvoy H, Tronstad C. Electrical Impedance Plethysmography Versus Tonometry To Measure the Pulse Wave Velocity in Peripheral Arteries in Young Healthy Volunteers: a Pilot Study. J Electr Bioimpedance. 2021 Dec 30;12(1):169-177. doi: 10.2478/joeb-2021-0020. eCollection 2021 Jan. PubMed 35111272 ↗
  • Shifren JL, Crandall CJ, Manson JE. Menopausal Hormone Therapy. JAMA. 2019 Jun 25;321(24):2458-2459. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.5346. No abstract available. PubMed 31145419 ↗
  • Roy S, Caillouette JC, Roy T, Faden JS. Vaginal pH is similar to follicle-stimulating hormone for menopause diagnosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 May;190(5):1272-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.12.015. PubMed 15167829 ↗
  • undefined
  • Tan O, Bradshaw K, Carr BR. Management of vulvovaginal atrophy-related sexual dysfunction in postmenopausal women: an up-to-date review. Menopause. 2012 Jan;19(1):109-17. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e31821f92df. PubMed 22011753 ↗
  • Sarmento ACA, Costa APF, Vieira-Baptista P, Giraldo PC, Eleuterio J Jr, Goncalves AK. Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause: Epidemiology, Physiopathology, Clinical Manifestation and Diagnostic. Front Reprod Health. 2021 Nov 15;3:779398. doi: 10.3389/frph.2021.779398. eCollection 2021. PubMed 36304000 ↗
  • Takahashi TA, Johnson KM. Menopause. Med Clin North Am. 2015 May;99(3):521-34. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2015.01.006. PubMed 25841598 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06925139
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 13, 2025
Start date
Jun 15, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2024
Completion
Dec 30, 2024
Last update
Aug 17, 2026

Study contacts

Claudia Quezada Bascuñán, Ms
principal investigator · University of Castilla-La Mancha
Asunción Ferri Morales, PhD
study chair · University of Castilla-La Mancha

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion