ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06921707Updated Jul 30, 2026

Pilot Trial for WounDx™ Clinical Decision Support Tool

An interventional study of Clinical Decision Support Tool and Standard of Care (SOC) in Wounds, Wounds and Injuries and Extremity Injury, sponsored by Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine. Recruiting at 5 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-30.

Sponsored by Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Device feasibility

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2026; still recruiting 6 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this research is to evaluate the overall use of the WounDx medical device in a clinical setting, such as a hospital. The WounDx device is experimental and not yet approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). WounDx uses information about a patient's wound to generate a report that a surgeon may use to help determine when to close or not close the wound. The final decision to close the wound remains with the surgeon. The results from this pilot trial will inform a larger pivotal trial.

Read the detailed description

Determining if a large, traumatic extremity wound is ready for successful delayed closure remains a challenge, as approximately 23%-25% of these wounds fail to heal after delayed closure is attempted, even when treated with aggressive surgical interventions, including debridement every 2-3 days. This pilot trial uses WounDx™, a device that aids clinicians in identifying extremity wounds that are likely to heal after surgical closure. The device is a Clinical Decision Support Tool (CDST) and consists of two main components: an immunoassay to obtain the expression of inflammatory biomarkers and, together with clinical data input, an interpretative algorithm. The purpose of the device is to identify wounds likely to proceed through normal phases of wound healing and, as a result, provide the clinician with a wound-specific prediction that an open traumatic extremity wound will heal successfully and remain closed if delayed closure is performed. The pilot trial serves as a proof of concept (POC) trial and establishes the overall feasibility of clinical operations (including recruitment, randomization, implementation of the intervention, and data collection). Trial enrollment is planned only for adults (≥18 to ≤65 years) with at least one traumatic extremity wound ≥75cm 2 , being treated with Negative Wound Pressure Therapy (NPWT), and delayed primary closure including split thickness skin grafting and rotational or free flaps. Local and systemic inflammatory biomarker expression will be assessed in wound effluent samples collected during subject treatment. These results will be input with other associated clinical data to WounDx™ to allow the device to provide a report including a recommendation on whether a specific wound should be closed within 48-72h of the previous debridement surgery, which is consistent with the current clinical practice guidelines. This pilot trial will inform the conduct of a larger, pivotal clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of WounDx™ in aiding clinicians identify traumatic extremity wounds ready for surgical closure.

02

Conditions studied

  • Wounds
  • Wounds and Injuries
  • Extremity Injury
  • Traumatic Wounds and Injuries
  • Amputation, Traumatic/Surgery
  • Amputation, Wound
  • Open Fracture Wounds

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Wounds
  • Extremity Injury
  • Clinical Decision Support Tool
  • Delayed Wound Closure
  • Cytokine Biomarkers
  • Wound Effluent
  • Traumatic Extremity Wounds
03

In context

Wounds and Injuries

2,217 studies on the registry are indexed under Wounds and Injuries; 441 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 70 across 1,424 interventional studies indexed under Wounds and Injuries.

Browse Wounds and Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine is the lead sponsor of 86 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (29%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Wound surface area ≥75cm 2
  • Extremity injury (including shoulder and buttock - without visceral communication)
  • Wound amenable to Negative Pressure Wound Therapy using 3M™ V.A.C. ® canisters without gel pack

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Insulin Dependent Diabetes
  • Peripheral Vascular Disease
  • Connective Tissue Disorders
  • Preexisting conditions or immunosuppression therapy
  • Pregnancy
  • Prisoners
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Device feasibility
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Standard of Care

    This is the control group that receives the standard of care of serial wound irrigation, Negative Pressure Wound Therapy, and surgical debridement with the attending clinician determining if a wound is ready to close.

    Procedure: Standard of Care (SOC)

  • Experimental
    WounDx

    This is the intervention group that receives standard of care plus the WounDx™ report to augment the clinicians' judgment regarding the wounds readiness to close.

    Device: Clinical Decision Support Tool

Interventions

  • DeviceClinical Decision Support Tool

    WounDx is a clinical decision support tool that will help augment the clinicians' judgment regarding the wounds readiness to close.

    Also known as: WounDx

  • ProcedureStandard of Care (SOC)

    The standard of care consists of serial wound irrigation, negative pressure wound therapy, and surgical debridement

    Also known as: Serial Wound Irrigation, Negative Wound Pressure Therapy, Surgical Debridement

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Patients from Each Site that Completes the Exploratory Outcome Measures

    The primary outcome will be a report detailing the total number of patients from each site who have successfully completed all exploratory outcome measures. It is expected that a minimum of 3 patients from each site will complete required exploratory outcome measures.

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

5 of 5 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Peoples GE, Jezior JR, Shriver CD. Caring for the wounded in Iraq--a photo essay. N Engl J Med. 2004 Dec 9;351(24):2476-80. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp048327. No abstract available. PubMed 15622566 ↗
  • Owens BD, Kragh JF Jr, Wenke JC, Macaitis J, Wade CE, Holcomb JB. Combat wounds in operation Iraqi Freedom and operation Enduring Freedom. J Trauma. 2008 Feb;64(2):295-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318163b875. PubMed 18301189 ↗
  • Montgomery SP, Swiecki CW, Shriver CD. The evaluation of casualties from Operation Iraqi Freedom on return to the continental United States from March to June 2003. J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Jul;201(1):7-12; discussion 12-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.03.038. PubMed 15978435 ↗
  • Lisboa FA, Dente CJ, Schobel SA, Khatri V, Potter BK, Kirk AD, Elster EA. Utilizing Precision Medicine to Estimate Timing for Surgical Closure of Traumatic Extremity Wounds. Ann Surg. 2019 Sep;270(3):535-543. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003470. PubMed 31348045 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started May 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2026, 4 months after the start.

Of 546 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Wounds and Injuries, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 49. This study's planned 4 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 599 studies reached it within 24 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 48.

Wounds and Injuries covers many different conditions, not one, so the studies compared here vary widely. Read these figures as a rough guide.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 3, 2025
First posted
Apr 10, 2025
StartActual
May 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Sep 20, 2026
CompletionEst.
Sep 20, 2026
Last update
Jul 30, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 30, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06921707
Lead sponsor
Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine
Collaborators
Duke University, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Brooke Army Medical Center, Grady Memorial Hospital, Indiana University Health, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Emory University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 10, 2025
Start date
May 1, 2026
Primary completion
Sep 20, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 20, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 30, 2026

Study contacts

Eric Elster, MD
Contact
eric.elster@usuhs.edu
301-295-3017
Seth Schobel, PhD
Contact
seth.schobel-mchugh@usuhs.edu
301-295-3164
Eric Elster, MD
principal investigator · Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion