CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06921525Updated Sep 30, 2026

Comparing Efficacy of Tea Tree Oil Versus Topical Azithromycin in Treating Dry Eye

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Tea Tree Oil Topical Application Oil and Azithromycin Ophthalmic Solution in Dry Eye, sponsored by Ehab Mohamed Elsayed Mohamed Saad. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-30.

Sponsored by Ehab Mohamed Elsayed Mohamed Saad · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Sep 30, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to compare the effects of azithromycin and tea tree oil on the clinical outcomes and inflammatory profile of patients with MGD-associated DED. By focusing on changes in tear IL-8 and IL-17 levels, the study seeks to provide insights into the differential mechanisms of these two treatments and their potential in addressing inflammation-driven DED.

Read the detailed description

Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial condition affecting the ocular surface, characterized by the loss of tear film homeostasis, resulting in discomfort, visual disturbances, and tear film instability . The prevalence of DED is significant, impacting approximately 5%-50% of the global population, with variability influenced by geographic location, age, and environmental factors . The condition not only affects the quality of life but also poses a substantial economic burden due to increased healthcare utilization and reduced productivity .

A hallmark of DED is its complex pathophysiology, which involves a vicious cycle of tear film instability, hyperosmolarity, and chronic inflammation of the ocular surface. Recent advances underscore the critical interplay between these factors and their contribution to symptomatology . Pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-8 (IL-8) and interleukin-17 (IL-17), have emerged as key mediators of ocular surface inflammation, amplifying the recruitment of neutrophils and T-helper 17 cells, respectively .

Among the various etiologies of DED, meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is recognized as a leading cause. MGD results from abnormalities in the secretion of meibum, a lipid essential for stabilizing the tear film and preventing evaporation . Dysregulation of the lipid layer exacerbates evaporative dry eye and promotes a pro-inflammatory microenvironment, further destabilizing the tear film.

Conventional therapeutic approaches to MGD, such as warm compresses and eyelid hygiene, aim to restore gland function and relieve symptoms. In addition, topical antibiotics, particularly azithromycin, are commonly employed due to their dual antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties . Azithromycin has demonstrated efficacy in improving meibomian gland function and reducing inflammation and improving symptoms of dryness of the eye .

Emerging treatments for MGD have focused on addressing the underlying inflammatory and microbial components. Tea tree oil (TTO), derived from the leaves of Melaleuca alternifolia, has garnered attention due to its antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and demodicidal properties . TTO has demonstrated efficacy in eradicating Demodex mites, microscopic parasites frequently associated with MGD and DED . Despite these promising effects, its impact on tear cytokine modulation remains an area of active investigation .

Preclinical and clinical studies have begun to elucidate the mechanisms by which TTO exerts its effects. For instance, TTO has been shown to inhibit pro-inflammatory pathways, reduce oxidative stress, and enhance epithelial barrier integrity . These findings suggest a broader therapeutic role for TTO in addressing not only MGD but also other ocular surface diseases characterized by inflammation and microbial dysbiosis .

Despite its potential, challenges remain in the widespread adoption of TTO for MGD. Patient tolerability, particularly regarding ocular irritation, is a critical consideration. Additionally, the lack of large-scale, randomized controlled trials limits the generalizability of existing findings .

In conclusion, while conventional therapies for MGD have been effective, emerging treatments such as TTO offer a promising alternative, particularly in addressing inflammation and microbial factors. Understanding the interplay between TTO, cytokines like IL-8 and IL-17, and the ocular surface could pave the way for novel therapeutic paradigms, ultimately improving outcomes for patients with DED and MGD .

02

Conditions studied

  • Dry Eye

Browse trials for

03

In context

Dry Eye Syndromes

1,292 studies on the registry are indexed under Dry Eye Syndromes; 191 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 50 is below the median of 60 across 1,077 interventional studies indexed under Dry Eye Syndromes.

Browse Dry Eye Syndromes studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Ehab Mohamed Elsayed Mohamed Saad as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT) ≤10 seconds.
  • Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score ≥20.
  • Willingness to comply with study requirements and provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of ocular surgery or trauma within the past 6 months.
  • Use of systemic or topical anti-inflammatory medications within 4 weeks prior to enrollment.
  • Known hypersensitivity to azithromycin or tea tree oil.
  • Presence of other ocular surface diseases unrelated to MGD.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group A (Azithromycin group)

    Group A (Azithromycin group): 22 patients who will receive topical azithromycin applied twice daily, along with preservative-free lubricant eye drops five times daily for 4 weeks.

    Drug: Azithromycin Ophthalmic Solution

  • Active comparator
    Group B (Tea Tree Oil group)

    Group B (Tea Tree Oil group): 22 patients who will receive topical tea tree oil applied twice daily, along with preservative-free lubricant eye drops five times daily for 4 weeks.

    Drug: Tea Tree Oil Topical Application Oil

Interventions

  • DrugTea Tree Oil Topical Application Oil

    Tea tree oil (TTO), derived from the leaves of Melaleuca alternifolia,

  • DrugAzithromycin Ophthalmic Solution

    Azithromycin has demonstrated efficacy in improving meibomian gland function and reducing inflammation and improving symptoms of dryness of the eye

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in IL-8 and IL-17 levels .

    Time frame: after 4 weeks of treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in clinical parameters (TBUT, OSDI, DEQS, Schirmer test).

    Change in the parameters TBUT "Tear breakup time'', OSDI ''Ocular Surface Disease Index'', DEQS ''Dry Eye-Related Quality-of-Life Score'' and Schirmer test. TBUT (from less than 5 to more than 10 seconds). OSDI (from 0 to 100 points) where patients rate their responses on a 0 to 4 scale with 0 corresponding to "none of the time" and 4 corresponding to "all of the time" a final score is calculated which ranges from 0 to 100 with scores and based on their OSDI scores, patients can be categorized as having a normal ocular surface (0-12 points) or as having mild (13-22 points), moderate (23-32 points), or severe (33-100 points) ocular surface disease. DEQS (from 0 to 100 points) which is a questionnaire and it was calculated using the following formula: (sum of the degree scores for all questions answered) × 25/(total number of questions answered), with higher scores indicating increased severity of DED symptoms and a greater impact on daily life. Schirmer test (from 0 to 15 mm).

    Time frame: after 4 weeks of treatment

  2. Change in meibomian gland function grading (from 0 to 4)

    Time frame: after 4 weeks of treatment

  3. Change in parameter OSDI (ocular surface disease index) from 0 to 100 points.

    OSDI (from 0 to 100 points) where patients rate their responses on a 0 to 4 scale with 0 corresponding to "none of the time" and 4 corresponding to "all of the time" a final score is calculated which ranges from 0 to 100 with scores and based on their OSDI scores, patients can be categorized as having a normal ocular surface (0-12 points) or as having mild (13-22 points), moderate (23-32 points), or severe (33-100 points) ocular surface disease.

    Time frame: after 4 weeks of treatment

  4. Change in the parameter DEQS (Dry Eye-Related Quality-of-Life Score) from 0 to 100 points.

    DEQS (from 0 to 100 points) which is a questionnaire and it was calculated using the following formula: (sum of the degree scores for all questions answered) × 25/(total number of questions answered), with higher scores indicating increased severity of DED symptoms and a greater impact on daily life.

    Time frame: after 4 weeks of treatment

  5. Change in the parameter Schirmer test (from 0 to 15 mm).

    Change in the parameter Schirmer test (from 0 to 15 mm) as Schirmer test results are interpreted as follows: 0 to 5 mm: extremely dry eyes. 5 to 10 mm: moderately dry eyes. 10 to 15 mm: possible dry eyes.

    Time frame: after 4 weeks of treatment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ebsar Eye Center
    Banhā, Benha 13111, Egypt
08

References and documents

Publications

  • El-Afify DR, Mahmoud RHH, Kotkata FA, Abdelhalim TI, Saad EME. Evaluating the efficacy of topical tea tree oil versus preservative-free azithromycin in the treatment of dry eye disease associated with meibomian gland dysfunction: A randomized controlled trial focusing on tear interleukin levels. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2026 Sep 20;49(6):102843. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2026.102843. Online ahead of print. PubMed 42764009 ↗
09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Sep 30, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Sep 30, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06921525
Lead sponsor
Ehab Mohamed Elsayed Mohamed Saad
Collaborators
Tanta University
Responsible party
Ehab Mohamed Elsayed Mohamed Saad (Lecturer, Benha University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Apr 10, 2025
Start date
Mar 1, 2025
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2025
Completion
Oct 1, 2025
Last update
Sep 30, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion