ClinicalTrials.gg
SuspendedNCT06918665HEALTHUpdated Oct 9, 2026

HEALTH Trial - Healthy Adult Evaluation of Ivermectin Bioequivalence: Infant Versus Standard Formulation

A Phase 1 interventional study of ivermectin infant formula preparation and Standard ivermectin 3mg tablet in Scabies, sponsored by Murdoch Childrens Research Institute. Suspended at 1 site in Australia. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 55 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-09.

Sponsored by Murdoch Childrens Research Institute · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was suspended
Difficulty in finalising the intervention
Updated Oct 9, 2026Start date movedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
52
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 55 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a clinical trial to compare two formulations of the drug ivermectin: the standard 3mg tablet formulation versus a newly developed infant formula preparation. The goal of the trial is to determine if the new formulation functions in the same way, tastes the same and causes no new side effects. The trial will involve 52 participants who will be healthy adult volunteers. The participants will receive both formulations - the order they receive each formulation will be assigned randomly (similar to the toss of a coin).

Read the detailed description

Randomised open-label cross-over trial of 52 healthy adult volunteers comparing two ivermectin formulations: the standard tablet formulation, and a newly developed infant formula preparation. Participants will be randomised to receive one of these two formulations at the start of the trial and after a 21 day wash out period will be given the alternative formulation. Blood samples will be taken to determine serum drug concentrations. The bioequivalence, tolerability and drug-related adverse effects will be evaluated.

02

Conditions studied

  • Scabies

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • ivermectin
03

In context

Scabies

51 studies on the registry are indexed under Scabies; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 52 is below the median of 183 across 41 interventional studies indexed under Scabies.

Browse Scabies studies →

Lead sponsor

Murdoch Childrens Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 99 studies on the registry; 34 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult aged over 18 years up to 55 years; and
  • of 18.0 - 32.0 kg/m2 with body weight ≥ 50.0 kg; and
  • Medically healthy, determined by medical history, physical examination, no abnormalities on baseline blood tests, vital signs (blood pressure, oxygen saturation and heart rate) as deemed by the study Doctor; and
  • Females must be non-pregnant, non-lactating or for at least 1 year or surgically sterile for at least 6 months prior to dosing; and
  • Sexually active, non-pregnant female participants will be required to use an effective form of from 28 days prior to study until end of study; and
  • Males must not have a pregnant partner and must agree to use condoms as a method of contraception from the time of signing until end of the study; and
  • Must be willing and able to read, understand, and sign the participant information and consent form. Willing to comply with all study requirements, including the inpatient period and outpatient visits for the duration of the study; and
  • Good venous access on at least one arm as assessed by study staff.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of any cardiac, endocrinologic, haematologic, hepatic, immunologic, metabolic, urologic, pulmonary, neurologic, dermatologic, psychiatric, and renal, or other major disease, as determined by the study doctor; or
  • Known allergy to ivermectin or taking a drug that interacts with ivermectin via the P-glycoprotein transport system (e.g. amiodarone, carvedilol, clarithromycin, clotrimazole); or
  • Currently taking warfarin; or
  • Known lactose intolerance or cow's protein intolerance; or
  • Known elective surgery scheduled within the next 3 months; or
  • Inability to comply with the study protocol.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
52 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Sequence 1 (standard 3mg ivermectin tablet then ivermectin infant formula preparation)

    Ivermectin standard 3mg tablet washout 21 days ivermectin infant formula preparation

    Drug: ivermectin infant formula preparation · Drug: Standard ivermectin 3mg tablet

  • Active comparator
    Sequence 2 (ivermectin infant formula preparation then standard ivermectin 3mg tablet)

    ivermectin infant formula preparation 21 days washout ivermectin standard 3mg tablet

    Drug: ivermectin infant formula preparation · Drug: Standard ivermectin 3mg tablet

Interventions

  • Drugivermectin infant formula preparation

    The ivermectin infant formula preparation is produced by micronizing the standard 3mg ivermectin tablet and then blending it with Stage 1 infant formula (Blackmores brand) to produce a homogenous powder. This powder blend of ivermectin and infant formula is then filled into food grade clear capsules.

  • DrugStandard ivermectin 3mg tablet

    standard 3mg ivermectin tablet

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Serum ivermectin Area Under the Curve (AUC) 0-96h bioequivalence across the 2 formulations (standard ivermectin tablet versus new infant formula preparation)

    The serum ivermectin Area Under the Curve (AUC) 0-96h for both the new infant formula preparation and the standard 3 mg tablet will be measured. Bioequivalence is defined as the 90% Confidence Interval (CI) of the geometric mean ratio of AUC 0-96h of the infant formula preparation relative to the standard 3mg tablet falling within 80-125%.

    Time frame: 31 days

  2. Serum ivermectin Maximum Concentration (Cmax) bioequivalence across the 2 formulations (standard ivermectin tablet versus new infant formula preparation)

    The serum ivermectin Maximum Concentration (Cmax) for both the new infant formula preparation and the standard 3 mg tablet will be measured. Bioequivalence is defined as the 90% Confidence Interval (CI) of the geometric mean ratio of Cmax of the infant formula preparation relative to the standard 3mg tablet falling within 80-125%.

    Time frame: 31 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Safety as measured by the proportion of participants experiencing one or more drug-related adverse effect(s) with each ivermectin formulation

    Proportion of participants who experience one or more drug-related adverse effects with each ivermectin formulation

    Time frame: 51 days

  2. Palatability of the new infant formula preparation as measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS)

    Palatability of the new infant formula preparation will be assessed using a visual analogue scale to assess bitterness and overall likeability. The scale used for this VAS tool will be 0 to 10. For the question on overall likeability, a higher score will correspond with a higher level of likeability. For the question on bitterness, a higher score will indicate a higher level of bitterness.

    Time frame: 51 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • The Royal Children's Hospital
    Melbourne, Victoria 3016, Australia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hauschke D, Steinijans VW, Pigeot I. Bioequivalence Studies in Drug Development. Chichester: John Wiley; 2007
  • European Medicines Agency. (2010). Guideline on the investigation of bioequivalence (CPMP/EWP/QWP/1401/98 Rev. 1/Corr). Available at https://www.tga.gov.au.
  • Yotsu RR, Fuller LC, Murdoch ME, van Brakel WH, Revankar C, Barogui MYT, Postigo JAR, Dagne DA, Asiedu K, Hay RJ. A global call for action to tackle skin-related neglected tropical diseases (skin NTDs) through integration: An ambitious step change. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023 Jun 15;17(6):e0011357. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011357. eCollection 2023 Jun. PubMed 37319139 ↗
  • Engelman D, Marks M, Steer AC, Beshah A, Biswas G, Chosidow O, Coffeng LE, Lardizabal Dofitas B, Enbiale W, Fallah M, Gasimov E, Hopkins A, Jacobson J, Kaldor JM, Ly F, Mackenzie CD, McVernon J, Parnaby M, Rainima-Qaniuci M, Sokana O, Sankara D, Yotsu R, Yajima A, Cantey PT. A framework for scabies control. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Sep 2;15(9):e0009661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009661. eCollection 2021 Sep. PubMed 34473725 ↗
  • Ponsonby-Thomas E, Pham AC, Huang S, Salim M, Klein LD, Offersen SM, Thymann T, Boyd BJ. Human milk improves the oral bioavailability of the poorly water-soluble drug clofazimine. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2025 Feb;207:114604. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2024.114604. Epub 2024 Dec 13. PubMed 39675684 ↗
  • Naranjo CA, Busto U, Sellers EM, Sandor P, Ruiz I, Roberts EA, Janecek E, Domecq C, Greenblatt DJ. A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1981 Aug;30(2):239-45. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1981.154. No abstract available. PubMed 7249508 ↗
  • Gwee A, Steer A, Phongluxa K, Luangphaxay C, Senggnam K, Philavanh A, Lei A, Martinez A, Huang S, McWhinney B, Ungerer J, Duffull S, Yang W, Zhu X, Coghlan B. Ivermectin therapy for young children with scabies infection: a multicentre phase 2 non-randomized trial. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2024 Jul 13;49:101144. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101144. eCollection 2024 Aug. PubMed 39109221 ↗
  • Karimkhani C, Colombara DV, Drucker AM, Norton SA, Hay R, Engelman D, Steer A, Whitfeld M, Naghavi M, Dellavalle RP. The global burden of scabies: a cross-sectional analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Dec;17(12):1247-1254. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30483-8. Epub 2017 Sep 21. PubMed 28941561 ↗
  • Dabira ED, Soumare HM, Conteh B, Ceesay F, Ndiath MO, Bradley J, Mohammed N, Kandeh B, Smit MR, Slater H, Peeters Grietens K, Broekhuizen H, Bousema T, Drakeley C, Lindsay SW, Achan J, D'Alessandro U. Mass drug administration of ivermectin and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine against malaria in settings with high coverage of standard control interventions: a cluster-randomised controlled trial in The Gambia. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Apr;22(4):519-528. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00557-0. Epub 2021 Dec 15. PubMed 34919831 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Beginning 12 months following analysis and article publication, upon approval of the request, the following will be made available long-term for the use by future researchers from a recognised research institute whose proposed use of the data has been ethically reviewed and approved by an independent committee and who accepts MCRI's condition for access: Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article after de-identification (text, tables, figures and appendices) Trial Protocol, PICF

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Start date
Jul 2026→Jan 2027
Oct 9, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 9, 2026
    Start date Jul 2026→Jan 2027
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06918665
Lead sponsor
Murdoch Childrens Research Institute
Collaborators
Monash University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 9, 2025
Start date
Jan 2027 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 9, 2026

Study contacts

Amanda Gwee
principal investigator · Murdoch Childrens Research Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is suspended, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion