ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06913569Updated Apr 18, 2025

EBUS-TTFB vs EBUS-TBNA for Diagnosing Inadequate Lymph Node Specimens Based on MOSE

An interventional study of EBUS-TBNA and EBUS-TTFB in Lymphadenopathy, sponsored by Shanghai Chest Hospital. Recruiting at 3 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-18.

Sponsored by Shanghai Chest Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jan 2026, 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Apr 2025; still recruiting 1 year 7 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
162
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transtunnel forceps biopsy to transbronchial needle aspiration in diagnosing inadequate lymph node specimens based on macroscopic on-site evaluation.

Read the detailed description

Mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy are common clinical conditions. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is the standard method recommended by guidelines for obtaining tissue from these patients. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial forceps biopsy (EBUS-TBFB) can overcome the limitations of inadequate tissue acquisition with EBUS-TBNA, and its efficacy and safety have been proved. However, EBUS-TBFB often requires the assistance of the electrocautery for mediastinal window creation, which increases technical difficulty and requires electrosurgical equipment, making it unsuitable for application in grassroots hospitals.

This study aims to use the endobronchial ultrasound-guided transtunnel forceps biopsy (EBUS-TTFB) method. A single-use bronchoscopic puncture dilation catheter will be employed to establish a tunnel between the airway and the lymph node, with both puncture and dilation completed in the same procedure. Currently, there is a lack of prospective randomized controlled trials to verify the efficacy and safety of EBUS-TTFB.

This study is designed as a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. A total of 162 patients will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the EBUS-TBNA group or the EBUS-TTFB group. The primary endpoint is thediagnostic yield. The secondary endpoints include specimen adequacy, procedure duration, tunnel creation success rate, and safety.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lymphadenopathy

Browse trials for

03

In context

Lymphadenopathy

77 studies on the registry are indexed under Lymphadenopathy; 14 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 162 is above the median of 101 across 52 interventional studies indexed under Lymphadenopathy.

Browse Lymphadenopathy studies →

Lead sponsor

Shanghai Chest Hospital is the lead sponsor of 198 studies on the registry; 98 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age ≥ 18 years;
  2. Chest imaging shows mediastinal or hilar lymphadenopathy (short axis ≥10 mm), requiring EBUS-TBNA for definitive diagnosis;
  3. EBUS-TBNA can be performed on these lymph nodes, and the specimens obtained from conventional EBUS-TBNA with three needle passes are inadequate (macroscopic visible core \< 30 mm);
  4. Willing to participate in this clinical study and sign the form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Enlarged lymph nodes are identified as cystic or abscesses;
  2. Severe coagulopathy, insufficient anticoagulants/antiplatelets withdraw time or bleeding diathesis (\<50*109/L, >1.3) that do not meet bronchoscopy requirements;
  3. Other to bronchoscopy or transbronchial , such as severe cardiopulmonary insufficiency, intolerance to anesthesia, or endoscopic procedures;
  4. Patients who have participated in another clinical trial within the past three months;
  5. Vulnerable groups, such as pregnant women
  6. Any other condition that the investigator considers inappropriate for participation in this study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
162 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    EBUS-TBNA

    Specimens were obtained using a 22-gauge biopsy needle by bronchoscope. Each lymph node was operated 4 passes.

    Procedure: EBUS-TBNA

  • Experimental
    EBUS-TTFB via a tunnel

    A tunnel to reach the lymph node is established by making use of a puncture dilation catheter, and specimens were obtained using a 1.5 mm biopsy forceps by bronchoscope. Conduct biopsies until 5-10 specimens are obtained, and the actual number of passes and effective specimens should be recorded.

    Procedure: EBUS-TTFB

Interventions

  • ProcedureEBUS-TBNA

    Participants with lymphadenopathy would receive EBUS-TBNA attempts to conduct diagnoses.

  • ProcedureEBUS-TTFB

    Participants with lymphadenopathy would receive EBUS-TTFB attempts to conduct diagnoses.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic yield

    The diagnostic yield is defined as the proportion of lymph nodes diagnosed by each biopsy to the total number of lymph nodes enrolled in the study.

    Time frame: Six months after the procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sample adequacy

    The adequacy rate of samples for genetic testing: measured as the percentage of lymph node samples qualified for next-generation sequencing among all malignant lymph nodes.

    Time frame: Six months after the procedure

  2. Total procedure time

    The total procedure time is defined as the time from the insertion of the bronchoscope to its removal.

    Time frame: During the procedure

  3. TTFB procedure time

    The EBUS-TTFB procedure time is defined as the time from the insertion of the biopsy needle into the bronchoscope to the cessation of bleeding after the final TTFB.

    Time frame: During the procedure

  4. TBNA procedure time

    The EBUS-TBNA procedure time is defined as the time from the insertion of the biopsy needle into the bronchoscope to the cessation of bleeding after the final TBNA.

    Time frame: During the procedure

  5. Tunnel creation success rate

    Defined as the percentage of lymph nodes in the EBUS-TTFB group where successful tunneling was achieved among the total number of lymph nodes.

    Time frame: During the procedure

  6. Incidence of complications

    Including pneumothorax, infection, mediastinal hematoma, emphysema and etc.

    Time frame: Six months after the procedure

07

Study locations

1 of 3 sites recruiting
  • The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University
    Shenyang, Liaoning 110032, China
    Not yet recruiting
  • Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
    Shanghai, Shanghai, China
    Recruiting
  • Huzhou Central Hospital
    Huizhou, Zhejiang 313000, China
    Not yet recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 18, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06913569
Responsible party
Jiayuan Sun (Director, Department of Respiratory Endoscopy, Shanghai Chest Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 6, 2025
Start date
Apr 1, 2025
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 18, 2025

Study contacts

Jiayuan Sun, MD, PhD
Contact
xkyyjysun@163.com
+86-021-22200000 ext. 1511
Jiayuan Sun
study director · Shanghai Chest Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion