CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06913257Updated Apr 6, 2025

Cost-Effectiveness of ESWT Plus Rehabilitation vs Rehabilitation Alone in Post-Burn Scars

An interventional study of ESWT Combined with Standard Rehabilitation and Standard Rehabilitation Therapy Alone in Hypertrophic Scar, sponsored by Al Hayah University In Cairo. Recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-06.

Sponsored by Al Hayah University In Cairo · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
104
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled trial (RCT) will evaluate the cost-effectiveness of combining extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) with standard rehabilitation versus standard rehabilitation alone for the management of hypertrophic post-burn scars in adults. The study will assess clinical outcomes-such as pain intensity, pruritus, and scar quality-alongside economic outcomes including cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained, direct medical costs, and indirect costs (e.g., absenteeism and reduced productivity). Results will inform health policy and resource allocation decisions for advanced burn rehabilitation interventions.

Read the detailed description

Post-burn hypertrophic scars can cause significant pain and pruritus, substantially affecting quality of life and functionality. Although ESWT has been recently associated with enhanced scar maturation and symptom reduction (Yang et al., 2022), its implementation into standard care is limited by a lack of economic evaluation. This trial is a prospective, randomized controlled study with an integrated cost-effectiveness analysis. Adult patients (aged 18-65) with hypertrophic scars at least 6 months post-burn injury will be recruited and stratified by scar severity. Participants will be randomized into one of two arms:

Arm 1 (Experimental): ESWT combined with standardized rehabilitation therapy. Arm 2 (Active Comparator): Standard rehabilitation therapy alone.

Primary clinical outcomes will include changes in pain intensity (measured on a Visual Analog Scale [VAS]), pruritus intensity (using the Itch Man Scale), and scar quality (assessed through the Vancouver Scar Scale [VSS]).

Economic outcomes will be determined by calculating the cost per QALY gained along with an assessment of both direct (therapy sessions, equipment use, hospital visits) and indirect costs (absenteeism, lost productivity).

Data will be collected at baseline and at follow-up visits at 1, 3, and 6 months post-intervention.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hypertrophic Scar
03

In context

Cicatrix, Hypertrophic

121 studies on the registry are indexed under Cicatrix, Hypertrophic; 29 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 104 is above the median of 36 across 104 interventional studies indexed under Cicatrix, Hypertrophic.

Browse Cicatrix, Hypertrophic studies →

Lead sponsor

Al Hayah University In Cairo is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Adults aged 18-65 years. Documented hypertrophic scars following a burn injury, with scars present and stable for at least 6 months.

Moderate to severe scar severity as measured by a standardized clinical assessment.

Experiencing significant pain and/or pruritus related to the scar, with a baseline VAS score of ≥4.

Able to provide informed consent and comply with study procedures. Employed or engaged in daily activities such that indirect costs (absenteeism/reduced productivity) can be recorded.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Pregnant or lactating women. Individuals with previous surgical scar revision or other invasive scar treatments within the last 6 months.

Patients with comorbid conditions (e.g., severe cardiovascular disease, uncontrolled diabetes) that could interfere with rehabilitation or ESWT.

Active skin infection in the area of the scar. Use of concurrent investigational therapies for scar management.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
104 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ESWT Plus Standard Rehabilitation

    Participants in this arm will undergo extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in addition to receiving standard rehabilitation therapy. ESWT will be administered using a standardized protocol, with treatment sessions conducted weekly for a predetermined duration, integrated with a rehabilitation program focused on scar management, functional restoration, and symptom relief.

    Device: ESWT Combined with Standard Rehabilitation

  • Active comparator
    Standard Rehabilitation Alone

    Participants assigned to this arm will receive the standard rehabilitation therapy protocol designed for post-burn scar management. This regimen includes physical, occupational, and scar-specific therapy sessions delivered in a standardized fashion without the addition of ESWT.

    Behavioral: Standard Rehabilitation Therapy Alone

Interventions

  • DeviceESWT Combined with Standard Rehabilitation

    Participants in the experimental arm will receive a combination intervention comprising ESWT delivered by certified technicians using a validated device for post-burn scars, along with standard rehabilitation therapy. ESWT sessions will be standardized (e.g., 3,000 pulses per session, weekly for 8 weeks) and will be integrated with a comprehensive rehabilitation program encompassing physical therapy, scar management exercises, and patient education. The specific parameters (e.g., energy level, frequency) will be reported based on established guidelines.

  • BehavioralStandard Rehabilitation Therapy Alone

    Participants in the control arm will receive the institution's standard rehabilitation therapy for managing post-burn scars, including physical therapy, occupational therapy, and scar-massage techniques. Treatment frequency and duration will mirror the experimental arm's rehabilitation component to ensure consistency. No ESWT will be provided.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Intensity (Visual Analog Scale [VAS])

    This measure evaluates the intensity of pain experienced by participants, using a 10-centimeter Visual Analog Scale where 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 indicates "worst pain imaginable." The VAS is a validated, standardized tool allowing for quantitative measurement of patient-reported pain intensity changes over time.

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-intervention.

  2. Cost per Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY) Gained

    This economic outcome will be determined by calculating the incremental cost per QALY gained using validated health-related quality-of-life instruments (eg, EQ-5D) alongside hospital billing data. It compares the cumulative costs (both direct and indirect) and QALYs between the ESWT plus rehabilitation arm versus the rehabilitation alone arm over a 6-month period.

    Time frame: Evaluated at 6 months post-intervention.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pruritus Intensity (Itch Man Scale)

    Pruritus will be quantified using the Itch Man Scale, a validated instrument designed to assess the severity and frequency of itching, which is a common symptom in post-burn scars.

    Time frame: Measured at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-intervention.

  2. Scar Quality (Vancouver Scar Scale [VSS])

    The Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) will be employed to evaluate scar characteristics such as vascularity, pliability, height, and pigmentation. This scale is widely used for the objective assessment of burn scars.

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-intervention.

  3. Direct Medical Costs

    Direct medical costs include expenditures for therapy sessions, ESWT equipment usage, hospital visits, and any additional medical services related to the intervention. Data will be extracted from hospital billing records.

    Time frame: Collated over the 6-month study period.

  4. Indirect Costs (Absenteeism and Reduced Productivity)

    Indirect costs will encompass lost productivity and absenteeism, as estimated through participant-reported work absenteeism and validated economic questionnaires. These costs represent the broader societal impact of treatment.

    Time frame: Evaluated cumulatively over the 6-month follow-up period.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Faculty of Physical Therapy, Al Hayah University
    Cairo, 12311, Egypt
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 6, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06913257
Lead sponsor
Al Hayah University In Cairo
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 6, 2025
Start date
Apr 22, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 6, 2025

Study contacts

Ibrahim Zoheiry, Ph.D
Contact
ibrahim.alzoheiry@hotmail.com
01277774949 ext. +20

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion