An interventional study of Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson Disease, Idiopathic, sponsored by Newronika. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-24.
Sponsored by Newronika · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →
Among 347 studies in Parkinson Disease with a site in Italy — 90 open to participants now, 108 under way, 4 of them phase 3. Parkinson Disease · Italy.
Among the 347 studies in Parkinson Disease with a site in Italy, this one is the 104th largest by planned enrollment of the 244 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 16 that started in 2026, is one of 146 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 84 of the 107 other live ones, and was the 301st registered.
4,576 studies on the registry are indexed under Parkinson Disease; 1,087 are open to participants now.
Browse Parkinson Disease studies →90 of the 347 studies in Parkinson Disease with a site in Italy are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:
University Hospital Tuebingen · Sites in Italy, France, Germany and 4 more countries
Ages 35–80
University Hospital of Ferrara · Sites in Italy
Ages 18+
Universita di Verona · Sites in Italy
Ages 18+
Neuromed IRCCS · Sites in Italy
Ages 18+ · Healthy volunteers
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico · Sites in Italy
Ages 50–80
A study can be open while its sites in Italy have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Italy →
Of the 749 Parkinson Disease studies recruiting now, 311 (42%) set no upper age limit and 127 (17%) stop at 75 or younger; 64 take children under 18; 189 take healthy volunteers.
This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.
The full table on the hub →This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
347 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.
A study in two phases is counted once above. Listed by phase, each with its combined phases: Phase 1 3 · Phase 2 37 · Phase 3 49 · Phase 4 13
First in 2002; this study’s year is marked. 16 started in 2026.
By drug class, each counting the studies that test any of its medicines:
This study's planned enrollment of 104 is above the median of 40 across 3,355 interventional studies indexed under Parkinson Disease.
Median enrollment 82 across the 244 interventional studies, 145 across the 102 observational. Of the 184 that completed or were terminated, 50 (27%) have results posted.
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
109 of 347 have an industry lead sponsor. The 10 most frequent:
Newronika is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.
Newronika has 4 studies filed under Parkinson Disease — fewer than ten, so there is no comparison to draw.
22 of the studies in Parkinson Disease with a site in Italy that are under way reach primary completion within a year, 0 of them phase 3. Phase 3 first, then by date:
| Study | Primary completion |
|---|---|
| NCT07502066IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, ItalyClinical Efficacy of a telerehabilItation Protocol, for the Improvement of Balance in Degenerative Neurological Diseases | 2026-12 |
| NCT07485218University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern SwitzerlandMultidimensional Assessment of Fatigability in Older Adults Living in Southern Switzerland and Elderly With Parkinson's Disease | 2026-12 |
| NCT07637123IRCCS San Raffaele RomaEvaluation of a Soft Elbow Exoskeleton and a Haptic Armband in Post-stroke and Parkinson's Disease Patients | 2026-12 |
| NCT07616050Marta MondelliniEvaluation of the Impact of Virtual Park on Training Motivation in Adult Patients | 2026-12 |
| NCT06814431Azienda USL Reggio Emilia - IRCCSStudy on the Incidence of Malignant Neoplasms in Patients With Parkinson's Disease and Heterozygous Mutation of the GBA Gene | 2026-12 |
Add all 22 to your calendar (.ics) → With an account.
Among the 347 studies in Parkinson Disease with a site in Italy, from their registry updates:
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
The goal of this prospective, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, crossover clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of adaptive DBS (aDBS) and conventional DBS (cDBS) delivered through the AlphaDBS system, in levodopa-responsive Parkinson's disease subjects. Data from previous studies conducted in Europe indicate that the use of the AlphaDBS system is safe and effective in both aDBS and cDBS modes. However, such studies suggest that aDBS may lead to more ON-time without troublesome dyskinesias in some patients. The study is designed to first demonstrate safety of effectiveness of cDBS, then to directly compare effectiveness of aDBS relative to cDBS. Subjects enrolled in the study will undergo multiple visits to assess the improvement of PD symptoms and will be randomized to Mode 1 for three months, followed by Mode 2. At the end of Mode 2, subjects will select their preferred mode, which will be maintained for 3 additional months. Subjects will complete patient diaries at different time points to evaluate their symptoms throughout the day.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Subjects who meet all of the following criteria may be given consideration for inclusion in this clinical trial:
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
The subject must not meet any of the following exclusion criteria:
Has any current major psychiatric disorder(s), such as Major Depressive Disorder, Bipolar I or II disorder, Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective Disorder, Delusional Disorder, Brief Psychotic Disorder, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, or any other current psychiatric condition that in the opinion of the investigator would confound the assessment of study endpoints, prevent proper data collection and/or compromise the subject's ability to participate, based on the psychiatric/psychological assessment at screening.
(It is permitted if a subject has a diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder with symptoms that currently are well-controlled and managed by a stable regimen of antidepressants for a minimum of 4 weeks prior to the screening visit). Includes current moderate or severe alcohol and/or substance use disorder based on the psychiatric/psychological assessment at screening.
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.
Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).
Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.
Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.
Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
MMSE and MoCA
Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Postmenopausal
Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Contraception
Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.
Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Contraindication
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Metastases
Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Clinically significant
Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
adaptive DBS (closed-loop DBS)
Device: Deep Brain Stimulation
conventional DBS
Device: Deep Brain Stimulation
AlphaDBS System
Improvement in Good On Time (GOT)
Mean improvement in GOT with cDBS, when compared with preop baseline, measured at the end of Mode 1, as assessed by a 3-day Hauser diary.
Time frame: After 3 months of follow up in cDBS as compared with preop baseline
GOT difference between aDBS and cDBS
The mean difference in GOT (aDBS - cDBS) at the end of the second crossover period
Time frame: 6 months of follow up (end of of the second crossover period)
UPDRS III score difference between aDBS and cDBS
The mean difference in UPDRS III scores (aDBS - cDBS) at the end of the second crossover period
Time frame: 6 months of follow up (end of of the second crossover period)
PDQ-39 score difference between aDBS and cDBS
The mean difference in PDQ-39 score (aDBS - cDBS) at the end of the second crossover period
Time frame: 6 months of follow up (end of of the second crossover period)
Subject Preference for aDBS vs. cDBS
The proportion of subjects that prefer adaptive (aDBS) mode over conventional (cDBS)mode, according to subject preference selection
Time frame: 6 months of follow up (end of of the second crossover period)
Safety Objectives
All adverse events (AEs), including serious and nonserious AEs, regardless of relationship (e.g., to study procedures, etc.), will be collected. All unanticipated events will also be collected.
Time frame: From enrollment to study exit (approximately 10-18 months)
Started Aug 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2028, 24 months after the start.
Of 76 industry-sponsored interventional studies with no phase under Parkinson Disease, half reached primary completion within 27 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 43. This study's planned 24 months is below that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 1,369 studies reached it within 25 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 44.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Newronika