ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06889376Updated Mar 21, 2025

Use of Intranasal Midazolam to Reduce Stress and Procedural Pain in Premature Infants During Routine ROP Examination.

A Phase 1 interventional study of Intranasal midazolam administration via the DART™ intranasal atomization device along with routine comfort care. in Drug Safety, sponsored by Polish Mother Memorial Hospital Research Institute. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Poland. Open to participants aged Up to 30 Weeks. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-21.

Sponsored by Polish Mother Memorial Hospital Research Institute · Phase 1, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2025, 1 year 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 30 Weeks
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this study is to learn about the safety and effectiveness of intranasal midazolam in newborns and infants born prematurely, undergoing Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) screening.

The main question it aims to answer is:

  • Does use of intranasal midazolam is a safe, quick, non-invasive medication, that reduces the pain, stress, discomfort, and other complications in patients undergoing ROP screening?

Researchers will compare the intervention group with a comparison group of the patients who will receive routine comfort care.

Read the detailed description

The aim of this parallel, prospective, nonblinded randomised control trial is to assess the effectiveness and safety of intranasal midazolam administered before ROP screening using the DART™ intranasal atomization device in preterm newborns and infants.

Participants: Preterm newborns and infants eligible for routine ROP screening. Recruitment: Parental/legal guardian consent required before random assignment to either the study or control group.

Study Groups and Randomization:

Random Assignment: Block randomization will be used. • Sample Size: 40 newborns/infants (20 in control, 20 in study group).

Study intervention and monitoring:

  • Study Group (midazolam group) Intervention: intranasal midazolam (0.2 mg/kg) administered 10 minutes before ROP screening via the DART™ intranasal atomization device.

Comfort Measures:

  • 1 ml of 20% glucose solution orally with a pacifier, 5 minutes before screening.
  • Swaddling and placement under the radiant warmer.

Monitoring:

  • Vital signs: heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation recorded 10 minutes before screening until 2 hours post-examination.
  • Pain assessment (PIPP scale) conducted before, during, and 10, 30 minutes 1 hour and 2 hours post-procedure.
  • Modified N-PASS scale to assess the level of sedation conducted before, during, 10, 30 minutes 1 hour and 2 hours post-procedure.

Control Group (non-midazolam group)

  • No midazolam administered.
  • Comfort measures: 1 ml of 20% glucose solution orally with a pacifier 5 minutes before screening. Swaddling and placement under the radiant warmer.

Monitoring:

  • Vital signs: heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation recorded 10 minutes before screening until 2 hours post-examination.
  • Pain assessment (PIPP scale) conducted before, during, and 10, 30 minutes 1 hour and 2 hours post-procedure.

In both groups, observations for:

  • Respiratory Distress (apnoea, desaturation, increased work of breathing)
  • Cardiovascular Instability (Bradycardia, tachycardia, hypotension)
  • Neurological Symptoms (Lethargy, seizures, abnormal tone)
  • Gastrointestinal Issues (Feeding intolerance, NEC-like symptoms)
  • Infections \& Sepsis (Confirmed or suspected based on clinical signs)

Study Outcome Assessment:

Change in pain and stress symptoms during ROP screening, measured by the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP).

Clinical safety of intranasal midazolam using a nasal atomizer (DART™ intranasal atomization device) in newborns/infants.

Assessment of sedation post intranasal midazolam administration.

02

Conditions studied

  • Drug Safety

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • intranasal midazolam
  • ROP screening
  • Premature infants
03

In context

Premature Birth

2,550 studies on the registry are indexed under Premature Birth; 500 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 84 across 1,666 interventional studies indexed under Premature Birth.

Browse Premature Birth studies →

Lead sponsor

Polish Mother Memorial Hospital Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 19 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 30 Weeks
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Newborns qualified for ophthalmologic screening examination to detect retinopathy of prematurity (ROP):

    a. Newborns/infants born before the 32 weeks of gestation and/or with a birth weight \<1500 g.

  • Obtaining from a parent/legal guardian.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Newborns/infants not qualified for screening ophthalmologic examination (ROP).
  • Newborns/infants clinically unstable, with respiratory disorders/cardiovascular instability before the ophthalmologic examination.
  • Newborns/infants with congenital developmental defects.
  • Newborns/infants receiving analgesic/sedative medications for other reasons.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intranasal midazolam and comfort care

    The newborn/infant qualified for the ROP screening will receive intranasal midazolam before the procedure using a nasal atomizer. The newborn/infant will also receive comfort care

    Drug: Intranasal midazolam administration via the DART™ intranasal atomization device along with routine comfort care.

  • No intervention
    Control group

    Control Group (non-midazolam group) * No midazolam administered. * Routine comfort care

Interventions

  • DrugIntranasal midazolam administration via the DART™ intranasal atomization device along with routine comfort care.

    Intervention: Intranasal midazolam (0.2 mg/kg) administered 10 minutes before ROP screening via the DART™ intranasal atomization device. Comfort Measures: * 1 ml of 20% glucose solution orally with a pacifier, 5 min before screening. * Swaddling and placement under the radiant warmer. Monitoring: * Vital Signs (heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation monitoring before drug administration until 2 hours after). * Pain assessment (PIPP scale) conducted before, during, and 10 and 30 min post-procedure. * Modified N-PASS to assess the level of sedation conducted before, during, 10, 30 minutes 1 hour and 2 hours post-procedure Observations for signs of: * Respiratory Distress (apnoea, desaturation, increased work of breathing) * Cardiovascular Instability (Bradycardia, tachycardia, hypotension) * Neurological Symptoms (Lethargy, seizures, abnormal tone) * Gastrointestinal Issues (Feeding intolerance, NEC-like symptoms)

    Also known as: nasal midazolam

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain assessment pre and post intranasal midazolam administration

    Primary Endpoint: - Change in the occurrence of pain symptoms and stress associated with screening ophthalmologic examination (ROP). Use of Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) score * Purpose: To evaluate pain and stress responses before, during, and after the procedure. * Scoring Components: * Heart rate changes. * Oxygen saturation levels. * Facial expressions (brow bulge, eye squeeze, nasolabial furrow). * Behavioural state (awake, fussy, crying). * Gestational age adjustment.

    Time frame: PIPP Score Assessment Time Points: 5 minutes before drug administration, during drug administration, 10, 30 minutes 1 hour and 2 hours post-procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of clinical safety of intranasal midazolam using a nasal atomizer (DART™ intranasal atomisation device) in newborns/infants.

    To accurately report the adverse events during intranasal midazolam administration using a nasal atomizer (DART™ intranasal atomisation device) in newborns/infants, the Neonatal Adverse Event Severity Scale (NAESS) will be used. This scale contains generic severity criteria that can occur in neonates, followed by a list of 35 specific medical conditions: neurological, cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, infectious, general and any other symptoms Each of the criteria is divided into grading system: Grade 1 - Mild Grade 2 - Moderate Grade 3 - Severe Grade 4 - Life- threatening Grade 5 - Death Assessment of the severity of the adverse event is based on the observation of the changes in the following components: age appropriate behavioural changes, changes from the baseline in the vital signs, changes in the required care and monitoring. Only changes from the baseline condition will be considered as a reported adverse-events.

    Time frame: Neonatal Adverse Event Severity Scale (NAESS) will be reported up to 24 hours following drug administration.

  2. Sedation assessment after intranasal midazolam administration.

    To assess the sedation status after intranasal midazolam administration, Modified N-PASS: Neonatal Sedation Assessment Scale will be used. The assessment criteria of the scale include: * Crying/ Irritability * Behaviour State * Facial Expression * Extremities Tone * Vital Signs: HR, RR, BP, SaO2 Each of the criteria scores from 0 to -2, the sum provides a total score and note as a negative score (0 to -10). Deep sedation: -10 to -6 Light sedation: -5 to - 2 Normal: -1 to +3

    Time frame: Modified N-PASS score used to assess level of sedation time points: 5 minutes before drug administration, during drug administration, 10, 30 minutess, 1 hour and 2 hours post - drug administration.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Polish Mother's Health Center Institute Rzgowska 281/289, 93-338 Lodz
    Lodz, 93-338, Poland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Salaets T, Lacaze-Masmonteil T, Hokuto I, Gauldin C, Taha A, Smits A, Thewissen L, Van Horebeek I, Shoraisham A, Mohammad K, Suzuki M, Komachi S, Michels K, Turner MA, Allegaert K, Lewis T. Prospective assessment of inter-rater reliability of a neonatal adverse event severity scale. Front Pharmacol. 2023 Sep 7;14:1237982. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1237982. eCollection 2023. PubMed 37745081 ↗
  • Salaets T, Turner MA, Short M, Ward RM, Hokuto I, Ariagno RL, Klein A, Beauman S, Wade K, Thomson M, Roberts E, Harrison J, Quinn T, Baer G, Davis J, Allegaert K; International Neonatal Consortium. Development of a neonatal adverse event severity scale through a Delphi consensus approach. Arch Dis Child. 2019 Dec;104(12):1167-1173. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-317399. Epub 2019 Sep 19. PubMed 31537552 ↗
  • Morgan ME, Kukora S, Nemshak M, Shuman CJ. Neonatal Pain, Agitation, and Sedation Scale's use, reliability, and validity: a systematic review. J Perinatol. 2020 Dec;40(12):1753-1763. doi: 10.1038/s41372-020-00840-7. Epub 2020 Oct 2. PubMed 33009491 ↗
  • Vinall J, Miller SP, Chau V, Brummelte S, Synnes AR, Grunau RE. Neonatal pain in relation to postnatal growth in infants born very preterm. Pain. 2012 Jul;153(7):1374-1381. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.02.007. PubMed 22704600 ↗
  • COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN and SECTION ON ANESTHESIOLOGY AND PAIN MEDICINE. Prevention and Management of Procedural Pain in the Neonate: An Update. Pediatrics. 2016 Feb;137(2):e20154271. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-4271. Epub 2016 Jan 25. PubMed 26810788 ↗
  • Snyers D, Tribolet S, Rigo V. Intranasal Analgosedation for Infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review. Neonatology. 2022;119(3):273-284. doi: 10.1159/000521949. Epub 2022 Mar 1. PubMed 35231912 ↗
  • Pasero C. Pain assessment in infants and young children: Premature Infant Pain Profile. Am J Nurs. 2002 Sep;102(9):105-6. doi: 10.1097/00000446-200209000-00065. No abstract available. PubMed 12394025 ↗
  • Francis K. What Is Best Practice for Providing Pain Relief During Retinopathy of Prematurity Eye Examinations? Adv Neonatal Care. 2016 Jun;16(3):220-8. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000267. PubMed 27195471 ↗
  • Ballantyne M, Stevens B, McAllister M, Dionne K, Jack A. Validation of the premature infant pain profile in the clinical setting. Clin J Pain. 1999 Dec;15(4):297-303. doi: 10.1097/00002508-199912000-00006. PubMed 10617258 ↗
  • Brummelte S, Grunau RE, Chau V, Poskitt KJ, Brant R, Vinall J, Gover A, Synnes AR, Miller SP. Procedural pain and brain development in premature newborns. Ann Neurol. 2012 Mar;71(3):385-96. doi: 10.1002/ana.22267. Epub 2012 Feb 28. PubMed 22374882 ↗
  • Mitchell AJ, Green A, Jeffs DA, Roberson PK. Physiologic effects of retinopathy of prematurity screening examinations. Adv Neonatal Care. 2011 Aug;11(4):291-7. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0b013e318225a332. PubMed 22123352 ↗
  • Moral-Pumarega MT, Caserio-Carbonero S, De-La-Cruz-Bertolo J, Tejada-Palacios P, Lora-Pablos D, Pallas-Alonso CR. Pain and stress assessment after retinopathy of prematurity screening examination: indirect ophthalmoscopy versus digital retinal imaging. BMC Pediatr. 2012 Aug 28;12:132. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-12-132. PubMed 22928523 ↗
  • Thirunavukarasu AJ, Hassan R, Savant SV, Hamilton DL. Analgesia for retinopathy of prematurity screening: A systematic review. Pain Pract. 2022 Sep;22(7):642-651. doi: 10.1111/papr.13138. Epub 2022 Jun 27. PubMed 35703418 ↗
  • Slevin M, Murphy JF, Daly L, O'Keefe M. Retinopathy of prematurity screening, stress related responses, the role of nesting. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997 Sep;81(9):762-4. doi: 10.1136/bjo.81.9.762. PubMed 9422929 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 21, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06889376
Lead sponsor
Polish Mother Memorial Hospital Research Institute
Responsible party
Agnieszka Nowacka (Principal Investigator, Senior Assistant at Neonatology Department, Polish Mother Memorial Hospital Research Institute) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 21, 2025
Start date
Mar 24, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 6, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 21, 2025

Study contacts

Agnieszka Nowacka, MSc
Contact
agn.nowacka@gmail.com
+48 607603226
Ewa Gulczyńska, Professor
study chair · Polish Mother's Health Center Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion