ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06885931AURA-4XUpdated May 15, 2026

Augmenting Urinary Reflex Activity Study 4 (Including eXtended Indications)

An interventional study of Pudendal neuromodulation in Mixed Urinary Incontinence, Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI) and Chronic Pelvic Pain, sponsored by Amber Therapeutics Ltd. Recruiting at 7 sites in 3 countries. Open to female participants aged 22 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-15.

Sponsored by Amber Therapeutics Ltd · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2025; still recruiting 1 year 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
86
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
22 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 11 studies in Urinary Incontinence, Stress with a site in Belgium — 2 open to participants now, 3 under way, none of them phase 3. Urinary Incontinence, Stress · Belgium.

Started
2025
the only one that year
No phase
5 of 11
1 open now
Registered
11th of 11
by date
Lead sponsor
1 of 11
Amber Therapeutics Ltd

Among the 11 studies in Urinary Incontinence, Stress with a site in Belgium, this one is the only one that started in 2025, is one of 5 with no phase, and was the 11th registered.

Urinary Incontinence, Stress

653 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Incontinence, Stress; 121 are open to participants now.

Browse Urinary Incontinence, Stress studies →

Open to participants now

2 of the 11 studies in Urinary Incontinence, Stress with a site in Belgium are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

All 2 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Belgium have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Belgium →

Who these studies take

Of the 74 Urinary Incontinence, Stress studies recruiting now, 42 (57%) set no upper age limit and 18 (24%) stop at 75 or younger; 2 take children under 18; 16 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 22 Years and older · female · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 11 studies in Urinary Incontinence, Stress with a site in Belgium, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Exploratory safety and feasibility study of personalized adaptive pudendal neuromodulation for mixed urinary incontinence and extended indications using an implanted (Picostim™ II) system.

03

Conditions studied

  • Mixed Urinary Incontinence
  • Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)
  • Chronic Pelvic Pain
  • Urge Urinary Incontinence
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
22 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female. NB: the definition of female refers to sex at birth.
  • Adult: aged ≥ 22 years (at the time of signature).
  • Patient self-reports both stress and urge episodes (clinician-opinion on history taking).
  • Patient has failed to respond to or could not tolerate conservative treatment as determined by the treating health care provider.
  • Duration of urinary incontinence symptom ≥ 6 months prior to the screening baseline visit date.
  • Able and willing to voluntarily sign informed consent form.
  • Able to participate in all testing and follow-up clinic visits associated with study protocol.
  • Patient is mobile and able to use a toilet.
  • In the opinion of the Investigator, the patient is capable of independently using the system components (after training).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is pregnant, breastfeeding, or plans to become pregnant at any time in the future.
  • Patient is unwilling or unable to use during sexual intercourse for the duration of the study.
  • In the event that patient becomes pregnant during or after the study, they are not prepared to inactivate device for the whole period of the pregnancy.
  • Any significant medical condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, is likely to interfere with study procedures, device operation, or likely to confound evaluation of study endpoints.
  • History of major psychiatric or personality disorder.
  • Any neurological condition that in the opinion of the investigator may interfere with normal bladder function (e.g., stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, peripheral neuropathy, or complete spinal cord injury).
  • Uncontrolled type I or type II diabetes (as defined by their routine care clinician or ≥ 7.0).
  • History of cancer within 5 years prior to enrolment, except for a cancer that was determined to be free of systemic cancer risk, such as basal cell carcinoma.
  • Patient is taking antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant drugs including warfarin or newer alternatives (e.g., rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban) which cannot be paused prior to surgery, or has a bleeding disorder that cannot be corrected prior to surgery.
  • Any clinical reason that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may compromise patient's safety during the study.
  • Currently participating in another interventional study. This excepts purely observational studies, e.g., registries.
  • Patient participation in vigorous physical activities where these cannot be restricted for a period of 6 weeks post-implantation.
  • Patient unwilling to stop any future participation in scuba diving below 10m. ≥ 40kg/m2 or waist circumference > 127cm
  • Documented history of allergic response to titanium, zirconia, polyurethane, epoxy, or silicone.
  • Skin, orthopedic or neurological anatomical limitations at the site of implant that could prevent successful placement of an electrode or IPG. This includes active perineal sepsis or perianal sepsis (e.g., anal fistula and pilonidal sinus).
  • Knowledge of planned MRIs, diathermy, medical microwave exposure, high output ultrasonic exposure, or medical RF energy exposure.
  • Implantable neurostimulator or antennae, pacemaker or defibrillator in-situ (anywhere in body).

Exclusion Criteria (Urological):

  • Known diagnosis of interstitial cystitis or bladder pain syndrome as defined by either AUA or EAU guidelines. Diagnosis of any other chronic pelvic or regional pain syndrome
  • Documented bladder emptying syndrome including neurogenic bladder.
  • Known abnormal post void residual (> 100 ml).
  • Any prolapse (symptomatic or asymptomatic) currently at or below the hymenal level Known urinary tract mechanical obstruction such as urethral stricture and/or bladder neck contracture.
  • Current symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI) or more than 3 culture-proven UTIs in past year.
  • Current diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux
  • Current diagnosis of bladder stones
  • History of bladder tumour (benign or malignant) -Suspected or proven pudendal nerve entrapment syndrome. In patients with co- existent chronic pelvic pain and urinary incontinence symptoms, Nantes criteria will be used for screening. Patients meeting essential criteria will be excluded from the study.
  • Suspected or proven severe pudendal nerve damage at discretion of clinician with or without specialist investigations
  • Any previous experience of pudendal nerve stimulation using an implanted lead.
  • Previous failure of SNM therapy (based on implantation; failed test phase is not an exclusion)
  • Major previous urethral or bladder surgery (excisional or reconstructive) at discretion of investigator
  • SUI surgery e.g. urethral slings, tapes, and bulking agents colposuspension within last 2 years; > 2 years at discretion of investigator
  • Prolapse surgery e.g. colposuspension / colporrhaphy within last 12 months with current confirmation via pelvic exam of no recurrence > or = to Stage 2 pelvic organ prolapse
  • Previous use of bladder botox injections within last 6 months
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
86 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cohort A

    Mixed Urinary Incontinence cohort

    Device: Pudendal neuromodulation

  • Experimental
    Cohort B

    Extended indications cohort (Stress Urinary Incontinence, Urge Urinary Incontinence, Chronic Pelvic Pain, AURA-2)

    Device: Pudendal neuromodulation

Interventions

  • DevicePudendal neuromodulation

    In this feasibility study, all subjects will receive the Amber UI system.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Summative rates of procedural and device related adverse events and device deficiencies.

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Urinary Distress Inventory score change

    Score minimum 0 to maximum 100. Lower score is better outcome.

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Proportion of participants requiring surgical reintervention.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Urinary Distress Inventory (total, total Mixed Urinary Incontinence) score change

    Score minimum 0 to maximum 100. Lower score is better outcome.

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. 3-day voiding diary number of events

    Fewer events is better outcome.

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. 24-hour pad test weight change

    Lower weight is better outcome.

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire score change

    Score minimum 0 to maximum 21. Lower score is better outcome.

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Patient Global Impression of Improvement score change

    Score minimum 0 to maximum 7. Lower score is better outcome.

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. General Anxiety Disorder score change

    Score minimum 0 to maximum 21. Lower score is better outcome.

    Time frame: 12 months

  7. Patient Health Questionnaire 9 score change

    Score minimum 0 to maximum 27. Lower score is better outcome.

    Time frame: 12 months

  8. World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule score change

    Score minimum 0 to maximum 100. Lower score is better outcome.

    Time frame: 12 months

  9. European Quality of Life 5 Dimension Questionnaire score change.

    Score minimum 5 to maximum 25. Higher score is a better outcome.

    Time frame: 12 months

Other outcomes

  1. Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) score change (Cohort B Chronic Pelvic Pain only)

    Score minimum 0 to maximum 40. Lower score is better outcome.

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

6 of 7 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2027, 24 months after the start.

Of 41 industry-sponsored interventional studies with no phase under Urinary Incontinence, Stress, half reached primary completion within 16 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 46. This study's planned 24 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 267 studies reached it within 19 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 43.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 6, 2025
First posted
Mar 20, 2025
StartActual
Jun 24, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2027
CompletionEst.
Jan 2030
Last update
May 15, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06885931
Lead sponsor
Amber Therapeutics Ltd
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 20, 2025
Start date
Jun 24, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2030 (estimated)
Last update
May 15, 2026

Study contacts

Amber Clinical Affairs
Contact
AURA-4X@amber-tx.com
08000418515

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion