CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06871124Updated Jun 3, 2026

Early Neuromodulation in Traumatic Brain Injury

An interventional study of transcranial electrical stimulation and Sham Comparator in Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Patients, sponsored by University of Cincinnati. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-03.

Sponsored by University of Cincinnati · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2025; still recruiting 1 year 3 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The two goals of the proposed study are: (1) To determine how brain activity changes with cognitive recovery over time from acute to chronic phases of traumatic brain injury (TBI). (2) To determine how the time of anodal transcranial electrical stimulation (A-tES) administration affects cognitive performance and brain activity in TBI.

To achieve these study goals, the investigators will conduct a pilot clinical trial over three years in which the investigators aim to recruit 60 patients with moderate to severe TBI at the University of Cincinnati Medical Center (UCMC). During the acute phase of TBI, all participants will complete clinical questionnaires and perform 2 cognitive computer tasks while their brain activity is recorded. Half of the participants will be randomly selected to receive A-tES for 15 minutes while performing cognitive tasks and the other half will receive sham stimulation. All participants will be followed for 6 months. During their 3-month follow-up, the investigators will perform another session where all participants complete the questionnaires and receive A-tES while performing cognitive tasks during brain recording. In their last visit at 6 months post-injury, all participants will complete the questionnaires and cognitive tasks with brain recording but no stimulation treatment. From the collected data, the investigators will determine if time from brain injury correlates with brain activity during performance of cognitive tasks. The investigators will also assess the efficacy of early A-tES treatment for improving cognitive task performance and clinical test ratings at 6 months post-injury in comparison to A-tES delivered during the 3-month follow-up visit.

Read the detailed description

Background: Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is a medical and surgical epidemic affecting at least 1.7 million individuals yearly in the United States. Functional outcomes after TBI can show improvement or deterioration up to two decades after injury, and rates of all-cause mortality remain elevated for many years. Cognitive impairments are among the most disabling of post-TBI symptoms and typically contribute more to persisting disability than physical impairment. Following TBI, deficits are consistently demonstrated in the domains of attention, working memory and executive functioning. To date, there are some potential interventions for motor/functional recovery but there is no treatment for cognitive dysfunction which is more disabling. Although brain stimulation techniques appear promising as treatments to improve neuropsychiatric conditions and functional deficits, most noninvasive brain stimu¬lation interventions have been nontargeted and focused on the chronic phase of recovery after TBI. In the acute stages, there is limited available evidence of the efficacy and safety of brain stimulation to improve outcomes. The stimulation during chronic phase is applied either in isolation or before cognitive training. TBI thus underscores a major unaddressed challenge: the lack of time sensitive cognitive rehabilitation therapy post injury. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop rehabilitation paradigms in the early phases of injury for cognitive recovery and prevention of long-term cognitive impairments.

Hypothesis/Objective(s): This study is based on the hypothesis that early intervention with anodal transcranial electrical stimulation (A-tES) during the acute and sub-acute phases of TBI will enhance cognitive recovery over a similar intervention used only in the sub-acute phase. The objective of this study is to determine neural biomarkers of cognitive functional recovery in TBI and to investigate the neuromodulatory effects of early A-tES on cognitive functions in the sub-acute/chronic phases of TBI.

Specific Aims: (1) To determine neural correlates of cognitive recovery from injury over the acute to sub-acute/chronic phase in TBI, (2) To determine effects of time from injury when A-tES was administered on cognitive performance and associated EEG rhythms in TBI.

Study Design: The investigators will conduct a pilot clinical trial over a 3-year period in which we aim to recruit 60 patients with moderate to severe isolated TBI at the University of Cincinnati Medical Center (UCMC). All recruited participants will be administered a Brief test of adult cognition (BTACT) at bedside during the acute phase. They will perform 2 cognitive tasks on a laptop computer while their EEGs are being recorded. 50% of recruited patients selected randomly during the acute phase will receive active A-tES to their left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) for 15 minutes each during the performance of cognitive tasks while the rest will receive sham stimulation. All participants will be followed for 6 months. When they return for their typical 3-month follow-up, we will perform another session with BTACT, EEG and cognitive tasks. During this visit all participants will receive active A-tES to their left dlPFC while performing cognitive tasks. In their last visit at 6 months post injury, all participants will be administered BTACT and cognitive tasks with EEG recordings but no intervention. They will also complete a quality of life (QOL) questionnaire designed through involvement of CBPR during their follow-up visits. For Aim 1, the investigators will determine if there are significant temporal correlations between neural oscillations recorded via EEG during the performance of cognitive tasks and injury phase. For Aim 2, the investigators will use a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled, parallel study design to assess effects of early A-tES on improving performance on computer tasks, clinical test ratings and QOL measures during the 6-month post injury follow-up compared to A-tES delivered during the 3-month follow up visit.

02

Conditions studied

  • Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Patients

Keywords

  • transcranial electrical stimulation
  • cognitive control
  • working memory
  • EEG
03

In context

Brain Injuries, Traumatic

1,775 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Injuries, Traumatic; 448 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is close to the median of 56 across 1,133 interventional studies indexed under Brain Injuries, Traumatic.

Browse Brain Injuries, Traumatic studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Cincinnati is the lead sponsor of 314 studies on the registry; 43 are open to participants now.

Of its 22 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 15 (68%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Moderate to severe TBI: Glasgow Coma Scale (GSC) in the 3-12 range and greater than 30 min of loss of consciousness and/or a post-traumatic amnesia that lasts more than 24 hours and/or an alteration of mental state over 24 hours,
  2. age 18-80 years,
  3. Isolated TBI,
  4. Intelligible speech and Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test (GOAT) score >70 at time of enrollment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Persistent bilateral non-reactive pupils or other evidence of non-survivable injury,
  2. Decompressive craniectomy to treat refractory ICP subsequent to diffuse injury, (3) Co-enrollment in another therapeutic TBI trial,

(4) Pregnancy, (5) Patients with polytrauma (6) Patients with clinical seizures or status epilepticus.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Early intervention

    Patients assigned to this arm will receive anodal transcranial electrical stimulation (A-tES) within a 1-2 weeks of their injury and another session of tES at a 3 month follow up visit.

    Device: transcranial electrical stimulation

  • Sham comparator
    Sham

    Patients assigned to this arm will receive sham transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) within a 1-2 weeks of their injury and another session of tES at a 3 month follow up visit.

    Device: Sham Comparator

Interventions

  • Devicetranscranial electrical stimulation

    Anodal transcranial electrical stimulation (A-tES) is a widely used and well tolerated non-invasive electrical stimulation paradigm that promotes adaptive neuroplasticity and may prevent or reduce pathological sequela following brain injury. It has been used in a wide variety of neurologic and psychiatric disorders for cognitive and motor rehabilitation.

  • DeviceSham Comparator

    Sham comparator consist of A-tES in the beginning and end of stimulation block but no stimulation during the actual stimulation period.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cognitive Task Behavior

    Response time and accuracy on multi source interference task and 1-back working memory task.

    Time frame: from enrollment to 6 months after brain injury

  2. Task evoked EEG oscillatory power

    Task evoked theta and alpha band power

    Time frame: from enrollment to end of 6 month visit

Secondary outcomes

  1. Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone (BTACT)

    The Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone (BTACT) assesses multiple dimensions central for effective functioning across adulthood: episodic memory, working memory, reasoning, verbal fluency, and executive function. The BTACT is the first instrument which includes measures of processing speed, reaction time, and task switching/inhibitory control for use over the telephone.

    Time frame: from enrollment to 6 months after brain injury

  2. Quality of Life (QOL)

    We will formulate a QOL by partnering with a community advisory board comprising of TBI survivors and their caregiver/family members.

    Time frame: from enrollment to 6 months after brain injury

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University of Cincinnati
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45219, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 3, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06871124
Lead sponsor
University of Cincinnati
Responsible party
Ishita Basu (Assistant Professor, University of Cincinnati) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 11, 2025
Start date
Jun 16, 2025
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 30, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 3, 2026

Study contacts

Ishita Basu, PhD
Contact
basuia@ucmail.uc.edu
5135583991

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion