ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06866769EVAR-markersUpdated Mar 10, 2025

Efficacy of Biomarkers and CEUS Versus CTA in AAA Follow-up Post-EVAR

An observational study in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Without Rupture, sponsored by Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria La Fe. Recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-10.

Sponsored by Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria La Fe · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2025, 1 year 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jul 2024; still recruiting 2 years 3 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective observational study evaluates the efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and biomarker determination in the follow-up of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) treated with Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR). Currently, computed tomography angiography (CTA) is the standard for follow-up, although it has disadvantages such as radiation exposure and the use of iodinated contrasts. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), free of radiation and nephrotoxicity, and biomarkers could reduce the need for CTA minimizing the associated risks. Biomarkers will be measured before and after EVAR and CEUS will be performed at various time points and compared with CTA results to validate concordance and effectiveness in detecting endoleaks and aneurysm remodeling. The objectives include determining the efficacy of these combined methods and establishing a follow-up protocol that reduces exposure to radiation and iodinated contrast agents.

Read the detailed description

Background/Rationale:

Patients with AAA who have undergone EVAR of the abdominal aortic aneurysm require indefinite follow-up since a 4-year complication rate after EVAR of up to 40% has been described in some series.

In some patients a decrease in the diameters of the residual aneurysm sac after EVAR has been described, which is known as remodeling.

CTA is the gold standard imaging technique for the follow-up of these patients, although it has the disadvantage of using ionizing radiation and iodinated contrasts that are nephrotoxic and can produce hypersensitivity reactions. Furthermore, there is no consensus on which protocol is the most suitable (one phase, two phases or three phases). Currently, in our hospital, three-phase CTA is being performed, as well as CTA with the Split Bolus technique, which allows the acquisition of images in arterial and venous phases in a single acquisition, thus reducing radiation doses; a correlation between both techniques of 85.7-100% and a decrease in radiation doses of between 30-78% has been described.

An alternative to CTA is CEUS that presents a sensitivity of 90.5% (22-100%) and a specificity of 90.65% (71-100%) for the detection of endoleaks. It is a technique that does not use ionizing radiation; furthermore, ultrasound contrasts are not nephrotoxic and hypersensitivity reactions to them are exceptional. In addition, there are publications concerning the determination of biomarkers in the follow-up of patients with AAA both before and after treatment with EVAR.

Hypothesis:

Performing CEUS together with biomarker determination in patients with AAA treated by EVAR would allow reducing the number of CTA to these patients; and, therefore, radiation doses and the use of iodinated contrasts that may cause nephrotoxicity, as well as hypersensitivity reactions.

Primary objectives:

    • To determine whether the combination of biomarker levels together with CEUS in the follow-up of treated AAA patients is as effective as performing CTA to detect endoleaks.
    • To validate the usefulness of CEUS together with biomarker determination in the follow-up of these patients.

Secondary Objectives:

1.- To determine the cost-effectiveness of biomarkers in the follow-up of these patients.

To establish a protocol for the follow-up of patients with AAA treated with EVAR, including biomarkers and CEUS.

3.-To reduce radiation doses in the follow-up of patients with AAA treated with EVAR.

Methodology:

Prospective observational study. Biomarker levels will be determined before (within 30 days prior to the procedure) and after stent implantation (24-48 h, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year) together with contrast echography. In addition, a control CTA will be performed to validate concordance. These biomarkers will be analyzed comparing the values obtained in patients with endoleaks versus patients without endoleaks, as well as in those with aneurysm remodeling.

02

Conditions studied

  • Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Without Rupture

Keywords

  • Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA)
  • Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR)
  • Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)
  • Computed tomography angiography (CTA)
  • Biomarkers.
03

In context

Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal

467 studies on the registry are indexed under Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; 99 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 165 across 217 observational studies indexed under Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal.

Browse Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal studies →

Lead sponsor

Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria La Fe is the lead sponsor of 59 studies on the registry; 14 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with AAA treated with EVAR will undergo a clinical evaluation prior to the procedure, assessing inclusion and exclusion criteria. A determination of biomarkers will be carried out to determine their values before the procedure, which will be carried out within 30 days of said assessment. Patients who meet the inclusion criteria will be studied prospectively to assess the effectiveness of biomarker levels along with CEUS to detect endoleaks.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • patients with AAA under follow-up who are going to be treated with EVAR.
  • signed to perform CTA, CEUS and for the determination of biomarkers.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms or ruptured aneurysm.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Study cohort

    Inclusion Criteria: * patients with AAA under follow-up who are going to be treated with EVAR. * signed informed consent to perform CTA, CEUS and for the determination of biomarkers. Exclusion Criteria: * patients with inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms or ruptured aneurysm.

    Diagnostic Test: CTA

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testCTA

    The levels of biomarkers are determined before (within 30 days prior to the procedure) and after the implantation of the stent (24-48 hours, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and at 1 year), along with the performance of a contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Additionally, a follow-up CT angiography is performed to validate the concordance, that is, to assess if there are changes in the biomarker values determined one month after the implantation of the stent compared to the baseline values that may suggest the presence of complications (endoleaks, infection, thrombosis, etc.).

    Also known as: Ultrasound image enhancement

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Biomarkers Levels for Endoleak Detection Post-EVAR Treatment

    To determine if biomarker levels can detect endoleaks as a complication in patients treated for AAA, changes in biomarker levels will be compared to baseline values and subsequent assessments. Outcome Measure: Change in Endoleak Biomarkers from baseline to 1 year. Biomarkers and Units of Measure: * Extracellular Matrix Remodeling Markers: Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) (ng/mL) * Renal Function Markers: Cystatin C (mg/L) * Coagulation Markers: von Willebrand Factor (%), Factor VIII (IU/dL) Analysis: Each biomarker will be grouped into clinically relevant categories and analyzed as an independent measure within its respective category to assess its correlation with endoleak occurrence.

    Time frame: Biomarkers will be evaluated before (within 30 days prior to the procedure) and after implantation of the endoprosthesis (24-48 hours, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year).

  2. Biomarkers Levels for Thrombosis Detection Post-EVAR Treatment

    To determine if biomarker levels detect thrombosis in AAA patients, changes will be compared to baseline values and subsequent assessments. Outcome Measure: Change in Thrombosis Biomarkers from baseline to 1 year. Biomarkers and Units of Measure: * Coagulation Markers: Prothrombin Time (PT) (seconds), Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT) (seconds), Derived Fibrinogen (mg/dL), Factor XIII (%) * Platelet Function Markers: PFA-100 COL/ADP (seconds), PFA-100 COL/EPI (seconds) * Anticoagulation Markers: Protein C (%), Protein S (%), Antithrombin (%) * Thrombophilia Markers: Lupus Anticoagulant (Presence/Absence), Activated Protein C Resistance ((+/-)), Prothrombin G20210A Mutation ((+/-)), Factor V Leiden Mutation (G1691A) ((+/-)) Analysis: Each biomarker will be grouped into clinically relevant categories and analyzed as an independent measure within its respective category to track changes and assess their correlation with thrombosis.

    Time frame: Biomarkers will be evaluated before (within 30 days prior to the procedure) and after implantation of the endoprosthesis (24-48 hours, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year).

  3. Biomarkers Levels for Infection Detection Post-EVAR Treatment

    To determine if biomarker levels can detect infection as a complication in patients treated for AAA, changes in biomarker levels will be compared to baseline values and subsequent assessments. Outcome Measure: Change in Infection Biomarkers from baseline to 1 year. Biomarkers and Units of Measure: - Inflammatory Markers: C-Reactive Protein (CRP) (mg/L); Procalcitonin (ng/mL); IL-6 (pg/mL); IL-8 (pg/mL); TNF-α (pg/mL); Serum Calprotectin (µg/mL) Analysis: Each biomarker will be grouped as an inflammatory marker and analyzed as an independent measure to track changes and assess its correlation with infection.

    Time frame: Biomarkers will be evaluated before (within 30 days prior to the procedure) and after implantation of the endoprosthesis (24-48 hours, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year).

  4. Biomarker Levels for Prosthesis-Related Complication Detection Post-EVAR Treatment

    To determine whether biomarker levels can detect complications such as displacement, dislocation, and plication of the prosthesis in patients treated for AAA, changes in biomarker levels will be compared to baseline values and subsequent assessments. Outcome Measure: Change in Biomarkers Related to Prosthesis Issues from baseline to 1 year. Biomarkers and Units of Measure: * Lipid Metabolism Markers: Apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1) (mg/dL), Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) (mg/dL) * Hematological Markers: Reticulocytes (10³/mL) * Coagulation Markers: Quick Index (%) * Autoimmune Markers: Anticardiolipin Antibodies (IgG/IgM) (GPL/MPL units) Analysis: Each biomarker will be grouped into clinically relevant categories and treated as an independent measure within its respective category.

    Time frame: Biomarkers will be evaluated before (within 30 days prior to the procedure) and after implantation of the endoprosthesis (24-48 hours, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year).

  5. CEUS (Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound) for Endoleak Detection Post-EVAR treatment

    Objective: To determine if CEUS can detect endoleaks, thrombosis, infection, and complications related to protesis placement (displacement/dislocation of the prosthesis, plication of the prosthesis) in patients treated for AAA. • Units of Measure: Presence/absence of endoleaks, thrombosis, infection, displacement/dislocation of the prosthesis, plication of the prosthesis Comments: The presence or absence of endoleaks and other complications will be assessed, along with severity when applicable

    Time frame: CEUS will be performed at baseline (within 30 days before the procedure) and after implantation of the endoprosthesis: 24-48 hours, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year.

  6. Validation of CEUS for Endoleak and Complication Detection Post-EVAR treatment

    Objective: To validate the use of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) for detecting endoleaks, thrombosis, infection, and complications related to protesis placement (displacement/dislocation of the prosthesis, plication of the prosthesis) in patients treated for AAA, compared to angio-CT (gold standard). * Units of Measure: Presence/absence of endoleaks, thrombosis, infection, displacement/dislocation of the prosthesis, plication of the prosthesis * Comparison Standard: Angio-CT (gold standard) Comments: The presence or absence of endoleaks and other complications will be assessed, along with severity when applicable. CEUS results will be compared to the angio-CT results for validation.

    Time frame: CEUS will be performed at baseline (within 30 days before the procedure) and after implantation of the endoprosthesis: 24-48 hours, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year.

  7. Validation of Biomarkers for Endoleaks Detection Post EVAR

    To validate biomarkers for detecting endoleaks as a post-EVAR complication, changes in biomarker levels will be compared to baseline values and subsequent assessments. Outcome Measure: Change in Endoleak Biomarkers from baseline to 1 year. Biomarkers and Units of Measure: * Extracellular Matrix Remodeling Markers: Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) (ng/mL) * Renal Function Markers: Cystatin C (mg/L) * Coagulation Markers: von Willebrand Factor (%), Factor VIII (IU/dL) Analysis: Each biomarker will be grouped into clinically relevant categories and analyzed as an independent measure within its respective category to assess its correlation with endoleak occurrence

    Time frame: Biomarkers will be assessed at baseline (within 30 days prior to the procedure) and after implantation of the endoprosthesis: 24-48 hours, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year.

  8. Validation of Biomarkers for Thrombosis Detection Post-EVAR treatment

    To validate biomarkers for detecting thrombosis as a post-EVAR complication, changes in biomarker levels will be compared to baseline values and subsequent assessments. Outcome Measure: Change in Thrombosis Biomarkers from baseline to 1 year. Biomarkers and Units of Measure: * Coagulation Markers: Prothrombin Time (PT) (seconds), Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT) (seconds), Derived Fibrinogen (mg/dL), Factor XIII (%) * Platelet Function Markers: PFA-100 COL/ADP (seconds), PFA-100 COL/EPI (seconds) * Anticoagulation Markers: Protein C (%), Protein S (%), Antithrombin (%) * Thrombophilia Markers: Lupus Anticoagulant (Presence/Absence), Activated Protein C Resistance ((+/-)), Prothrombin G20210A Mutation ((+/-)), Factor V Leiden Mutation (G1691A) ((+/-)) Analysis: Each biomarker will be grouped into clinically relevant categories and analyzed as an independent measure within its respective category to track changes and assess their correlation with thrombosis.

    Time frame: Biomarkers will be assessed at baseline (within 30 days prior to the procedure) and after implantation of the endoprosthesis: 24-48 hours, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year.

  9. Validation of Biomarkers for Infection Detection Post-EVAR treatment

    To validate biomarkers for detecting infection as a post-EVAR complication, changes in biomarker levels will be compared to baseline values and subsequent assessments. Outcome Measure: Change in Infection Biomarkers from baseline to 1 year. Biomarkers and Units of Measure: - Inflammatory Markers: C-Reactive Protein (CRP) (mg/L); Procalcitonin (ng/mL); IL-6 (pg/mL); IL-8 (pg/mL); TNF-α (pg/mL); Serum Calprotectin (µg/mL) Analysis: Each biomarker will be grouped as an inflammatory marker and analyzed as an independent measure to track changes and assess its correlation with infection.

    Time frame: Biomarkers will be assessed at baseline (within 30 days prior to the procedure) and after implantation of the endoprosthesis: 24-48 hours, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year.

  10. Validation of Biomarkers for Prosthesis-Related Complication Detection Post-EVAR Treatment

    To validate biomarkers for detecting complications such as displacement, dislocation, and plication of the prosthesis, changes in biomarker levels will be compared to baseline values and subsequent assessments. Outcome Measure: Change in Biomarkers Related to Prosthesis Issues from baseline to 1 year. Biomarkers and Units of Measure: * Lipid Metabolism Markers: Apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1) (mg/dL), Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) (mg/dL) * Hematological Markers: Reticulocytes (10³/mL) * Coagulation Markers: Quick Index (%) * Autoimmune Markers: Anticardiolipin Antibodies (IgG/IgM) (GPL/MPL units) Analysis: Each biomarker will be grouped into clinically relevant categories and analyzed as an independent measure within its respective category.

    Time frame: Biomarkers will be assessed at baseline (within 30 days prior to the procedure) and after implantation of the endoprosthesis: 24-48 hours, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cost-Effectiveness of Biomarker Measurements in AAA Follow-Up Post-EVAR treatment

    Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of biomarker determination in the follow-up of AAA patients treated with EVAR, using a Health Economic Evaluation framework. * Units of Measure: Cost of biomarker tests (in euros). * Analysis Method: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) and Cost-Minimization Analysis (CMA). Comments: The cost-effectiveness analysis will compare the costs of biomarker measurements to clinical outcomes such as detection and management of complications.

    Time frame: Biomarkers will be evaluated before (within 30 days prior to the procedure) and after implantation of the endoprosthesis (24-48 hours, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year).

  2. Cost-Effectiveness of Imaging (CEUS and CTA) in AAA Follow-Up Post-EVAR treatment

    Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of imaging techniques (CEUS and CTA) for follow-up of AAA patients treated with EVAR. * Units of Measure: Cost per imaging session (in euros). * Analysis Method: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) and Cost-Minimization Analysis (CMA). Comments: The cost-effectiveness of CEUS and CTA will be assessed in relation to clinical outcomes, like the detection and management of complications.

    Time frame: Imaging techniques (CEUS and CTA) will be performed at the same time points as biomarker assessments (within 30 days before the procedure, and after implantation: 24-48 hours, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2025, 12 months after the start.

Of 67 non-industry observational studies under Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal, half reached primary completion within 48 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 22 and three quarters within 83. This study's planned 12 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 91 studies reached it within 48 months; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 83.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 24, 2025
First posted
Mar 10, 2025
StartActual
Jul 25, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Jul 30, 2025
CompletionEst.
Apr 30, 2028
Last update
Mar 10, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 10, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06866769
Lead sponsor
Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria La Fe
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 10, 2025
Start date
Jul 25, 2024
Primary completion
Jul 30, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 30, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 10, 2025

Study contacts

Juan Manuel Sanchís García
Contact
sanchis_juagar@gva.es
+34 961245655
Juan Manuel Sanchís García
principal investigator · Hospital Universitario La Fe

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion