CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06861959Updated Mar 10, 2025

Comparison Volume-controlled Ventilation, Pressure-controlled Volume-guaranteed Ventilation, and Pressure-controlled Ventilation During Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery in the Steep Trendelenburg Position

An interventional study of Device: Volume-Controlled Ventilation (VCV) and Device: Pressure-Controlled Ventilation (PCV) in Mechanical Ventilation, Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery and Peak Inspiratuar Pressure, sponsored by Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to female participants aged 20 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-10.

Sponsored by Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 years 1 month after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2021, registered Feb 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 65 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Objective:

This study aimed to compare the effects of three different mechanical ventilation modes-Volume-Controlled Ventilation (VCV), Pressure-Controlled Ventilation (PCV), and Pressure-Controlled Volume-Guaranteed Ventilation (PCV-VG)-on pulmonary and hemodynamic variables during laparoscopic gynecologic surgery in the steep Trendelenburg position. The hypothesis was that PCV and PCV-VG would be superior to VCV in optimizing respiratory mechanics and improving oxygenation, particularly by reducing peak inspiratory pressure (Ppeak).

Methods:

Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Sixty ASA I-III patients aged 20-65 years undergoing elective laparoscopic gynecologic surgery in the steep Trendelenburg position were included (20 patients per ventilation group).

Patients were randomized into VCV, PCV, and PCV-VG groups. Intraoperative ventilation was performed with a tidal volume of 8 mL/kg, PEEP of 5 cmH2O, and intra-abdominal pressure maintained at 12-14 mmHg.

Data were collected at four time points: T1 (after induction, supine), T2 (30 min after CO2 insufflation, Trendelenburg), T3 (60 min after pneumoperitoneum), and T4 (after CO2 deflation, supine).

Primary outcome: Ppeak comparison between groups. Secondary outcomes: Dynamic lung compliance (Cdyn), mean inspiratory pressure (Pmean), gas exchange, and hemodynamic parameters.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mechanical Ventilation
  • Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery
  • Peak Inspiratuar Pressure
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital is the lead sponsor of 76 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • The study included patients aged 20-65 years
  • Classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or III
  • who were scheduled to undergo an elective laparoscopic gynecologic surgery with pneumoperitoneum lasting at least one hour in the steep Trendelenburg position.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • morbid obesity (BMI > 40 kg/m²)
  • pulmonary or cardiac diseases (e.g., chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure)
  • a history of difficult intubation
  • Patients requiring conversion to laparotomy or experiencing hemodynamic instability during surgery
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group VCV

    Patients in this group were ventilated using Volume-Controlled Ventilation (VCV) mode throughout the procedure.

    Device: Device: Volume-Controlled Ventilation (VCV)

  • Active comparator
    Group PCV

    Patients in this group were ventilated using Pressure-Controlled Ventilation (PCV) mode throughout the procedure.

    Device: Device: Pressure-Controlled Ventilation (PCV)

  • Active comparator
    Group PCV-VG

    Patients in this group were ventilated using Pressure-Controlled Volume-Guaranteed Ventilation (PCV-VG) mode throughout the procedure.

    Device: Device: Pressure-Controlled Volume-Guaranteed Ventilation (PCV-VG)

Interventions

  • DeviceDevice: Volume-Controlled Ventilation (VCV)

    Tidal volume: 8 mL/kg of ideal body weight Respiratory rate adjusted to maintain an end-tidal CO₂ (EtCO₂) level of 30-35 mmHg Inspiratory-expiratory ratio: 1:2 PEEP: 5 cmH₂O Mechanical ventilation was provided using a Datex-Ohmeda Avance Anesthesia Machine (GE Healthcare, USA) Measurements were taken at four predefined time points (T1-T4)

  • DeviceDevice: Pressure-Controlled Ventilation (PCV)

    Initial peak inspiratory pressure adjusted to deliver a tidal volume of 8 mL/kg of ideal body weight Respiratory rate adjusted to maintain an end-tidal CO₂ (EtCO₂) level of 30-35 mmHg Inspiratory-expiratory ratio: 1:2 PEEP: 5 cmH₂O Mechanical ventilation was provided using a Datex-Ohmeda Avance Anesthesia Machine (GE Healthcare, USA) Measurements were taken at four predefined time points (T1-T4)

  • DeviceDevice: Pressure-Controlled Volume-Guaranteed Ventilation (PCV-VG)

    Pressure-controlled mode with volume guarantee to maintain a tidal volume of 8 mL/kg of ideal body weight Respiratory rate adjusted to maintain an end-tidal CO₂ (EtCO₂) level of 30-35 mmHg Inspiratory-expiratory ratio: 1:2 PEEP: 5 cmH₂O Mechanical ventilation was provided using a Datex-Ohmeda Avance Anesthesia Machine (GE Healthcare, USA) Measurements were taken at four predefined time points (T1-T4)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. peak inspiratory pressure (Ppeak) among the groups

    The primary outcome of the study was to compare peak inspiratory pressure (Ppeak) (cmH₂O) among the VCV, PCV, and PCV-VG ventilation modes in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery in the steep Trendelenburg position. Data were collected at four predefined time points during the study. The first time point (T1) was measured 15 minutes after the induction of anesthesia, with patients in the supine position. The second time point (T2) was recorded 30 minutes following CO₂ insufflation and positioning in the Trendelenburg position. The third time point (T3) represented measurements taken 60 minutes after the initiation of pneumoperitoneum. The final time point (T4) was assessed 15 minutes after CO₂ deflation and the return of patients to the supine position.

    Time frame: 15 minutes after the induction, 30 minutes following CO₂ insufflation, 60 minutes after the initiation of pneumoperitoneum, 15 minutes after CO₂ deflation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Inspiratory Pressure (Pmean) (cmH₂O) among the groups

    Mean Inspiratory Pressure (Pmean) (cmH₂O) Ventilation variables was recorded at T1 to T4.

    Time frame: 15 minutes after the induction, 30 minutes following CO₂ insufflation, 60 minutes after the initiation of pneumoperitoneum, 15 minutes after CO₂ deflation

  2. Plateau Pressure (Pplateau) (cmH₂O) among the groups

    Plateau Pressure (Pplateau) (cmH₂O) Ventilation variables was recorded at T1 to T4.

    Time frame: 15 minutes after the induction, 30 minutes following CO₂ insufflation, 60 minutes after the initiation of pneumoperitoneum, 15 minutes after CO₂ deflation

  3. Dynamic Lung Compliance (Cdyn) (mL/cmH₂O) among the groups

    Dynamic Lung Compliance (Cdyn) (mL/cmH₂O) Ventilation variables was recorded at T1 to T4.

    Time frame: 15 minutes after the induction, 30 minutes following CO₂ insufflation, 60 minutes after the initiation of pneumoperitoneum, 15 minutes after CO₂ deflation

  4. Respiratory Rate (RR) (breaths per minute) among the groups

    Respiratory Rate (RR) (breaths per minute) Ventilation variables was recorded at T1 to T4.

    Time frame: 15 minutes after the induction, 30 minutes following CO₂ insufflation, 60 minutes after the initiation of pneumoperitoneum, 15 minutes after CO₂ deflation

  5. Exhaled Tidal Volume (Exhale TV) (mL) among the groups

    Exhaled Tidal Volume (Exhale TV) (mL) Ventilation variables was recorded at T1 to T4.

    Time frame: 15 minutes after the induction, 30 minutes following CO₂ insufflation, 60 minutes after the initiation of pneumoperitoneum, 15 minutes after CO₂ deflation

  6. Hemodynamic parameters: Heart Rate (HR) (beats per minute) among the groups

    Heart Rate (HR) (beats per minute) hemodynamic parameters were recorded at T1 to T4

    Time frame: 15 minutes after the induction, 30 minutes following CO₂ insufflation, 60 minutes after the initiation of pneumoperitoneum, 15 minutes after CO₂ deflation

  7. Hemodynamic parameters:Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) (mmHg) among the groups

    Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) (mmHg) hemodynamic parameters were recorded at T1 to T4

    Time frame: 15 minutes after the induction, 30 minutes following CO₂ insufflation, 60 minutes after the initiation of pneumoperitoneum, 15 minutes after CO₂ deflation

  8. Hemodynamic parameters: Peripheral Oxygen Saturation (SpO₂) (%) among the groups

    Peripheral Oxygen Saturation (SpO₂) (%) hemodynamic parameters were recorded at T1 to T4

    Time frame: 15 minutes after the induction, 30 minutes following CO₂ insufflation, 60 minutes after the initiation of pneumoperitoneum, 15 minutes after CO₂ deflation

  9. Hemodynamic parameters:End-Tidal CO₂ (EtCO₂) (mmHg) among the groups

    End-Tidal CO₂ (EtCO₂) (mmHg) hemodynamic parameters were recorded at T1 to T4

    Time frame: 15 minutes after the induction, 30 minutes following CO₂ insufflation, 60 minutes after the initiation of pneumoperitoneum, 15 minutes after CO₂ deflation

  10. arterial blood gas analysis: Arterial Partial Pressure of Oxygen (PaO₂) (mmHg) among the groups

    Arterial Partial Pressure of Oxygen (PaO₂) (mmHg) Arterial blood gas analysis was conducted at T1 and T3.

    Time frame: 15 minutes after the induction, 60 minutes after the initiation of pneumoperitoneum

  11. arterial blood gas analysis: Arterial Partial Pressure of Oxygen (PaO₂) (mmHg) among the groups

    Arterial Partial Pressure of Carbon Dioxide (PaCO₂) (mmHg) Arterial blood gas analysis was conducted at T1 and T3.

    Time frame: 15 minutes after the induction, 60 minutes after the initiation of pneumoperitoneum

  12. arterial blood gas analysis: Arterial Oxygen Saturation (SaO₂) (%) among the groups

    Arterial Oxygen Saturation (SaO₂) (%) Arterial blood gas analysis was conducted at T1 and T3.

    Time frame: 15 minutes after the induction, 60 minutes after the initiation of pneumoperitoneum

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Zeynep Kamil Maternity and Children's Training and Research Hospital
    Istanbul, Üsküdar, Turkey
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Toker MK, Altiparmak B, Uysal AI, Demirbilek SG. [Comparison of pressure-controlled volume-guaranteed ventilation and volume-controlled ventilation in obese patients during gynecologic laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position]. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2019 Nov-Dec;69(6):553-560. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2019.09.003. Epub 2019 Dec 10. PubMed 31836201 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 10, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06861959
Lead sponsor
Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital
Responsible party
kübra taşkın (anesthesiology and reanimation specialist doctor, Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 6, 2025
Start date
Jan 1, 2021
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2021
Completion
Sep 1, 2021
Last update
Mar 10, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion