ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06398769Updated May 3, 2024

VCare Versus SecuFix Uterine Manipulator for Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

An interventional study of SecuFix UM and VCare UM in Operative Time, Length of Hospital Stay and Perioperative Complications, sponsored by Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital. Not yet recruiting. Open to female participants aged 35 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-03.

Sponsored by Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Device feasibility

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by May 2024, 2 years 6 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
35 Years to 65 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Hysterectomy, the most commonly performed gynecological operation, can be carried out through various methods using a wide array of instruments and energy techniques. Minimally invasive procedures such as robotic or laparoscopic approaches are linked to lower perioperative complications and quicker recovery when compared to abdominal hysterectomy. Furthermore, recent advancements in surgical tools and methodologies have facilitated endoscopic surgeries. Uterine manipulation plays a crucial role in laparoscopic hysterectomy by facilitating bladder dissection, positioning the ureters, and exposing the anterior and posterior vaginal fornices. It also prevents pneumoperitoneum loss by closing off the vaginal space. Despite these apparent benefits, there is no existing report comparing different types of uterine manipulators. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the Vcare and SecuFix uterine manipulators used in laparoscopic hysterectomy based on operative time, length of hospital stay, estimated blood loss, perioperative complications, and subjective performance.

Read the detailed description

Introduction Hysterectomy is the most commonly performed gynecological operation and can be carried out through various methods using a wide array of instruments and energy techniques. Although the methods have advantages and disadvantages over each other, minimally invasive procedures are associated with less morbidity and perioperative recovery. Recent advancements in surgical tools and methodologies have facilitated endoscopic surgeries. Uterine manipulation is crucial in laparoscopic hysterectomy as it facilitates bladder dissection, positioning the ureters, and exposing the anterior and posterior vaginal fornices. It also maintains pneumoperitoneum. Currently, many uterine manipulators are available, but the evidence for their efficacy and safety is still unclear. The purpose of utilizing a uterine manipulator is to enhance surgical outcomes and reduce intraoperative complications, particularly concerning the bladder and ureter. It is important to visualize the anterior and posterior fornices and ensure maintenance of the pneumoperitoneum. Therefore, uterine manipulators play a crucial role in laparoscopic hysterectomy. However, none of the manipulators currently available possess all the characteristics of an ideal manipulator. Therefore, the investigators aimed to compare the Vcare and SecuFix uterine manipulators used in laparoscopic hysterectomy with regard to operative time, length of hospital stay, estimated blood loss, and perioperative complications.

02

Conditions studied

  • Operative Time
  • Length of Hospital Stay
  • Perioperative Complications

Keywords

  • uterine manipulator
  • laparoscopy
  • Instruments
  • minimally invasive surgery
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital is the lead sponsor of 78 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
35 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • aged 35-65 years
  • hysterectomy for benign gynecological indications

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of urogynecologic procedures
  • suspected gynecological ,
  • endometriosis,
  • pelvic inflammatory disease,
  • pelvic organ prolapse,
  • unavailibility of operative records
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Device feasibility
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
10 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    SecuFix UM

    SecuFix UM arm: patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy

    Device: SecuFix UM

  • Active comparator
    VCare UM

    VCare UM arm: patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy

    Device: VCare UM

Interventions

  • DeviceSecuFix UM

    All surgeries were performed using Secufix UM.

  • DeviceVCare UM

    All surgeries were performed using VCare UM.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. operative time

    Operation time was defined as the duration from the skin incision to detachment of the uterus.

    Time frame: Operation time was defined as the duration in minutes from the skin incision to detachment of the uterus during surgery.

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The dataset used and/or analyzed in the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for May 2024; primary completion for May 2024, 0 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 26, 2024
First posted
May 3, 2024
StartEst.
May 2024
Primary completionEst.
May 2024
CompletionEst.
May 2024
Last update
May 3, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 3, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06398769
Lead sponsor
Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital
Responsible party
Esra Keles (Assoc Prof, MD, PhD candidate, Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 3, 2024
Start date
May 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 2024 (estimated)
Completion
May 2024 (estimated)
Last update
May 3, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion