CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06853795Updated Mar 3, 2025

Prospective Validation Study of an E-health Tool for Patient Selection for SCS

An observational study in Pain, Chronic, sponsored by Erasmus Medical Center. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-03.

Sponsored by Erasmus Medical Center · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational study is to learn more about the selection of patients with chronic pain for spinal cord stimulation. The main question it aims to answer is to assess the predictive value of an e-health tool for patient outcomes.

Participants will be treated as normal and will be asked to complete patient questionnaires to evaluate their pain relief after receiving spinal cord stimulation. The e-health tool will not be used during the conduct of the study, as patient outcomes will only at the end of the study be compared with the recommendations made by the e-health tool.

Read the detailed description

This is a multicentre study within Europe, prospectively collecting data from patients with a positive decision on SCS, receiving either a direct implant or an SCS screening trial. Data will be collected by implant centres who have not previously used the e-health tool for SCS patient selection (i.e. tool-naïve). Furthermore, participating centres should declare neither to use the tool during the conduct of study nor on patients included in the study population. In addition, participating implant centres should have previous experience in conducting prospective clinical trials.

Baseline data should be collected at the moment of the final decision on SCS (i.e., after multidisciplinary team consultation if applicable) using an online data capture program:

  • General baseline data
  • e-Health tool variables
  • Centre decision on SCS (direct implant or trial)

Only for patients receiving SCS (direct implant or positive trial), follow-up data at 6 and 12 months will be collected.

Afterwards, the prospectively collected data will be applied to the e-health tool and its recommendations compared with the centre decisions, trial results and patient outcomes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain, Chronic

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • SCS
  • e-health tool
  • patient selection
03

In context

Chronic Pain

2,930 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Pain; 701 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is below the median of 126 across 688 observational studies indexed under Chronic Pain.

Browse Chronic Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Erasmus Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 466 studies on the registry; 179 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with chronic pain being eligible for spinal cord stimulation and receiving a direct implant or SCS screening trial

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Chronic pain with a duration of least 6 months
  • One of the following primary indications: Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome (PSPS) (type 1 and type 2), Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, Neuropathic Pain Syndrome, Ischaemic Pain Syndrome
  • Pain severity at least moderate (VAS ≥ 5, on average over the last month) having a substantial impact on daily functioning and quality of life at the discretion of the attending physician
  • Insufficiently responding to appropriate trials of medication, conservative management (e.g. physiotherapy) and/or minimally invasive treatments (such as local anaesthetic nerve blocks), and/or experiencing intolerable side effects of these treatments
  • No clear benefits of surgery expected

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

  • Unwilling to have an implant
  • Unable to manage the device
  • Absolute contra-indications for active treatment (e.g. unfit for undergoing SCS, pregnancy, spine- or skin-related infections, coagulation disorder)
  • Uncontrolled disruptive psychological or psychiatric disorder at the discretion of the attending physician
  • Ongoing alcohol and drug misuse
  • Widespread pain
  • Lack of reimbursement of SCS
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Chronic pain patients eligible for spinal cord stimulation

    Patients with chronic pain with a positive decision on SCS. Those receiving either a direct implant or a positive screening trial will be followed at 6 and 12 months after receiving SCS

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. e-health tool predictive value

    Assessment of the predictive value of the panel recommendations (i.e., not recommended, recommended, highly recommended) embedded in the SCS e-health tool for patient outcomes (a). trial outcome: positive/negative, based on Numeric Pain Rating Scale, range 0-10; b).pain-related outcomes after SCS implant: EQ-5D-5L (range 5-25), Brief Pain Inventory (range 0-10), Global Perceived Effect (range 1-7).

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Relationship between panel recommendations with centre decisions

    Assessment of the relationship between the panel recommendations (i.e., not recommended, recommended, highly recommended) embedded in the SCS e-health tool with the centre decisions (positive=proceed with SCS; negative=no SCS; defer=reassess in a later phase).

    Time frame: 1 week

  2. Trial results

    Assessment of the predictive value of the panel recommendations (i.e., not recommended, recommended, highly recommended) embedded in the e-health tool for trial results (% pain reduction on Numeric Pain Rating Scale; range 0-10).

    Time frame: 1 week

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — No data will be shared with researchers not part of the study

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 3, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06853795
Lead sponsor
Erasmus Medical Center
Responsible party
Prof. Dr. Frank Huygen (Prof. Dr., Erasmus Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 3, 2025
Start date
Mar 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 3, 2025

Study contacts

Herman Stoevelaar, PhD
Contact
herman.stoevelaar@ismar.com
+3134856072
Frank Huygen, MD, PhD
Contact
f.huygen@erasmusmc.nl
+31107034906
Herman Stoevelaar, PhD
study director · Ismar Healthcare

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion