An observational study in Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN), sponsored by P. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute. Completed at 1 site in Russia. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-25.
Sponsored by P. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute · Observational
The goal of this observational study was to learn about the long-term effects of neoadjuvant (pre-surgery) chemotherapy on patients with locally advanced colon cancer. The main focus was to better understand the severity of long-lasting nerve damage, known as chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), and its impact on patients' quality of life (QoL).
The key question the study aimed to answer was: What is the long-term severity of this common adverse event, and how much of an impact does it have on patients' quality of life?
Participants provided detailed responses about the severity of their CIPN symptoms and the overall impact on their well-being using the FACT-GOG-Ntx questionnaire.
Introduction. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common and debilitating side effect experienced by many cancer patients receiving neurotoxic agents such as oxaliplatin. CIPN can manifest as numbness, tingling, and neuropathic pain, significantly impairing patients' quality of life (QoL). While the acute development of CIPN during chemotherapy treatment is well documented, the long-term persistence and severity of CIPN symptoms after completion of therapy is less understood.
The relatively new approach to treatment of patients with locally advanced colon cancer involves starting treatment with neoadjuvant (pre-operative) chemotherapy regimens containing oxaliplatin, such as FOLFOX, followed by definitive surgical resection and potentially additional adjuvant chemotherapy. This strategy has proven to be non-inferior to more established adjuvant (post-operative) chemotherapy, according to results of several clinical trials. However, the impact of this long-term CIPN on patient-reported outcomes and QoL in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy has not been thoroughly investigated.
Additionally, there is interest in exploring whether modifying the sequence of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy regimens could potentially mitigate the severity of CIPN. Specifically, a hypothesis can be made that delivering a reduced volume of oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy (6 cycles of neoadjuvant FOLFOX) followed by a break for surgery, with only selective use of additional adjuvant chemotherapy based on response, may result in less cumulative neurotoxicity and improved long-term CIPN outcomes compared to the standard approach of administering the full course of chemotherapy after surgery.
The primary objective of this observational study was to characterize the long-term severity of CIPN symptoms and the associated impact on QoL in patients with locally advanced colon cancer who received neoadjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy, followed by surgical resection and response-dependent adjuvant chemotherapy.
Study Design and Participants. This was a single-center, prospective observational study conducted at an academic medical center. Adult patients (≥18 years old) with histologically confirmed, locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the colon (clinical stage III or high-risk stage II) were eligible for enrollment. Key inclusion criteria included an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1, adequate organ function, and no prior systemic chemotherapy or radiotherapy.
Eligible patients were enrolled and received 6 cycles of neoadjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy. FOLFOX consisted of oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 IV on day 1, leucovorin 400 mg/m2 IV on day 1, and 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 IV bolus on day 1 followed by 2400 mg/m2 continuous IV infusion over 46 hours, every 2 weeks.
After completing six cycles of neoadjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy, patients underwent definitive surgical resection of their primary tumor. For those who achieved a favorable pathologic response (defined as pT0-2N0M0 or pT3N0M0 without risk factors), no additional adjuvant chemotherapy was administered post-surgery. However, in cases of pT3N0M0 with the presence of risk factors, patients received 3 months of adjuvant capecitabine. Patients with a poor pathologic response were offered an additional six cycles of adjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy.
Assessment of CIPN. Throughout the course of treatment, patients underwent clinical assessments for the development of CIPN. During treatment, a physician performed a neurological examination and graded the severity of CIPN using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 4.0. This standardized grading system classifies CIPN from grade 1 (mild) to grade 4 (life-threatening).
At a minimum of 3 months after the end of platinum-containing chemotherapy treatment, patients completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (FACT-GOG-Ntx) questionnaire. The FACT-GOG-Ntx is a validated, patient-reported outcome measure that evaluates the severity of CIPN symptoms and their impact on daily functioning and QoL.
The primary endpoint of this observational study was assessment of the long-term severity of CIPN and its impact on QoL, as measured by the FACT-GOG-Ntx questionnaire. The secondary target was assessment of correlation between various risk factors (older age (> 65 years), diabetes, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, Body mass index (BMI) > 25, and higher cumulative oxaliplatin dose; cold temperatures during treatment) and severity of long-term CIPN.
Statistical Considerations. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize characteristics of patients. Associations between risk factors and ACIPN severity were evaluated using chi-squared tests. Two-tailed Mann-Whitney U tests were used to show significant differences in long-term CIPN outcomes and QoL scores between patient groups. Pearson and Spearman correlations were used to evaluate associations between risk factors and CIPN severity. Statistical significance was set at p \< 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using JASP (Version 0.18.3), an open-source statistical software package (JASP Team, 2024) or GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).
Results. Between March 2021 and February 2024, a total of 54 patients were included and assessed by clinicians for acute CIPN during treatment. 45 of these patients provided complete FACT-GOG-Ntx questionnaire data for the long-term CIPN assessment, and 40 were included in the QoL analysis.
1,485 studies on the registry are indexed under Colonic Neoplasms; 362 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 54 is below the median of 262 across 363 observational studies indexed under Colonic Neoplasms.
Browse Colonic Neoplasms studies →P. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
This study includes patients who were treated for locally advanced colon cancer in P. Hertsen Oncology Clinical Research Institute in Moscow, Russian Federation
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
History of other oncological diseases, except for:
54 Patients with locally advanced colon cancer who received platinum-containing chemotherapy as the initial phase of their treatment, followed by surgical resection and, if indicated, adjuvant chemotherapy
Severity of long-term chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity-13 Version 4 (FACT/GOG-Ntx) questionnaire. The FACT/GOG-Ntx total score ranges from 0-160 with higher scores indicating better QoL and/or fewer symptoms.
Time frame: At least 3 months after the end of platinum-containing treatment
Patients' quality of life
Assessment using the the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) scores within the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity-13 Version 4 (FACT/GOG-Ntx) questionnaire. The FACT-G score ranges from 0-108 with higher scores indicating better QoL and/or fewer symptoms.
Time frame: At least 3 months after the end of platinum-containing treatment
Severity of acute chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy
Assessed by physicians using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.0. Grading criteria for peripheral sensory neuropathy was used (grade 1-4). Higher grade indicates worse symptoms.
Time frame: Through platinum-containing chemotherapy treatment completion, an average of 3,5 months
Correlation between risk factors and severity of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy
Correlation between previously descriped risk factors (older age \[\> 65 years\], diabetes, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group \[ECOG\] performance status, Body mass index \[BMI\] \> 25 and higher cumulative oxaliplatin dose) and severity of acute and long-term chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy severity
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Correlation between severity of long-term chemotherapy induced neuropathy and quality of life
Correlation between severity of long-term chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy and patients' quality of life, as assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity-13 Version 4 (FACT/GOG-Ntx) questionnaire. FACT/GOG-Ntx total score ranges from 0-160 with higher scores indicating better QoL and/or fewer symptoms.
Time frame: At least 3 months after the end of platinum-containing treatment
Plan to share: Yes
Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Analytic code
Time frame: Data requests can be submitted starting 9 months after article publication and the data will be made accessible for up to 24 months. Extensions will be considered on a case-by-case basis
Access criteria: Access to trial IPD can be requested by qualified researchers engaging in independent scientific research, and will be provided following review and approval of a research proposal and Statistical Analysis Plan and execution of a Data Sharing Agreement
This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
P. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute