ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06844409NEOCIPN-COLONUpdated Feb 25, 2025

Neoadjuvant FOLFOX Chemotherapy for Colon Cancer: Long-Term Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy and Impact on Quality of Life

An observational study in Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN), sponsored by P. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute. Completed at 1 site in Russia. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-25.

Sponsored by P. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
54
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational study was to learn about the long-term effects of neoadjuvant (pre-surgery) chemotherapy on patients with locally advanced colon cancer. The main focus was to better understand the severity of long-lasting nerve damage, known as chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), and its impact on patients' quality of life (QoL).

The key question the study aimed to answer was: What is the long-term severity of this common adverse event, and how much of an impact does it have on patients' quality of life?

Participants provided detailed responses about the severity of their CIPN symptoms and the overall impact on their well-being using the FACT-GOG-Ntx questionnaire.

Read the detailed description

Introduction. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common and debilitating side effect experienced by many cancer patients receiving neurotoxic agents such as oxaliplatin. CIPN can manifest as numbness, tingling, and neuropathic pain, significantly impairing patients' quality of life (QoL). While the acute development of CIPN during chemotherapy treatment is well documented, the long-term persistence and severity of CIPN symptoms after completion of therapy is less understood.

The relatively new approach to treatment of patients with locally advanced colon cancer involves starting treatment with neoadjuvant (pre-operative) chemotherapy regimens containing oxaliplatin, such as FOLFOX, followed by definitive surgical resection and potentially additional adjuvant chemotherapy. This strategy has proven to be non-inferior to more established adjuvant (post-operative) chemotherapy, according to results of several clinical trials. However, the impact of this long-term CIPN on patient-reported outcomes and QoL in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy has not been thoroughly investigated.

Additionally, there is interest in exploring whether modifying the sequence of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy regimens could potentially mitigate the severity of CIPN. Specifically, a hypothesis can be made that delivering a reduced volume of oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy (6 cycles of neoadjuvant FOLFOX) followed by a break for surgery, with only selective use of additional adjuvant chemotherapy based on response, may result in less cumulative neurotoxicity and improved long-term CIPN outcomes compared to the standard approach of administering the full course of chemotherapy after surgery.

The primary objective of this observational study was to characterize the long-term severity of CIPN symptoms and the associated impact on QoL in patients with locally advanced colon cancer who received neoadjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy, followed by surgical resection and response-dependent adjuvant chemotherapy.

Study Design and Participants. This was a single-center, prospective observational study conducted at an academic medical center. Adult patients (≥18 years old) with histologically confirmed, locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the colon (clinical stage III or high-risk stage II) were eligible for enrollment. Key inclusion criteria included an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1, adequate organ function, and no prior systemic chemotherapy or radiotherapy.

Eligible patients were enrolled and received 6 cycles of neoadjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy. FOLFOX consisted of oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 IV on day 1, leucovorin 400 mg/m2 IV on day 1, and 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 IV bolus on day 1 followed by 2400 mg/m2 continuous IV infusion over 46 hours, every 2 weeks.

After completing six cycles of neoadjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy, patients underwent definitive surgical resection of their primary tumor. For those who achieved a favorable pathologic response (defined as pT0-2N0M0 or pT3N0M0 without risk factors), no additional adjuvant chemotherapy was administered post-surgery. However, in cases of pT3N0M0 with the presence of risk factors, patients received 3 months of adjuvant capecitabine. Patients with a poor pathologic response were offered an additional six cycles of adjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy.

Assessment of CIPN. Throughout the course of treatment, patients underwent clinical assessments for the development of CIPN. During treatment, a physician performed a neurological examination and graded the severity of CIPN using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 4.0. This standardized grading system classifies CIPN from grade 1 (mild) to grade 4 (life-threatening).

At a minimum of 3 months after the end of platinum-containing chemotherapy treatment, patients completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (FACT-GOG-Ntx) questionnaire. The FACT-GOG-Ntx is a validated, patient-reported outcome measure that evaluates the severity of CIPN symptoms and their impact on daily functioning and QoL.

The primary endpoint of this observational study was assessment of the long-term severity of CIPN and its impact on QoL, as measured by the FACT-GOG-Ntx questionnaire. The secondary target was assessment of correlation between various risk factors (older age (> 65 years), diabetes, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, Body mass index (BMI) > 25, and higher cumulative oxaliplatin dose; cold temperatures during treatment) and severity of long-term CIPN.

Statistical Considerations. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize characteristics of patients. Associations between risk factors and ACIPN severity were evaluated using chi-squared tests. Two-tailed Mann-Whitney U tests were used to show significant differences in long-term CIPN outcomes and QoL scores between patient groups. Pearson and Spearman correlations were used to evaluate associations between risk factors and CIPN severity. Statistical significance was set at p \< 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using JASP (Version 0.18.3), an open-source statistical software package (JASP Team, 2024) or GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

Results. Between March 2021 and February 2024, a total of 54 patients were included and assessed by clinicians for acute CIPN during treatment. 45 of these patients provided complete FACT-GOG-Ntx questionnaire data for the long-term CIPN assessment, and 40 were included in the QoL analysis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN)

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy
  • oxaliplatin
  • quality of life
  • neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • colon cancer
03

In context

Colonic Neoplasms

1,485 studies on the registry are indexed under Colonic Neoplasms; 362 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 54 is below the median of 262 across 363 observational studies indexed under Colonic Neoplasms.

Browse Colonic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

P. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

This study includes patients who were treated for locally advanced colon cancer in P. Hertsen Oncology Clinical Research Institute in Moscow, Russian Federation

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed, resectable colon cancer stage IIA - IIIC (cT3N0M0 [depth of invasion > 5 mm], cT4a-T4bN0M0, T1-4N1-2M0).
  • Age \< 75 years.
  • ECOG performance status 0-1.
  • Hemoglobin > 9 g/dL.
  • Absolute neutrophil count > 1500/µL.
  • Platelet count > 100,000/µL.
  • Bilirubin level \< 1.5 times the upper limit of normal.
  • Creatinine clearance > 60 mL/min (calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault formula).
  • ALT and AST levels \< 2.5 times the upper limit of normal.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of distant metastases.
  • History of other oncological diseases, except for:

    1. Cured non-melanoma skin cancer without known signs of recurrence or progression for > 5 years.
    2. Cured carcinoma in situ without signs of recurrence or progression for > 5 years.
  • Clinically significant concomitant cardiac pathology (chronic heart failure NYHA class > 1; hypertension with a risk of cardiovascular complications > 3; history of myocardial infarction, stroke, or transient ischemic attack; presence of other decompensated cardiovascular diseases).
  • ECOG performance status > 1.
  • Presence of viral or infectious diseases (human immunodeficiency virus, chronic viral hepatitis, other infectious diseases in the acute phase).
  • History of clinically significant central nervous system disorders.
  • Clinically significant peripheral polyneuropathy (> grade 2).
  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Individual intolerance to the components of the treatment.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
54 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients with colon cancer (II-III stage) who received neoadjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy

    54 Patients with locally advanced colon cancer who received platinum-containing chemotherapy as the initial phase of their treatment, followed by surgical resection and, if indicated, adjuvant chemotherapy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Severity of long-term chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy

    Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity-13 Version 4 (FACT/GOG-Ntx) questionnaire. The FACT/GOG-Ntx total score ranges from 0-160 with higher scores indicating better QoL and/or fewer symptoms.

    Time frame: At least 3 months after the end of platinum-containing treatment

  2. Patients' quality of life

    Assessment using the the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) scores within the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity-13 Version 4 (FACT/GOG-Ntx) questionnaire. The FACT-G score ranges from 0-108 with higher scores indicating better QoL and/or fewer symptoms.

    Time frame: At least 3 months after the end of platinum-containing treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Severity of acute chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy

    Assessed by physicians using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.0. Grading criteria for peripheral sensory neuropathy was used (grade 1-4). Higher grade indicates worse symptoms.

    Time frame: Through platinum-containing chemotherapy treatment completion, an average of 3,5 months

  2. Correlation between risk factors and severity of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy

    Correlation between previously descriped risk factors (older age \[\> 65 years\], diabetes, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group \[ECOG\] performance status, Body mass index \[BMI\] \> 25 and higher cumulative oxaliplatin dose) and severity of acute and long-term chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy severity

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years

  3. Correlation between severity of long-term chemotherapy induced neuropathy and quality of life

    Correlation between severity of long-term chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy and patients' quality of life, as assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity-13 Version 4 (FACT/GOG-Ntx) questionnaire. FACT/GOG-Ntx total score ranges from 0-160 with higher scores indicating better QoL and/or fewer symptoms.

    Time frame: At least 3 months after the end of platinum-containing treatment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute
    Moscow, Moscow 125284, Russia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Teng C; Venkatesha; Blinman PL, Vardy JL. Patterns of Patient-Reported Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Colorectal Cancer Survivors. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022 Dec;20(12):1308-1315. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.7050. PubMed 36509075 ↗
  • Land SR, Kopec JA, Cecchini RS, Ganz PA, Wieand HS, Colangelo LH, Murphy K, Kuebler JP, Seay TE, Needles BM, Bearden JD 3rd, Colman LK, Lanier KS, Pajon ER Jr, Cella D, Smith RE, O'Connell MJ, Costantino JP, Wolmark N. Neurotoxicity from oxaliplatin combined with weekly bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin as surgical adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II and III colon cancer: NSABP C-07. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jun 1;25(16):2205-11. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.6652. Epub 2007 Apr 30. PubMed 17470850 ↗
  • Soveri LM, Lamminmaki A, Hanninen UA, Karhunen M, Bono P, Osterlund P. Long-term neuropathy and quality of life in colorectal cancer patients treated with oxaliplatin containing adjuvant chemotherapy. Acta Oncol. 2019 Apr;58(4):398-406. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2018.1556804. Epub 2019 Jan 14. PubMed 30638100 ↗
  • Morton D, Seymour M, Magill L, Handley K, Glasbey J, Glimelius B, Palmer A, Seligmann J, Laurberg S, Murakami K, West N, Quirke P, Gray R; FOxTROT Collaborative Group. Preoperative Chemotherapy for Operable Colon Cancer: Mature Results of an International Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Mar 10;41(8):1541-1552. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00046. Epub 2023 Jan 19. PubMed 36657089 ↗
  • Davey MG, Amir AH, Ryan OK, Donnelly M, Donlon NE, Regan M, Meshkat B, Nugent E, Joyce M, Hogan AM. Evaluating the oncological safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced colon carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials and propensity-matched studies. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Jul 11;38(1):193. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04482-x. PubMed 37432559 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Analytic code

Time frame: Data requests can be submitted starting 9 months after article publication and the data will be made accessible for up to 24 months. Extensions will be considered on a case-by-case basis

Access criteria: Access to trial IPD can be requested by qualified researchers engaging in independent scientific research, and will be provided following review and approval of a research proposal and Statistical Analysis Plan and execution of a Data Sharing Agreement

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 25, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06844409
Lead sponsor
P. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute
Collaborators
Jiaxing University
Responsible party
Yulia Karagodina (Researcher, P. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 25, 2025
Start date
Mar 19, 2021
Primary completion
May 20, 2024
Completion
May 20, 2024
Last update
Feb 25, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion