ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06837051Updated Feb 20, 2025

The Effect of Modified Olfactory Training on Postoperative Olfactory Dysfunction in Patients With CRS

An interventional study of Conventional olfactory training device and Modified olfactory training device in Olfactory Dysfunction and Chronic Rhinosinusitis, sponsored by Peking University Third Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-20.

Sponsored by Peking University Third Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
213
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to validate the effectiveness of the modified olfactory training device, the main questions it aims to answer are:

Is it possible that the device can treat postoperative olfactory dysfunction in patients with chronic sinusitis? Compared to the conventional device, how efficient is the modified olfactory training device for treating postoperative olfactory dysfunction in patients with chronic sinusitis?

Read the detailed description

Endoscopic sinus surgery is an effective treatment for treating olfactory dysfunction related to chronic rhinosinusitis. However, recent studies have shown that most patients experience a return of olfactory function to preoperative levels within months to a year after surgery. Clinically, olfactory training after endoscopic sinus surgery has been proven beneficial for the olfactory recovery.

The improved olfactory training device, based on a nasal bidirectional drug delivery system, can increase the deposition rate in the olfactory fissure region and improve the efficiency of olfactory training.

In this study, the investigators planned to recruit 213 patients and divided them into three groups for control group and olfactory training with conventional and modified devices, and validate the effectiveness of the modified device based on changes in cognitive function and the comparison of the outcomes of the three groups.

02

Conditions studied

  • Olfactory Dysfunction
  • Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • olfactory dysfunction
  • chronic rhinosinusitis
  • endoscopic sinus surgery
  • olfactory training
03

In context

Rhinosinusitis

251 studies on the registry are indexed under Rhinosinusitis; 69 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 213 is above the median of 74 across 177 interventional studies indexed under Rhinosinusitis.

Browse Rhinosinusitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Peking University Third Hospital is the lead sponsor of 752 studies on the registry; 273 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. A diagnosis of CRSsNP based on the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2020 (EPOS20).
  2. The duration after endoscopic sinus surgery is 3months.
  3. Olfactory dysfunction confirmed with the Sniffin's Sticks psychophysical test (TDI score≦30.5) .
  4. Willingness to participate in this study and sign the form (ICF).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with olfactory impairment due to traumatic, congenital, toxic/drug-induced causes, tumors, or post-upper respiratory infections.
  2. Lund-Mackay olfactory cleft score > 0.
  3. Patients with severe comorbidities, such as malignant tumors.
  4. Current or planned pregnancy prior to the end of study.
  5. Patients who are unable to complete the study or are unable to comply with the requirements of the study (such as inability to tolerate olfactory function testing and treatment, memory or behavioral abnormalities, depression, smoking, heavy alcohol use, previous delinquent behavior)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
213 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    The Conventional Olfactory Training Group

    Patients are instructed to use the conventional olfactory training device at home twice daily, before breakfast and at bedtime. Four odors will be used: rose, mint, lemon, and clove. In each training session, participants are exposed to each odor for a duration of 10 seconds, followed by a 10-second break before the next odor is presented. Each training session lasts 5 minutes and is conducted for a duration of 12 months. All the patients will be treated with budesonide irrigations. Saline irrigations will be administered twice daily for 12 months using a NeilMed™ (NeilMed, Santa Rosa, CA) squeeze bottle along with salt packets and either distilled or filtered water. 2 mL of 0.5 mg/ 2 mL budesonide (Pulmicort Respules, AstraZeneca Canada, Mis sissauga, ON, Canada) will be added to the irrigation bottles of the patients.

    Device: Conventional olfactory training device

  • Experimental
    The Modified Olfactory Training Group

    Patients are instructed to use a modified olfactory training device based on expiratory pressure at home twice daily, before breakfast and at bedtime. Four odors will be used: rose, mint, lemon, and clove. In each training session, participants are exposed to each odor for a duration of 10 seconds, followed by a 10-second break before the next odor is presented. Each training session lasts 5 minutes and is conducted for a duration of 12 months. All the patients will be treated with budesonide irrigations. Saline irrigations will be administered twice daily for 12 months using a NeilMed™ (NeilMed, Santa Rosa, CA) squeeze bottle along with salt packets and either distilled or filtered water. 2 mL of 0.5 mg/ 2 mL budesonide (Pulmicort Respules, AstraZeneca Canada, Mis sissauga, ON, Canada) will be added to the irrigation bottles of the patients.

    Device: Modified olfactory training device

  • Sham comparator
    The Control Group

    Participants will not receive any olfactory training. All the patients will be treated with budesonide irrigations. Saline irrigations will be administered twice daily for 12 months using a NeilMed™ (NeilMed, Santa Rosa, CA) squeeze bottle along with salt packets and either distilled or filtered water. 2 mL of 0.5 mg/ 2 mL budesonide (Pulmicort Respules, AstraZeneca Canada, Mis sissauga, ON, Canada) will be added to the irrigation bottles of the patients.

    Drug: Budesonide irrigation

Interventions

  • DeviceConventional olfactory training device

    Four odorants are used: phenyl ethyl alcohol (PEA): rose, menthol: mint, citronellal: lemon, and eugenol: cloves. Training patients will receive four glass vials. Each contains one odorant (5 mL, soaked in cotton pads to prevent spilling) and is labeled with the name of the odorant. Budesonide irrigation can effectively target the olfactory cleft area to provide anti-inflammatory effects.

  • DeviceModified olfactory training device

    The modified olfactory training device is based on the nasal bidirectional drug delivery system. The device uses breathing pressure to create positive pressure, significantly increasing the deposition rate of odors in the olfactory cleft area. Budesonide irrigation can effectively target the olfactory cleft area to provide anti-inflammatory effects.

  • DrugBudesonide irrigation

    Budesonide irrigation can effectively target the olfactory cleft area to provide anti-inflammatory effects.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Sniffin's Sticks test

    A clinically significant olfactory improvement as measured by Sniffin' Sticks threshold, discrimination, and identification(TDI)( more than 6 scores)

    Time frame: Baseline,Month 3,Month 6,Month 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Olfactory cleft CT score

    Time frame: Baseline,Month 3,Month 6,Month 12

  2. Olfactory cleft endoscopy scale (OCES)

    The degree of discharge, nasal polyposis, edema, crusting, and scarring scores from 0 to 2 points for each measure. The sum of the olfactory cleft score on both sides is recorded for final results that ranged from 0 to 20 points. Higher scores indicate increased disease severity of the olfactory cleft.

    Time frame: Baseline,Month 3,Month 6,Month 12

  3. OB volume measurement

    MRI scans are performed using a 3T GE scanner with a 8-channel phase-array head coil. OB volumes are obtained by manual bordering and following addition of all slices, which are multiplied by the slice thickness to yield volume.

    Time frame: Baseline,Month 3,Month 6,Month 12

  4. Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders - Negative Statements (QOD-NS)

    The QOD-NS includes 17 negative statements, each graded from 0 (disagree) to 3 (agree) for a maximum score of 51. Higher QOD-NS scores reflect worse QoL.

    Time frame: Baseline,Month 3,Month 6,Month 12

  5. Olfactory-Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    Subjects rate the impact of smell loss on their mood, ability to enjoy food, social interactions, safety, personal hygiene, sex life, ability to cook food, appetite and change in weight from 0 (no impact) to 10 (most impact) for a maximum score of 90. Higher olfactory-VAS scores reflect more severe impacts on daily life.

    Time frame: Baseline,Month 3,Month 6,Month 12

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — We will decide whether to share the individual participant data after the study.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Mar 2025; primary completion for Mar 2027, 24 months later.

Of 33 interventional studies with no phase under Rhinosinusitis, half reached primary completion within 16 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 36. This study's planned 24 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 6, 2025
First posted
Feb 20, 2025
StartEst.
Mar 14, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Mar 14, 2027
CompletionEst.
Mar 14, 2027
Last update
Feb 20, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 20, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06837051
Responsible party
Dawei Wu (Associate Researcher, Peking University Third Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 20, 2025
Start date
Mar 14, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 14, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 14, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 20, 2025

Study contacts

Dawei Wu, MD, PhD
Contact
davidwuorl@163.com
13522503401

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion