CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06832059Updated Jul 1, 2026

Precision Nutrition Versus Standard Dietary Care: Continuous Glucose Monitoring as a Tool for Guided Nutrition Care in Type 2 Diabetes - The PRECISE-DIET Trial. -A Pilot Study

An interventional study of The precise diet intervention in Type 2 Diabetes, sponsored by Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-01.

Sponsored by Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary aim of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility of a 12-week dietary intervention combined with the use of CGM in adults with T2D. The results of the pilot study will provide insights into recruitment, design, and the effectiveness of the intervention for the future long-term (12-month) PRECISE-DIET STUDY

Read the detailed description

In recent decades, there has been a significant rise in the development and use of glucose lowering drugs aimed at improving glycemic control in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Despite medical advancements, more than one-third of the danish population with T2D have a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) exceeding the recommended thresholds. One limiting factor in supporting individuals achieve their glycaemic target may be driven by substantial postprandial increases in plasma glucose levels, which is influenced by the quantity and type of carbohydrates in meals, underscoring the critical role of dietary interventions as an integral component of T2D management.

Recent studies have demonstrated that the use of continuous glucose monitors (CGMs), which allow individuals to track their glucose profiles continuously throughout the day, improves glycemic control in T2D patients. However, these studies often exclude dietary interventions, which could potentially yield greater improvements in blood glucose regulation.

Nutritional research in recent years has focused on dietary patterns such as low-fat diets, the paleo diet, and vegan diets. Nevertheless, these studies have not sufficiently addressed individualized dietary adjustments to mitigate postprandial glucose excursions, despite their substantial importance for glycemic control.

Several clinical studies have revealed significant inter-individual variations in glycemic responses to identical standardized meals, highlighting the necessity of a personalized approach to dietary recommendations, particularly with a focus on carbohydrate intake.

The primary aim of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility of a 12-week dietary intervention combined with the use of CGM in adults with T2D. The results of the pilot study will provide insights into recruitment, design, and the effectiveness of the intervention for the future long-term (12-month) PRECISE-DIET STUDY

02

Conditions studied

  • Type 2 Diabetes

Keywords

  • Type 2 diabetes
  • Dietary intervention
  • CGM
  • continuous glucose monitoring
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

9,359 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; 1,318 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 80 across 7,525 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 studies →

Lead sponsor

Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen is the lead sponsor of 111 studies on the registry; 22 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • T2D

    • Diabetes duration of ≥12 months
    • ≥18 years of age
    • HbA1c ≥58 mmol/mol
    • Attending the SDCC outpatient clinic
    • Provided voluntary signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to understand the patient information.
  • Complications which do not permit to lowering HbA1c to \<58 mmol/mol.
  • Treatment with insulin.
  • Low daily carbohydrate intake (defined as below 25 E% or 100 g/day) prior to study inclusion.
  • Systematic use of corticosteroids.
  • Using or requiring a specialized diet (e.g., kidney diet).
  • Circumstances that affect HbA1c (e.g., liver disease and anaemia).
  • Known or suspected drug or alcohol abuse (judged by the investigator).
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding or plans of pregnancy within the study period.
  • Participation in other clinical trials.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Precise diet intervention

    The precise diet intervention for 12 weeks (n=20).

    Other: The precise diet intervention

Interventions

  • OtherThe precise diet intervention

    The intervention includes training and education in CGM use and reduction in overall carbohydrate intake guided by individualized flexible nutrition recommendations, with adjustments made according to postprandial blood glucose responses. Staff will guide participants in the daily carbohydrate intake with personalized adjustments to accommodate individual needs by the individuals. The primary goal is to minimize the participant's time spent above 10 mmol/l

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Fidelity testing

    Participants will be invited to a workshop to evaluate the intervention and its components. Procedures from fidelity testing will be applied in the evaluation. These specific topics will be evaluated: * Study design o Is the design appropriate? E.g., number of visits, CGM use, dietetic feedback? * Sampling strategy o E.g., how many participated, recruitment methods, sample diversity? * Treatment receipt * "What is learned?" * Is the intervention relevant to and accepted by the participants? * Treatment enactment * What is actually used and done? * Do participants' "behavioural skills" improve?

    Time frame: 12 weeks after baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. HbA1c (mmol/mol)

    Assessed from blood samples

    Time frame: Measured at baseline and after 12 weeks

  2. Time in range (TIR)

    Time spent in time in range 3.9 mmol/l - 10.0 mmol/l from CGM data

    Time frame: Measured at baseline and after 12 weeks

  3. Time above range (TAR)

    Time spent in time above range 10.1-13.9 mmol/l from CGM data

    Time frame: Measured at baseline and after 12 weeks

  4. Time below range (TBR)

    Time spent in time below range \<3.9 mmol/l from from CGM data

    Time frame: Measured at baseline and after 12 weeks

  5. Coefficient of variation (CV)

    Percentage coefficient of variation in glucose differences

    Time frame: Measured at baseline and after 12 weeks

  6. Estimated HbA1c

    Estimated HbA1c (14-days average of the CGM data)

    Time frame: Measured at baseline and after 12 weeks

  7. Body mass index (kg/m^2)

    Calculated from body weight (kg) and height (m).

    Time frame: Measured at baseline and after 12 weeks

  8. Body weight (kg)

    Measured on a digital scale

    Time frame: Measured at baseline and after 12 weeks

  9. Waist circumference (cm)

    Measured using tape measure.

    Time frame: Measured at baseline and after 12 weeks

  10. Hip circumference (cm)

    Measured using tape measure

    Time frame: Measured at baseline and after 12 weeks

  11. Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)

    Measured under resting

    Time frame: Measured at baseline and after 12 weeks

  12. Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)

    Measured under resting

    Time frame: Measured at baseline and after 12 weeks

  13. Self-reported diabetes distress

    Assessed from the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale comprising of twenty emotional-distress questions. Each item can be rated from 0 to 5.

    Time frame: Measured at baseline and after 12 weeks

  14. Self-reported treatment satisfaction

    Assessed from the questionnaire Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ).

    Time frame: Measured at baseline and after 12 weeks

  15. Dietary intake

    Dietary intake (total energy intake and macronutrient composition based on 3-days' diet records)

    Time frame: Measured at baseline and after 12 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Changes in glucose lowering drugs

    Medication status, change in doses or discontinuation of medicine

    Time frame: Measured at baseline and after 12 weeks

  2. Personality trait assesment

    Assesed fromt the BIG FIVE Inventory questionnaire (BFI-44). Comprising of 44 items.

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Physical activity

    Physical activity levels measured by X3 accelerometers

    Time frame: Measured at baseline and after 12 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen
    Herlev, 2730, Denmark
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 1, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06832059
Lead sponsor
Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen
Responsible party
Bettina Ewers (Head of Nutrition and PhD, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 18, 2025
Start date
Nov 18, 2025
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 1, 2026

Study contacts

Bettina Ewers, PhD
principal investigator · Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion