CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06827041BPhageUpdated Feb 14, 2025

Use of Phage Therapy for Treatment of a Periprosthetic Joint Infection

A Phase 1 interventional study of Phage (Cytophage Technologies) in Periprosthetic Joint Infection, sponsored by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-14.

Sponsored by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Feb 2025, 1 year 8 months ago, but the record still lists the study as active, not recruiting.
Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about the safety, tolerability and activity or efficacy of systemic intravenous and intraarticular administration of a mono-bacteriophage (phage) peparation in a patient with chronic-recalcitrant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and also to understand clinical changes pre- and post-therapy, as well as identifying adjunctive changes in biomarkers (C-reactive protein [CRP], erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR], and interleukin-6 [IL-6]) correlated with PJI.

Phage will be administered to the study participant with chronic PJI twice daily over a total duration of two weeks via two routes: a) intravenous (through vein) and b) intra-articular (through the affected joint). Phage therapy is given 4 hours after the patient receives their standard of care antibiotic therapy. The patient will remain in clinical follow-up for up to a year.1

Read the detailed description

At The Ottawa Hospital (TOH), the orthopedic infectious diseases team is currently managing a very challenging case: a 78-year-old female with a severe, chronic-recalcitrant right hip PJI due to a multidrug resistant strain of S. epidermidis in which surgical source control with complete removal of implants cannot be achieved, and in whom there are no viable antibiotic treatment options for chronic suppressive therapy. This patient has undergone multiple surgical revisions with complex reconstructions and adjunctive flap coverage procedures and has received prolonged courses of antibiotic therapy. Unfortunately, this patient suffered multiple, severe antibiotic allergic reactions during initial treatment course which has precluded the use of any viable suppressive therapy - a treatment strategy which is critical to preventing relapse of infection and is at the crux of chronic PJI management.

In the absence of any viable adjunctive antimicrobial therapy, this patient is at very high risk of mortality. The Investigators have exhausted all surgical and medical management of PJI for our patient. Remaining on lower dose daptomycin and adjunctive oral rifampin, the patient continued to experience myalgias and neuropathy. It was anticipated that with eventual discontinuation of daptomycin (this patient cannot remain indefinitely on this therapy given her symptoms), her infection would again rapidly relapse with systemic symptoms. This infection is associated with a high risk of mortality without a viable suppressive antimicrobial treatment; a more aggressive surgical approach (high right leg amputation and hemipelvectomy) to reduce the burden of infection is not possible in this patient given her frailty, co-morbidity, resultant significant physical debility and risk of surgical complications. Given the above, phage therapy poses very low risk and is a remaining possible medical therapy that may eradicate her infection.

The primary objective of this study is to investigate the safety, tolerability and activity or efficacy of systemic (intravenous) and intra-articular administration of phage in our patient with chronic-recalcitrant methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis PJI.

Secondary objectives will be documenting clinical changes pre- and post-therapy, as well as identifying adjunctive changes in biomarkers (C-reactive protein [CRP], erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR], and interleukin-6 [IL-6]) correlated with PJI.

In this study, lytic phage prepared in injection-grade saline will be administered to the patient both intravenously and intraarticularly, twice a day for a duration of 14 days. In addition to phage therapy, the patient will receive standard of care antibiotic therapy.

The patient will remain in clinical follow-up for up to one year.

02

Conditions studied

  • Periprosthetic Joint Infection
03

In context

Infections

6,687 studies on the registry are indexed under Infections; 807 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1 is below the median of 120 across 4,200 interventional studies indexed under Infections.

Browse Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 538 studies on the registry; 100 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

This N-of-1 Phage therapy is designed for one patient who meet the following conditions.

  • willingness to provide signed and dated informed consent form to participate in the clinical study.
  • severe chronic periprosthetic joint infection due to a multidrug resistant strain of S. epidermidis in which surgical source control with complete removal of implants cannot be safely achieved
  • have received multiple surgical revisions with complex reconstructions and adjunctive flap coverage procedures and prolonged courses of antibiotic therapy and suffered multiple, severe antibiotic allergic reactions during initial treatment course which has lead to the use of any viable suppressive therapy impossible
  • complex burden of hardware
  • poor bone quality and hip instability with high associated morbidity and mortality due to the S. epidermidis infection

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • below age 18 years
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1 participant (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Phage therapy

    Lytic monophage prepared in injection-grade saline will be given via two routes: a) intravenously twice daily, and concomitantly, b) intra-articularly twice daily, for a total duration of 14 days. In addition to phage therapy, the patient will receive standard of care antibiotic therapy.

    Biological: Phage (Cytophage Technologies)

Interventions

  • BiologicalPhage (Cytophage Technologies)

    Our phage is a new type of investigational treatment for bacterial infections. Our lytic, monophage preparation was provided by Cytophage Technologies and underwent rigorous testing to ensure final product potency (7 x 10\^9 PFU/dose), purity, fidelity, and safety; laboratory tests demonstrate phage in vitro efficacy against the S. epidermidis strain. Phage prepared in injection-grade saline will be given via two routes: a) intravenously twice daily, and concomitantly, b) intraarticularly twice daily, for a total duration of 14 days.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Safety of phage therapy

    Reactions and adverse events to study treatment.

    Time frame: From first day to 12 months from treatment

  2. Efficacy of phage therapy (clinical response)

    Wound healing and no recurrence of the infection as determined by the orthopedic infectious diseases physician during follow-up to 12 months from phage treatment.

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Response of laboratory markers (C-reactive protein) of inflammation to phage treatment

    Serum C-reactive protein (mg/L) as measured at baseline, during phage treatment to day 14, and in follow-up to 12 months from phage treatment.

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Response of laboratory markers (erythrocyte sedimentation rate) of inflammation to phage treatment

    Serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mm/hr) as measured at baseline, during phage treatment to day 14, and in follow-up to 12 months from phage treatment.

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. Response of laboratory markers (peripheral blood neutrophil count) of inflammation to phage treatment

    Peripheral blood neutrophil count (cells/L) as measured at baseline, during phage treatment to day 14, and in follow-up to 12 months from phage treatment.

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
    Ottawa, Ontario K1Y 4E9, Canada
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — IPD will be available from a publication which is pending

Supporting information: Csr

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 14, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06827041
Lead sponsor
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Collaborators
Cytophage Technologies Inc.
Responsible party
Marisa Azad (Assistant Professor of Medicine, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 14, 2025
Start date
Feb 22, 2024
Primary completion
Feb 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 14, 2025

Study contacts

Marisa A Azad, MD PhD
principal investigator · Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion