CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06823440CIPNUpdated Apr 17, 2026

Prevention of CIPN Using Compressive Therapy

An interventional study of Compression using surgical gloves and compression knee socks in CIPN in Adjuvant Breast Cancer Patients, sponsored by Martina Lojova. Recruiting at 1 site in Czechia. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-17.

Sponsored by Martina Lojova · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2025; still recruiting 1 year 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common side effect of treatment with taxanes and platinum-based drugs, significantly impacting the quality of life of oncology patients. Symptoms such as reduced sensitivity and pain may persist even after treatment ends. Research has shown that compression therapy using gloves and stockings effectively reduces the incidence of CIPN, improves patient adherence to treatment, and has no severe side effects. A study at the Chemotherapy Unit of the Comprehensive Oncology Care Clinic, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, will investigate the efficacy of this therapy. Tight-fitting gloves and compression stockings will be used to limit the flow of cytotoxic agents to peripheral areas. Effectiveness will be assessed through quality-of-life questionnaires, hand strength and coordination tests, and laboratory analyses to identify predictive markers of neuropathy. The study aims to enhance CIPN prevention and integrate this method into clinical practice.

02

Conditions studied

  • CIPN in Adjuvant Breast Cancer Patients

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • CIPN
  • breast cancer
  • compressive therapy
  • chemotherapy
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

12,544 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 2,892 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 72 across 9,303 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Martina Lojova as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-70 years at the time of signing the informed consent (IC).
  • Signed informed consent.
  • Breast cancer stages I-III
  • ECOG performance status 0-2.
  • (Neo)adjuvant treatment with paclitaxel weekly.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Metastatic disease.
  • History of neuropathy/vasculopathy and its pharmacological treatment.
  • Type I or II diabetes.
  • Stroke within the last 6 months.
  • Prior treatment with taxanes and/or cisplatin derivatives.
  • Peripheral arterial ischemia.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    A - compression short

    In Arm A, patients will wear compression gloves beginning 15 min before the start of paclitaxel infusion, during infusion, and for 30 min post-paclitaxel infusion. They will also wear the compression knee socks beginning 15 minutes before the start of paclitaxel infusion, during infusion, and for 90 minutes post-paclitaxel infusion.

    Device: Compression using surgical gloves and compression knee socks

  • Experimental
    B - compression long

    In Arm B, patients will wear compression gloves beginning 15 min before the start of paclitaxel infusion, during infusion, and for 90 minutes post-paclitaxel infusion. They will also wear the compression knee socks beginning 15 minutes before the start of paclitaxel infusion, during infusion, and for 24 hours post-paclitaxel infusion.

    Device: Compression using surgical gloves and compression knee socks

  • No intervention
    C - no compression

    Nonrandomized control group with no compression intervention.

Interventions

  • DeviceCompression using surgical gloves and compression knee socks

    Compression therapy will be applied using surgical gloves and compression knee socks. The compression itself will take place on the principle of compressing the limbs, which will narrow the blood vessels and thereby limit the flow of cytostatics to the peripheral parts of the body. This is believed to reduce damage to nerve fibers. Special knee socks with compression of 20-30 mm Hg and latex/nitrile surgical gloves will be used for pressure therapy. The size of the compression aids will be determined by the nursing staff (gloves will be a tight-fitting size; they will not cause discomfort). The patients will wear the compression aids for a specific amount of time before administering paclitaxel, throughout paclitaxel infusion, and after the infusion.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in reported EORTC QLQ CIPN20 subscales

    The preventive effect of compression therapy will be evaluated based on changes reported in a survey, using self-reported neuropathy assessed with EORTC QLQ-CIPN 20, which contains 20 items divided into three subscales assessing sensory, motor, and autonomic symptoms. Each item is scored on a Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Scores will be converted to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores representing more higher scores represent more symptoms/problems.

    Time frame: Before paclitaxel course (baseline) and completion paclitaxel course (standardly 12 weeks)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in reported EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales

    QoL will be assessed with the EORTC QLQ-C30, which contains 30 items. Each item is scored on a Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much), except for the global QoL scale that ranges from 1 (very poor) to 7 (excellent). The item will be transformed into a global health status (GHS) scale, five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea-vomiting), and six single-item symptom items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). Scores will be converted to a 0-100 scale. Higher numerical scores on functional scales or the GHS scale indicate better QoL, while higher scores on symptom scales/items reflect a greater level of symptoms or problems.

    Time frame: Before paclitaxel course (baseline), after the sixth cycle of paclitaxel (standardly 6 weeks), after completion paclitaxel course (standardly 12 weeks) and six months after completition paclitaxel course

  2. Changes in reported EORTC QLQ CIPN20 subscales

    The preventive effect of compression therapy will be evaluated based on changes reported in a survey, using self-reported neuropathy assessed with EORTC QLQ-CIPN 20, which contains 20 items divided into three subscales assessing sensory, motor, and autonomic symptoms. Each item is scored on a Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Scores will be converted to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores representing more higher scores represent more symptoms/problems.

    Time frame: Before paclitaxel course (baseline), after the sixth cycle of paclitaxel (standardly 6 weeks), after completion paclitaxel course (standardly 12 weeks) and six months after completition paclitaxel course

Other outcomes

  1. Changes in hand grip test a grip ability test

    In the Hand grip test, the hand grip strength is measured three times for each upper limb with a rest interval between each grip of the device handle. The grip ability test is a modification of the general hand function test based on daily activities.

    Time frame: Before paclitaxel course (baseline), after the sixth cycle of paclitaxel (standardly 6 weeks), after completion paclitaxel course (standardly 12 weeks) and six months after completition paclitaxel course

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute
    Brno, 60200, Czechia
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06823440
Lead sponsor
Martina Lojova
Responsible party
Martina Lojova (Tatiana Ciprova, lead nurse, Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic., Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Feb 12, 2025
Start date
Feb 1, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 17, 2026

Study contacts

Martina Lojova, Ph.D.
Contact
martina.lojova@mou.cz
+420543136232
Iveta Selingerova, Ph.D.
Contact
iveta.selingerova@mou.cz
+420543136720
Tatiana Ciprova, MBA
principal investigator · Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion