ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06822816VideothequeUpdated Aug 11, 2026

Video/Image Library of Endoscopy Procedures for the Development of AI-empowered Endoscopy Quality Reporting and Educational Modules

An observational study in Polyp of Colon and Artificial Intelligence (AI), sponsored by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM). Recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-11.

Sponsored by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2022; still recruiting 4 years 5 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
10,000
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational study is to establish a video/image library dataset of complete endoscopy or partial colonoscopy procedures for patients with rectal cancer or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). With this video/image library, the aims are:

  • to develop and validate novel AI-empowered solutions to automatically detect and report endoscopy quality metrics
  • to develop automated endoscopy reporting solutions, auditing, and educational tools for residents and fellows to enhance their endoscopy skills.

The hypothesis is that a heterogeneous video/image library will provide:

  • comprehensive and robust source material to develop AI models
  • real-time quality feedback at the end of an endoscopy procedure.
Read the detailed description

The video/image library will be constructed by prospectively recruiting patients referred for endoscopy procedures for the upper or lower gastrointestinal tract diseases. Patients who have had a screening, surveillance, or diagnostic upper or lower endoscopy recorded as part of a research project at the CHUM will all be invited to participate in this banking.

A qualified and adequately trained study team representative will invite potential study patients to participate during and outpatient clinic visit, or at their arrival in the endoscopy unit on the day of the endoscopy.

Board-certified gastroenterologists, or trainees under supervison, will perform all upper or lower endoscopies at the CHUM. Patients will be prepared for endoscopies according to the most recent guidelines and current standards of care.

The complete or partial endoscopy will be video recorded and the data files will be saved without loss of image quality using Medicapture USB 300 (or equivalent) devices and stored locally in an on-site storage cloud. All videos will be recorded with timestamps burned into the recording. A research assistant will document all relevant informations and annotations during the procedure.

All esophagogastroduodenoscopies (EGDs) will be performed using the high-definition endoscopes. All findings (e.g., lesions, polyps, inflammations), diagnostics, and therapeutic procedures will be documented during EGDs.

The colonoscopies will be performed using high-definition colonoscopes equipped with image-enhanced techniques, or CAD systems, to provide real-time support to endoscopists to detect polyps of all sizes. If required, the endoscopists will be instructed to use white-light and narrow-band imaging to perform optical diagnosis (OD) for all 1-10mm polyps. An OD will first be performed without CADx, then CADx will be used to make a CAD-based OD.

After detecting a polyp and performing ODs, the endoscopists will remove all polyps using standard techniques. Endoscopists will annotate the withdrawal time before initiating a resection, and again when the resection is complete. All biopsy specimens and main polyp specimens will be sent to the institutional pathology laboratories (in separate jars) for histopathology assessments.

02

Conditions studied

  • Polyp of Colon
  • Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Browse trials for

03

In context

Colonic Polyps

377 studies on the registry are indexed under Colonic Polyps; 57 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 10,000 is above the median of 411 across 115 observational studies indexed under Colonic Polyps.

Browse Colonic Polyps studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) is the lead sponsor of 376 studies on the registry; 110 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All eligible patients presenting at the CHUM for an upper or lower endoscopy will be approached for this study.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • ≥ 18 y.o.
  • indication of undergoing a screening, surveillance, diagnostic, or therapeutic upper (EGD) or lower (colonoscopy) endoscopy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Coagulopathy defined as an elevated ≥ 2.5
  • count ≤ 50,000/mm3
  • Emergency endoscopy
  • Poor general health defined as the physical status class >3
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
10,000 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
5 Years
Patient registry
Yes
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. EGD documented data

    For EGD procedures, the following data will be documented: the exact time to reach the GE junction, the diaphragmatic hiatus, body/fondus/antrum of stomach, duodenum, procedural time during EGD, complications (immediate and late: first 24h post-procedure and 14 days post-procedure, respectively), the use of a distal attachment cap, insufflation and desufflation, cardiac retroflexion for facilitating visualization of mucosa during EGD, the use of existing AI platforms that increase lesion detection (CADe) and classification (CADx), the AI classification (autonomous CADx diagnosis), the endoscopists' ODs without CADx, the endoscopists' ODs after seeing the diagnosis from CADx (CADx-assisted diagnosis), the performance of endoscopists (measured with detection rates such as ADR, AADR, SSLDR, PDR, or with detection counts such as APC).

    Time frame: From enrollment to 14 days post-procedure

  2. Colonoscopy documented data

    For colonoscopy procedures, the following data will be documented: the exact time to reach the caecum, caecum intubation, the exact time of the visualisation of each anatomical landmarks, confirmed time of each lesion, ulcer, polyp visualised by the endoscopist, withdrawal time, mucosal inspection time, and complications (immediate and late: 24h post-procedure and 14 days post-procedure, respectively), the use of existing AI platforms that increase lesion detection (CADe) and classification (CADx), the AI classification (autonomous CADx diagnosis), the endoscopists' ODs without CADx, the endoscopists' ODs after seeing the diagnosis from CADx (CADx-assisted diagnosis), the performance of endoscopists (measured with detection rates such as ADR, AADR, SSLDR, PDR, or with detection counts such as APC). In the case of patients with rectal cancer, any active disease, such as tumor recurrence will be documented.

    Time frame: From enrollment to 14 days post-procedure

Other outcomes

  1. Polyp, lesion, or ulcer-related characteristics

    For upper and lower endoscopies, polyp, lesion, or ulcer-related characteristics will be documented: anatomical location, size estimated by the endoscopists, surface and vascular pattern and morphology. Any other pathological findings with the description of severity and anatomical location will be documented. Any biopsies taken during the procedure, and their location will be documented, including the number and a description of the biopsied tissue, as well as the reason for the biopsy.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of histology assessment

  2. IBD data

    In case of IBD indication, Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis endoscopic characteristics will be graded and documented. The inflammation, ulceration/erosion, stricture, bleeding, and their related severity or extent in each colon segment will be documented. The endoscopic characteristics of the colon will also be documented, using components of the Mayo Score / DAI for Ulcerative Colitis, including vessels and bleeding.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the procedure

  3. Hiatal hernia data

    In case of hiatal hernia, the size of the hernia along with the related type will be documented.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the procedure

  4. GERD data

    In case of esophagitis (GERD), the Los Angeles classification of esophagitis will be used to define the grade and extent of the inflammation. The MUSE classification system will also be used to categorise esophageal lesions and strictures.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the procedure

  5. Barrett's esophagus data

    In case of Barrett's esophagus, a detailed description of the esophagus will be documented: presence and extent of Barrett's esophagus, including the length of Barrett's segment in cm, the classification of Barrett's esophagus, the presence or absence of hiatal hernia and its size, and any sign of reflux esophagitis alongside their severity and location. The Prague classification will be used to describe the circumferential and maximal Barrett's segment length. The number and locations of biopsies taken within the Barrett's segment, at the GE junction, and in any suspicious area. The size and characteristics of any polyps or nodules found within the Barrett's segment will be documented as biopsies are essential for grading dysplasia and monitoring disease progression.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end the histology assessment

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in research articles based on this video registry, after de-identification (text, tables, figures and appendices).

Access criteria: Proposals should be directed to daniel.von.renteln.med@ssss.gouv.qc.ca . To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06822816
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 12, 2025
Start date
Jun 10, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 11, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion