CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06812377RCTUpdated Nov 18, 2025

Comparative Study Between Different Mobilization Techniques for Patients With Chronic Tennis Elbow

An interventional study of Maitland joint mbilization and mulligan mobilization in Tennis Elbow, sponsored by Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University. Completed at 1 site in Saudi Arabia. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-18.

Sponsored by Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
45
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background: Tennis elbow is a common musculoskeletal disorder affecting the functional activities of daily living through common extensor tendinopathy. There is a limited knowledge about neural restriction as a source of movement limitation in patients with tennis other than enriched joint mobilization techniques knowledge.

Objectives: This study will be designed to determine the efficacy of adding different mobilization techniques along with eccentric exercises on elbow pain intensity, functional disability, hand grip strength and pain pressure in patients with chronic tennis elbow.

Methods: Forty five patients with lateral epicondylitis with their ages ranged from 18 and 45 more than six weeks will be randomly assigned into three groups. Group A will receive Maitland joint mobilization techniques. Patients in group B will receive Mulligan mobilization techniques while patient in group C will receive radial nerve mobilization.. Both groups will receive eccentric exercises for wrist extensors . Patients will be treated three session per week for four week and they will be evaluated pre and post treatment for pain severity using by visual analogue scale, level of functionality by DASH questionnaire, hand grip strength by hand held dynamometer and pressure pain threshold(PPT) by pressure algometer.

Results: All the outcome variables will be assessed at baseline and 4weeks following the treatment period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tennis Elbow

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Tennis elbow, Grip strength, Pain pressure threshold , Nerve mobilization , Maitland mobilization, Mulligan mobilization
03

In context

Tennis Elbow

284 studies on the registry are indexed under Tennis Elbow; 60 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 45 is close to the median of 50 across 253 interventional studies indexed under Tennis Elbow.

Browse Tennis Elbow studies →

Lead sponsor

Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University is the lead sponsor of 34 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • This study will include individuals between the ages of 18 and 45 who have been diagnosed with lateral epicondylitis based on positive results from the Mill's and Cozen's tests. The participants must also have complaints of local tenderness at the elbow that lasts longer than six weeks. Additionally, to complete the assessment and get treatment, the participants' elbow must have a full extension range of motion

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals diagnosed with cervical radiculopathy, upper thoracic outlet syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, myositis ossificans, carpal tunnel syndrome, recent upper limb trauma, elbow immobilization, steroid injection administration within the previous six months, and any history of physical therapy administered within the previous six months were excluded from the study. Furthermore, participation will not be permitted for anyone who has previously experienced discomfort because of their profession
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
45 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    group A

    maitland mobilization Posteroanterior mobilization of the radial head in motion. This method is gliding over the radial head posteriorly to anteriorly while the patient executes (and relaxes) the painful action (e.g., clutching). Repeat the method six to ten times if there is a noticeable increase in your ability to grip without pain

    Other: Maitland joint mbilization

  • Active comparator
    Group (B)

    mulligan mobilization Using this approach, the patient performs (and relaxes) the painful action (e.g., clutching) while a lateral humeroulnar auxiliary glide is applied and maintained. If you notice a noticeable increase in your ability to grip without pain, repeat the method six to ten times. You can use a belt to help you glide.Three sets of it were performed, with a 30-second break in between \[44\].

    Other: mulligan mobilization

  • Experimental
    Group (c)

    radial nerve mobilization

    Other: radial nerve mobilization

Interventions

  • OtherMaitland joint mbilization

    Posteroanterior mobilization of the radial head in motion. This method is gliding over the radial head posteriorly to anteriorly while the patient executes (and relaxes) the painful action (e.g., clutching). Repeat the method six to ten times if there is a noticeable increase in your ability to grip without pain

  • Othermulligan mobilization

    Using this approach, the patient performs (and relaxes) the painful action (e.g., clutching) while a lateral humeroulnar auxiliary glide is applied and maintained. If you notice a noticeable increase in your ability to grip without pain, repeat the method six to ten times. You can use a belt to help you glide.Three sets of it were performed, with a 30-second break in between

  • Otherradial nerve mobilization

    The subjects will be placed in a reclining supine position. The arm will be internally rotated, the wrist, thumb, and fingers will be flexed, the shoulder girdle will be depressed, and the elbow will be stretched. Elbow flexion and wrist extension will be used to maintain shoulder depression after the radial nerve will be strained by these motions. Before beginning the gentle elbow extension test, the subject's wrist and fingers will be stabilized. The elbow will be then gently extended for about two seconds, just into the range where the participant felt tension but no pain, and then flexed. In a single session, three sets of six to eight oscillations will be executed

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. elbow pain

    Assessment of pain intensity will be measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) which consists of a vertical line (0-10) where one end refers to no pain while the other end refers to great pain.) It is a reliable test for literate and illiterate patients 0.94I,0.71 respectively)

    Time frame: At baseline and after 4 weeks

  2. Hand grip strength

    To assess hand grip strength, In order to assess grip strength painlessly, the patient will comfortably sit with their arm at their side, their shoulder adducted and neutrally rotated, their elbow flexed to 90 degrees \[38\], their forearm in a neutral position, their wrist between 0 and 30 degrees of extension, and their ulnar deviation between 0 and 15 degrees. The greatest grip contraction, expressed in kilograms, shall be noted when no discomfort is felt. The patient will squeeze for three to five seconds, as hard as they can. Multiple trials will be conducted, with an average of three repetitions recorded and a gap of approximately 15 seconds between each trial, to mitigate the possible effect of muscle fatigue

    Time frame: At baseline and after 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. pain pressure threshold

    Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT) will be measured by pressure algometer by applying the probe tip on the most sensitive poin. Also, three trials will be given, and the average will be taken \[39\]. A portable device called a pressure algometer is used to measure the pressure-pain threshold. The lowest pressure value at which a person feels pain is known as the pressure-pain threshold \[40\]. One accurate way to gauge someone's level of discomfort is by using their pressure-pain threshold \[41\]. A force gauge with a spring-operated plunger is called an algometer. The gauge is fastened to a short metal pole with a rubber tip that is circular and has a diameter of 1 cm. The unit of calibration for the instrument is kilograms of pressure per square centimeter (kg/cm2). The gauge measures between 0 and 10 kg/cm\^2. The gadget can be reset to 0 to take a new measurement once one has been taken

    Time frame: At baseline and after 4 weeks

  2. functionality

    Assessment of level of functionality: A 30-item disability/symptom scale that evaluates the patient's health during the preceding week is the main component of the DASH \[36\]. The questions include how difficult it is to perform different physical activities due to an arm, shoulder, or hand problem (21 items), how severe each pain symptom is, how much pain, tingling, weakness, or stiffness is related to a particular activity (5 items), and how the problem affects social activities, work, sleep, and one's self-image (4 items). For every item, there are five possible responses. A scale score ranging from 0 (no impairment) to 100 (full disability) (most severe disability) is then obtained by adding the scores for each component

    Time frame: At baseline and after 4 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University
    Al Kharj, 16242, Saudi Arabia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Vicenzino B, Paungmali A, Teys P. Mulligan's mobilization-with-movement, positional faults and pain relief: current concepts from a critical review of literature. Man Ther. 2007 May;12(2):98-108. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2006.07.012. Epub 2006 Sep 7. PubMed 16959529 ↗
  • Coombes BK, Bisset L, Vicenzino B. Management of Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy: One Size Does Not Fit All. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015 Nov;45(11):938-49. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2015.5841. Epub 2015 Sep 17. PubMed 26381484 ↗
  • Dorf ER, Chhabra AB, Golish SR, McGinty JL, Pannunzio ME. Effect of elbow position on grip strength in the evaluation of lateral epicondylitis. J Hand Surg Am. 2007 Jul-Aug;32(6):882-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.04.010. PubMed 17606071 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 18, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06812377
Lead sponsor
Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University
Responsible party
Mohammad Moustafa Aldosoukki Hegazy (dr, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 6, 2025
Start date
Aug 5, 2025
Primary completion
Oct 17, 2025
Completion
Oct 20, 2025
Last update
Nov 18, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion