An observational study in Stroke, Stroke with Hemiparesis and Stroke, Ischemic, sponsored by Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology. Recruiting at 2 sites in Russian Federation. Open to participants aged 35 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-04.
Sponsored by Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology · Observational
The aim of the study was to explore potential pathways for recovery and adaptation of the motor cortex by examining cerebral blood flow characteristics and hemodynamic markers analyzed by functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) in patients with hemiparesis after stroke. Participants in the study performed a simple stimulus-response task several times with one healthy and one paralyzed limb at different stages of basic rehabilitation. A group of healthy, age-matched volunteers participated in the same experiment to verify the stroke-related changes. The researchers recorded fNIRS signals, muscle activity using electromyography, and heart activity using electrocardiography.
The study included 40 participants, divided into two groups: individuals with a history of stroke-related hemiparesis and a matched healthy control group.Participants were instructed to perform a stimulus-response task designed to assess reaction speed.During the task, they positioned their hands within a designated box equipped with two buttons corresponding to left and right responses. A visual stimulus, presented via LEDs located above the buttons, served as the response target. A flash of a stimulus required participants to respond by extending their fingers to press the corresponding button. If limb paresis prevented a full button press, participants were instructed to form an intention to move and attempt the task to the best of their ability.
Neurophysiological data acquisition. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) data were acquired using a combined NIRSport 16x16 and NIRSport 8x8 system (NIRx Medizintechnik GmbH, Berlin, Germany).Twenty-four sources and 24 detectors were placed over the sensorimotor area and adjacent regions, forming 76 source-detector pairs to ensure comprehensive cortical coverage. The light sources were activated synchronously, resulting in a sampling rate of 13.56 Hz. In addition, surface electromyography (EMG), electrocardiography (ECG), and scalp electroencephalography (EEG) were recorded using the NVX-36 electroencephalograph (ISS, Zelenograd, Russia). EMG activity was recorded from the extensor digitorum communis muscle of both hands using a bipolar belly-tendon montage. ECG was recorded by 1st standard bipolar montage with electrode placed on both wrists. EEG was recorded with 6 electrodes placed at 'FCC3', 'FCC4', 'CCP3', 'CCP4', 'FCC5', 'A1', 'FCC6', 'A2' according to the standard "10-05" montage. The experimental protocol was completed within two weeks for each participant. There were six sessions (3 at the beginning of rehabilitation and 3 before discharge). Each session lasted a maximum of one hour. Before the experimental session, each patient's motor abilities were tested using the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) scale.
2,612 studies on the registry are indexed under Ischemic Stroke; 971 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 300 across 771 observational studies indexed under Ischemic Stroke.
Browse Ischemic Stroke studies →Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.
Compared within Ischemic Stroke, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Stroke. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →
Patients undergoing rehabilitation at the Federal center of brain research and neurotechnologies, FMBA, Moscow, Russia
For Healthy Volunteers:
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
For stroke patients:
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.
Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
MMSE and MoCA
Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Clinically significant
Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Diagnostic Test: Stimulus response task
Diagnostic Test: Stimulus response task
Participants were tasked with performing a finger extension exercise that required pressing buttons in response to visual stimuli. In cases where physical movement was not possible, participants were instructed to imagine performing the task while focusing on their fingers.
Hemodynamic changes after stroke
In post-stroke subjects, an increase in blood flow and oxygenation was observed in sensorimotor cortical regions of both hemispheres during movement of the paretic limb. This observation may indicate that the healthy hemisphere contributes to the execution of movement.
Time frame: 14 days
Not enrolling at this site.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology