CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06804798Updated Feb 3, 2025

Evaluation of Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection Between Metal Alloy Coated Catheter and Conventional Latex Catheter in Critically Ill Patients

A Phase 4 interventional study of Latex metal alloy coated catheter and conventional latex urinary catheter in Sepsis, Urosepsis and Intensive Care Unit, sponsored by National University of Malaysia. Completed at 1 site in Malaysia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-03.

Sponsored by National University of Malaysia · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2023, registered Jan 2025).
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
76
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a prospective single blinded randomized trial to evaluate the incidence of catheter associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) between latex catheter and metal alloy coated catheter among Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients. CAUTI has a few definitions, in this study, we will follow the latest Central of Disease Control (CDC) guideline definition of CAUTI in January 2022.

This study involves 100 patients who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria that have been set. The patients will be divided into group A and group B and two types of catheters will be given out to the healthcare workers according to the randomization. Data collection involves demographic, medical and laboratory data and will be documented in the tables provided. All data will be collected from day of urinary catheterization in ICU until patients discharge or die or maximum of 14 days in ICU or develop CAUTI or ABUTI or whichever that occurred earlier. Patients who died within 48 hours of catheter insertion, will be considered as drop-out.

Data that has been extrapolated from this study will then give us an insight regarding the best type of catheter to avoid CAUTI, risk factors associated with CAUTI and to determine length of ICU stay and ICU morbidity with patients who have CAUTI. This study proves to be important in reducing the overall healthcare associated infection in the ICU setting.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sepsis
  • Urosepsis
  • Intensive Care Unit
03

In context

Urinary Tract Infections

753 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Tract Infections; 128 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 76 is below the median of 130 across 524 interventional studies indexed under Urinary Tract Infections.

Browse Urinary Tract Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

National University of Malaysia is the lead sponsor of 119 studies on the registry; 42 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adult more than 18 years old
  2. Indwelling urinary catheter more than 48 hours Exclusion Criteria
  1. Community urosepsis 2. Chronic kidney disease and end stage renal failure 3. Suprapubic catheter 4. Patient with dependent urinary catheter 5. Pregnant ladies 6. Congenital urinary tract abnormality 7. Surgical procedure involving urinary tract 8. Moribound patient or expected to die within 24 hours 9. Discharged to ward within 48 hours 10. Latex allergy
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
76 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Conventional latex urinary catheter

    Device: Latex metal alloy coated catheter

  • Experimental
    Latex metal alloy coated catheter

    Device: conventional latex urinary catheter

Interventions

  • DeviceLatex metal alloy coated catheter

    Metal alloy works as an antiseptic whereby preventing the attachment of biofilm to the catheter lining.

  • Deviceconventional latex urinary catheter

    Latex catheters prove to be soft, flexible, inexpensive and thermo-sensitive towards body temperature. However, there is a risk of developing CAUTI as bacteria are more susceptible to adhere to latex.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To Compare

    To compare catheter associated urinary tract infections rate between conventional latex urinary catheter and latex metal alloy

    Time frame: 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. To compare

    To compare the rate of bacteremia from catheter associated urinary tract infection between conventional latex urinary catheter and latex metal alloy catheter

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. To compare

    To compare the common types of microorganisms associated with catheter associated urinary tract infection between conventional latex urinary catheter and latex metal alloy catheter

    Time frame: 2 years

  3. To compare

    To compare risk factor that is associated with catheter associated urinary tract infection between conventional latex urinary catheter and latex metal alloy catheter

    Time frame: 2 years

  4. To compare

    To compare the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in catheter associated urinary tract infection between conventional latex urinary catheter and latex metal alloy catheter

    Time frame: 2 years

  5. Length of stay

    To determine length of stay in ICU and ICU mortality in catheter associated urinary tract infection between conventional latex urinary catheter and latex metal alloy catheter

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
    Bandar Tun Razak, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 3, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06804798
Lead sponsor
National University of Malaysia
Responsible party
Mohammad Nizam Mokhtar (Dr, National University of Malaysia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 3, 2025
Start date
Mar 1, 2023
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2024
Completion
Nov 1, 2024
Last update
Feb 3, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion