ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06798662Updated Jan 29, 2025

Multimodal Nerve Block and Pulse Radiofrequency for Acute Herpes Zoster Pain

An interventional study of Ultrasound-Guided Pulsed Radiofrequency (PRF) and Intercostal nerve block (2% ropivacaine or 133 mg of liposomal bupivacaine) in Herpes Zoster (HZ), sponsored by Xiaguang Duan. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-29.

Sponsored by Xiaguang Duan · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2025, 1 year 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine and ropivacaine in the treatment of pain associated with herpes zoster (shingles). This trial will also assess the safety profiles of both liposomal bupivacaine and ropivacaine.

The study aims to address the following key questions:

Does nerve blockade with liposomal bupivacaine or ropivacaine reduce the required dosage of gabapentin in participants? What medical issues, if any, arise in participants undergoing paravertebral block, intercostal nerve block, RISS (Radiofrequency Intervention for Spinal Segment); or pulsed radiofrequency (PRF)? Can nerve blocks, specifically paravertebral block, intercostal nerve block, RISS; and PRF, effectively treat severe postherpetic neuralgia (PHN)? The study will compare these interventions.

Study Procedures:

Participants will:Receive ultrasound-guided nerve blocks or pulsed radiofrequency every 48 hours, for a total of 3 treatments.

Undergo assessments, either in-person or via telephone, at the following time points: before therapy (baseline), on the day of treatment (Day 1), Day 7, Day 30, and Day 90 post-treatment.

Have their symptoms recorded, along with their scores on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and the Zoster Brief Pain Inventory (ZBPI).

Read the detailed description

Study design:This study is a prospective, randomized, controlled, comparative trial with blinding of both participants and clinicians. The trial is designed to assess both the superiority and non-inferiority of several interventions for analgesia in postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). The following interventions will be compared: Rhomboid Intercostal and Subserratus Plane (RISS) block, Paravertebral (PVB) block, Intercostal nerve block, Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF). Participant recruitment will take place at Baogang Hospital in Inner Mongolia. This study has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Baogang Hospital, Inner Mongolia. The research will be conducted in accordance with the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines. All participants will provide voluntary, informed consent prior to enrollment.

Patients:A total of 120 patients, aged 44 to 82 years, with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification of I-III, who are scheduled to receive treatment for pain associated with herpes zoster (shingles) with either Rhomboid Intercostal and Subserratus Plane (RISS) block, Paravertebral (PVB) block, intercostal nerve block, or pulsed radiofrequency (PRF), will be enrolled in the study between February 2025 and May 2025. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of four groups, with 30 patients in each group.

Randomization and Blinding:This study employed block randomization to generate the random allocation sequence. A block size of 6 was set, and the random sequence was generated using dedicated software (the blockrand package in R version 4.3.2). The allocation of the random sequence was performed by an independent third party, and allocation concealment was implemented using sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes. The research team remained blinded throughout the randomization process and was not involved in the generation or allocation of the random sequence.

Intervention:For patients with postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) unresponsive to pharmacotherapy, consideration will be given to the Rhomboid Intercostal and Subserratus Plane (RISS) block, Paravertebral (PVB) block, intercostal nerve block, or pulsed radiofrequency (PRF). All patients will receive famciclovir and gabapentin. All participants will receive standard antiviral therapy with famciclovir 500 mg orally three times daily for 7 days. Gabapentin will be initiated at a typical starting dose of 300 mg per day, administered in three divided doses. The dosage may be gradually increased, as needed and tolerated, up to a maximum dose of 1800 mg per day. All procedures will be performed in an outpatient surgical suite. All participating physicians will have undergone standardized training. Upon entering the procedure room, patients will have electrocardiogram (ECG), blood pressure, and oxygen saturation monitoring established. Patients will be positioned in the prone position with their arms abducted and internally rotated. Ultrasound guidance will be utilized with a SonoSite Edge II ultrasound system (Fujifilm SonoSite, Bothell, WA, USA) equipped with a linear 13-6 MHz transducer (HFL50x; Fujifilm SonoSite, Bothell, WA, USA). For each nerve block, a 5 mL test dose will be administered initially, and clinical signs of pain relief in the affected thoracic dermatome will be observed. After confirmation of appropriate injection site, the remaining medication will be administered. Patients will receive ultrasound-guided nerve blocks every 48 hours for a total of 3 treatments.

Rhomboid Intercostal and Subserratus Plane (RISS) Block:

The RISS block is a composite nerve block technique that involves two injection sites: the inter-rhomboid plane and the sub-serratus plane. The selection of block plane was determined by the patient's specific location of pain.

Rhomboid Intercostal Plane Block (RIPB):

For the Rhomboid Intercostal Plane Block (RIPB), a high-frequency linear ultrasound transducer was initially positioned in a sagittal orientation, medial to the scapular border. It was then slightly rotated to obtain an oblique sagittal view (oblique paramedian sagittal view), located 1-2 cm lateral to the scapular border. Upon obtaining the appropriate ultrasound image, the following anatomical structures were identified sequentially, from superficial to deep: the trapezius muscle, the rhomboid muscles (specifically, the major rhomboid), the intercostal muscles (located between the ribs), the pleura, and the lung. The target injection plane was the fascial plane situated between the rhomboid muscle and the intercostal muscle. Following confirmation of correct needle tip placement, a solution of 10 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine (or 133 mg of liposomal bupivacaine) combined with 10 mg of triamcinolone acetonide was slowly injected in divided doses. The injection was performed under real-time ultrasound visualization, and the spread of the local anesthetic was carefully observed to ensure adequate distribution within the target fascial plane.

Subserratus Plane Block (SSPB):

For the Subserratus Plane Block (SSPB), the ultrasound transducer was moved inferiorly, to the caudal aspect of the inferior angle of the scapula, and then laterally, to a point posterior to the posterior axillary line. In the ultrasound image, the following structures were visualized sequentially, from superficial to deep: the latissimus dorsi muscle, the serratus anterior muscle, the intercostal muscles (located between the ribs), the pleura, and the lung. The target injection plane was the fascial plane between the serratus anterior muscle and the external intercostal muscle. Following confirmation of correct needle tip placement, a solution of 15 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine (or 133 mg of liposomal bupivacaine) combined with 10 mg of triamcinolone acetonide was slowly injected in divided doses. The injection was performed under real-time ultrasound visualization, and the spread of the local anesthetic was carefully observed to ensure adequate distribution within the target fascial plane and to cover the surface of the intercostal muscles.

Paravertebral (PVB) Block:

For the Paravertebral (PVB) block, a high-frequency linear ultrasound transducer was placed transversely, parallel to the spinous processes, approximately 2-3 cm lateral to the spinous process of the target thoracic vertebral segment. The position and angle of the transducer were adjusted to clearly visualize the transverse process (TP) and the axial view of the lamina of the target vertebra. In the ultrasound image, the transverse process appeared as a hyperechoic structure, typically with a characteristic acoustic shadow posterior to it. Subsequently, the transducer was slightly slid caudally, causing the transverse process and its acoustic shadow to gradually disappear from view. At this point, the ultrasound image revealed components of the paravertebral space (PVS), including the parietal pleura, the superior costotransverse ligament, and the intercostal fascia, which exhibited a heterogeneous mixed echogenicity. Using an in-plane technique, a puncture needle was advanced from lateral to medial under real-time ultrasound guidance towards the target paravertebral space. The needle was carefully advanced, passing through the intercostal fascia, while avoiding the parietal pleura, and positioning the needle tip superior to the costotransverse ligament. Following confirmation of correct needle tip placement, a solution of 10 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine (or 133 mg of liposomal bupivacaine) combined with 10 mg of triamcinolone acetonide was slowly injected in divided doses. The injection was performed under real-time ultrasound visualization, and the spread of the local anesthetic was carefully observed to ensure adequate distribution within the PVS for an effective block. If multiple nerves were involved, the injection sites were spaced one thoracic vertebral segment apart.

Intercostal Nerve Block:

The patient is positioned in either the lateral decubitus or sitting position, with the affected side facing upwards, ensuring adequate exposure of the targeted intercostal region. A high-frequency linear ultrasound transducer is placed transversely over the posterior lateral aspect of the targeted rib, using the vertebral column as a reference point. The transducer is then scanned laterally to identify the target rib, clearly visualizing the rib, intercostal muscles, and pleura. The intercostal nerve appears as a small hyperechoic structure located between the internal and innermost intercostal muscles. The needle is advanced until it contacts the inferior border of the rib. The needle is then slightly withdrawn and positioned between the internal and innermost intercostal muscles to avoid pleural puncture. After negative aspiration, 10 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine (or 133 mg of liposomal bupivacaine) combined with 10 mg of triamcinolone acetonide is injected slowly.

Ultrasound-Guided Pulsed Radiofrequency (PRF):

A high-frequency linear ultrasound transducer will be used for this procedure. The transducer will be placed transversely over the target rib area to obtain a clear visualization of the rib, intercostal muscles, and pleura. The entry point for needle insertion will be selected 1-2 cm inferior to the inferior border of the target rib. Using a 22G radiofrequency (RF) needle, an in-plane approach will be used for needle advancement. The needle will be advanced slowly until it reaches the inferior border of the rib. The needle will then be withdrawn 1-2 mm to ensure the needle tip is positioned adjacent to the intercostal nerve. The RF needle will then be connected to the RF generator for sensory testing. Stimulation parameters will be set at 50 Hz and 0.5-1V. The target location will be considered accurate if stimulation induces pain in the participant. Pulsed radiofrequency treatment will then be administered using the following parameters: voltage of 45V, frequency of 2 Hz, pulse width of 20 ms, and treatment time of 360 seconds.

Outcomes and measures:Follow-up assessments will be conducted at the pain clinic by two specially trained nurses who are blinded to participant treatment allocation. Assessments will be performed at the following time points: prior to therapy (baseline), on the day of treatment (Day 1), Day 7 post-treatment, Day 30 post-treatment, and Day 90 post-treatment. These assessments will be conducted either in-person or via telephone.

02

Conditions studied

  • Herpes Zoster (HZ)

Browse trials for

03

In context

Herpes Zoster

299 studies on the registry are indexed under Herpes Zoster; 55 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is below the median of 160 across 247 interventional studies indexed under Herpes Zoster.

Browse Herpes Zoster studies →

Lead sponsor

Xiaguang Duan is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Presence of typical clinical manifestations of herpes zoster (shingles), including vesicular and painful rash.
  • Diagnosis of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) lasting for more than one month, unresponsive to conventional treatment.
  • Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score ≥ 4.
  • Involvement of thoracic nerve roots.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to provide written .
  • Inability to cooperate with study assessments.
  • History of systemic disease, organ transplantation, or cancer.
  • Prior receipt of other invasive pain treatments, such as spinal cord stimulation.
  • Presence of a central nervous system (CNS) disorder.
  • Presence of coagulopathy.
  • Skin infection at the puncture site.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    RISS group

    Rhomboid Intercostal and Subserratus Plane (RISS) Block: The RISS block is a composite nerve block technique that involves two injection sites: the inter-rhomboid plane and the sub-serratus plane. The selection of block plane was determined by the patient's specific location of pain. Rhomboid Intercostal Plane Block (RIPB): For the Rhomboid Intercostal Plane Block (RIPB), a high-frequency linear ultrasound transducer was initially positioned in a sagittal orientation, medial to the scapular border. It was then slightly rotated to obtain an oblique sagittal view (oblique paramedian sagittal view), located 1-2 cm lateral to the scapular border. Upon obtaining the appropriate ultrasound image, the following anatomical structures were identified sequentially, from superficial to deep: the trapezius muscle, the rhomboid muscles (specifically, the major rhomboid), the intercostal muscles (located between the ribs), the pleura, and the lung. The target injection plane was the fascial plan

    Device: Rhomboid Intercostal and Subserratus Plane (RISS) Block (2% ropivacaine or 133 mg of liposomal bupivacaine) · Drug: Drug (famciclovir and gabapentin)

  • Experimental
    PVB group

    For the Paravertebral (PVB) block, a high-frequency linear ultrasound transducer was placed transversely, parallel to the spinous processes, approximately 2-3 cm lateral to the spinous process of the target thoracic vertebral segment. The position and angle of the transducer were adjusted to clearly visualize the transverse process (TP) and the axial view of the lamina of the target vertebra. In the ultrasound image, the transverse process appeared as a hyperechoic structure, typically with a characteristic acoustic shadow posterior to it. Subsequently, the transducer was slightly slid caudally, causing the transverse process and its acoustic shadow to gradually disappear from view. At this point, the ultrasound image revealed components of the paravertebral space (PVS), including the parietal pleura, the superior costotransverse ligament, and the intercostal fascia, which exhibited a heterogeneous mixed echogenicity. Using an in-plane technique, a puncture needle was advanced from la

    Device: Paravertebral (PVB) Block (2% ropivacaine or 133 mg of liposomal bupivacaine) · Drug: Drug (famciclovir and gabapentin)

  • Experimental
    ICN group

    The patient is positioned in either the lateral decubitus or sitting position, with the affected side facing upwards, ensuring adequate exposure of the targeted intercostal region. A high-frequency linear ultrasound transducer is placed transversely over the posterior lateral aspect of the targeted rib, using the vertebral column as a reference point. The transducer is then scanned laterally to identify the target rib, clearly visualizing the rib, intercostal muscles, and pleura. The intercostal nerve appears as a small hyperechoic structure located between the internal and innermost intercostal muscles. The needle is advanced until it contacts the inferior border of the rib. The needle is then slightly withdrawn and positioned between the internal and innermost intercostal muscles to avoid pleural puncture. After negative aspiration, 10 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine (or 133 mg of liposomal bupivacaine) combined with 10 mg of triamcinolone acetonide is injected slowly.

    Device: Intercostal nerve block (2% ropivacaine or 133 mg of liposomal bupivacaine) · Drug: Drug (famciclovir and gabapentin)

  • Experimental
    PRF group

    A high-frequency linear ultrasound transducer will be used for this procedure. The transducer will be placed transversely over the target rib area to obtain a clear visualization of the rib, intercostal muscles, and pleura. The entry point for needle insertion will be selected 1-2 cm inferior to the inferior border of the target rib. Using a 22G radiofrequency (RF) needle, an in-plane approach will be used for needle advancement. The needle will be advanced slowly until it reaches the inferior border of the rib. The needle will then be withdrawn 1-2 mm to ensure the needle tip is positioned adjacent to the intercostal nerve. The RF needle will then be connected to the RF generator for sensory testing. Stimulation parameters will be set at 50 Hz and 0.5-1V. The target location will be considered accurate if stimulation induces pain in the participant. Pulsed radiofrequency treatment will then be administered using the following parameters: voltage of 45V, frequency of 2 Hz, pulse width

    Device: Ultrasound-Guided Pulsed Radiofrequency (PRF) · Drug: Drug (famciclovir and gabapentin)

Interventions

  • DeviceUltrasound-Guided Pulsed Radiofrequency (PRF)

    A high-frequency linear ultrasound transducer will be used for this procedure. The transducer will be placed transversely over the target rib area to obtain a clear visualization of the rib, intercostal muscles, and pleura. The entry point for needle insertion will be selected 1-2 cm inferior to the inferior border of the target rib. Using a 22G radiofrequency (RF) needle, an in-plane approach will be used for needle advancement. The needle will be advanced slowly until it reaches the inferior border of the rib. The needle will then be withdrawn 1-2 mm to ensure the needle tip is positioned adjacent to the intercostal nerve. The RF needle will then be connected to the RF generator for sensory testing. Stimulation parameters will be set at 50 Hz and 0.5-1V. The target location will be considered accurate if stimulation induces pain in the participant. Pulsed radiofrequency treatment will then be administered using the following parameters: voltage of 45V, frequency of 2 Hz, pulse width

  • DeviceIntercostal nerve block (2% ropivacaine or 133 mg of liposomal bupivacaine)

    The patient is positioned in either the lateral decubitus or sitting position, with the affected side facing upwards, ensuring adequate exposure of the targeted intercostal region. A high-frequency linear ultrasound transducer is placed transversely over the posterior lateral aspect of the targeted rib, using the vertebral column as a reference point. The transducer is then scanned laterally to identify the target rib, clearly visualizing the rib, intercostal muscles, and pleura. The intercostal nerve appears as a small hyperechoic structure located between the internal and innermost intercostal muscles. The needle is advanced until it contacts the inferior border of the rib. The needle is then slightly withdrawn and positioned between the internal and innermost intercostal muscles to avoid pleural puncture. After negative aspiration, 10 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine (or 133 mg of liposomal bupivacaine) combined with 10 mg of triamcinolone acetonide is injected slowly.

  • DeviceParavertebral (PVB) Block (2% ropivacaine or 133 mg of liposomal bupivacaine)

    For the Paravertebral (PVB) block, a high-frequency linear ultrasound transducer was placed transversely, parallel to the spinous processes, approximately 2-3 cm lateral to the spinous process of the target thoracic vertebral segment. The position and angle of the transducer were adjusted to clearly visualize the transverse process (TP) and the axial view of the lamina of the target vertebra. In the ultrasound image, the transverse process appeared as a hyperechoic structure, typically with a characteristic acoustic shadow posterior to it. Subsequently, the transducer was slightly slid caudally, causing the transverse process and its acoustic shadow to gradually disappear from view. At this point, the ultrasound image revealed components of the paravertebral space (PVS), including the parietal pleura, the superior costotransverse ligament, and the intercostal fascia, which exhibited a heterogeneous mixed echogenicity. Using an in-plane technique, a puncture needle was advanced from lat

  • DeviceRhomboid Intercostal and Subserratus Plane (RISS) Block (2% ropivacaine or 133 mg of liposomal bupivacaine)

    The RISS block is a composite nerve block technique that involves two injection sites: the inter-rhomboid plane and the sub-serratus plane. The selection of block plane was determined by the patient's specific location of pain. Rhomboid Intercostal Plane Block (RIPB): For the Rhomboid Intercostal Plane Block (RIPB), a high-frequency linear ultrasound transducer was initially positioned in a sagittal orientation, medial to the scapular border. It was then slightly rotated to obtain an oblique sagittal view (oblique paramedian sagittal view), located 1-2 cm lateral to the scapular border. Upon obtaining the appropriate ultrasound image, the following anatomical structures were identified sequentially, from superficial to deep: the trapezius muscle, the rhomboid muscles (specifically, the major rhomboid), the intercostal muscles (located between the ribs), the pleura, and the lung. The target injection plane was the fascial plane situated between the rhomboid muscle and the intercostal

  • DrugDrug (famciclovir and gabapentin)

    All patients will receive famciclovir and gabapentin. All participants will receive standard antiviral therapy with famciclovir 500 mg orally three times daily for 7 days. Gabapentin will be initiated at a typical starting dose of 300 mg per day, administered in three divided doses. The dosage may be gradually increased, as needed and tolerated, up to a maximum dose of 1800 mg per day.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Numerical Rating Scale(NRS)

    The NRS, Numerical Rating Scale, is a rating system from 0 to 10, where 0 represents "no pain" and 10 represents the worst possible pain.

    Time frame: At baseline (before therapy), at 1 day of treatment, at 7 days post-treatment, 30 days post-treatment, and 90 days post-treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Zoster Brief Pain Inventory (ZBPI)

    The Zoster Brief Pain Inventory (ZBPI) was used as the HZ-specific pain measure. The daily activity questionnaire included seven items: general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relationships with others, sleep, and enjoyment of life. Each question concerning daily activity was scored on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 indicated no interference and 10 indicated complete interference.

    Time frame: At baseline (before therapy), at 1 day of treatment,, at 7 days post-treatment, 30 days post-treatment, and 90 days post-treatment

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Russo M, Graham B, Santarelli DM. Gabapentin-Friend or foe? Pain Pract. 2023 Jan;23(1):63-69. doi: 10.1111/papr.13165. Epub 2022 Oct 27. PubMed 36300903 ↗
  • Elhouty MG, Elbahrawy K, Elawady MS. Rhomboid intercostal block versus serratus block for postoperative analgesia after thoracoscopic sympathectomy for primary palmar hyperhidrosis: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Jul 19;23(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02203-z. PubMed 37468840 ↗
  • Rosamilia LL. Herpes Zoster Presentation, Management, and Prevention: A Modern Case-Based Review. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2020 Feb;21(1):97-107. doi: 10.1007/s40257-019-00483-1. PubMed 31741185 ↗
  • Asada H. Recent topics in the management of herpes zoster. J Dermatol. 2023 Mar;50(3):305-310. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.16666. Epub 2022 Dec 20. PubMed 36539935 ↗
  • Okmen K, Gurbuz H, Ozkan H. Application of unilateral rhomboid intercostal and subserratus plane block for analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a quasi-experimental study. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2022 Feb;75(1):79-85. doi: 10.4097/kja.21229. Epub 2021 Jul 20. PubMed 34283910 ↗
  • Wang X, Turner EL, Li F. Designing individually randomized group treatment trials with repeated outcome measurements using generalized estimating equations. Stat Med. 2024 Jan 30;43(2):358-378. doi: 10.1002/sim.9966. Epub 2023 Nov 27. PubMed 38009329 ↗
  • Patil A, Goldust M, Wollina U. Herpes zoster: A Review of Clinical Manifestations and Management. Viruses. 2022 Jan 19;14(2):192. doi: 10.3390/v14020192. PubMed 35215786 ↗
  • Li SJ, Feng D. Comparison of two distinct needle tip positions in pulsed radiofrequency for herpes zoster-related pain. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2023 Jul;29(7):1881-1888. doi: 10.1111/cns.14146. Epub 2023 Mar 7. PubMed 36880287 ↗
  • Boezaart AP, Lucas SD, Elliott CE. Paravertebral block: cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and sacral. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009 Oct;22(5):637-43. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32832f3277. PubMed 19680122 ↗
  • Xue M, Yuan R, Yang Y, Qin Z, Fu R. Application of ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block or intercostal nerve block for acute herpes zoster and prevention of post-herpetic neuralgia: A case-control retrospective trial. Scand J Pain. 2024 Jul 9;24(1). doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2024-0030. eCollection 2024 Jan 1. PubMed 38981512 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All IPD that underlie results in a publication

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

Time frame: January 2026-January 2031

Access criteria: A proposal that describes planned analyses must be submitted or whether a data sharing agreement must be signed.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Feb 2025; primary completion for Jun 2025, 4 months later.

Of 34 interventional studies with no phase under Herpes Zoster, half reached primary completion within 13 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 24. This study's planned 4 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 17, 2025
First posted
Jan 29, 2025
StartEst.
Feb 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jun 1, 2025
CompletionEst.
Jun 10, 2025
Last update
Jan 29, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 29, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06798662
Lead sponsor
Xiaguang Duan
Responsible party
Xiaguang Duan (Deputy Chief of Anesthesiology, Inner Mongolia Baogang Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jan 29, 2025
Start date
Feb 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 10, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 29, 2025

Study contacts

Xiaguang Duan, Master's degree
Contact
alonlord2023@gmail.com
+86 13314720012

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion