ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06796790LIMEUpdated Feb 23, 2026

Literacy Instruction Through Media for Everyone

An interventional study of Media instruction and Storybook intervention in Media Effects on Literacy Gains in Young Children, sponsored by Ohio State University. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 42 Months to 57 Months, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-23.

Sponsored by Ohio State University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2025; still recruiting 1 year 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
450
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
42 Months to 57 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this study is to determine whether an intervention to support caregivers in engaging with their children while using educational media together can improve children's early literacy skills, compared to an aligned shared book reading intervention and to no intervention. Given that early literacy skills predict children's later academic learning, this home intervention, which aims to shape the communication patterns surrounding a common, family-friendly activity, has the potential to positively influence the trajectory of low income children's academic success. The investigators propose that amedia based activity will reduce barriers and increase adherence therefore increasing literacy skills over time.

Read the detailed description

The proposed study draws upon an implementation science framework (Nilsen, 2015) to determine the extent to which a media-based caregiver-led intervention improves caregiver adherence and in turn children's early literacy development relative to a shared reading intervention. Caregiver-implemented shared reading interventions represent the 'current standard practice' for addressing early literacy needs, yet many caregivers cannot implement this practice with adequate adherence. This is particularly true for low-socioeconomic status families, in which shared reading may not be a conventional activity and barriers inhibit its use. The investigators propose-and test-that a media-based intervention reduces barriers to intervention implementation and increases social validity, leading to higher levels of adherence and, via mediation, enhanced child literacy outcomes. To establish this causal chain, the investigators mplement a media-based early literacy intervention, compare it to a highly aligned shared reading intervention, and measure (1) social validity of the intervention to test whether use of media circumvents barriers, (2) caregiver adherence (i.e., frequency and dosage), and (3) child early literacy skills gains immediately and over time. As the first causally interpretable study to compare media and shared reading as caregiver-led interventions, the proposed project will identify strategies to improve adherence in home-based interventions and inform development of interventions to improve school readiness among low-SES children.

02

Conditions studied

  • Media Effects on Literacy Gains in Young Children

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Literacy
  • Media
  • Shared reading
  • Poverty
  • Parents
  • Intervention
  • Preschool
  • Television
03

In context

Literacy

201 studies on the registry are indexed under Literacy; 69 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 450 is above the median of 124 across 170 interventional studies indexed under Literacy.

Browse Literacy studies →

Lead sponsor

Ohio State University is the lead sponsor of 663 studies on the registry; 148 are open to participants now.

Of its 67 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 49 (73%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
42 Months to 57 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • between 42 and 57 months at enrollment
  • minimally verbal in English
  • caregiver sufficiently proficient in English
  • does not have severe intellectual disability

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • under 42 months
  • over 57 months at enrollment
  • severe intellectual disability
  • not proficient in English
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
450 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Media instruction

    Caregivers will be asked to implement joint media sessions with their child four times per week for 12 weeks using lightly adapted versions of the commercially-available Super Why! program, which focuses on early literacy skills, including alphabet knowledge, rhyming, spelling, and print concepts. Sessions are anticipated to last 20 minutes. Caregivers will be trained by researchers on explicit strategies to use to promote children's learning. Caregivers will digitally log every session and audio record 1 session each week.

    Behavioral: Media instruction

  • Active comparator
    Storybook instruction

    Caregivers will be asked to implement joint storybook reading sessions with their child four times per week for 12 weeks using adapted versions of the commercially -available Super-Why! storybooks, which focus on early literacy skills including alphabet knowledge, rhyming, spelling, and print concepts. Sessions are anticipated to last 20 minutes. Caregivers will be trained by researchers on explicit strategies to use to promote children's learning. Caregivers will digitally log every session and audio record 1 session each week.

    Behavioral: Storybook intervention

  • No intervention
    Business-as-usual control

    Caregivers will be asked to log any joint learning activities they engage in with their child but will not be provided with any specific materials or instructions.

Interventions

  • BehavioralMedia instruction

    Caregivers will be asked to implement joint media sessions with their child four times per week for 12 weeks using lightly adapted versions of the commercially-available Super Why! program, which focuses on early literacy skills, including alphabet knowledge, rhyming, spelling, and print concepts. Sessions are anticipated to last 20 minutes. Caregivers will be trained by researchers on explicit strategies to use to promote children's learning. Caregivers will digitally log every session and audio record 1 session each week

  • BehavioralStorybook intervention

    Caregivers will be asked to implement joint storybook reading sessions with their child four times per week for 12 weeks using adapted versions of the commercially -available Super-Why! storybooks, which focus on early literacy skills including alphabet knowledge, rhyming, spelling, and print concepts. Sessions are anticipated to last 20 minutes. Caregivers will be trained by researchers on explicit strategies to use to promote children's learning. Caregivers will digitally log every session and audio record 1 session each week.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Print concept knowledge

    Children are administered the Preschool Word and Print Awareness (PWPA) measure (Justice et al., 2006), which examines children's knowledge of 16 basic print concepts. The PWPA has high inter-rater reliability (96% to 100%, Justice \& Ezell, 200), acceptable internal consistency (#= .7; Dobbs- Oates et al., 2015) and can reliably estimate preschoolers' print-concept knowledge (Justice et al., 2006).

    Time frame: At pretest after enrollment and at posttest after the 12 week intervention period

  2. Alphabet knowledge

    Children are administered the Alphabet Knowledge subtest of the Phonological Awareness Literacy Screening - Preschool (PALS-PreK; Invernizzi et al., 2001). Children are presented with uppercase and lowercase letters printed in random order and receive a point for each letter named correctly. Cronbach's alphas average average .86. Inter-rater reliability is \>.96 (Invernizzi et al., 2004). The full PALS-PreK test is highly correlated with measures of reading ability (e.g., Test of Early Reading Ability, r= .67) and predicts later performance on a similar literacy measure (rs \> .53). Further, this subtest has high predictive validity in discriminating children who will later be identified as needing additional instruction (Invernizzi et al., 2001).

    Time frame: At pretest after enrollment and at posttest after the 12 week intervention period

  3. Name Writing

    Children are administered the Name Writing subtest from the PALS-PreK. In the Name Writing subtest, the child is asked to draw a picture of themselves and then write their name. They are then asked to show the assessor their name. Only the written name is scored. This subtests has high inter-rater reliability (.99). As noted above, the full test has good convergent and predictive validity (Invernizzi et al., 2001).

    Time frame: At pretest after enrollment and at posttest after the 12 week intervention period

  4. Phonological Awareness

    Children are administered two subtests from the PALS-PreK. In the Beginning Sound Awareness subtest, the child is asked to produce the beginning sound of a word. This subtests has acceptable reliability (# = .93) and inter-rater reliability is high (.99). As noted above, the full test has good convergent and predictive validity (Invernizzi et al., 2001). The Rhyme Awareness subtest was removed in February 2026 due to feasibility concerns identified in early study data.

    Time frame: At pretest after enrollment and at posttest after the 12 week intervention period

  5. Word reading

    At all timepoints, children are administered the Letter-Word Identification subtest of the Woodcock Johnson IV Test of Achievement (WJ IV; Schrank, McGrew \& Mather, 2014). This subtest requires children to identify or read isolated letters and words orally. This subtest has adequate internal-consistency (.94; Schrank \& Wendling, 2018). It has a high factor loading onto the Broad Reading cluster (.92; McGrew et al., 2014) which is highly correlated with other measures of reading like the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (WIAT) Total Reading (.89; Schrank \& Wendling, 2018). It is strongly correlated with general school readiness (r = .84) as measured by the Differential Ability Scales (McGrew et al., 2014).

    Time frame: At pretest after enrollment, at posttest after the 12 week intervention period, at 3-month follow up, at 6-month follow-up, and at 12- month follow up

  6. Spelling

    At all timepoints, children are administered the Spelling subtest from the WJ IV, requiring children to draw lines, trace and write letters, and spell orally presented words. This subtest has adequate internal-consistency reliability (.92; Schrank \& Wendling, 2018) and a high factor loading onto the Broad Written Language Cluster (.87), which is highly correlated with other measures of writing like WIAT Written Expression (.77; McGrew et al., 2014). This subtest is moderately correlated (r = .69) with general school readiness as measured by the Differential Ability Scales (McGrew et al., 2014).

    Time frame: At pretest after enrollment, at posttest after the 12 week intervention period, at 3-month follow up, at 6-month follow-up, and at 12- month follow up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Enjoyment of intervention activities

    Enjoyment of intervention activities is measured to assess the extent to which the media intervention circumvents barriers related to caregiver difficulty and discomfort with reading. Enjoyment will be measured with three items: "How do you think today's session went?", "How much did you enjoy these sessions?", and "How uncomfortable or difficult did you find these sessions?"

    Time frame: Four times per week during the 12-week intervention and at posttest after the intervention

  2. Perceived value of intervention activities

    Perceived value of intervention activities is measured to assess the extent to which the media intervention reduces barriers related to a limited understanding of the benefits of shared-reading activities. Two items are used: "How much did these sessions help your child's development?" and "How much did these sessions help your child learn about letters and how to read simple words?".

    Time frame: At posttest after the 12 week intervention period

  3. Ease of Scheduling

    Ease of fitting activities into schedule is measured to assess the extent to which the media intervention reduces the time pressure barrier. One item asks: "How easy was it to fit this session into your family's schedule?"

    Time frame: At posttest after the 12 week intervention period

  4. Caregiver Adherence

    Caregivers will be trained in procedures for using a digital Qualtrics log to track use of the intervention activities. The log will be preloaded as a bookmark onto the home screen of each tablet and will ask participants to note the episode watched.

    Time frame: Throughout the 12-week intervention

  5. Quantity of print-related talk

    Audio-recorded intervention sessions will be coded by trained research staff to document the quantity of print-related talk within each session. Specifically, the Fidelity Coding Catalog (FCC) coding scheme was developed to document caregiver-child talk during reading sessions and is a reliable event-based coding system measuring frequency and quantity of print-focused talk. The FCC captures, for instance, every adult utterance that contains print-related key words, such as letter, word, and read. The quantity of print-related talk as measured by the FCC is an important index of intervention adherence but also represents a key mechanism through which intervention impacts early literacy development (McGinty et al., 2011).

    Time frame: Throughout the 12-week intervention

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • The Ohio State University Crane Center for Early Childhood
    Columbus, Ohio 43201, United States
    Recruiting
    • Eileen L Donnally, Master of Science · Contactdonnally.7@osu.edu · 614-247-5897
    • Rebecca A Dore, PhD · Contactdore.13@osu.edu · (614) 247-7488
    • Rebecca A Dore, PhD · Principal investigator
    • Laura M Justice, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Amy Nathanson, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Hui Jiang, PhD · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — This project will generate quantitative data from 450 families and children, which will be used to assess the efficacy of a media-based early literacy intervention. The data will be collected via direct assessments, questionnaires, applications loaded onto provided tablets, and audio and video observations. The primary final, cleaned data will consist of a single comma-delimited file for all valid responses. Transcription records will be stored as text files and audio/video files will be stored as MP3/4 files. Upon publication of major findings from the proposed study, the primary data file, transcripts, and audio and video files will be shared with other researchers through the Open Science Framework (primary comma-delimited data file), Databrary (audio and video files), and CHILDES/TalkBank (transcripts).

Time frame: Data will be made available upon publication of major findings from the proposed study. Study data deposited in the OSF, Databrary, and CHILDES/TalkBank will be available to the research community in perpetuity.

Access criteria: Deidentified datasets will be made available as public use data on the OSF. Data with potentially personally identifiable information, such as audio or video, will be shared in more restricted manner via Databrary. Databrary provides data access to authorized users who have been granted secure access by Databrary's administrators. Only researchers with Principal Investigator status from institutions with Institutional Review Boards or similar review entities, or researchers affiliated with Principal Investigators, will be authorized for access. Transcripts will be shared via CHILDES/TalkBank and will be redacted as needed to remove potentially personally identifiable information.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2029, 49 months after the start.

Of 115 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Literacy, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 20. This study's planned 49 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 117 studies reached it within 11 months; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 19.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 22, 2025
First posted
Jan 28, 2025
StartActual
Jul 11, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Aug 31, 2029
CompletionEst.
Aug 31, 2029
Last update
Feb 23, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06796790
Responsible party
Rebecca Dore (Director of Research, Ohio State University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 28, 2025
Start date
Jul 11, 2025
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 31, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 23, 2026

Study contacts

Eileen L Donnally, Master of Science
Contact
donnally.7@osu.edu
614-247-5897
Rebecca A Dore, PhD
Contact
dore.13@osu.edu
(614) 247-7488
Rebecca A Dore, PhD
principal investigator · Ohio State University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion