CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06779136Updated Apr 18, 2025

Phase III Clinical Study of MG-K10 Humanized Mab Injection in Subjects With Prurigo Nodularis

A Phase 3 interventional study of Placebo in Prurigo Nodularis, sponsored by Shanghai Mabgeek Biotech.Co.Ltd. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-18.

Sponsored by Shanghai Mabgeek Biotech.Co.Ltd · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
160
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A phase III clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a humanized MG-K10 mab injection in subjects with prurigo nodularis.administered every 4 weeks for 56 weeks.

Read the detailed description

The study was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase III study. Approximately 160 adults with prurigo nodularis were scheduled to receive multiple subcutaneous injections (every 4 weeks for 56 weeks). The study was divided into a screening period (1-4 weeks), a double-blind treatment period (24 weeks), a maintenance treatment period (24 weeks), and a follow-up period (8 weeks).

02

Conditions studied

  • Prurigo Nodularis

Keywords

  • Prurigo nodularis
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

eligibility criteria:

  1. voluntarily sign the ICF and comply with all the visits and research-related procedures required by the protocol;
  2. Both men and women were required to be ≥ 18 and ≤ 80 years old at the time of signing the informed consent;
  3. the duration of PN diagnosed by a dermatologist at the time of screening was ≥ 3 months;
  4. In the range of 1-10, WI-NRS≥7 in the past 24 h at screening; WI-NRS in the week before the baseline visit The average weekly score was ≥ 7 points.

Exclusion criteria:

  1. There are skin diseases other than PN and mild atopic dermatitis (AD) that may interfere with the assessment of research outcomes.
  2. Patients who had a history of moderate to severe AD during the 6 months prior to the screening visit or screening visit.
  3. Receiving potent or super-potent TCS/TCI treatment within 2 weeks before or during screening.
  1. Evidence of active tuberculosis. 5) Participation in any other clinical study within 12 weeks or 5 half-lives prior to screening
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
160 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    MG-K10 Humanized Monoclonal Antibody Injection

    Every four weeks, subcutaneous injection ,total of 56W

    Drug: Placebo

  • Placebo comparator
    placebo

    Every four weeks, subcutaneous injection,Switch to MG-K10 treatment after 24 weeks of administration

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugPlacebo

    Every four weeks, subcutaneous injection,Switch to MG-K10 treatment after 24 weeks of administration

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportions of subjects achieving WI-NRS

    In the experimental group, the weekly mean value of WI-NRS at week 24 was compared with baseline.Proportion of subjects who improved (decreased) by ≥ 4 points

    Time frame: week 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportions of subjects achieving IGA PN-S score of 0/1 point

    Proportion of subjects with overall disease score of 0/1

    Time frame: week 24

  2. The proportion of subjects whose weekly mean WI-NRS decreased by ≥ 4 from baseline at each evaluation visit

    The proportion of subjects whose weekly mean WI-NRS decreased by ≥ 4 from baseline at each evaluation visit

    Time frame: From baseline to week 56

  3. The absolute value and percentage change of weekly mean WI-NRS from baseline at each evaluation visit;

    The absolute value and percentage change of weekly mean WI-NRS from baseline at each evaluation visit;

    Time frame: From baseline to week 56

  4. Duration of onset of response to pruritus

    The proportion of subjects with a weekly mean decrease of ≥4 points from baseline in the WI-NRS was compared, and the difference from the placebo group was first presented p \< 0.05).

    Time frame: From baseline to week 56

  5. the first response to pruritus occurred.

    The time from baseline to the 24th week when the first response to pruritus occurred (the average weekly WI-NRS score decreased by ≥ 4 points compared with the baseline)

    Time frame: from baseline to the week 24

  6. The time when the first intergroup response difference in pruritus occurred

    The time of the first intergroup response difference for pruritus (the time when the difference in the proportion of subjects with a weekly average WI-NRS score reduction of ≥ 4 points compared to the baseline first reached p \< 0.05 compared with the placebo group)

    Time frame: From baseline to week 24

  7. The duration of the difference in persistent response to pruritus between groups

    The duration of the difference in persistent response between the prurity-onset groups (comparing the change in weekly WI-NRS from baseline between the MG-K10 and placebo groups, the time when the difference between the MG-K10 and placebo groups first appeared to be p \< 0.05 and remained significant on subsequent measures)

    Time frame: From baseline to week 24

  8. Proportion of subjects with an IGA PN-S score of 0/1

    Proportion of subjects with IGA PN-S score of 0/1 at each evaluation visit

    Time frame: From baseline to week 56

  9. Changes in IGA PN-S scores

    Changes in IGA PN-S scores from baseline at each evaluation site

    Time frame: From baseline to week 56

  10. Proportion of subjects with an IGA PN-A score of 0/1

    Proportion of subjects with an IGA PN-A score of 0/1 from baseline to each visit point

    Time frame: From baseline to week 56

  11. Changes in IGA PN-A scores from baseline

    Changes in IGA PN-A scores from baseline at each evaluation visit

    Time frame: From baseline to week 56

  12. Proportion of subjects wit weekly WI-NRS improvement (decrease) of ≥ 4 points and IGA PN-S of 0/1

    Proportion of subjects with weekly WI-NRS improvement (decrease) of ≥ 4 points from baseline and IGA PN-S of 0/1 at each evaluation visit

    Time frame: From baseline to week 56

  13. Changes in DLQI scores from baseline

    Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) from baseline at each evaluation visit

    Time frame: From baseline to week 56

  14. Changes in HADS from baseline

    Changes in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale(HADS) from baseline at each evaluation site

    Time frame: From baseline to week 56

  15. safety

    These include Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) and Serious Adverse events Events (SAE), adverse events of special interest (AESI), clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, physical examination, and abnormalities in 12-lead electrocardiograms;

    Time frame: From baseline to week 56

  16. pharmacokinetics

    Ctrough (valley concentration) change over time;

    Time frame: From baseline to week 56

  17. pharmacodynamics

    Changes of biomarkers before and after administration

    Time frame: From baseline to week 56

  18. immunogenicity

    Occurrence of Anit-Drug Antibodies (ADA) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAb)

    Time frame: From baseline to week 56

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing,
    Beijing, bejing 100009, China
    • Jianzhong Zhang, Medical Ph.D · Contact · rmzjz@126.com · 010-88326666
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06779136
Lead sponsor
Shanghai Mabgeek Biotech.Co.Ltd
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 16, 2025
Start date
Feb 26, 2025
Primary completion
Aug 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 18, 2025

Study contacts

xiaofeng xiao Cai, bachelor
Contact
xiaofeng.cai@mabgeek.com
02151371305
Jianzhong Zhang, Medical Ph.D
study director · Feking University People's Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion