ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06776809Updated Feb 11, 2025

Effect of Music During Toe Amputation

An interventional study of Music listening in Amputation, sponsored by Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-11.

Sponsored by Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jan 2026, 9 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled intervention study aims to investigate the impact of music played during toe amputation on patients' anxiety, pain, sense of safety, and fear of surgery.

The study will be carried out with two groups: The control and the intervention groups with 60 participants for each group. While the control group participants will receive standard care, the intervention group participants will listen to selection of Sufi music during the whole amputation procedure in addition to standard care.

Read the detailed description

Diabetes rates are continuing to rise worldwide, leading to an increasing number of people with diabetes seeking medical care for foot wounds, with approximately 35% of diabetic individuals experiencing a foot wound at some point in their lives. Diabetic foot (DF) wounds tend to recur, with a 50% recurrence rate after treatment. Foot wounds are responsible for 85% of amputations in diabetics, and the five-year mortality rate following a lower extremity amputation rises to 77%. It is estimated that a diabetic patient undergoes an amputation every 20 seconds globally. Lower extremity amputations encompass a range of procedures, from hemipelvectomy to toe amputations. Among the most common partial amputations are those of the big toe and other toes, with diabetes being the cause of about 24% of these amputations.

A comprehensive meta-analysis examined the risk factors for amputation associated with diabetic foot ulcers and found that the overall incidence of lower extremity amputation in diabetic foot ulcer patients is 31%. This study provides crucial epidemiological data for medical practice. Key risk factors associated with lower extremity amputation include male gender, smoking history, body mass index (BMI), hypertension, cardiovascular disease, kidney disease, white blood cell count, hemoglobin, and albumin levels. Among these factors, BMI, hemoglobin, and albumin levels were negatively correlated with the likelihood of amputation, while other factors, such as gender, smoking, and comorbidities, showed positive correlations.

These findings highlight the importance of monitoring and addressing these risk factors in patients with diabetic foot ulcers to reduce the likelihood of lower extremity amputations. Consequently, targeted preventive and intervention measures focusing on these risk factors are essential in clinical practice to improve patient outcomes.

The literature reveals that pain following lower extremity amputation is widespread and remains a significant factor affecting patients' quality of life. If not properly managed, this post-amputation pain can have detrimental consequences for the patient. Effective pain control during the perioperative period has been shown to help prevent chronic stump pain, highlighting the importance of intraoperative anesthesia management and postoperative acute pain control. These factors influence the body's stress response to surgery and have a direct impact on recovery, discharge, and the return to daily activities. This is particularly critical for amputation patients, as early mobilization plays a key role in both physical and psychological recovery.

These findings underscore the importance of managing perioperative pain in patients undergoing lower extremity amputation, especially during the early postoperative period. Uncontrolled postoperative pain is one of the primary risk factors for the development of chronic pain following surgery. For amputee patients, pain, particularly in the early stages after surgery, is often accompanied by significant emotional challenges. Therefore, for comprehensive care, it is essential to consider the interplay between pain experience and the emotional well-being of patients who have not received adequate pain management.The literature reveals that pain following lower extremity amputation is widespread and remains a significant factor affecting patients' quality of life. If not properly managed, this post-amputation pain can have detrimental consequences for the patient. Effective pain control during the perioperative period has been shown to help prevent chronic stump pain, highlighting the importance of intraoperative anesthesia management and postoperative acute pain control. These factors influence the body's stress response to surgery and have a direct impact on recovery, discharge, and the return to daily activities. This is particularly critical for amputation patients, as early mobilization plays a key role in both physical and psychological recovery.

These findings underscore the importance of managing perioperative pain in patients undergoing lower extremity amputation, especially during the early postoperative period. Uncontrolled postoperative pain is one of the primary risk factors for the development of chronic pain following surgery. For amputee patients, pain, particularly in the early stages after surgery, is often accompanied by significant emotional challenges. Therefore, for comprehensive care, it is essential to consider the interplay between pain experience and the emotional well-being of patients who have not received adequate pain management.

Anxiety often begins when an individual is informed that they require surgery and tends to increase during hospitalization. This heightened anxiety can negatively impact the individual's quality of life, their ability to adapt to the illness, and the overall progression of the condition. Surgical patients, in general, are considered to be at higher risk for experiencing anxiety.

A sense of safety is an inherent human need, and it is crucial for patients to feel safe within healthcare environments. While all healthcare practices aim to ensure patient safety, it is equally important to assess whether these practices foster a sense of safety for the patient. The sense of safety experienced by patients plays a vital role in their overall health and well-being.

To date, no studies have explored the effects of music on pain, anxiety, and the sense of safety in patients before, during, or after any type of amputation. Therefore, our study aims to investigate the impact of music played during toe amputation on patients' anxiety, pain, sense of safety, and fear of surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Amputation

Keywords

  • Amputation
  • Toe amputation
  • Music
  • Pain
  • Anxiety
  • Surgical fear
  • Sense of Safety
03

In context

Pain

2,450 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain; 945 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 70 across 2,101 interventional studies indexed under Pain.

Browse Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University is the lead sponsor of 111 studies on the registry; 36 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years of age or above,
  • Having a toe amputation under spinal anesthesia due to diabetic foot,
  • Without hearing/speech impairment,
  • Without a diagnosis of psychiatric disorders,
  • Without any professional training in music,
  • and volunteered to participate.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients under 18 years of age,
  • With hearing/speech impairment,
  • With a diagnosis of psychiatric disorders,
  • With any kind of professional training in music,
  • and not willing to participate in the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control Group

    Patients in the control group will not be allowed to listen to music. These patients will receive standard health care in the Diabetic Foot and Wound Care Clinic.

  • Experimental
    Intervention Group- Listening to Sufi Music

    Patients in this group will listen to Sufi music during toe amputation in addition to standard health care in the Diabetic Foot and Wound Care Clinic. Music will be played to the patients with the help of Mp3 player and headphones throughout the operation. Disposable headphone covers will be used for the headphones and the covers will be changed for each patient.

    Other: Music listening

Interventions

  • OtherMusic listening

    Selection of Sufi music will be played to the patients during the course of the operation.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Numerical Rating Scale-Anxiety (NRS-A)

    The Numerical Rating Scale-Anxiety (NRS-A) has been widely used in research to assess anxiety levels, with its reliability and validity well-established. This scale, which ranges from 0 to 10, measures anxiety from "No Stress" (0) to "Very Bad Stress" (10). A higher score indicates a greater level of anxiety. The scale categorizes raw anxiety scores as follows: 0-no anxiety, 1-3-slightly anxious, 4-6-moderately anxious, 7-9-very or extremely anxious, and 10-the worst imaginable or extremely anxious.

    Time frame: 3 days

  2. Numerical Rating Scale-Pain (NRS-P)

    The Numerical Rating Scale-Pain (NRS-P) is a one-dimensional tool that uses 11 numbers, ranging from 0 to 10, to assess pain intensity. The patient selects the number that most accurately reflects the severity of their pain, with 0 representing "no pain" and 10 indicating "the worst (unbearable) pain". The NRS-P is widely recognized as an effective method for measuring pain intensity, and it is generally considered more valid and reliable than other pain assessment scales.

    Time frame: 3 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Surgical Fear Questionnaire

    Surgical Fear Questionnaire was developed by Theunissen et al. in 2014 to determine the level of fear of short- and long-term consequences of surgery in patients who will undergo elective surgery. The scale is an 11-point Likert scale with 8 items, each scored from 0 to 10, where 0 represents "I am not scared at all" and 10 represents "I am very scared." It is divided into two sub-dimensions, each containing four items, reflecting different sources of fear. Items 1-4 assess the fear of short-term consequences of surgery, while items 5-8 focus on the fear of long-term consequences.

    Time frame: 3 days

  2. Safety Feeling Scale

    Safety Feeling Scale, developed by Dabaghi et al. in 2023, is designed to assess the sense of security among hospitalized adult patients. It includes four sub-dimensions: effective care (5 items), trust in the healthcare team (3 items), emotional enrichment (2 items), and hygienic facilities (2 items), totaling 12 items. The scale uses a five-point Likert scale for responses: 1. = Strongly disagree 2. = Disagree 3. = Undecided 4. = Agree 5. = Strongly agree Raw scale scores range from 12 to 60, with higher scores indicating a stronger sense of safety experienced by the patient in the hospital.

    Time frame: 3 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University Hospital,
    Afyonkarahisar, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 11, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06776809
Responsible party
Yeliz Ciğerci (Assoc.Prof., Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 15, 2025
Start date
Feb 12, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 6, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 6, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 11, 2025

Study contacts

Yeliz CIGERCI, Assoc. Prof.
Contact
Yelizceylin@hotmail.com
+902724440304
Yeliz CIGERCI, Assoc.Prof.
principal investigator · Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion