ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06773247NSLBP-MFRUpdated Jan 14, 2025

Effectiveness of Myofascial Release Versus Dry Cupping in Management of Non-Specific Low Back Pain

An interventional study of I. Myofascial Release Technique ,Cupping Technique and II. Conventional Physical Therapy in Non-specific Low Back Pain, sponsored by Cairo University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 45 Years to 55 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-14.

Sponsored by Cairo University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Mar 2025, 1 year 7 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
45 Years to 55 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the differences between the effect of myofascial release technique versus cupping technique on pain intensity level, spinal mobility and functional disabilities level in patients with NSLBP.

Methods: The study participants were 60 patients from both genders diagnosed as NSLBP. Their age ranged from 45 to 55 years old. They were assigned randomly into two groups: Group A (MFR): 20 patients received MFR and conventional physical therapy treatment. Group B: 20 patients received cupping technique and conventional physical therapy treatment. Group C: 20 patients received conventional physical therapy treatment only. All groups received treatment protocols three times a week for 4 consecutive weeks.

Read the detailed description

The study participants were assigned randomly into two groups; Group A: 20 patients received MFR and conventional physical therapy treatment (therapeutic exercises in the form of stretching exercises for the back, iliopsoas, and hamstring muscles and strengthening exercises for the abdominal muscles for 30 minutes. Group B: 20 patients received cupping technique and conventional physical therapy treatment (therapeutic exercises in form of stretching exercises for the back, iliopsoas, and hamstring muscles and strengthening exercises for the abdominal muscles for 30 minutes. Group C: 20 patients received conventional physical therapy treatment only (therapeutic exercises in form of stretching exercises for the back, iliopsoas, and hamstring muscles and strengthening exercises for the abdominal muscles for 30 minutes. All groups received treatment protocols three times a week for 4 consecutive weeks.

Intervention I. Myofascial Release Technique Vertical stroking technique was performed in lumbar region to quadratus lumborum. Activities like sustained repetitive movements, twisting, bending, sedentary posture for prolonged duration, muscle imbalance, etc. leads to trigger point formation making quadratus lumborum as a common source of low back pain. It was performed as follow; Quadratus lumborum is palpated in prone and side lying for trigger points. The technique is applied by the patient positioned in side lying with a pillow under waist to exaggerate stretch of the muscle. The therapist stands at level of patient's hip posterior and counter pressure was applied by one hand on the ribs in a cephalic direction and with the other hand vertical stroking was performed by the knuckles caudally through its course in direction of the barrier. When a barrier was reached, light pressure was maintained to stretch the barrier and wait for approximately 3-5 minutes. Prior to release, a therapeutic pulse was felt (e.g. heat). As the barrier releases, the hand felt the motion and softening of the tissue. Sessions were conducted three days / week every other day for four weeks Cupping Technique The cupping procedure was performed as follows: Massage oil was applied over the area first to improve contact and makes it easier to move the cup's position. double-walled glass cups (6 glasses with diameters from 75 to 100 mm) were held inverted, after which each glass was placed on an afflicted area overlying the low back muscle (acupoint: BL23. This point is located 1.5 cm lateral to the posterior midline, on the level of the lower border of the spinous process of the second lumbar vertebra) and has been used to treat conditions such as lower back pain. As the air inside the cups cooled, vacuums were created, drawing up the skin within each cup. The cups were separated by 1-2 centimeters. The glasses were removed after 10 to 20 minutes depending on the colour of the circular so-called cupping marks, which range from slightly rose to dark pink. During cupping, the patients were asked to remain as still as possible. If the suctioning became too painful to bear, the cups were removed before the full time had elapsed.

II. Conventional Physical Therapy Treatment It consists of stretching exercises for the back, iliopsoas, and hamstring muscles and strengthening exercises for the abdominal muscles for 30 minutes. Three sets of stretching exercises, each involving a 30-sec hold and 30 sec of rest repeated three times, were performed in three sessions per week over four weeks. One set of strengthening exercises, consisting of 10 repetitions with a 5-sec hold, sessions were conducted three days a week, every other day, for four weeks.

The cupping procedure was performed as follows: Massage oil was applied over the area first to improve contact and makes it easier to move the cup's position. double-walled glass cups (6 glasses with diameters from 75 to 100 mm) were held inverted, after which each glass was placed on an afflicted area overlying the low back muscle (acupoint: BL23. This point is located 1.5 cm lateral to the posterior midline, on the level of the lower border of the spinous process of the second lumbar vertebra) and has been used to treat conditions such as lower back pain. As the air inside the cups cooled, vacuums were created, drawing up the skin within each cup. The cups were separated by 1-2 centimeters. The glasses were removed after 10 to 20 minutes depending on the colour of the circular so-called cupping marks, which range from slightly rose to dark pink. During cupping, the patients were asked to remain as still as possible. If the suctioning became too painful to bear, the cups were removed before the full time has elapsed. Cupping therapy was performed for 15-20 minutes three days / week every other day for four weeks

02

Conditions studied

  • Non-specific Low Back Pain

Keywords

  • Myofascial Release, Cupping, NSLBP
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Cairo University is the lead sponsor of 4,909 studies on the registry; 1,445 are open to participants now.

Of its 37 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (14%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. patients age ranged from 45 to 55 years old and body mass index of 18.5-24.9 (kg/m2) with NSLBP of 3 or more month's duration.
  2. All patients reported pain score of 4-6 based on the visual analog scale (VAS). 3.Patient with limitation in range of motion of lumbar spine due to tightness of the muscles, hypersensitive tender points on palpation along with pain localized para spinally .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Patients presented with lumbar radiculopathy
  2. spinal pathology (fracture or tumors) or history of any spinal surgery
  3. lumbar canal stenosis, osteoporosis
  4. pregnancy related back pain, and spinal deformities like scoliosis or kyphosis.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Myofascial Release Technique

    Vertical stroking technique was performed in lumbar region to quadratus lumborum. Activities like sustained repetitive movements, twisting, bending, sedentary posture for prolonged duration, muscle imbalance, etc. leads to trigger point formation making quadratus lumborum as a common source of low back pain. It was performed as follow; Quadratus lumborum is palpated in prone and side lying for trigger points. The technique is applied by the patient positioned in side lying with a pillow under waist to exaggerate stretch of the muscle.

    Other: I. Myofascial Release Technique ,Cupping Technique and II. Conventional Physical Therapy

Interventions

  • OtherI. Myofascial Release Technique ,Cupping Technique and II. Conventional Physical Therapy

    The cupping procedure was performed as follows: Massage oil was applied over the area first to improve contact and makes it easier to move the cup's position. double-walled glass cups (6 glasses with diameters from 75 to 100 mm) were held inverted, after which each glass was placed on an afflicted area overlying the low back muscle (acupoint: BL23). Myofascial Release Technique Vertical stroking technique was performed in lumbar region to quadratus lumborum. AIt was performed as follow; Quadratus lumborum is palpated in prone and side lying for trigger points. The technique is applied by the patient positioned in side lying with a pillow under waist to exaggerate stretch of the muscle. The therapist stands at level of patient's hip posterior and counter pre

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. pain in low back area

    Visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess the intensity of perceived pain pre and post treatment in patients with NSLBP. The VAS is a reliable and valid tool for the quantification of perceived pain

    Time frame: 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Functional Disability

    Level of daily living activities was measured using Oswestry Disability Index (Ar-ODI).The questionnaire contains 10 items related to limitations in daily life activities (like personal care, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, social life, traveling, and work).Each item includes six potential responses that are rating on a 0 to 5 points scale, with maximum scores of ''5'' or ''total disability'' and a minimum score of ''0'' or ''no disability.'' 39-41 The total score is calculated as follows: (patient' score/50) \*100 to obtain the score expressed in percentage

    Time frame: 4 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Assessment procedure of lumbar flexion and extension ROM

    Two inclinometers were used to measure lumbar flexion and extension. The examiner stood behind the standing subject. The skin was marked along the spine midway between two posterior superior iliac spines (PSIS), and one mark was made on the spinous processes, 15 cm superior to the PSIS line. Both inclinometers were placed over the skin marks.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University.
    Cairo, Egypt 12518, Egypt
    • Rabab M shoala, PHD · Contact · r.shoala@qu.edu.sa · 00201158382830
    • Rabab M Shoala, PHD · Contact
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Jan 2025; primary completion for Mar 2025, 2 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 2, 2025
First posted
Jan 14, 2025
StartEst.
Jan 3, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Mar 3, 2025
CompletionEst.
Apr 3, 2025
Last update
Jan 14, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 14, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06773247
Lead sponsor
Cairo University
Responsible party
Rabab Ali Mohamed (Assistant Professor of Physical Therapy, Cairo University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 14, 2025
Start date
Jan 3, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 3, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 3, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 14, 2025

Study contacts

Rabab M Assistant Professor of Physical Therapy, PHD
Contact
drrabab0@gmail.com
r.shoala@qu.edu.sa ext. 00201158382830
Rabab M Assistant Professor of Physical Therapy, PHD
Contact
r.shoala@qu.edu.sa
00201158382830 ext. +966542462187
Rabab M Shoala, PHD
principal investigator · Basic Science Department, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Egypt.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Dec 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion