ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06760026ADTIDUpdated Feb 17, 2026

Cosmetic Results With Tissue Adhesive vs. Subdermal Sutures in Cesarean Section

An interventional study of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive applied continuously over the Pfannenstiel-type cesarean incision and subdermal suture in Cesarean Wound Repair, Cesarean Section Scar and Cosmetic Appearance of Cesarean Scar, sponsored by Ricardo A Gutierrez Ramirez, MD, MSc, FACOG. Completed at 1 site in Honduras. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-17.

Sponsored by Ricardo A Gutierrez Ramirez, MD, MSc, FACOG · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Morbidity associated with post-cesarean wound closure, including cosmetically unfavorable scarring, is a significant concern in obstetrics, impacting patient satisfaction and recovery. Recent advances have introduced the use of tissue adhesives, such as 2-octylcyanoacrylate, which promise to improve cosmetic outcomes and reduce postoperative complications. This study will evaluate different tissue adhesive application schedules, keeping the total dose constant, to determine whether the method of application influences cosmetic results and the incidence of postoperative complications

Read the detailed description

In Honduras, as in many parts of the world, cesarean section is a common obstetric practice. The choice of wound closure method in this procedure has significant implications not only in terms of the patient's physical health, but also in her psychological and aesthetic well-being. The scar resulting from a cesarean section can have a lasting impact on a woman's perception of her own body, affecting her self-esteem and quality of life.

Historically, in Honduras, the use of subdermal sutures with nylon thread has been preferred for the closure of post-cesarean section wounds. However, with advances in medical technology, tissue adhesives have emerged as a promising alternative, potentially offering a better cosmetic outcome, faster application, and more comfortable recovery for the patient.

This study is crucial in the Honduran context for several reasons:

  1. improved Cosmetic Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction: By comparing two methods of wound closure, this study seeks to identify the technique that offers better cosmetic results, which could significantly improve the satisfaction and psychological well-being of patients undergoing elective cesarean sections.
  2. Adaptation to Local Resources: In a country like Honduras, where health resources may be limited, it is essential to optimize the use of technologies and surgical materials. This study will provide valuable information on the feasibility and efficacy of tissue adhesives compared to the traditional method, taking into account factors such as cost and availability of materials.
  3. Reduction of Postoperative Complications: By evaluating and comparing the incidence of complications associated with each closure method, the study could contribute to improve surgical practices and reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, which is of great relevance in the context of public health in Honduras.
  4. Impact on Resource Management in the Health System: In the context of a country with possibly limited health resources such as Honduras, it is essential to evaluate not only the clinical efficacy of surgical techniques, but also their cost-effectiveness. This study will provide information on the relative costs of the use of tissue adhesives compared to subdermal sutures, which is relevant for planning and resource allocation in the health system.
  5. Fostering Research and Evidence-Based Medicine in Honduras: This study will contribute to the growing need for contextualized medical research in Honduras, promoting the practice of evidence-based medicine that takes into account local realities and the specific needs of the population.

Objective: To evaluate the effects on morbidity and postoperative cosmetic outcomes of the use of tissue adhesive versus subdermal sutures in Pfannenstiel-type cesarean sections.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cesarean Wound Repair
  • Cesarean Section Scar
  • Cosmetic Appearance of Cesarean Scar
  • Tissue Adhesives

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Cesarean Wound Repair
  • Cesarean section scar
  • cosmetic appearance of cesarean scar
  • tissue adhesives
03

In context

Cicatrix

611 studies on the registry are indexed under Cicatrix; 114 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 36 is close to the median of 40 across 512 interventional studies indexed under Cicatrix.

Browse Cicatrix studies →

Lead sponsor

Ricardo A Gutierrez Ramirez, MD, MSc, FACOG is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Submission of a signed and dated form.
  • Declared willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study.
  • Pregnant patient at 37 or more weeks gestation, scheduled for elective cesarean section at the Hospital Materno Infantil.
  • Cesarean section performed in the Maternity and Children's Hospital, operating room.
  • Literate patient, able to understand and respond to the study questions, with less than 30.
  • Possess cell phone or other means of communication to facilitate postoperative follow-up.
  • Residing in the city of Tegucigalpa, Honduras, to ensure accessibility to scheduled follow-up visits.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients under 18 years of age.
  • Patients with diagnosed psychiatric illnesses that may interfere with their ability to give or follow the study protocol.
  • Pregnant patients with complications that may affect the healing process or increase the risk of postoperative complications, such as severe preeclampsia.
  • Diabetes.
  • Collagen diseases.
  • diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease).
  • Vascular diseases (vasculitis).
  • Coagulation disorders (thrombophilia).
  • Pregnant patients with premature rupture of membranes, since this may influence the choice of timing and method of cesarean section.
  • Pregnant patients diagnosed with chorioamnionitis, which represents an increased risk of postoperative infection.
  • Pregnant patients diagnosed with acute abdomen, which may require emergency surgical management that is not compatible with standard cesarean section procedures.
  • Pregnant patients with multiple pregnancies, since this could complicate the cesarean section procedure and affect the results of the study.
  • Presence of major fetal malformations that may require additional interventions at birth.
  • Fetal stillbirth
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
36 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention

    use 2-octyl cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive applied continuously over the Pfannenstiel-type cesarean incision

    Procedure: 2-octyl cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive applied continuously over the Pfannenstiel-type cesarean incision

  • Active comparator
    Control

    wound closure with subdermal sutures using 2-0 nylon thread

    Procedure: subdermal suture

Interventions

  • Procedure2-octyl cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive applied continuously over the Pfannenstiel-type cesarean incision

    2-octyl cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive applied continuously over the Pfannenstiel-type cesarean incision

  • Proceduresubdermal suture

    wound closure with subdermal sutures using 2-0 nylon thread, under the same evaluation scheme

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in the OSAS Scale score

    The OSAS score is based on the assessment of several aspects of a scar, and each of these aspects is scored individually. Each variable uses a 10-point scoring system, where 1 represents normal foot. The scores of the individual variables can be added together to obtain a total score ranging from 5 to 50, where 5 represents normal skin. Items typically assessed include: * Vascularity: Refers to the presence of visible blood vessels or red coloration in the scar. * Pigmentation: Assesses whether the scar has a different color than the surrounding skin. * Thickness: Refers to the height or prominence of the scar above the level of the surrounding skin. * Relief: Assesses the texture of the scar compared to the surrounding skin. * Flexibility: Measures how stiff or flexible the scar is compared to the surrounding skin.

    Time frame: One month from the first intervention until 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. PSAS scale score

    The Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS) consists of 6 items on scar-related pain, itching, color, stiffness, thickness, and irregularity. Each item uses a 10-point scoring system, summed to give a total score ranging from 6 to 60, where 6 represents normal skin with no associated symptoms.

    Time frame: One month from the first intervention until 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital Escuela
    Tegucigalpa, Francisco Morazán Department 11101, Honduras
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Gottardi A, Cherubino M, Uccella S, Valdatta L. Cosmetic outcomes of various skin closure methods following cesarean delivery: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jul;203(1):36.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.001. Epub 2010 Apr 24. PubMed 20417924 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — It is not necessary, none of the 18 HIPAA identifiers will be placed

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06760026
Lead sponsor
Ricardo A Gutierrez Ramirez, MD, MSc, FACOG
Responsible party
Ricardo A Gutierrez Ramirez, MD, MSc, FACOG (Titular professor, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Honduras) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jan 6, 2025
Start date
Jan 1, 2025
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2025
Completion
Dec 30, 2025
Last update
Feb 17, 2026

Study contacts

Ricardo A. Gutierrez Ramirez, MD, MSc
study director · Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Honduras

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion