ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06732726DVTUpdated Sep 17, 2026

Padua Prediction Score for VTE Risk in Thoracic Surgery Patients

An observational study in DVT - Deep Vein Thrombosis and VTE (Venous Thromboembolism), sponsored by Al-Nahrain University. Recruiting at 1 site in Iraq. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-17.

Sponsored by Al-Nahrain University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Apr 2025; still recruiting 1 year 6 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
150
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational study is to assess the predictive accuracy of the Padua Prediction Score (PPS) for venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk in thoracic surgery patients.

The study aims to answer the following question:

Does the PPS provide a more accurate prediction of VTE risk?

Participants will:

Have their VTE risk assessed using the PPS during their hospital admission.

Read the detailed description

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, comprising conditions like deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Hospitalized patients are particularly vulnerable to VTE due to factors such as prolonged immobility, surgical procedures, and preexisting comorbidities.

To address this risk, tools like the Padua Prediction Score (PPS) have been developed. PPS is a validated scoring system that uses clinical and demographic criteria to categorize patients as high- or low-risk for VTE, allowing healthcare providers to tailor prophylactic measures accordingly. Although the Padua Prediction Score has been increasingly adopted in various healthcare settings, its applicability in Iraq remains understudied. There is limited local data on the prevalence of VTE, risk assessment practices and adherence to prophylaxis protocols, leaving a clear gap in the literature. This study aims to explore the utility and predictive accuracy of the Padua Prediction Score in the Iraqi healthcare context. By addressing this gap, the findings could help refine VTE prevention strategies, improve resource allocation, and ultimately reduce complications associated with this condition.

02

Conditions studied

  • DVT - Deep Vein Thrombosis
  • VTE (Venous Thromboembolism)

Keywords

  • Padua Prediction Score (PPS)
03

In context

Venous Thrombosis

785 studies on the registry are indexed under Venous Thrombosis; 110 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 150 is below the median of 301 across 274 observational studies indexed under Venous Thrombosis.

Browse Venous Thrombosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Al-Nahrain University is the lead sponsor of 26 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study will focus on adult patients undergoing thoracic surgery at a single center in Iraq.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients who have undergone preoperative Padua Prediction Score assessment.
  • Inpatients with a hospital stay over 3 days
  • Written obtained from patients or their legal guardians.
  • Availability for postoperative follow-up to assess outcomes like LEVT development or related complications.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Preexisting LEVT or pulmonary embolism.
  • Severe Coagulopathy: Patients with inherited or acquired bleeding disorders (e.g., hemophilia, advanced liver disease).
  • receiving any anticoagulation therapy for any reason.
  • patients who did not undergo a postoperative D-dimer test.
  • Incomplete Data: missing essential clinical or laboratory data.
  • Pregnancy: pregnant women or those within six weeks postpartum.
  • Noncompliance: Patients unwilling or unable to adhere to study follow-up protocols.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Episodes in Patients

    symptomatic or asymptomatic, confirmed by instrumental diagnostics.

    Time frame: In-Hospital Phase (average of 10 days through discharge); Post-Discharge Follow-Up: Day 7, Day 15, and Day 30

  2. Padua Prediction Score

    A total score that ranges from 0 to 20. 4 or higher indicates a significant likelihood of developing VTE.

    Time frame: Day 1 preoperative (one day prior to surgery)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Symptomatic Pulmonary Embolism in Patients

    symptomatic pulmonary embolism confirmed by perfusion isotope scanning or CT pulmonary angiography.

    Time frame: In-Hospital Phase (average of 10 days through discharge); Post-Discharge Follow-Up: Day 7, Day 15, and Day 30

  2. Rate of Recurrent Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) in Patients

    A new episode of deep vein thrombosis occurs after the initial diagnosis with clinical symptoms (such as leg pain, swelling, redness, or tenderness) and is confirmed through instrumental diagnostics (e.g., ultrasound, CT venography, MRI).

    Time frame: Post-Discharge Follow-Up: Day 7, Day 15, and Day 30

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • College of Medicine - Al-Nahrain University
    Baghdad, Kadhimiya, Iraq
    Recruiting
    • Abdul-Ilah R. Khamis · Principal investigator
    • Zahraa Bassam Alkhalidy, Student · Sub investigator
    • Mahmoud M Morsy, MD · Sub investigator
    • Shewaz Tariq Latif, MD · Sub investigator
    • Ibrahim Abusufian Dafallah, MBBS · Sub investigator
    • Sanarya N Abd-Al-Taj, Student · Sub investigator
    • Qais M. Qasim, Student · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Al Yami MS, Silva MA, Donovan JL, Kanaan AO. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in medically ill patients: a mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2018 Jan;45(1):36-47. doi: 10.1007/s11239-017-1562-5. PubMed 29043538 ↗
  • Barbar S, Noventa F, Rossetto V, Ferrari A, Brandolin B, Perlati M, De Bon E, Tormene D, Pagnan A, Prandoni P. A risk assessment model for the identification of hospitalized medical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism: the Padua Prediction Score. J Thromb Haemost. 2010 Nov;8(11):2450-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.04044.x. PubMed 20738765 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06732726
Lead sponsor
Al-Nahrain University
Responsible party
Abdulillah R. Khamees (Principal Investigator, Al-Nahrain University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 13, 2024
Start date
Apr 20, 2025
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 15, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 17, 2026

Study contacts

Abdul-Ilah R. Khamis
Contact
allaabed987@ced.nahrainuniv.edu.iq
+9647838571013
Yaser aamer Eisa Alhaibi, Assistant professor
study director · College Of Medicine - Nahrain University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion