ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06725966Updated Dec 10, 2024

Personalized Treatment of Refractory BPPV

An interventional study of Conventional Epley maneuver and Personalized Epley maneuver in Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo and Personalized Medicine, sponsored by Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago. Recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-10.

Sponsored by Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2026, 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Registered 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2024, registered Dec 2024).
  • Started Jul 2024; still recruiting 2 years 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
54
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background: Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is the most common cause of vertigo, often effectively treated with standard canalith repositioning maneuvers (CRMs). However, approximately 12.5% of cases remain refractory, leading to persistent symptoms and increased healthcare burden. Variations in the anatomical orientation of the semicircular canals (SCCs) may explain the resistance to conventional maneuvers. This study explores a personalized medicine approach, utilizing computational fluid dynamics (CFD) based on MRI reconstructions to tailor CRMs with the help of mechanical rotation chair according to individual inner ear anatomy.

Methods: The investigators conducted a randomized, multicenter, open-label study targeting patients with refractory posterior canal BPPV. Participants were allocated to either a control group (receiving repeated standard CRMs and Brandt-Daroff exercises) or an intervention group (receiving personalized CRMs based on CFD simulations derived from MRI scans). The intervention group's maneuvers were executed using a mechanical rotational chair designed for precise angulation. Primary outcomes included resolution of nystagmus and vertigo symptoms, while secondary outcomes measured the reduction in healthcare visits and improved quality of life (Dizziness Handicap Inventory score).

Read the detailed description
  1. STUDY DESIGN This is an experimental, multicenter, open-label, randomized study (using balanced block randomization) with two parallel arms. The study targets patients with a definitive diagnosis of refractory posterior semicircular canal BPPV (BPPVp).
  2. STUDY PARTICIPANTS Study Period: From January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2026. Study Population: Patients diagnosed with BPPV. Target Population: Individuals >18 years of age, of both sexes, diagnosed with unilateral refractory BPPVp, from three Health Areas. Participants will be selected from patients attending the Otoneurology Unit of the Otolaryngology Departments of these three University Hospital Complexes.

    To confirm the diagnosis and rule out other potential causes, all participants will undergo a complete otoneurological evaluation, including:

    • Otoscopy.
    • Basic neurological examination.
    • Observation of spontaneous nystagmus (with and without gaze fixation).
    • Clinical head impulse test (vHIT), including video-assisted evaluation.
    • Positional tests (DHT, McClure test, and head hyperextension), with videonystagmographic recording.
    • Pure-tone audiometry. In cases of refractory BPPV (lack of resolution after three therapeutic maneuvers), a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of the inner ears and posterior cranial fossa will be requested to rule out central neurological causes.
  3. RANDOMIZATION

    Pre-selection Visit (Visit -1): Participants will undergo a comprehensive vestibular assessment to identify candidates with refractory BPPVp. The following tests will be included:

    • Video-assisted head impulse test (vHIT) to assess for other vestibular pathologies.
    • Dix-Hallpike test (DHT) to confirm the diagnosis of BPPVp.
    • McClure test to exclude horizontal canal BPPV.
    • Head hyperextension test to exclude superior canal BPPV.
    • Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) questionnaire adapted to Spanish, assessing perceived disability due to vertigo.

    For posterior canal BPPV, it will be verified in the medical record that three repositioning maneuvers (Epley and/or Semont) were performed without symptom resolution.

    Eligible participants will be given a detailed explanation of the study objectives and procedures, and will receive the approved Patient Information Sheet (PIS) to provide informed consent.

  4. RANDOMIZATION PROCESS

    Visit 0 (Randomization Visit): After obtaining consent, participants will be randomized to one of the following study arms:

    • Control Group: Participants will be advised to perform Brandt-Daroff exercises at home twice daily for 8 weeks. An MRI of the inner ear and posterior cranial fossa will also be requested. If the exercises are ineffective, repositioning maneuvers using a mechanized chair will be repeated biweekly until symptom resolution.
    • Study Group: Participants will perform Brandt-Daroff exercises at home twice daily for 8 weeks. An MRI will be conducted, and based on the images, a personalized mathematical model will be created to modify the angles of the repositioning maneuver. If the exercises are ineffective, the personalized maneuver will be performed using a mechanized chair.

    A balanced block randomization sequence with block size n=10 will be generated by a member of the research team.

  5. DATA COLLECTION

    Even if intermediate visits are necessary, the following study visits will be conducted according to the protocol (with data recording):

    • Visit 1 (Eight Weeks After Inclusion):

      • The Dix-Hallpike Test (DHT) will be performed with videonystagmographic recording. If positive:
      • In the control group, the conventional Epley maneuver will be repeated using a mechanized chair.
      • In the study group, a personalized Epley maneuver will be performed using a mechanized chair.
    • Visit 2 (Ten Weeks After Inclusion):

      • The DHT will be repeated with videonystagmographic recording. If positive:
      • In the control group, the conventional Epley maneuver will be repeated using a mechanized chair.
      • In the study group, the personalized Epley maneuver will be repeated using a mechanized chair.

    These maneuvers (conventional for the control group and personalized for the study group) will be repeated every two weeks until resolution of symptoms (or up to a maximum of 8 repetitions).

    • Visit 3 (Six Months After Inclusion):
    • The following variables will be recorded:
    • Dix-Hallpike Test (DHT) results (negative or positive).
    • Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) score.
    • Number of consultations required for resolution.
  1. MATHEMATICAL STUDY A 3D model of the affected membranous labyrinth will be reconstructed based on MRI imaging. An analysis of the planes on which the semicircular canals rest will be performed, and the geometric model will be adapted for subsequent numerical simulation. The computational study, carried out using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) techniques, will involve combining the dynamics of the endolymph within the labyrinth and the particle dynamics of the free otoliths.

Mathematically, the Navier-Stokes equations will be coupled with a discrete particle model sensitive to gravity and the fluid forces. This will allow for the determination of the velocity distribution of the endolymph, the pressures exerted on the labyrinth walls, as well as the timing and positions of the otoliths during the personalized Epley maneuver.

  1. DATA ANALYSIS Demographic data and patient characteristics will be described globally and by relevant covariables.

Continuous outcomes will be summarized using mean, median, standard deviation (SD), and interquartile range (P25, P75). For categorical outcomes, the number and percentage of patients in each category will be reported. Statistical analyses will be based on the full analysis set (FAS), which includes all randomized participants who provided informed consent and met all inclusion criteria without any exclusion criteria.

  1. STUDY LIMITATIONS, DATA BIASES, AND MITIGATION STRATEGIES Despite being an open-label study, the potential bias introduced is minimal, as both the maneuvers and outcome evaluation are performed by the same person. The primary outcome (resolution of nystagmus) is assessed objectively through videonystagmography, which does not require interpretation by the evaluator.

There is a risk of patient dropout during the eight-week period of Brandt-Daroff exercises prior to the personalized maneuver. To mitigate this risk, patient adherence will be closely monitored and encouraged.

Since patients will be recruited from three different hospitals, there may be diagnostic biases depending on the evaluator. However, all intervention maneuvers (both personalized and conventional) will be conducted at a single center, where a diagnostic reevaluation will be performed prior to intervention to confirm that the BPPV remains unresolved and exclusively affects the posterior canal.

  1. SAMPLE SIZE AND CALCULATION METHODOLOGY To estimate the sample size, the investigators assume that approximately 25% of patients with refractory BPPVp may be cured through repeated maneuvers or Brandt-Daroff exercises (control group). A significant difference of 50% in the study group (i.e., a 75% efficacy rate for symptom resolution) is considered clinically meaningful. With a 95% confidence level (1-α) and 95% statistical power for a two-tailed hypothesis test, a sample size of 23 participants per arm is required. Thus, the estimated total sample size is 46 individuals, increased to 54 (27 per group) to account for a 15% anticipated dropout rate.
02

Conditions studied

  • Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo
  • Personalized Medicine

Keywords

  • BPPV
  • Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo
  • Computational fluid dynamics
  • MRI
  • Canalith repositioning maneuvers
  • Mechanical rotation chair
03

In context

Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo

75 studies on the registry are indexed under Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo; 15 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 54 is below the median of 78 across 62 interventional studies indexed under Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo.

Browse Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago is the lead sponsor of 33 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • A. Diagnosed with BPPVp according to the Barany Society criteria:

    1. Recurrent episodes of vertigo or positional instability, triggered by lying down or turning the head in the supine position.
    2. Episodes lasting less than 1 minute.
    3. Positional nystagmus observed after a latency period during the Dix-Hallpike test (DHT), with an upward vertical component and a torsional component (clockwise on the left side and counterclockwise on the right).
    4. Symptoms not explained by any other cause.

      AND

  • B. to otolith repositioning maneuvers (Epley and/or Semont maneuvers), with persistence of symptoms after three attempts.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive impairment that prevents understanding of their condition and the required procedures.
  • Pathological conditions that hinder the execution of the maneuvers.
  • BPPV involving canals other than the posterior canal or bilateral posterior canal involvement.
  • Low educational level, which may impede understanding of the procedures and .
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
54 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Conventional Epley maneuver

    Participants will be advised to perform Brandt-Daroff exercises at home twice daily for 8 weeks. An MRI of the inner ear and posterior cranial fossa will also be requested. If the exercises are ineffective, repositioning maneuvers using a mechanized chair will be repeated biweekly until symptom resolution.

    Procedure: Conventional Epley maneuver

  • Experimental
    Personalized Epley maneuver

    Participants will perform Brandt-Daroff exercises at home twice daily for 8 weeks. An MRI will be conducted, and based on the images, a personalized mathematical model will be created to modify the angles of the repositioning maneuver. If the exercises are ineffective, the personalized maneuver will be performed using a mechanized chair.

    Procedure: Personalized Epley maneuver

Interventions

  • ProcedureConventional Epley maneuver

    Epley maneuver using a mechanized chair

  • ProcedurePersonalized Epley maneuver

    Personalized Epley maneuver, using a mechanized chair

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of curation

    Percentage of participants in whom, after the maneuvers, no nystagmus is observed in the Dix and Hallpike test

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rate of resolution of symptomatology

    Percentage of participants who, after the maneuvers, do not report vertigo in the Dix and Hallpike test

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. DHI score

    DHI (Dizzines Handicap Inventory) score after the maneuvers, compared to the score at the time of inclusion

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Number of sessions

    Number of maneuvers need to curation

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Hospital Clínico Universitario
    Santiago De Compostela, A Coruña 15706, Spain
    Recruiting
    • Andrés Soto-Varela, PhD · Contactandres.soto.varela@sergas.es · +34981951157
    • Miguel Blanco-Ulla · Sub investigator
    • Sofía Santos-Pérez · Sub investigator
    • Marcos Rossi-Izquierdo · Sub investigator
    • Ismael Arán-González · Sub investigator
    • Isabel Vaamonde-Sánchez-Andrade · Sub investigator
    • Virginia Franco-Gutiérrez · Sub investigator
    • Vicente Pérez-Muñuzuri · Sub investigator
    • Alberto Pérez-Muñuzuri · Sub investigator
    • Ismael Arán-Tapia · Sub investigator
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 10, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06725966
Lead sponsor
Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago
Collaborators
Instituto de Salud Carlos III, European Union
Responsible party
Andrés Soto-Varela (Professor and Chairman, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 10, 2024
Start date
Jul 1, 2024
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 10, 2024

Study contacts

Andrés Soto-Varela, Prof, PhD
Contact
andres.soto.varela@sergas.es
+34981951157
Ismael Arán-Tapia, PhD
Contact
ismaelaran.tapia@usc.es
+34663654574
Andrés Soto-Varela, Prof, PhD
principal investigator · Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion