ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06721715Updated Dec 6, 2024

Textbook Outcomes After Oesophagectomy in Regional Australia

An observational study in Oesophageal Cancer Nos, sponsored by Launceston General Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Australia. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-06.

Sponsored by Launceston General Hospital · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2024, 1 year 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
100
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational cohort study is to assess textbook outcomes after oesophagectomy in a regional Australian hospital. This is a composite quality measure that include 9 parameters related to cancer care. Researchers will compares the textbook outcome rate in this regional hospital and compare it to textbook outcomes rates from other Australian hospitals, as well as hospitals overseas. Participants will not be actively involved in this study, as all data will be collected from medical records only.

Read the detailed description

Rationale Textbook outcomes is a composite tool to assess the quality of cancer care within an institution by evaluating several perioperative and postoperative factors. Most studies assessing textbook outcomes after oesophagectomy have been conducted in high-volume centres, achieving rates of up to 50%. To the best of our knowledge this is the first study to assess textbook outcomes after oesophagectomy in a regional Australian hospital, providing a unique insight into the performance of this procedure in a country that has not widely adopted centralisation of cases.

Aims/objectives To calculate textbook outcomes rates in a regional hospital in Australia and compare to higher volume Australian and international institutions.

Methods Retrospective identification of patients from MBS codes related to oesphagectomy, and collection of data retrospectively from the medical record only. All patients undergoing oesophagectomy from January 2014 to December 2023 will be included. There are no exclusion criteria.

Data collection Baseline patient characteristics, tumour-specific factors, textbook outcome parameters, treatment details including postoperative complications, and follow up data on survival will be collected

Statistical analysis Statistical analysis will be performed in consultation with a biostatistician. The number and proportion of patients who meet each parameter of the textbook outcome will be calculated for each year and compared. Patient characteristics (age, gender, BMI and ASA grade), tumour factors (histology, AJCC clinical T and N stage), and treatment aspects (neoadjuvant therapy and surgical approach) will be assessed for association with textbook outcomes using the Chi squared test with significance considered less than 0.05. A Kaplan-Meier survival curve will be used to investigate overall survival of patients with and without a textbook outcome.

02

Conditions studied

  • Oesophageal Cancer Nos

Keywords

  • oesophagectomy
  • oesophageal cancer
  • regional surgery
03

In context

Esophageal Neoplasms

1,631 studies on the registry are indexed under Esophageal Neoplasms; 469 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is below the median of 200 across 346 observational studies indexed under Esophageal Neoplasms.

Browse Esophageal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Launceston General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All patients who underwent oesophagectomy at a single regional hospital in Tasmania, Australia between January 2014 and December 2023 will be included in this study,

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • all patients who underwent oesophagectomy between January 2014 and December 2023

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • none
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Textbook outcome

    Patients that achieve a textbook outcome after oesophagectomy

  • No textbook outcome

    Patients who do not achieve a textbook outcome after oesophagectomy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Textbook outcome

    Patients who achieve a textbook outcome. This is defined when all 9 following criteria are met: R0 resection, retrieval of 15 or more lymph nodes, no intraoperative complications, no post-operative complications Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher, no readmission to the ICU, no hospital stay longer than 21 days, no mortality within 90 days, no readmission related to the procedure within 30 days of admission, and no reintervention related to the surgical procedure (operative, endoscopic or radiologic).

    Time frame: from date of surgery to end of study (December 2024) for a timeframe up to 10 years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Launceston General Hospital
    Launceston, Tasmania 7250, Australia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kalff MC, Vesseur I, Eshuis WJ, Heineman DJ, Daams F, van der Peet DL, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS. The Association of Textbook Outcome and Long-Term Survival After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Oct;112(4):1134-1141. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.09.035. Epub 2020 Nov 19. PubMed 33221197 ↗
  • Kay B, Healy TE. Propofol ('Diprivan') for outpatient cystoscopy. Efficacy and recovery compared with althesin and methohexitone. Postgrad Med J. 1985;61 Suppl 3:108-14. PubMed 3877277 ↗
  • Kalff MC, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS. Textbook outcome for esophageal cancer surgery: an international consensus-based update of a quality measure. Dis Esophagus. 2021 Jul 12;34(7):doab011. doi: 10.1093/dote/doab011. PubMed 33744921 ↗
  • Ball ED, Keefe KA, Colby E. Expression of antigens associated with small cell carcinoma of the lung on hematopoietic progenitor cells. Cancer Res. 1987 Dec 15;47(24 Pt 1):6556-9. PubMed 2824035 ↗
  • van der Werf LR, Wijnhoven BPL, Fransen LFC, van Sandick JW, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Busweiler LAD, van Hillegersberg R, Wouters MWJM, Luyer MDP, van Berge Henegouwen MI. A National Cohort Study Evaluating the Association Between Short-term Outcomes and Long-term Survival After Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Surgery. Ann Surg. 2019 Nov;270(5):868-876. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003520. PubMed 31634182 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 6, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06721715
Lead sponsor
Launceston General Hospital
Responsible party
Renishka Sellayah (General Surgery Fellow, Launceston General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 6, 2024
Start date
Dec 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 6, 2024

Study contacts

Renishka Sellayah, MBBS (hons) FRACS
Contact
r.sellayah@gmail.com
+61 425 816 462
Girish Pande, FRACS
Contact
girish.pande@ths.tas.gov.au
+61 439 656 110

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Dec 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion