ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06720142Updated Apr 22, 2026

Mg OSTEOCRETE Post-Treatment Outcomes

An observational study in Cancer of Bone, Trauma and Aseptic Loosening of Orthopaedic Hardware, sponsored by Santiago Lozano-Calderon. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-22.

Sponsored by Santiago Lozano-Calderon · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2025; still recruiting 1 year 7 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
10
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Mg OSTEOCRETE is a bone substitute used to fill a defect in bone caused by excision of a tumor, orthopaedic hardware that has become loosened, or a trauma-related condition. The aim of this study is to determine the amount of time it takes for bone to heal after treatment with Mg OSTEOCRETE, and to better understand the efficacy of this treatment through clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Bone voids in the skeletal system can result from trauma, infection, surgery, or oncologic disease. If these voids are not treated, they may lead to issues such as pathological fractures, treatment or hardware failure, and recurrence of disease. Various methods exist for addressing bone voids, primarily through the use of grafting materials. Autograft-bone harvested from another part of the same patient and transplanted into the void-is considered the "gold standard" because they fulfill all three criteria of the "ideal" void filler: they are osteoconductive, osteoinductive, and osteogenic. However, their use can be limited by availability and potential donor site complications, with up to 39% of patients reporting pain at the donor site.

Due to concerns with traditional bone grafting methods, there is growing interest in alternative options. While allografts carry a risk of disease transmission and xenografts are prone to immune rejection, synthetic bone graft substitutes offer a promising alternative. These substitutes, made from materials like calcium sulfate or calcium phosphate, address many issues associated with autografts and allografts. With improved understanding of their performance post-implantation, ongoing advancements are being made. This Clinical Investigation Plan outlines an observational study to evaluate clinical and radiographic outcomes with a particular synthetic bone graft substitute (Mg OSTEOCRETE™; Alliant Biotech, LLC; Grand Rapids, MI).

Mg OSTEOCRETE™ is a moldable/injectable magnesium-based void filler that provides stability while also increasing cell proliferation. Use of Mg OSTEOCRETE™ has been shown to advance the rate of mineralization with a result of enhanced bone regeneration for multiple types of orthopedic applications.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cancer of Bone
  • Trauma
  • Aseptic Loosening of Orthopaedic Hardware

Keywords

  • bone defect
  • bone substitute
  • osteocrete
03

In context

Bone Neoplasms

258 studies on the registry are indexed under Bone Neoplasms; 68 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 10 is below the median of 101 across 82 observational studies indexed under Bone Neoplasms.

Browse Bone Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Santiago Lozano-Calderon as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

This study will include patients who are 18 years or older and receive Mg OSTEOCRETE™ as bone void filler as a component of their treatment.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years of age and older on the day of surgery
  • has received or will receive Mg OSTEOCRETE as a component of their treatment at this institution in accordance with Instructions for Use for the implanted product
  • Mg OSTEOCRETE is indicated for one of the following reasons:

    1. as a bone void filler following bone tumor resection, or;
    2. as an augment for defects causing aseptic loosening of orthopaedic implants, or;
    3. to help substitute bone for trauma-related conditions

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • any as per Instructions for Use for Mg OSTEOCRETE
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
10 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Bone void following bone tumor resection

    Patients are being targeted because they have already agreed to receive OSTEOCRETE as part of standard clinical care. They will complete surveys, blood draws to test for magnesium levels, and low-dose CT scans at various post-operative timepoints.

    Device: Mg OSTEOCRETE as a bone void filler

  • Bone defect caused by aseptic loosening of orthopaedic implants

    Patients are being targeted because they have already agreed to receive OSTEOCRETE as part of standard clinical care. They will complete surveys, blood draws to test for magnesium levels, and low-dose CT scans at various post-operative timepoints.

    Device: Mg OSTEOCRETE as a bone void filler

  • Bone defect caused by trauma-related condition

    Patients are being targeted because they have already agreed to receive OSTEOCRETE as part of standard clinical care. They will complete surveys, blood draws to test for magnesium levels, and low-dose CT scans at various post-operative timepoints.

    Device: Mg OSTEOCRETE as a bone void filler

Interventions

  • DeviceMg OSTEOCRETE as a bone void filler

    Patients will be treated with Mg OSTEOCRETE as per standard clinical care to fill defects in bone left by bone tumor resection

  • DeviceMg OSTEOCRETE as a bone void filler

    Patients will be treated with Mg OSTEOCRETE as per standard clinical care to fill defects in bone left by aseptic loosening of orthopaedic hardware

  • DeviceMg OSTEOCRETE as a bone void filler

    Patients will be treated with Mg OSTEOCRETE as per standard clinical care to fill defects in bone left by trauma-related conditions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to complete bone remodeling

    To determine the time to complete bone remodeling after injection of a magnesium-based bone graft substitute (Mg OSTEOCRETE™), as determined by Hounsfield Units on computed tomography (CT) scan.

    Time frame: Pre-operatively through one year after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Survey of patient-reported outcomes and safety and efficacy of OSTEOCRETE

    To collect safety and efficacy data regarding the performance of Mg OSTEOCRETE™. To longitudinally assess the patient-reported clinical outcomes after injection of a magnesium-based bone graft substitute (Mg OSTEOCRETE™).

    Time frame: Pre-operatively through one year after surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Wu F, Wei J, Guo H, Chen F, Hong H, Liu C. Self-setting bioactive calcium-magnesium phosphate cement with high strength and degradability for bone regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2008 Nov;4(6):1873-84. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.06.020. Epub 2008 Jul 10. PubMed 18662897 ↗
  • Zhang Z., Yang Z., Chen Z., et al. A study on bone cement containing magnesium potassium phosphate for bone repair. Cogent Biol 2018;4(1):1487255. Doi: 10.1080/23312025.2018.1487255.
  • Waselau M, Samii VF, Weisbrode SE, Litsky AS, Bertone AL. Effects of a magnesium adhesive cement on bone stability and healing following a metatarsal osteotomy in horses. Am J Vet Res. 2007 Apr;68(4):370-8. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.68.4.370. PubMed 17397291 ↗
  • Gulotta LV, Kovacevic D, Ying L, Ehteshami JR, Montgomery S, Rodeo SA. Augmentation of tendon-to-bone healing with a magnesium-based bone adhesive. Am J Sports Med. 2008 Jul;36(7):1290-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546508314396. Epub 2008 Mar 4. PubMed 18319348 ↗
  • Yoshizawa S, Brown A, Barchowsky A, Sfeir C. Magnesium ion stimulation of bone marrow stromal cells enhances osteogenic activity, simulating the effect of magnesium alloy degradation. Acta Biomater. 2014 Jun;10(6):2834-42. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.02.002. Epub 2014 Feb 7. PubMed 24512978 ↗
  • Diaz-Tocados JM, Herencia C, Martinez-Moreno JM, Montes de Oca A, Rodriguez-Ortiz ME, Vergara N, Blanco A, Steppan S, Almaden Y, Rodriguez M, Munoz-Castaneda JR. Magnesium Chloride promotes Osteogenesis through Notch signaling activation and expansion of Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 10;7(1):7839. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08379-y. PubMed 28798480 ↗
  • Pernaa K, Koski I, Mattila K, Gullichsen E, Heikkila J, Aho A, Lindfors N. Bioactive glass S53P4 and autograft bone in treatment of depressed tibial plateau fractures - a prospective randomized 11-year follow-up. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2011;21(2):139-48. doi: 10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.v21.i2.40. PubMed 22043972 ↗
  • Russell TA, Leighton RK; Alpha-BSM Tibial Plateau Fracture Study Group. Comparison of autogenous bone graft and endothermic calcium phosphate cement for defect augmentation in tibial plateau fractures. A multicenter, prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Oct;90(10):2057-61. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01191. PubMed 18829901 ↗
  • Heikkila JT, Kukkonen J, Aho AJ, Moisander S, Kyyronen T, Mattila K. Bioactive glass granules: a suitable bone substitute material in the operative treatment of depressed lateral tibial plateau fractures: a prospective, randomized 1 year follow-up study. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2011 Apr;22(4):1073-80. doi: 10.1007/s10856-011-4272-0. Epub 2011 Mar 23. PubMed 21431354 ↗
  • Hofmann A, Gorbulev S, Guehring T, Schulz AP, Schupfner R, Raschke M, Huber-Wagner S, Rommens PM; CERTiFy Study Group. Autologous Iliac Bone Graft Compared with Biphasic Hydroxyapatite and Calcium Sulfate Cement for the Treatment of Bone Defects in Tibial Plateau Fractures: A Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter Study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Feb 5;102(3):179-193. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.00680. PubMed 31809394 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2027, 24 months after the start.

Of 37 observational studies under Bone Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 192 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 41. This study's planned 24 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 3, 2024
First posted
Dec 6, 2024
StartActual
Mar 17, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Mar 17, 2027
CompletionEst.
Mar 17, 2028
Last update
Apr 22, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06720142
Lead sponsor
Santiago Lozano-Calderon
Collaborators
Bone Solutions Inc
Responsible party
Santiago Lozano-Calderon (Attending Orthopaedic Surgeon/Assistant Professor, Massachusetts General Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Dec 6, 2024
Start date
Mar 17, 2025
Primary completion
Mar 17, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 17, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 22, 2026

Study contacts

Shreya Halur, BS
Contact
shalur@mgh.harvard.edu
617-726-4932
Santiago A Lozano-Calderon, MD, PhD
Contact
617-643-4947
Santiago A Lozano-Calderon, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Massachusetts General Hospital

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion