ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06714500LuxValveUpdated Sep 16, 2026

Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement Using the Lux-Valve Plus System

An interventional study of LuxValve PLlus in Tricuspid Regurgitation, sponsored by Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong. Recruiting at 1 site in Hong Kong. Open to participants aged 50 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-16.

Sponsored by Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 2 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2023, registered Nov 2024).
  • Started Sep 2023; still recruiting 3 years 1 month later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
50 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a common disease, and the tricuspid valve (TV) is no longer a "forgotten valve". Open heart surgery for isolated TR is uncommonly performed due to high operative risk (8-10% mortality). However, TR is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. There exists an unmet clinical need for less invasive intervention to treat TR. Transcatheter edge to edge repair (TEER) is a technique that is shown to be safe and effective in TR reduction and is associated with significant symptom improvement. However, a significant portion of TV anatomy are not suitable to be treated with TEER (e.g. coaptation gap >10mm). A wide variety of technologies has been developed in recent years. Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) is one of the more promising option for tricuspid regurgitation (TR) patients at high risk for surgery. A previous study reported that transcatheter tricuspid devices, which were employed with the radial force between the device and tricuspid annulus, were radial force-dependent. However, this radial force for valve fixation may cause complications, such as conduction block and right coronary artery impingement. The LuX-Valve (Jenscare Biotechnology) is a radial force-independent orthotopic TTVR device. The feasibility and efficacy of this device have been reported by several studies. However, this valve was implanted through right atrial access, where a small incision of the right chest and right atrium is needed. The LuX-Valve Plus valve replacement system is the second-generation version of the LuX-Valve and can be implanted through the jugular vein. The first-in-human implantation was recently performed. The study aims to assess the feasibility, safety and efficacy outcome of the Lux Valve Plus system in a cohort of otherwise no surgical option patients with severe symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation despite optimal medical therapy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tricuspid Regurgitation
03

In context

Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency

226 studies on the registry are indexed under Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency; 109 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 60 across 128 interventional studies indexed under Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency.

Browse Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency studies →

Lead sponsor

Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong is the lead sponsor of 27 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 50- to 90-year-old
  • Severe symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation ( III-IV) despite optimal medical therapy
  • Deem high risk for tricuspid valve surgery determined by a multidisciplinary heart team (including cardiologists, cardiac surgeons and cardiac anesthetists)
  • Anatomically not feasible with other transcatheter tricuspid valve therapy that is commercially available in Hong Kong (i.e. TriClip System)
  • Capacity to provide

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) > 60 mmHg assessed by echocardiography
  • (LVEF) \<40%
  • Evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation
  • Anatomical structures precluding proper device deployment or device vascular access, evaluated by echo or CT
  • Surgical correction is indicated for other concomitant valvular disease (e.g., severe aortic, mitral and/or pulmonic valve stenosis and/or regurgitation); Subjects with concomitant valvular disease may treat their respective valve first and wait 2 months before being reassessed for the trial.
  • Sepsis or active endocarditis within 3 months, or infections requiring antibiotic therapy within 2 weeks prior to the planned procedure
  • Active peptic ulcer or active gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding precluding anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy
  • Subjects currently participating in another clinical trial of an drug or device that has not yet completed its primary endpoint.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention

    Device: LuxValve PLlus

Interventions

  • DeviceLuxValve PLlus

    The LuX-Valve (Jenscare Biotechnology) is a radial force-independent orthotopic TTVR device. The feasibility and efficacy of this device have been reported by several studies (11-13). However, this valve was implanted through right atrial access, where a small incision of the right chest and right atrium is needed. The LuX-Valve Plus valve replacement system is the second-generation version of the LuX-Valve and can be implanted through the jugular vein.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. A composite endpoint of Major Adverse Event (MAE)

    A composite endpoint of Major Adverse Event (MAE) at 30 days post procedure: Cardiovascular Mortality, Myocardial Infarction (MI), Stroke, New onset renal failure requiring unplanned dialysis or renal replacement therapy, Severe Bleeding (includes fatal, life-threatening and extensive bleeding as defined by VARC), Non-selective tricuspid valve surgery or transcatheter re-intervention post procedure, Major cardiac structural complications, Major access site and vascular complications, New pacemaker implantation due to AV block

    Time frame: 1 year post-op

Secondary outcomes

  1. Acute Device Success Rate

    successful deployment of the device and removal of the delivery system as planned, with no unplanned surgery related to the device or access procedure.

    Time frame: At the end of Procedure

  2. Procedural Success Rate

    Device success without clinically significant PVL, as determined by the Echo Core Lab (ECL) assessment of a discharge TTE. Subjects who die or undergo tricuspid valve surgery before discharge are procedure failures.

    Time frame: At the end of Procedure

  3. All-cause mortality

    30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality

    Time frame: 30-day and 1-year post-op

  4. Heart failure hospitalization

    30-day and 1-year Heart failure hospitalization

    Time frame: 30-day and 1-year post-op

  5. NYHA Functional Class

    NYHA Functional Class 2. Distance of 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) 3. Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ):Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status

    Time frame: 30-day and 1-year post-op

  6. Distance of 6-Minute Walk Test

    Distance of 6-Minute Walk Test in meters

    Time frame: 30-day and 1-year post-op

  7. Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire

    Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ):Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status

    Time frame: 30-day and 1-year post-op

  8. TR Severity

    TR Severity assessed by echocardiography

    Time frame: Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year

  9. Mean Tricuspid valve inflow gradient

    Mean Tricuspid valve inflow gradient assessed by echocardiography

    Time frame: Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year

  10. Right Atrial Volume

    Right Atrial Volume assessed by echocardiography

    Time frame: Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year

  11. TAPSE

    TAPSE assessed by echocardiography

    Time frame: Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year

  12. Right ventricular functions assessments

    Right ventricular functions assessments assessed by echocardiography

    Time frame: Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year

  13. Right ventricular functions assessments: fractional area change(FAC)

    Right ventricular functions assessments: fractional area change(FAC)assessed by echocardiography

    Time frame: Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year

  14. Right ventricular functions assessments: systolic tricuspid lateral annular tissue velocity S'

    Right ventricular functions assessments: systolic tricuspid lateral annular tissue velocity S' assessed by echocardiography

    Time frame: Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year

  15. Right ventricular functions assessments: Hepatic vein flow reversal

    Right ventricular functions assessments: Hepatic vein flow reversal assessed by echocardiography

    Time frame: Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year

  16. Systolic pulmonary artery pressure

    Systolic pulmonary artery pressure assessed by echocardiography

    Time frame: Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year

  17. Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)

    Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) assessed by echocardiography

    Time frame: Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year

  18. Paravalvular leak severity

    Paravalvular leak severity assessed by echocardiography

    Time frame: Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — IPD will not be shared

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 16, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06714500
Lead sponsor
Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong
Responsible party
Dr So Chak Yu kent (Principle Investigator, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 3, 2024
Start date
Sep 18, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 16, 2026

Study contacts

Daniel Xu, Nursing Officer
Contact
danielxu@cuhk.edu.hk
35051518
Kent So, PI
principal investigator · Chinese University of Hong Kong

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion