ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06703515Updated Nov 25, 2024

Awake Transnasal Laser-assisted Surgery (TNLS) and Microlaryngeal Surgery for Vocal Cord Cyst

An interventional study of Awake transnasal laser-assisted surgery (TNLS) and Microlaryngeal surgery (MLS) in Vocal Cord Cyst, sponsored by Chinese University of Hong Kong. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Hong Kong. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-25.

Sponsored by Chinese University of Hong Kong · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
54
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a prospective randomised controlled trial conducted at two tertiary referral hospitals in Hong Kong to compare the clinical and functional outcomes of office-based awake transnasal laser-assisted laryngeal surgery (TNLS) under local anesthesia to traditional microlaryngeal surgery for vocal cord cyst under general anesthesia.

Read the detailed description

The aim of the study is to prospectively compare the functional and clinical outcomes of TNLS under local anesthesia and MLS under general anesthesia in managing vocal cord cysts.

Office-based awake transnasal laser-assisted surgery (TNLS) has been gaining popularity in treating different laryngeal lesions, with the advantages of avoiding general anesthetic risks and minimizing healthcare-related costs. In addition, the general waiting time for surgeries under general anesthesia in public hospitals is getting longer due to the increasing population and limited resources. The investigators have recently conducted a novel randomized controlled trial in 2021-2022 comparing the functional and cost-effectiveness of traditional microlaryngeal surgery (MLS) under general anesthesia and TNLS for benign laryngeal lesions (vocal cord polyps, nodules, cysts, granuloma and Reinke's edema), and found that TNLS was superior to MLS in terms of length of stay, intraoperative complications, perioperative throat discomfort and hospital costs; while it was equivalent to MLS in terms of functional outcome, operative time and recurrence rate. However, since the previous study's main goal was to compare TNLS to MLS in a macroscopic perspective in terms of functional outcomes and cost-effectiveness, it had included a wide variety of benign laryngeal lesions, and different vocal cord lesions may respond differently to laser surgery.

Vocal cord cyst is a fluid-filled sac inside the vocal cord, with 2 subtypes: 1) Epidermoid cyst due to epithelial inclusion 2) Mucous retention cyst due to glandular ductal obstruction. Vocal cord cysts typically do not resolve with voice therapy, and are traditionally excised with microlaryngeal surgery with microflap technique or marsupialization. In our previous RCT study, subgroup analysis did not show a significant difference of vocal cord cyst recurrence in both TNLS and MLS group. However, the investigators' cohort had a higher overall vocal cord cyst recurrence rate (13.8%) compared to historic cohort rate of 2.2-8.7% , which may be accounted by that the vocal cord cysts were ablated and marsupialized instead of removed in the TNLS group. Nevertheless, a recent case series by Gao and colleagues showed a good functional outcome of awake KTP-laser marsupialization in selected cases. A larger cohort is warranted to compare TNLS to MLS for vocal cord cyst. Therefore, the investigators would like to conduct a randomized controlled trial to compared tradition MLS surgery to TNLS, with hypothesis that TNLS would be non-inferior to traditional microlaryngeal surgery in benign laryngeal lesions, and with its additional benefits on minimization of anesthetic risks and hospital expenses, hopefully to expand its further application.

02

Conditions studied

  • Vocal Cord Cyst

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Vocal cord cyst
  • Transnasal laser surgery
  • Microlaryngeal surgery
  • Office based laser surgery
  • Awake laser laryngeal surgery
  • Trublue laser
03

In context

Cysts

67 studies on the registry are indexed under Cysts; 16 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 54 is above the median of 48 across 40 interventional studies indexed under Cysts.

Browse Cysts studies →

Lead sponsor

Chinese University of Hong Kong is the lead sponsor of 1,454 studies on the registry; 474 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with vocal cord cysts
  • older than 18-year-old
  • able to independently provide consent
  • able to tolerate flexible laryngoscopy would be recruited

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • under 18-year-old
  • unable to independently give an
  • unable to tolerate flexible laryngoscopy
  • allergic to local anesthesia
  • had unfavorable anatomy such as prolapsing epiglottis precluding adequate visualization, extensive lesions and an expected difficult operation as judged by the surgeons
  • with pathologies other than vocal cord cyst
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
54 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Microlaryngeal surgery (MLS)

    For traditional MLS under general anesthesia, after general anesthesia and intubation with microlaryngeal tube, the patient would be positioned on head-ring support for better alignment and access to glottis. A laryngoscope will be inserted transorally under direct vision and suspended. Vocal cord cysts are visualized with microscope, and removed with microsurgery instruments with microflap technique and sent for routine section. After the surgery, the patient is kept nil-by-mouth until fully awake, and is discharged on same day or the next day depending on the post- operative recovery. Patient will be discharged with voice rest for 3 days.

    Procedure: Microlaryngeal surgery (MLS)

  • Experimental
    Awake transnasal laser-assisted surgery (TNLS)

    For TNLS, patients are admitted to the day center on the same morning or afternoon of the surgery with fasting prior 6 hours. After local anesthesia application, a 445nm blue laser is introduced via a working channel of bronchoscope and laser ablation of vocal cord cyst is performed. During the operation, patient will receive continuous SpO2 monitoring with regular blood pressure monitoring. After the procedure, patients are kept nil-by-mouth for 2 hours until anesthesia wears off, meanwhile with close observation in day ward with continuous SpO2 monitor for 1 hour. Patients will be discharged on the same day of the procedure, with voice rest for 3 days.

    Procedure: Awake transnasal laser-assisted surgery (TNLS)

Interventions

  • ProcedureAwake transnasal laser-assisted surgery (TNLS)

    For TNLS, patients are admitted to the day center on the same morning or afternoon of the surgery with fasting prior 6 hours. After local anesthesia application, a 445nm blue laser is introduced via a working channel of bronchoscope and laser ablation of vocal cord cyst is performed. During the operation, patient will receive continuous SpO2 monitoring with regular blood pressure monitoring. After the procedure, patients are kept nil-by-mouth for 2 hours until anesthesia wears off, meanwhile with close observation in day ward with continuous SpO2 monitor for 1 hour. Patients will be discharged on the same day of the procedure, with voice rest for 3 days.

  • ProcedureMicrolaryngeal surgery (MLS)

    For traditional MLS under general anesthesia, after general anesthesia and intubation with microlaryngeal tube, the patient would be positioned on head-ring support for better alignment and access to glottis. A laryngoscope will be inserted transorally under direct vision and suspended. Vocal cord cysts are visualized with microscope, and removed with microsurgery instruments with microflap technique and sent for routine section. After the surgery, the patient is kept nil-by-mouth until fully awake, and is discharged on same day or the next day depending on the post- operative recovery. Patient will be discharged with voice rest for 3 days.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Voice-Handicap Index (VHI-30)

    The primary outcome was to compare the pre- and post-operative Voice-Handicap Index 30 (VHI-30) of TNLS and MLS groups. The VHI-30 is a 30-item self-administered questionnaire, with score range from 0 to 120, and a score of 120 meaning worst voice score. It has been shown to be a reliable measure for voice treatment outcome. It consists of three subscales, namely physical, functional and emotional. It provides an overall measurement of a person's vocal function and how it influences a person's everyday functioning and experience.

    Time frame: From enrolment to post-operative 1year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Perceptual evaluation of voice

    Perceptual evaluation of voice using the GBRAS scale, in which patients would be required to produce sustained vowel and connected speech voice samples. Score range from 0 to 15, with 15 being the worst score. Two experienced speech-language pathologists blinded to the patient's information would rate the audio recordings.

    Time frame: From enrolment to post-operative 1year

  2. Acoustic voice analysis - Noise-to-Harmonic ratio (NHR)

    Acoustic voice analysis will be performed using PRATT program; Noise-to-Harmonic ratio refers to the ratio between periodic and non-periodic components of a speech sound. A lower NHR score may indicate a worse voice outcome.

    Time frame: From enrolment to post-operative 1year

  3. Acoustic voice analysis - Jitter

    Acoustic voice analysis will be performed using PRATT program; Jitter refers to variation of voice frequency.

    Time frame: From enrolment to post-operative 1year

  4. Acoustic voice analysis - Shimmer

    Acoustic voice analysis will be performed using PRATT program; Shimmer refers to variation of intensity of the voice.

    Time frame: From enrolment to post-operative 1year

  5. Aerodynamic measure of voice

    Aerodynamic measure, maximal phonation time (MPT) would be measured by instructing patients to phonate /a:/ sound for as long as possible after maximal inspiration, at a spontaneous, comfortable pitch and loudness level, for three consequent trials.

    Time frame: From enrolment to post-operative 1year

  6. Visual analog scale (VAS)

    In VAS, patients would be asked to self-rate their voice quality on a visual analog scale of 0 (best) to 10 (worst).

    Time frame: From enrolment to post-operative 1year

  7. Videostroboscopy - Mucosal wave pattern

    Videostroboscopy would be conducted on all patients to look for any impaired mucosal wave form.

    Time frame: From enrolment to post-operative 1year

  8. Videostroboscopy - Vocal fold closure

    Videostroboscopy would be conducted on all patients to compare the degree of vocal fold closure.

    Time frame: From enrolment to post-operative 1year

  9. Procedure-oriented outcomes - Reoperation

    Comparison of the rate of reoperation for recurrence vocal cord cyst between two groups.

    Time frame: From perioperative period to post-operative 1 year

  10. Procedure-oriented outcomes - Disease recurrence

    Comparison of the rate of vocal cord cyst recurrence between two groups.

    Time frame: From perioperative period to post-operative 1 year

  11. Procedure-oriented outcomes - Length of hospital stay

    Comparison of the length of hospital stay (number of day) between two groups.

    Time frame: From perioperative period to post-operative 1 year

  12. Procedure-oriented outcomes - Surgical complications in Clavien-Dindo classification

    Clavien-Dindo classification is a commonly used surgical complication grading system, from grade I-V with grade V indicating worst outcome (death).

    Time frame: From perioperative period to post-operative 1 year

  13. Procedure-oriented outcomes - Completeness of lesion removal

    Indicates if the vocal fold pathology has been completely removed

    Time frame: From perioperative period to post-operative 1 year

  14. Procedure-oriented outcomes - Operation time

    Comparison of the operation time between two groups in terms of minute.

    Time frame: From perioperative period to post-operative 1 year

  15. Patient-oriented outcomes

    Patient-oriented outcomes included peri-operative throat, nose, and overall discomfort in visual analogue scale, a 10-point scale with 0 (least uncomfortable) to 10 (most uncomfortable).

    Time frame: Perioperative period

  16. Medical costs

    Medical costs of both interventions would be also calculated respectively, including costs for inpatient hospital stay, medical staff, operating theater and consumable.

    Time frame: From enrolment to post-operative 1year

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Misono S, Yueh B, Stockness AN, House ME, Marmor S. Minimal Important Difference in Voice Handicap Index-10. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Nov 1;143(11):1098-1103. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2017.1621. PubMed 28973078 ↗
  • Ng E, Law T, Tang EC, Ho FN, Tong MC, Lee KY. The Cutoff Point and Diagnostic Accuracy of the Voice Handicap Index in Cantonese-Speaking Population. J Voice. 2021 Mar;35(2):163-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.09.021. Epub 2020 Oct 9. PubMed 33046276 ↗
  • Gao WZ, Abu-Ghanem S, Reder LS, Amin M, Johns MM. A Novel Approach to Vocal Fold Mucous Retention Cysts: Awake KTP Laser-Assisted Marsupialization. J Voice. 2022 Jul;36(4):570-573. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.07.028. Epub 2020 Aug 22. PubMed 32843259 ↗
  • Gocal WA, Tong JY, Maxwell PJ, Sataloff RT. Systematic Review of Recurrence Rates of Benign Vocal Fold Lesions Following Surgery. J Voice. 2022 Dec 10:S0892-1997(22)00321-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.10.015. Online ahead of print. PubMed 36513559 ↗
  • Hsu CM, Armas GL, Su CY. Marsupialization of vocal fold retention cysts: voice assessment and surgical outcomes. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2009 Apr;118(4):270-5. doi: 10.1177/000348940911800406. PubMed 19462847 ↗
  • Courey MS, Gardner GM, Stone RE, Ossoff RH. Endoscopic vocal fold microflap: a three-year experience. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1995 Apr;104(4 Pt 1):267-73. doi: 10.1177/000348949510400402. PubMed 7717615 ↗
  • Tam AKY, Leung NMW, Lee SKJ, Wei Y, Hu Y, Chan JYK, Law T. Randomized Controlled Trial of Awake Transnasal Laser-Assisted Surgery for Benign Laryngeal Lesions. Laryngoscope. 2024 Aug;134(8):3732-3740. doi: 10.1002/lary.31481. Epub 2024 May 10. PubMed 38727019 ↗
  • Schimberg AS, Wellenstein DJ, van den Broek EM, Honings J, van den Hoogen FJA, Marres HAM, Takes RP, van den Broek GB. Office-based vs. operating room-performed laryngopharyngeal surgery: a review of cost differences. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Nov;276(11):2963-2973. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05617-z. Epub 2019 Sep 5. PubMed 31486936 ↗
  • Lin YH, Wang CT, Lin FC, Liao LJ, Lo WC, Cheng PW. Treatment Outcomes and Adverse Events Following In-Office Angiolytic Laser With or Without Concurrent Polypectomy for Vocal Fold Polyps. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Mar 1;144(3):222-230. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2017.2899. PubMed 29346486 ↗
  • Wellenstein DJ, Honings J, Schimberg AS, Schutte HW, Herruer JM, van den Hoogen FJA, Takes RP, van den Broek GB. Office-based CO2 laser surgery for benign and premalignant laryngeal lesions. Laryngoscope. 2020 Jun;130(6):1503-1507. doi: 10.1002/lary.28278. Epub 2019 Sep 9. PubMed 31498454 ↗
  • Shoffel-Havakuk H, Sadoughi B, Sulica L, Johns MM 3rd. In-office procedures for the treatment of benign vocal fold lesions in the awake patient: A contemporary review. Laryngoscope. 2019 Sep;129(9):2131-2138. doi: 10.1002/lary.27731. Epub 2018 Dec 21. PubMed 30575043 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 25, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06703515
Responsible party
Tam Aurora Ka Yue (Principal Investigator, Chinese University of Hong Kong) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 25, 2024
Start date
Dec 1, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 25, 2024

Study contacts

Aurora KY Tam, MBBS, MRCSEd
Contact
tky369@ha.org.hk
+852-3505 1409
Wing Kei Ng
Contact
cherrieng@cuhk.edu.hk
+852-3505 1409

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion